Titel des Referats
Download
Report
Transcript Titel des Referats
Contribution to the AMICA expert panel, Copenhagen September 3/4, 2007
Call centres: a global or embedded
production model? The 'Global Call Centre
Industry' project
PD Dr. Ursula Holtgrewe, FORBA, Vienna ([email protected])
The research question
To what extent are CCs
▫ a globally convergent production model for services
OR / AND
▫ embedded in societal institutional configurations or
varieties of capitalism that explain variation?
The Global Call Center Industry
Project (www.globalcallcenter.org)
comparative study in 21 countries
management survey of CCs in 17
countries (n=2,477)
case studies and site visits
co-ordination:
Rose Batt, ILR School, Cornell Univ.,
David Holman, Sheffield University,
Ursula Holtgrewe, FORBA
immaterial franchise structure with decentral funding (so far, € 1,000,000 + x)
The theory perspective: What
shapes company strategies?
embeddedness
varieties of capitalism
National business,
employment,
innovation systems
convergence
Globalising competition
service cultures
gender regimes and
flexible labour markets
information and
communication technology
Deregulation (finance, telco)
strategies mediated by global
consultancies and service
providers
service logics and dilemmas
customer segmentation
women's employment
Global Similarities
• Young companies, median age 8 years
• 86% serve national markets.
• 2/3 are Inhouse-CC.
• CC have an mean 49 employees, but ¾ of CC
agents work in CC > 230 employees.
• Flat hierarchies: 12% of employees are team leaders
or managers.
• 71% of CC employees are women (exception India
with 50%).
Differences I
“co-ordinated market economies”(AT, DK, DE, FR, IL, NL,
ES, SE) have better jobs
▫ Lower turnover
▫ Higher wages
▫ Higher discretion
▫ More outsourcing
▫ more part-time work
▫ And more presence of unions!
BUT: CC use nearly all the forms of flexibility that a CME
employment system has to offer: e.g. Freelancers in
Austria.
Differences II
B2B CCs have better jobs
▫ Higher wages
▫ Lower turnover
▫ More discretion at work (large business centres)
▫ Less frequent monitoring
▫ More permanent full-time employment
▫ More teamwork
▫ Less union presence!
Differences III
Outsourced CC have worse jobs
▫ Higher turnover
▫ Lower wages
▫ Less discretion at work
▫ More monitoring
▫ More precarious employment (part-time, fixed-term, agency
workers)
▫ Less union presence and less union influence!
GCC: general findings
• CCs are NOT a picture of convergence.
• Size and internationalisation are limited.
• Outsourcing abroad follows language lines, India
is a special case
• Unionisation exists and positively influences
working conditions.
• Outsourcing “works” and limits union influence
• “embedded escapes” of CCs from collective
agreements and regulation.
• The global electronic sweatshops do not represent
the entire picture!
Conclusion from GCC
• Good jobs in call centres are possible.
• Institutions and union presence make positive
differences
• BUT in co-ordinated market economies there is no
reason to feel too smug!
• Outsourcing (not necessarily abroad) and costcutting strategies may massively challenge previous
gains
Outsourcing: some examples
from Germany
• The company agreement of an independent
provider:
▫ performance-based pay not regulated, criteria agreed with
customers
• This year‘s strike at Deutsche Telekom
▫ Outsourcing sale of CC to independent providers
establishment of own CC subsidiary with lower wages etc.
Outsourcing: some examples
from Germany
• A service provider working for T-mobile
▫ Competes and is networked with all the large ones (Walter,
arvato, vivento)
▫ Performance and quality measures agreed with customer
▫ One monthly suggestion for improvements is part of contract
with T-mobile
▫ Process defined by T-mobile (50-60 e-mails/day)
▫ Customer requires 2/3 full-time employees
„and the process
changes by the hour, I
could say” (CEO)
What to do?
• Embed CCs in relational value chains, rather than
being captive to large customers
• Build, value and retain customer service expertise
(across customer segments) in the dimensions of
▫ Skills
▫ Discretion
▫ high-trust working environment (use of monitoring)
▫ use of agents‘ problem-solving capabilities