Manual Handling Risk Assessment
Download
Report
Transcript Manual Handling Risk Assessment
Pamela Simpson MCSP
Moving And Handling Consultant
What and How?
Person Centred decision making
Legal and good practice guidance as tools
The process
The practicalities
Risk Management
RISK MANAGEMENT: To act to control and minimise
the risks to which a person or an organisation may be
exposed.
Risk Management
Balanced decision making, considering all relevant
aspects
Best practice happens when your policy, your training
content and what happens with the service user
everyday matches.
The Balanced Approach
Increased safety for service users
Increased safety for all staff groups, volunteers and
informal carers
Enhanced rehabilitation opportunities
The right to choice and dignity for all concerned
Common Law
Employers must ensure they provide:
Safe place of work
Safe systems of work
Safe equipment
Competent employees who understand
basic safety instructions and systems
Health and Safety
The legal system provides us with:
Health and Safety at Work Act 1974
Management of Health and Safety at Work Regs 1999
Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992
Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations
1998
Lifting Operations Lifting Equipment Regulations
1998
ALL REQUIRE RISK ASSESSMENTS TO BE COMPLETED
AND ACTION TO BE TAKEN FOR SAFETY
Other Legal Considerations
Human Rights legislation 1998
Mental Capacity Act 2003
Equality Act 210
Care Standards Act 2010
Care Act 2014
In individual circumstances and when assessing
children there will be other legal considerations
Professional Guidelines &
Advice
RCN Guidance 1996
“Manual lifting of patients is eliminated in all
but exceptional or life threatening
situations”
HSE Guidance 2002
“Implementation of policy & practice on lifting
& handling should not place any
unreasonable restriction on clients rights to
autonomy, privacy or dignity”
More Professional Guidance
Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Guidance on
Manual Handling 2002, 2008 and 2014 setting out
responsibilities for advice and delegation.
College of Occupational Therapists Manual
Handling guidance April 2006
National Back Exchange series of publications, e.g.
Standards in Manual Handling
February 2005
Agreed Standard that is as up to date as possible
THE GUIDE TO THE HANDLING OF PEOPLE
5th edition
Balanced decision making and evidence based tools
February 2011
Agreed Standard that is as up to date as possible
THE GUIDE TO THE HANDLING OF PEOPLE
6th edition A Systems Approach
‘advice must have come from the most accepted body of thought at the time of the occurrence’
Moving
and
Handling
Policy
Continuum
Risk Assessment Tools
Task
REBA measuring, Borg scales
Load
FIM scores, comfort scales
Environment Turning angles and space
Individual Capability
Benner scales
How do we make decisions?
Involve everyone especially the service user
Talk to the people who know the service user the best
Proactively listen!
Try the solutions for yourself
Be prepared to compromise and be flexible
Consider all 4 areas of decision making
Involve other professionals where necessary
Write it down together
CONCENSUS DECISION MAKING
What should we try to avoid?
Making decisions from a distance
Being prescriptive and dogmatic
The words allowed, not allowed, illegal, condemned
Confrontation
Quoting from the “rules”
Focussing solely on staff safety
It Depends……..
Hoists should always be used by
2 people
It Depends……..
Training makes people competent
It Depends……….
If the hoist isn’t working we
must leave someone in bed
It Depends…...
Risk assessments and handling
plans are always carried out by
senior staff and must be
followed
What is Competency?
Having sufficient skill
Having knowledge and understanding
Having the ability to do something well
Communicating well with others
Must be measurable and observable
Stages of Learning
Unconscious incompetence
Conscious incompetence
Conscious competence
Unconscious competence
Best practice happens when your
policy, your training content and
what happens with the service user
everyday matches.
Documentation
Generic risk assessments
Patient specific risk assessment
Specific Handling plans
Do they say enough?
How often are they reviewed
ARE THEY EFFECTIVE?
“Success consists of going from
failure to failure without a loss of
enthusiasm”
Winston Churchill