Transcript WTP Unit 3, Lesson 19 pp - Millbury Public Schools
Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment Unit 3, Lesson 19
“Equal Protection of the Law”
Constitutional guarantee of fair treatment of all persons regardless of sex, race, religion, or national origin.
Guarantees Equality of Opportunity but NOT Equality of Condition.
Separate But Equal?
Argument that racial segregation is constitutional as long as facilities are equal.
Part of Jim Crow Era: 1870s – 1960s
Plessy v. Furguson (1896) made it federal policy.
Brown v. Board of Education overturns Separate But Equal!
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) had fought lynching & segregation since 1909.
Sued the Board of Edu. In Topeka, KS (1954) over the “ effects segregated schools had on African American children severe & damaging .”
Supreme Court ruled that “ Separate facilities are inherently unequal ”
How has the Supreme Court’s interpretation of “equal protection” changed since Brown?
The Court analyzes laws that classify people into groups to see if that law violates the equal protection clause.
Example: Must be 18 to vote classifications (those who can, those who can’t). Does this law violate the equal protection clause?
= 2
3 Levels of Law Analysis
1. Strict Scrutiny: Reserved for laws that classify people based on race, national origin, religion, or citizenship, & laws that restrict voting, travel, or access to courts.
2. Intermediate Scrutiny: reserved for laws that classify people based on gender
3. Rational Basis: All other laws that create classifications (wealth, age, disability).
Remaining Controversies
1. Is Affirmative Action permissible?
– Laws that give preferences to groups that
have been historically denied opportunities.
2. Should laws that classify gender have a higher scrutiny?
3. Where do the handicapped, homosexuals, or children of illegal aliens fit in?