Transcript SAD Regional Workshop 30 Nov - 1 Dec

MILCON Transformation
(Efficient Designs)
SAME Washington DC Post
25 April 2006
Mr. Donald Basham, PE
Chief, Engineering and Construction
Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~
1
Facility Requirements and
Standards Dictated by ACSIM
• Defines facility requirements and standards
• Dictates standardization for similar facility types
• Programs total mission requirements of BCT on
one DD 1391
“ Direction from the customer …ACSIM”
24 mar 06
~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~
2
Transition to a Continuous
Building Program
• Develop Regional Acquisition Plans – FY2006
– Expediency
– Economies of scale
– Small Business participation
• Establish regional acquisition vehicles – FY2006
• Utilize acquisition tools that allow repetition and
reduces construction execution learning curve
• Structure contracts to allow contractors to lock-in
labor force and suppliers for similar facilities
• Initiate a Continuous Building Program by FY08
“Maximize time and cost savings by repetition”
24 mar 06
~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~
3
Standardization of Processes
(Across USACE)
• Consistent and uniform RFPs and acquisition approach
– Consistent acquisition approach defined by programmatic acquisition
plan (approved Feb 06)
– Mandatory use of standard RFP templates
– Streamline the acquisition time
– Facilitate the proposal process
• Consistent engineering/construction applications
– Standardization in the evaluation/selection criteria
– Streamline review and submittal process
• Expand the use of all types of construction
– Type I thru Type V construction
• Maximize use of Industry Standards
– International Building Code
– Focus on end result; not “how to”
“Consistency is vital to successful program execution”
24 mar 06
~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~
4
Standardization of Facilities
• Transition from design/build to use of prototype models
• Prototype models will be established in FY07 for standard facility
types
– Mission
– Community Support
– Others
• Centers of Standardization for facility types
– Transition and expand to be Corps design centers in FY 07
 Initial operation in March 06
 Fully engaged in Oct 06
– Establish adapt-build models and transition to prototype models
– Maintain prototype models
– Establish and maintain regional ID/IQs for design, D/B and construction
contracts
– Incorporate Lessons-Learned
“Continual improvement of prototypes”
24 mar 06
~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~
5
Centers of Standardization
Realignment – 6 March 2006
•
Huntsville Center (15)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Physical Fitness
Outdoor Sports Facility
Child Development (2)
Youth Activity Centers
Consolidated Fire, Safety and
Security Facility
Fire Station
Army Community Service Center
Bowling Center RFP
Hazard Material Storage
Close Combat Tactical Trainer
Mil. Ops. Urban Terrain Facility
Training Ranges
Battle Cmd Training Ctr.
Training Support Ctr.
24 mar 06
•
Louisville District/LRD (2)
– Army Reserve Centers
– Operational Readiness Training
Complex
•
Norfolk District/NAD (7)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
•
General Instructional Facility
Classroom 21
Enlisted personnel Dining Facility
Mil. Entrance Processing Stations
Family Housing RFP
Information Systems Facility
Criminal Investigation Facility
Omaha District/NWD (2)
– Religious Facilities
– Access Control Points
~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~
6
Centers of Standardization
(cont)
•
Mobile District/SAD (2)
– Aviation – Vertical Construction
– 4 Star HQ Facility
•
Savannah District/SAD (6)
–
–
–
–
–
Company Operations Facility
Tactical Equipment Maintenance
Brigade Operations Complex
Brigade/ Battalion HQ: Admin
Cmd./Control : UEy and Corps
(UEx) HQ: Admin/Operations
– Deployment Facility
•
•
Ft. Worth District/SWD (5)
– Unaccompanied Enlisted
Personnel Housing
– Basic Combat Training
Complex/One Station Unit Trainee
– Advanced individual Training
Complex
– General Purpose Warehouse
– Central Issue Warehouse
Honolulu District/POD (2)
– Unaccompanied Officers Quarters
– Transient Officers Quarters
24 mar 06
~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~
7
Centers of Standardization/Design
Centers
• Primary Responsibilities for HQDA
– Development of technical solutions that meet facility functional
requirements
– Develops standard designs
– Enforcer of Army Standards (ACSIM is approving authority for
waivers to Army standards)
• Primary Responsibilities for USACE:
– Become the design centers for the their assigned standard
facilities
– Maintain Model RFP statements of work
– Become technical resource for executing districts
– Establish regional IDIQ contracts for services associated w/
assigned facility types
24 mar 06
~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~
8
Product-Line
Design/Build IDIQ Contracts
• Capitalizes on industry strengths and best practices
• Encourages non-traditional builders to compete
• Provides separable contract packages for small business
opportunities and set-aside programs
• Provides repeat business incentive for good performance
• Repetitive nature work reduces learning curve, providing for lower
cost, faster delivery and improved quality
• Facilitates incorporation of lessons learned into future task orders
• Maximizes sustainability opportunities
• Allows supporting District to concentrate on one or two product lines and
become the expert within the region
24 mar 06
~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~
9
The Challenge … Permanent
facilities faster, better, cheaper and
greener
140,000+ people restationing
Ft Lewis
Fort Drum
West Point
Picatinny
Detroit Arsenal
Aberdeen
Rock Island
Ft Meade
Ft Belvoir
Ft Riley
Ft Eustis
Ft Leavenworth
Ft Carson
Ft Knox
Ft Leonard Wood
Ft Bragg / Pope AFB
Ft Campbell
Ft Irwin
Ft Lee
Ft Sill
Ft Jackson
Redstone
Hunter Army Airfield
Ft Huachuca
Ft Benning
PACIFIC
Ft Hood
Ft Stewart
Ft Bliss
Ft Polk
Ft Wainwright
Ft Rucker
Ft Sam Houston
Ft Richardson
Schofield Bks
24 mar 06
~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~
10
Expanded Use of
Manufactured Solutions
• Manufactured solutions for permanent construction
includes:
– Pre-engineered
– Modular
– Tilt-up/panel
• Expanded list of construction solutions
• Acquisition alternatives:
–
–
–
–
Contract directly for certain facility types
Creation of preferred provider lists
Multiple Basic Ordering Agreements (BOA)
Right size contracts to meet Small Business requirements
• Still meet Army quality and sustainability standards
“Viable alternative to conventional construction”
24 mar 06
~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~
11
Transitioning to Full MT
Implementation (FY2006-07)
•
FY2006:
– BRAC 2005 execution
 Utilization of Model RFP (for mission facilities)
– Utilize industry standards
– Performance specifications
 Type1 thru Type V construction
 Use fast-track design – build
 Ft. Bliss BCT and Infrastructure
 FT Carson BCT
 FT Knox BCT
– 2006 MCA execution (Pilot-test)
 Ft Campbell MFAB
– Use appropriate acquisition tools to design and construct unique stand alone
facilities
•
FY2007:
– Use MT concepts to maximum extent on all MCA and BRAC 05 projects
– Use Type 1 thru Type V construction on selected DLA and TMA projects
– Use appropriate acquisition tools to design and construct unique stand alone
facilities
USACE must implement MT rapidly
24 mar 06
~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~
12
Basis of Design/Construction –
Implications for DoD Analytical
Models and Program Goals
• 15% cost savings and 30% time savings
• Facilities with 50 year life cycle
• Lower unit costs for primary facilities provides a
greater ability to absorb market vagaries
• Sustainable and adaptable facilities with lower
life-cycle costs
24 mar 06
~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~
13
24 mar 06
~ Our Army at War – Relevant and Ready ~
14