Design And Analysis Of A Novel 8T SRAM Cell
Download
Report
Transcript Design And Analysis Of A Novel 8T SRAM Cell
Design and Analysis of A Novel 8T SRAM Cell
Department of Microelectronic Engineering
&
Centre for Efficiency Oriented Languages
University College Cork, Ireland
&
Synopsys, Ireland
Jiaoyan Chen, Dilip Vasudevan, Emanuel Popovici,
Michel Schellekens, Peter Gillen
Email: [email protected]
December 14, 2010
Contents
Motivation
Architectures of 6T SRAM, 9T SRAM
and our 8T SRAM
Adiabatic and Non-Adiabatic Operations
SNM Comparison
Dynamic Power
Static Power
Conclusion
Motivation
SOC Consumer Stationary Power Consumption (2008)
Roadmap –Cell Area Trend(ITRS 2008)
Consumer Portable Power Consumption Trend
(ITRS 2008 update)
SRAM consumes a lot of power and area
in chips.
Our aim is to built an efficient SRAM.
Conventional 6T SRAM
Technology:
90nm,65nm,45nm, 28nm…
Stability:
Static Noise Margin
(SNM) is getting Down.
Leakage Power:
a) Subthreshold leakage current
b) Gate oxide leakage current
4
9T SRAM
Features:
a) 2 sub-circuits:
Upper : Writing
Lower: Reading
b) Minimal Sizing for the
upper part
c) SNM is much better
d) Lower leakage Power
(in super cut-off mode)
Z. Liu and V. Kursun, “Characterization of a novel nine-transistor sram cell,” IEEE
Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 488–492, 2008
5
Proposed 8T SRAM
Features:
a) 2 sub-circuits:
Upper :1. No GND Connection
2. Add One Sharing
transistor
Lower: Using PMOS
b) Half swing
BL and BL’ return to VDD/2
after writing or reading.
6
Adiabatic Operations: Writing
PMOS P3 is used to meet the Adiabatic Principle:
No voltage difference before the transistor turns on
Adiabatic Operations: Reading
Simulation Waveforms
SNM Comparison (45nm)
Proposed 8T SRAM
Conventional 6T SRAM
Dynamic Power Comparison (1)
8*8
Array
1 Bit
Cell
Dynamic Power
Comparison (2)
62%
67%
Leakage Power Analysis
Temperature Variation
>90%
Process Variation (65nm) – TOX, VTH, U0
>90%
Process Variation (45nm) – TOX, VTH, U0
90%
Conclusion
Summary
Efficient 8T SRAM architecture
Improved SNM compared with 6T SRAM
Very Low Dynamic and Leakage power
Future work
Use 36nm, 28nm…Check performance particularly for
leakeage
Further Enhance the Stability
Fabricate and validate the proposed architecture
Thank You
Questions?