et al - across
Download
Report
Transcript et al - across
ACROSS Colloquium
Combined power management methods
in wireless networks of energy-hungry
sensors
Vana Jeličić, dipl.ing.
January 18, 2013
Content
Research area
WSNs – distributed event detection
Communication energy Wake-up radio
Energy-hungry sensors
Video
surveillance and smart gas monitoring
Hierarchical, adaptive, event-driven sensing
Motivation and challenges
Problem approach
To-date results
Future research
Activities of AIG
18. 01. 2013.
2 /27
Research area
Wireless sensor networks
Wireless sensor node
Energy-efficiency
Communication!
Distributed sensing systems
Event detection, alarm generation
Video surveillance, gas monitoring
Energy-hungry sensors
Power management
Comm. unit (RX, TX, idle state – cca 20 mA!)
Sensing unit
18. 01. 2013.
3 / 27
Power management
Duty-cycling (D)
Reducing
activity: sensors & radio
Maximal reaction time
Critical event arrival worst case
D = tactive / T
ENERGY
tactive <<
T >>
LATENCY
18. 01. 2013.
4 / 27
Eliminating radio idle time
“Classical” WSN problem!
One-channel wake-up radio
Radio (WOR) – radio periodically wakes up from sleep
mode and listens for incoming packets without MCU interaction.
Wake-On
TI CC1000, CC1101, CC1100E, CC2500, CC430
MAC:
B-MAC, S-MAC, X-MAC...
Optimization
delay
– energy trade-off
18. 01. 2013.
5 / 27
Wake-up receiver (WURx)
Two-channel wake-up radio
Ultra-low-power;
Continuously monitoring
No idle listening on main radio
Lin, Rabaey and Wolisz; “Power-efficient rendez-vous schemes for dense
WSNs”, 2004, <50 uW to outperform one-channel radios!
Trade-offs
wake-up range vs. energy consumption
wake-up range vs. delay (multihops)
in-band vs. out-of-band wake-up radio
18. 01. 2013.
6 / 27
WURx prototypes
Jelicic et al. Analytic Comparison of Wake-up receivers for WSNs and Benefits over the Wake-on Radio Scheme.
PM2HW2N 2012.
Author
Year
f [GHz]
Rate [kbps]
S [dBm]
d [m] P [uW]
AD
l [ms]
Implement.
Le Huy
2008
2,4
50
-50
NA
20
Y
NA
simulation
Yu
2008
2,4
100
-75
NA
53
N
NA
simulation
Langevelde
2009
0,868
45
-89
NA
2400
N
1,36
130 nm
Pletcher
2009
2
100
-72
NA
52
N
NA
90 nm
Durante
2009
2,4
100
-53
NA
12,5
Y, FPGA
NA
120 nm
Gamm
2010
0,868
NA
-52
40
2,78
Y
13
120 nm
Drago
2010
2,4
250
-87
NA
415
N
NA
65 nm
500
-82
NA
Fraunhofer
2010
0,868
1
-60
30
33
Y
32
180 nm
Huang
2010
2,4
100
-64
NA
51
N
NA
90 nm
0,915
100
-75
NA
Huang
2011
0,915
10
-86
NA
123
N
NA
90 nm
Marinkovic
2011
0,433
5.5
-51
10
0,270
N, (MCU)
9
OTS SMD
Shih
2011
0,9165
0.370
-122
1000
1153
Y
NA
OTS
Hambeck
2011
0,868
100
-71
304
2,4
Y
40-110
130 nm
18. 01. 2013.
7 / 27
WURx prototypes (2)
Commercially available (LF, 125 kHz)
Austriamicrosystems
Atmel
Addressing required
Addressing not required
18. 01. 2013.
8 / 27
WURx applications
Applications with WURx – proposals
Building automation 1, 3, 4
Healthcare 2
No energy vs. latency trade-off!
Still not used in
WSNs!
very promising!
1) Zhang et al. Improving Energy-Efficiency in Building Automation with Event-Driven Radio. WCSP 2011.
2) Marinkovic et al. Power Efficient Networking Using a Novel Wake-up Radio. PervasiveHealth 2011.
3) Gamm et al. Low Power Wireless Sensor Node for use in building automation. WAMICON 2011.
4) Gamm et al. Smart Metering Using Distributed Wake-up Receivers. I2MTC 2012.
18. 01. 2013.
9 / 27
Sensing power management
Fixed duty cycle energy wasting
Adaptive duty cycle
Wake-up
latency: ton ≥ twakeup + tacquire
Event-driven
Context-awareness
Energy-awareness
18. 01. 2013.
10 / 27
Heterogeneous WSNs for event detection
Different sensing modalities
Hierarchy
Applications
Video
surveillance: Camera + PIR
Gas monitoring: Gas sensor + PIR
High-consuming sensors
18. 01. 2013.
11 / 27
Smart video surveillance
Reducing transmitted data size
Hierarchical, multi-tier, multimodal
Pyroelectric InfraRed (PIR) sensor
Energy-aware decisions
18. 01. 2013.
12 / 27
Image transmission
Transmission of large amount of data
Only when really necessary
Increasing tactive
ZigBee not intended to that Stack modificaton 1
Image fragmentation – maximal frame filling
Disabled MAC acknowledgment APL layer control
Today – low power WiFi modules
Avoiding transmitting large amounts of data only event
1) Jelicic et al. Reducing Power Consumption of Image Transmission over IEEE802.15.4/ZigBee Sensor Network. I2MTC
2010.
18. 01. 2013.
13 / 27
Existing work – multimodal video networks
PIR sensor mounted on the camera board 1, 2, 3
Same FOV; Dynamically changed sensitivity
Multi-tier Multimodal WSNs 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
1) Magno et al. A Solar-powered Video Sensor Node for Energy Efficient Multimodal Surveillance. DSD 2008.
2) Magno et al. Adaptive Power Control for Solar Harvesting Multimodal Wireless Smart Camera. ICDSC 2009.
3) Magno et al. Multimodal abandoned/removed object detection for low power video surveillance systems. AVSS 2009.
4) Kulkarni et al. SensEye: A Multi–tier camera sensor network. ACM Multimedia 2005.
5) Prati et al. An Integrated MultiModal Sensor Network for Video Surveillance. VSSN 2005.
6) He et al. Vigilnet: An integrated sensor network system for energy efficient surveillance. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 2006.
7) Lopes et al. On the Development of a Multi-tier, Multimodal Wireless Sensor Network for Wild Life Monitoring. IFIP
Wireless Days 2008.
8) Magno et al. Energy Efficient Cooperative Multimodal Ambient Monitoring. EuroSSC 2010.
9) Jelicic et al. An energy efficient multimodal wireless video sensor network with eZ430-RF2500 modules. ICPCA 2010.
18. 01. 2013.
14 / 27
Heterogeneous WVSN
HOMOGENEOUS NWK
HETEROGENEOUS NWK
Camera + PIR onboard
Further reducing
radio activities
Further reducing
cameras’ activities
Tier 2
Camera nodes
Coordinator
wakeup
Tier 1
PIR nodes
Two-tier network
WOR duty-cycling!
18. 01. 2013.
Two-tier network
WURx NO duty-cycling
15 / 27
Smart gas monitoring
Metal Oxide Semiconductor (MOX)
Small form factor
Fast response
Power-efficient
Heater Resistance change
Fabrication field
System-level field
TWO SEPARATED AREAS BY NOW!
18. 01. 2013.
16 / 27
Related work
Fabrication field 1, 2
Pulse mode (duty-cycling)
Temperature dependence
Wake-up latency
9 mW
System-level application 3, 4, 5
Duty cycle
Still high energy consumption
1) Sayhan et al. Discontinuously operated metal oxide gas sensors for flexible tag microlab applications. IEEE Sensors J.
2008.
2) Rastrello et al. Thermal Transient Measurements of an Ultra-Low-Power MOX Sensor. J. of Sensors 2010.
3) Ivanov et al. Distributed smart sensor system for indoor climate monitoring. KONNEX Sci. Conf. 2002.
4) Postolache et al. Smart Sensors Network for Air Quality Monitoring applications. IEEE Trans. on Instrum. and Meas.
2009.
5) Choi et al. Micro sensor node for air pollutant monitoring: HW and SW issues. Sensors 2009.
6) De Vito et al. Wireless Sensor Networks for Distributed Chemical Sensing: Addressing Power Consumption Limits With
On-Board Intelligence. IEEE Sensors J. 2011.
18. 01. 2013.
17 / 27
System-level application – our solution
1) Jelicic et al. Design, Characterization and Management of a WSN for Smart Gas Detection. IWASI 2011.
2) Jelicic et al. Context-Adaptive Multimodal WSN for Energy-Efficient Gas Monitoring. IEEE Sensors J. 2012.
Network
Energy consumption reduction on 3 levels:
Sensor level
duty-cycling gas sensor
early detection of safe conditions
Node
Sensor
Node level
ultra low sleep current (8 uA)
duty-cycling sensor node
people presence detection (modifying duty cycle)
Network level
messages from neighbor nodes (modifying duty cycle)
18. 01. 2013.
18 / 27
Early detection of safe conditions
R [kΩ]
Stable difference
between clean air and
contaminated air signals
1x103
Clean air – after long inactive time
Clean air – after short inactive time
Contaminated air – after short inactive time
1x102
1x103
1x101
1x102
A
threshold
1x101
1x100
B
1x100
1x10-1
0 47
1x10-1
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
200
5000
18. 01. 2013.
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
19 / 27
time [ms]
Adaptive sampling rate (t_ON = 1s)
18. 01. 2013.
20 / 27
Quality ratio: node lifetime / worst case reaction time
18. 01. 2013.
21 / 27
Motivation and challenge
Policies to reduce
Communication energy
Sensing energy
Combined methods
Reducing amount of wirelessly transmitted data
Reducing radio idle consumption
adaptive sampling, event detection
Wake-up receiver
Goal
Context- and energy-awareness
Good QoS
18. 01. 2013.
22 / 27
To-date work and results
Proposed energy saving policies in WVSN & WGSN 1, 2, 5
multimodal (PIR nodes); adaptive duty-cycling
Reducing communication energy 3, 6
Extensive study and comparison of WURx solutions 4
1) Jelicic et al. Design, Characterization and Management of a WSN for Smart Gas Detection. IWASI 2011.
2) Jelicic et al. Context-Adaptive Multimodal WSN for Energy-Efficient Gas Monitoring. IEEE Sensors J. 2012.
3) Jelicic et al. Reducing Power Consumption of Image Transmission over IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee Sensor Network. I2MTC 2010.
4) Jelicic et al. Analytic Comparison of Wake-up Receivers for WSNs and Benefits over the Wake-on Radio Scheme.
PM2HW2N 2012.
5) Jelicic et al. An energy efficient multimodal wireless video sensor network with eZ430-RF2500 modules. ICPCA 2010.
6) Jelicic et al. MasliNET – A Wireless Sensor Network based Environmental Monitoring System. MIPRO 2011.
18. 01. 2013.
23 / 27
AIG – WSN activities
ACTIVITIES
APPLICATIONS
Sensors and sensor interfaces
HW (PCB) design
Measurements
Embedded systems
Wheeze detection
Air quality monitoring
Microcontrollers
FPGA
Firmware
Environmental
monitoring
Asthma monitoring
Berth monitoring
Fall detection
Wireless sensor networks
Power management
Signal processing
18. 01. 2013.
24 / 27
Hvala na pažnji!
18. 01. 2013.