Transcript Slide 1

Providing Affordable Housing
through PPP mode
A presentation by Shri. M.D. Lele, Chief Planner, CIDCO, Navi Mumbai
Introduction
Housing the poor
 Metro cities house a large percentage of migrant population with
people living in either rented houses or in slums/squatters
 48 % of the people in lower segment are currently staying in rented
accommodation*
 Affordable housing options for weaker sections is need of the hour
* - Tata Housing study
Overview of CIDCO’s past efforts
In Navi Mumbai
 Estimated 18 lakh population
 Total formal housing stock - 2.18 lac units
 CIDCO - 55% and Private sector 45%
 CIDCO’s total housing stock - 50% towards housing the poor
 CIDCO’s focus on the EWS/LIG section, the most striking
aspect
 Land as resource and system of cross-subsidy
 CIDCO constructed, BUDP scheme and DRS scheme - three
major categories
Overview of CIDCO’s past efforts
BUDP Project
 Launched in early 80s
 Supply of serviced land to manage the problem of slums
 Securing long-term legal tenure
 Focus on incremental housing
 Option to construct as per their financial condition
 Provision of basic services with recovery
 Plot sizes and infrastructure based on ‘affordable costs’
 Massive scale, spread over 6 nodes across Navi Mumbai
 22,300 serviced sites/Dwelling units created
Invoked enterprise of the citizen through design and construction on
their own terms and financial conditions
Overview of CIDCO’s past efforts
DRS Scheme
 DRS scheme - Public- Private partnership both in design and
construction
 Layouts and Building design skills of 10 national level Architects
were on display in 9 different nodes based on ‘organic chaos’
 Equal number of private developers given opportunity to design and
build housing schemes
 Layouts had heterogeneous and equal mix of LIG: MIG: HIG
categories and together gave 6500 odd EWS/LIG units
 The entire scheme was ‘low-rise high density’, laying a valuable
example of public-private partnership in Social housing
Overview of CIDCO’s past efforts
Circa 1991
 Reduced role of CIDCO
 Increased role of private sector
 Focus on EWS/LIG diluted
 Currently prices rising rapidly
 Provide many housing options
Overview of CIDCO’s past efforts
Recent Housing Schemes
 Vastu-vihar Scheme  Celebration Scheme -
 Unnati Housing -
Approach for future
 Mass Housing Schemes
 Rental Housing
 RPZ land model
 BSUP Project
Approach for future
Mass Housing

An ambitious scheme of making
available 50,000 houses (1/10th of
the target for the Mumbai
Metropolitan Region set by the
State Government) in Navi
Mumbai area over the span of
next 10 years

The Corporation has currently on
the drawing board schemes to
construct approximately 12,500
tenements

Focus firmly on the weaker
section and middle class
Sr. no.
Node
EWS/LIG
MIG
HIG
Tenements
1
Ghansoli
1200
-
-
1200
2
Vashi
450
-
-
450
3
Khargha
r
2292
588
620
3500
4
Ulwe
810
338
202
1350
5
Taloje
3596
1510
894
6000
Total
8348
2436
1716
12500
Approach for future
Rental Housing
 Corporation to construct housing complexes at strategic locations
 Locations nearer railway stations and in comparatively lesser land
price nodes to minimize travel costs and ensure lower rents
 Dispensation already in place to recover the service charges, etc.
in each node.
 Receiving applications, maintaining database of applications, allot
tenements on fair basis and recovering monthly rental charges is
possible
 Maintenance of buildings and recovery of rents, other charges to
be outsourced to private agency
 Ensure that assets created are sustainable
 A pilot project of about 500 tenements is in the offing
 This model thus attacks the root of the problem viz. affordability
Approach for future
RPZ land model
 GoM has acquired and transferred about 200 sqkm. land
 Undulating lands are not acquired and today land acquisition is costly
 2000 ha. of lands lying in the RPZ are amenable to development in
terms of favourable topography
 Low intensity development feasible but high cost of infrastructure
provision
Approach for future
RPZ land model
 Model - Developed plots with infrastructure given back to the land
owners in-lieu of the raw land to be surrendered for re-organization
 Developed plot area to vary from 15 - 25 percent based upon the
locations of land parcels vis-à-vis road network
 To bring about orderly development in terms of well organized land
parcels having a certain threshold size
Approach for future
BSUP Project
 Tho’ Navi Mumbai is a planned effort, slums have come up
in the city
 To address the issue early, CIDCO has been appointed the project
implementing authority under the BSUP project for construction of
13,600 dwelling units costing Rs. 300 crores (approx.)
 Central Government Grant under the JnNURM scheme - Rs. 139.44
crores, GoM share - Rs. 80.42 crores and monetary contribution by
beneficiaries ranging from 10-12% of the cost of tenements is
expected
Approach for future
BSUP Project
 Solicit private sector participation
 Obligatory on the part of the developers to handover free of cost
13,600 tenements in these pockets
 The balance built-up area out of 2.5 FSI on the gross plot area
shall be for sale essentially to EWS and LIG income people only
(30 and 45 sqm. BUA only)
 15 to 25% of the permissible built-up area with 2.5 FSI could be
utilized for commercial use – Viability of scheme
Alternatives
 Land at fixed price, building plans, technology approved by
CIDCO. 50% tenements to be handed over to CIDCO for
disposal. Max FSI – 3.0
 Land at fixed price, building plans, technology approved by
CIDCO. Instead of handing tenements, give premium. Max
FSI – 3.0
 Land at market rate. Max FSI – 3.0, building plans,
technology controlled by CIDCO
Other Alternatives
 Private developers assigned residential plots >2000 sqm. to
surrender BUA to CIDCO in form of EWS/LIG tenements
 Private developers assigned residential plots >2000 sqm. To
compulsorily construct EWS/LIG tenements
 Developers to be compensated for surrendered part by
allowing additional proportionate FSI
 All inclusive housing on land at fixed price



Free House Component (Rehab component)
Affordable houses (to be handed over to CIDCO at cost)
High priced housing (Developers component)
Selection on basis of maximum number offered for rehab
THANK YOU