Transcript Alkyl halides and alcohols
Alkyl halides Nucleophilic substitution and elimination reactions © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Alkyl halides - industrial sources HCl H C C H H 2 C=CHCl HgCl 2 vinyl chloride H H vinyl H © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Alkyl halides - industrial sources HCl H C C H H 2 C=CHCl HgCl 2 vinyl chloride Cl 2 H 2 C=CH 2 H 2 C=CHCl 500 o CH 3 Cl + Hg 2 F 2 CH 3 F + Hg 2 Cl 2 CCl 4 + SbF 3 CCl 2 F 2 Freon-12 © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Preparation from alcohols HX R-OH R-X or PX 3 or SOCl 2 SOCl 2 - thionyl chloride RCH 2 OH + SOCl 2 RCH 2 Cl + HCl +SO 2 © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Halogenation of hydrocarbons X 2 /h R-H RX CH 3 Br 2 h CH 2 Br lachrymatory © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Addition of HX to alkenes C C HX C C H X © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Addition of halogens to alkenes and alkynes X 2 C C C C X X C C 2X 2 X X C C X X © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Finkelstein reaction acetone R-X + NaI R-I + NaX soluble insoluble © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Nucleophilic substitution reactions The halide ion is the conjugate base of a strong acid. It is therefore a very weak base and little disposed to share its electrons.
When bonded to a carbon, the halogen is easily displaced as a halide ion by stronger nucleophiles - it is a
good leaving group
.
The typical reaction of alkyl halides is a nucleophilic substitution: R-X + Nu R-Nu + X the leaving group © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Nucleophiles • reagents that seek electron deficient centres • negative ions or neutral molecules having at least one unshared pair of electrons H 3 C C C + CH 3 -Br H 3 C C C CH 3 + Br H 3 C O H + CH 3 -I H 3 C + O CH 3 H + I nucleophile leaving group © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Leaving groups • a substituent that can leave as a weakly basic molecule or ion Nu CN Cl Ph 3 P: + L Nu L Br NC Br OH 2 + Cl Br PH 3 P OH 2 Br Nu NC Cl + Ph 3 P + L: + Br + H 2 O + Br © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Nucleophilic substitution CH 3 Br + CH 3 OH + Br A knowledge of how reaction rates depend on reactant concentrations provides invaluable information about reaction mechanisms. What is known about this reaction?
© E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Nucleophilic substitution CH 3 Br + CH 3 OH + Br [CH 3 Br] I 0.001 M 0.002 M 0.002 M [OH ] I 1.0 M 1.0 M 2.0 M initial rate 3 x 10 -7 mol L -1 s -1 6 x 10 -7 mol L -1 s -1 1.2 x 10 -6 mol L -1 s -1 rate a [CH 3 Br][OH ] rate = k[CH 3 Br][OH ] © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Order - a summary The order of a reaction is equal to the sum of the exponents in the rate equation.
Thus for the rate equation rate = k[A] m [B] n , the overall order is
m + n
.
The order with respect to A is
m
and the order with respect to B is
n
.
© E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Nucleophilic substitution CH 3 CH 3 -C-CH 3 + OH Br CH 3 CH 3 -C-CH 3 OH + Br [(CH 3 ) 3 CBr] I 0.001 M 0.002 M 0.002 M [OH ] I 1.0 M 1.0 M 2.0 M initial rate 4 x 10 -7 mol L -1 s -1 8 x 10 -7 mol L -1 s -1 8 x 10 -7 mol L -1 s -1 rate a [(CH 3 ) 3 CBr][OH ] 0 rate = k[(CH 3 ) 3 CBr] © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
OH The S N 2 mechanism CH 3 Br + CH 3 OH + Br Br rate = k[CH 3 Br][OH ] HO Br HO + Br References of interest: E.D. Hughes, C.K. Ingold, and C.S. Patel,
J. Chem. Soc
., 526 (1933) J.L. Gleave, E.D. Hughes and C.K. Ingold,
J. Chem. Soc
., 236 (1935) © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
OH Stereochemistry of the S N 2 reaction Br C 6 H 13 H H 3 C Br (-)-2-bromooctane [ a ] = -34.6
o HO C 6 H 13 H H 3 C OH (-)-2-octanol [ a ] = -9.9
o Br HO + Br C 6 H 13 HO H CH 3 (+)-2-octanol [ a ] = +9.9
o © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Stereochemistry of the S N 2 reaction C 6 H 13 C 6 H 13 NaOH H Br HO H S N 2 H 3 C (-)-2-bromooctane CH 3 (+)-2-octanol [ a ] = -34.6
o [ a ] = +9.9
o optical purity = 100% A
Walden
inversion.
P. Walden,
Uber die vermeintliche optische Activät der Chlorumarsäure und über optisch active Halogen bernsteinsäre
,
Ber.
, 26, 210 (1893) © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
1.
2.
The S N 1 mechanism CH 3 CH 3 -C-CH 3 + OH Br CH 3 CH -C-CH OH rate = k[(CH 3 ) 3 CBr] 3 3 + Br CH 3 H 3 C C CH 3 Br slow H 3 CH 3 C C + CH 3 + OH H 3 CH 3 C C + CH 3 fast + Br CH 3 H 3 C C OH CH 3 © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Carbocations G.A. Olah,
J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,
94, 808 (1972) CH 3 CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 3 CHCH 3 CH 3 CCH 3 + + + + 1 o 2 o 3 o sp 2 © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Carbocation stability R R C R + 3 o > R C H + R 2 o > R C H + H 1 o > H C H + H Hyperconjugation stabilizes the positive charge.
H H H H H © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Stereochemical consequences of a carbocation 1.
CH 3 H 3 C C CH 3 Br slow H 3 CH 3 C C + CH 3 + Br C 6 H 13 H H 3 C Br (-)-2-bromooctane [ a ] = -34.6
o OH H 2 O S N 1 ?
© E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Stereochemical consequences of a carbocation 1.
CH 3 H 3 C C CH 3 Br slow C 6 H 13 H H 3 C Br (-)-2-bromooctane [ a ] = -34.6
o OH H 2 O S N 1 H 3 CH 3 C C + CH 3 + Br (+)-C 6 H 13 CHOHCH 3 reduced optical purity Why?
© E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Stereochemical consequences of a carbocation C 6 H 13 H H 2 O HO C 6 H 13 H + CH 3 X CH 3 inversion predominates retention © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Carbocation rearrangements (CH 3 ) 3 CCH 2 Br C 2 H 5 O S N 2 (CH 3 ) 3 CCH 2 OC 2 H 5 Williamson ether synthesis C 2 H 5 OH S N 1 (CH 3 ) 2 CCH 2 CH 3 OC 2 H 5 + (CH 3 ) 2 C=CHCH 3 a rearrangement and elimination © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Carbocation rearrangements + CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 + CH 3 CH 2 CHCH 3 1 o 2 o + H C C + H + R C C + R 1,2 hydride and alkyl shifts © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Carbocation rearrangements (CH 3 ) 3 CCH 2 Br + (CH 3 ) 3 CCH 2 H 3 C CH 3 H + CH 3 H H 3 C CH 3 + CH 2 CH 3 C 2 H 5 OH CH 3 H 3 C CH 2 CH 3 + H OC 2 H 5 H 3 C CH 3 + CH 2 CH 3 -H + CH 3 H 3 C CH 2 CH 3 + H OC 2 H 5 H 3 C CH 3 CH 2 CH 3 OC 2 H 5 © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
OH Steric effects in the S N 2 reaction Br HO Br HO + Br Look at the transition state to see how substituents might affect this reaction.
HO Br © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Steric effects in the S N 2 reaction HO Br The order of reactivity of RX in these S N 2 reactions is CH 3 X > 1 o > 2 o > 3 o © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Steric effects in the S N 2 reaction RBr + I RI + Br reactivity CH 3 Br 150 > CH 3 CH 2 Br 1 > (CH 3 ) 2 CHBr 0.01
> (CH 3 ) 3 CBr 0.001
I Br I Br I Br I Br © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Structural effects in S N 1 reactions 3 o > 2 o > 1 o > CH 3 X R-X + R X R + + X HCO 2 H RBr + H 2 O ROH + HBr (CH 3 ) 3 CBr > (CH 3 ) 2 CHBr > CH 3 CH 2 Br > CH 3 Br 100,000,000 45 1.7 1 © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Nucleophilicity Rates of S N 2 reactions depend on concentration and nucleophilicity of the nucleophile.
A base is more nucleophilic than its conjugate acid: CH 3 Cl + H 2 O CH 3 Cl + HO CH 3 OH CH 3 OH 2 + slow fast The nucleophilicity of nucleophiles having the same nucleophilic atom parallels basicity: RO > HO >> RCO 2 > ROH >H 2 O © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Nucleophilicity When the nucleophilic atoms are different, their relative strengths do not always parallel their basicity.
In protic solvents, the larger the nucleophilic atom, the better: I > Br > Cl > F In protic solvents, the smaller the anion, the greater its solvation due to hydrogen bonding. This shell of solvent molecules reduces its ability to attack.
© E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Nucleophilicity Aprotic solvents tend to solvate cations rather than anions. Thus the unsolvated anion has a greater nucleophilicity in an aprotic solvent.
© E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Polar aprotic solvents O H N H 3 C CH 3
N,N
-dimethylformamide DMF (H 3 C) 2 N O P N(CH 3 ) 2 N(CH 3 ) 2 hexamethylphosphoramide HMPA H 3 C O S CH 3 dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO These solvents dissolve ionic compounds.
© E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Solvent polarity Cl H H H I Cl I more polar transition state less solvated than reagents A protic solvent will decrease the rate of this reaction and the reaction is 1,200,000 faster in DMF than in methanol.
© E.V. Blackburn, 2011
R-X Solvent polarity + R X R + + X less polar more polar greater stabilization by polar solvent The transition state is more polarized.
Therefore the rate of this reaction increases with increase in solvent polarity.
A protic solvent is particularly effective as it stabilizes the transition state by forming hydrogen bonds with the leaving group.
© E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Solvent polarity Explain the solvent effects for each of the following second order reactions: a) 131 I + CH 3 I CH 3 131 I + I Relative rates: in water, 1; in methanol, 16; in ethanol, 44 b) (
n
-C 3 H 7 ) 3 N + CH 3 I (
n
-C 3 H 7 ) 3 N + CH 3 I Relative rates: in
n
-hexane, 1; in chloroform, 13 000 © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Leaving group ability Weak bases are good leaving groups.
They are better able to accommodate a negative charge and therefore stabilize the transition state.
Thus I is a better leaving group than Br .
I > Br > Cl > H 2 O > F > OH © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
S N 1 v S N 2 S N 1 S N 2 kinetics: 1st order second order reactivity: 3 o > 2 o > 1 o > CH 3 X CH 3 X > 1 o > 2 o > 3 o rearrangements no rearrangements partial inversion inversion of configuration eliminations possible © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Functional group transformations using S N 2 reactions R = Me, 1 o , or 2 o CN R-CN nitrile 'R C C R C C R' alkyne © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
ROH + HX - an S N reaction ROH + HX RX + H 2 O HX: HI > HBr > HCl ROH: 3 o > 2 o > 1 o < CH 3 OH HBr or CH 3 CHCH 3 OH NaBr/H 2 SO 4 CH 3 CHCH 3 Br © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Experimental facts 1. The reaction is acid catalyzed 2. Rearrangements are possible CH 3 H H 3 C C C H OH CH 3 HCl CH 3 H H 3 C C C Cl H CH 3 3. Alcohol reactivity is 3 o > 2 o > 1 o < CH 3 OH © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
The mechanism 1. ROH + HX + ROH 2 + X + 2. ROH 2 + R + H 2 O + 3. R + X RX © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
Reaction of primary alcohols with HX 1. ROH + HX 1 o + ROH 2 + X + 2. ROH 2 + X + X R OH 2 RX + H 2 O S N 2 HX: HI > HBr > HCl © E.V. Blackburn, 2011
© E.V. Blackburn, 2011