Transcript Pakistan & the Strategy for Early Recovery, Rehabilitation

PAKISTAN DEVELOPMENT FORUM 2010
RELIEF, EARLY RECOVERY AND DISASTER
RISK REDUCTION
BY
LT GEN (R) NADEEM AHMED
CHAIRMAN NDMA
14 NOVEMBER 2010
SITUATIONAL BACKGROUND
 Population return started with improved accessibility
 Capacity enhancement for improved service delivery
 No outbreak of epidemic
 Infrastructural repairs in progress
 Distribution of Cash grants through WATAN Cards
 Draw down of Armed Forces as well as international
aviation assets in progress
 Plans for Early Recovery under implementation
2
RELIEF PROVIDED VS NEEDS
FOOD
SHELTER
WASH
WATER
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
3
EARLY RECOVERY PRINCIPLES
 Coverage of worst affected areas
 Mapping of partners and activities to avoid duplication
 Key performance indicators identified to measure aid
effectiveness through single reporting format
 Delivery enhancements through diversity of partners
 Monetization of area through cash based incentives
4
EARLY RECOVERY FOCUS
SEP 2010 – SEP 2011
 Shelter
Risk Reduction
 Farm based Livelihood
 Community Restoration
 Protection
Gender Equality
 Health
 Education
Environmental Safeguards
 Governance Infrastructure
5
STRATEGIES ISSUED
 Relief
SHELTER
AGRICULTURE
 Winter
 Survival
 Return
 Early Recovery
 Shelter
 Agriculture
FOOD
6
Pakistan Floods Emergency
Response Plan 2010 - PFERP
7
RESPONSE PLAN

Timeline
-
Sep 2010 - Sep 2011

Plan (GOP/UN)
-
Finalized

Projects
-
397

Amount
-
1.9 billion US $
8
CLUSTER WISE PROJECTS
Cluster
Total
Projects
Appeal ($)
Food Security
13
573.2 m
Shelter
61
321.1 m
WASH
51
245.1 m
Health
85
198.9 m
Agriculture
24
170.5 m
Community Restoration
61
167.1 m
Education
22
83.4 m
Protection
43
52.9 m
Nutrition
25
44.6 m
Miscellaneous
12
80.2 m
397
1.939 Billion
TOTAL
9
Pakistan Floods Emergency Response Plan
As of 11 November 2010
Funding
Unmet
40%
Food
14%
Shelter
86%
43%
Agriculture
57%
29%
Health
49%
13%
Protection
55%
76%
51%
Nutrition
45%
71%
24%
WASH
Overall Response
60%
87%
Community 3%
97%
Funded
Remaining
9%
Education
0%
91%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
10
Disaster Risk Reduction
(DRR)
11
NEED FOR DRR ?
• Pakistan a disaster prone country – frequency and
nature
5
4.5
5 Yrs
4
3.5
3
2.5
7Yrs
2
1.5
1
56 Yrs
11 Yrs
0.5
Since then:
•2 Cyclones
•2 Floods
•2 Earthquakes
•2 Land Slides
•1 Complex
Emergency
0
1926-1982
1983-1994
1994-2001
2002-2006
• Erosion of Economic Growth and Social Capital
• Unsustainable Development – Pakistan a developing
country with emphasis on infrastructure development
• Difficult to achieve Poverty Reduction Goals
12
PURPOSE OF DRR
• All activities are designed with consideration for
potential disaster risks
• Development and Reconstruction programs do not
increase vulnerability to disasters in all sectors
• Early Recovery, Rehabilitation and Reconstruction
initiatives are designed to contribute to developmental
aims
• Protection of huge investment
• Provide for internal coping mechanisms
13
An Opportunity !!
Receptive
Communities
Willing
Donor
Support
Responsive
Government
Scaling up Disaster
Reduction for
Sustainable Development
Effective
Organization
al Structure
Enabling
Environmen
t
Eager
Implementing
Partners
14
THQ MADIAN
Residential colony of
hospital
Punjab
CHALLENGES – DISASTER PREVENTION
• Resource
resistance
constraints,
• Lack
of consultative
partnerships
attitudinal
forums
and
and
institutional
public-private
• Lack of ex-ante dedicated funding arrangements and
catastrophe risk financing instruments
• Inadequate institutional capacities at national, provincial
and district levels
• Insufficient community mobilization, support structures
and resources
22
NDMA’s DRR RECOMMENDATIONS
• Central policy making and Robust M & E
• Baseline risk identification
• Multi-risk factors should be considered in design as well
as implementation
• Need based up gradations where ever required
• Planning documents (PC-Is) satisfy standardized DRR
requirements
Continued….
23
NDMA’s DRR RECOMMENDATIONS
• Wide-scale social mobilization and public sensitization
• Balance
mix
of
vernacular
and
hazard
resistant
construction
• Institutional capacity building for local authorities to
undertaking reconstruction
• Constant satellite imaging to guard against massive wood
logging
Continued….
24
Peaceful Environment
Social & Literate Capital
Community Mobilization
Institutional Capacity
Ex-Ante Funding
Public/Pvt Partnership
Political Ownership
Sustainable Development
25
Political Ownership
Sustainable Development
INABLE DEVELO
SUSTA
MENT
Public/Pvt Partnership
Peaceful Environment
Social & Literate Capital
Community Mobilization
Institutional Capacity
Ex-Ante Funding
Public/Pvt Partnership
DISASTER
26
THANK YOU