The Political Future for South

Download Report

Transcript The Political Future for South

The Atlantic Club of Bulgaria Conference
4-5 April 2006
Civil Security as a tool for
Transformation and Alliance Cohesion Opportunity for Bulgarian Contribution
in SEE/GBSA
Dr. Velizar Shalamanov - Director Strategic Studies
The Atlantic Club of Bulgaria
This publication is supported by NATO’s Scientific Division in
the framework of Science for Peace Program - Project
SFP-981149 (2005-2007)
Security Environment

Types of crisis we face:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Disasters / Catastrophes
Public Order / Security
Military / paramilitary operations – expeditionary ops
Threatened interests abroad
Terrorism and organized crime / trafficking
Prevention / Reaction / Consequence management
Crisis Management – New Scope of:
1.
2.
3.
4.
risks activated to form the situation
development of the situation
citizens involved / impacted
involved institutions (local, district, national,
regional, global)
5. required resources as quality and quantity
6. legal norms activated
7. cooperation on the ground
Need for Alliance Cohesion
Need for Change and US Responsibility
Importance of Unity and Diversity
Civil Security Concept–Citizen(s) and its
Living Environment in the Center
1. Third Pillar of the Security Sector: Civil Security
Organization
2. Third Factor in SSR: Civil Society for Civil Security
3. Balance between:
1.
2.
3.
4.
central power and local powers
public and private component
state component and volunteer components
Civil Security Organization and MoD / MoI, other traditional
security sector services
4. Level of international cooperation
Building of Integrated Security Sector through Third Generation SSR
White paper on Civil Security in Bulgaria presented in 2004
Concept for Protection of Population and National Economy as Civil
Security Concept is supported in 2005/2006
Third Generation of SSR: Integrated Security
Sector (ISS) focused on Civil Security
 Functional Challenge – dividing responsibilities
 Structural Challenge – dividing organization
 Operational Challenge – leading / support organization for
different operations
 Capabilities Challenge – ownership of critical capabilities
 Legal Challenges – new legislation
 C2 System Issue (NCO – network centric ops, NEC – network
enabled capabilities) – integrated emergency management
system (IEMS)
 Program Management Challenge – for capabilities, for early
warning, mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery
 Resource Management Challenge for Effect (Result) Based
Operation of Integrated Security Sector
General challenges to ISS
 Civil Control Issue: Parliamentarian control of
resources, operations, personnel policy
 International Cooperation Issue (SEE, BSCR /
GBSA, NATO/PfP, EU, OSCE) – Code of Conduct
and Cooperation on Emergency Management
 Change Management Issue (Transformation) of
the security sector to address new missions and
for regional cooperation
Center of Excellence in Operational
Analyses – NATO SfP 981149
1. Integrated studies for Concept
Development and Scenario Development
2. Integrated Studies for Architecture
Development
3. Integrated Studies for Command and
Control in Civil Security Area
4. Integrated Studies for Experimentation
through CAX and Civil Security Knowledge
Management
Where is the CoE-ОА situated among other
organizations?
Governance / Costumers
Parliament
President
Government
Security Council
Costumers
MoD
MoI
Civil Protection
Other Agencies
CoE-OA for
Change Management
Institutes of
BAS
Back office
Universities
Defense Industry
Other Industries
Implementation / Competition
EU TACOM SEE-2006 as a Case
Study on Civil Security Driven SST
1. Terrorist attack – disasters / catastrophes
consequence management
2. New Emergency management (Civil Security
Ministry) and its cooperation with MoD, MoI and
other agencies for integrated response
3. SEE Regional Cooperation and EU MIC, NATO
EADRCC
4. Bul Protection 2006, EU CME 06, NATO CMX 06
exercises integration
5. Extension to GBSA and integration in PfP/EAPC
and EU Neighborhood Policy
CoE-OA support to JTSAC
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
(NATO SfP => EU FWP7)
Concept development / scenario
development
Architecture development
CAX for experimentation, training,
knowledge acquisition
Change management
Knowledge management and education
Regional (SEE/GBSA) Training, Simulation and
Analysis Center on Civil Security
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Step to Civil Security Coordination Center for GBSA
Research in the Area of Civil Security and Concept
Development
Training, including ADL and CAX / Simulations for
Experimentation
Analysis and LL from Exercises
Certification of personnel and teams
Integration between MoDs, MoIs and Civil Protection
Services (Emergency Management Ministries) using
Academic Environment
Joint venture – Administration / NGO, Universities,
Academia Institutes; Regional players / NATO, EU, US
Transformation and Alliance Cohesion:
American Responsibilities, the
Importance of Unity and Diversity
 NATO-ACT
–
–
–
–
NATO Science Committee
RTO, NIAG
CoE in Civil Security from ACT Transformation Network
NC3A
 US responsibilities
– Initiative and leadership in Civil Security as it was with Airspace Initiative
and SEEDM for SEE/GBSA
– BSI-2004 is a good example and Bulgarian contribution is expected …
 Unity
– Coordination between NATO, EU, US, OSCE, UN, BSEC, SEEDM, …
 Diversity
– Contribution from all nations with specific added value
– Bulgarian contribution in Civil Security / Emergency Management and
Post-Conflict Reconstruction/
Management Challenge
 Management of Research Organizations (NATO
SfP 981149 CoE-OA case)
 Management of Research Projects (EU TACOM
SEE-2006 CAX case)
 Integration of NATO, EU, US/other bilateral or
Regional and National Funding (host organization
accounting system case)
 Crucial role of PPP and involvement of NGO and
Academic Institutions (openness of administration)
Example: Role of SSR Coalition in Definition of
NATO integration vision and Bu-US Strategic
Partnership Vision / NATO, EU and other projects
Conclusions
1.
2.
3.
4.
Education for Change Management – key instrument for
change management (link with PfP Consortium and
Education for Reform Initiative)
Role of Alliance Transformation and Cohesion around CS
Concept: responsibility of US
Integration of efforts of NATO, EU, US and strengthening of
OSCE and BSEC capacity in Civil Security: role of unity
Bulgarian contribution to the security in SEE/GBSA through
Regional JTSAC-CS: role of diversity
NEED FOR NATO-COUNTRY TRANSFORMATION STUDY – at
least for 10 new members in order to identify adequate
Transformation Agenda for each Nation