Alkyl halides and alcohols

Download Report

Transcript Alkyl halides and alcohols

Alkyl halides Nucleophilic substitution and elimination reactions © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Alkyl halides - industrial sources HCl H C C H H 2 C=CHCl HgCl 2 vinyl chloride H H vinyl H © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Alkyl halides - industrial sources HCl H C C H H 2 C=CHCl HgCl 2 vinyl chloride Cl 2 H 2 C=CH 2 H 2 C=CHCl 500 o CH 3 Cl + Hg 2 F 2 CH 3 F + Hg 2 Cl 2 CCl 4 + SbF 3 CCl 2 F 2 Freon-12 © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Preparation from alcohols HX R-OH R-X or PX 3 or SOCl 2 SOCl 2 - thionyl chloride RCH 2 OH + SOCl 2 RCH 2 Cl + HCl +SO 2 © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Halogenation of hydrocarbons X 2 /h  R-H RX CH 3 Br 2 h  CH 2 Br lachrymatory © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Addition of HX to alkenes C C HX C C H X © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Addition of halogens to alkenes and alkynes X 2 C C C C X X C C 2X 2 X X C C X X © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Finkelstein reaction acetone R-X + NaI R-I + NaX soluble insoluble © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Nucleophilic substitution reactions The halide ion is the conjugate base of a strong acid. It is therefore a very weak base and little disposed to share its electrons.

When bonded to a carbon, the halogen is easily displaced as a halide ion by stronger nucleophiles - it is a

good leaving group

.

The typical reaction of alkyl halides is a nucleophilic substitution: R-X + Nu R-Nu + X the leaving group © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Nucleophiles • reagents that seek electron deficient centres • negative ions or neutral molecules having at least one unshared pair of electrons H 3 C C C + CH 3 -Br H 3 C C C CH 3 + Br H 3 C O H + CH 3 -I H 3 C + O CH 3 H + I nucleophile leaving group © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Leaving groups • a substituent that can leave as a weakly basic molecule or ion Nu CN Cl Ph 3 P: + L Nu L Br  NC  Br OH 2 +  Cl Br  PH 3 P  OH 2  Br Nu NC Cl + Ph 3 P + L: + Br + H 2 O + Br © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Nucleophilic substitution CH 3 Br + CH 3 OH + Br A knowledge of how reaction rates depend on reactant concentrations provides invaluable information about reaction mechanisms. What is known about this reaction?

© E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Nucleophilic substitution CH 3 Br + CH 3 OH + Br [CH 3 Br] I 0.001 M 0.002 M 0.002 M [OH ] I 1.0 M 1.0 M 2.0 M initial rate 3 x 10 -7 mol  L -1  s -1 6 x 10 -7 mol  L -1  s -1 1.2 x 10 -6 mol  L -1  s -1 rate a [CH 3 Br][OH ] rate = k[CH 3 Br][OH ] © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Order - a summary The order of a reaction is equal to the sum of the exponents in the rate equation.

Thus for the rate equation rate = k[A] m [B] n , the overall order is

m + n

.

The order with respect to A is

m

and the order with respect to B is

n

.

© E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Nucleophilic substitution CH 3 CH 3 -C-CH 3 + OH Br CH 3 CH 3 -C-CH 3 OH + Br [(CH 3 ) 3 CBr] I 0.001 M 0.002 M 0.002 M [OH ] I 1.0 M 1.0 M 2.0 M initial rate 4 x 10 -7 mol  L -1  s -1 8 x 10 -7 mol  L -1  s -1 8 x 10 -7 mol  L -1  s -1 rate a [(CH 3 ) 3 CBr][OH ] 0 rate = k[(CH 3 ) 3 CBr] © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

OH The S N 2 mechanism CH 3 Br + CH 3 OH + Br Br rate = k[CH 3 Br][OH ]  HO  Br HO + Br References of interest: E.D. Hughes, C.K. Ingold, and C.S. Patel,

J. Chem. Soc

., 526 (1933) J.L. Gleave, E.D. Hughes and C.K. Ingold,

J. Chem. Soc

., 236 (1935) © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

OH Stereochemistry of the S N 2 reaction Br C 6 H 13 H H 3 C Br (-)-2-bromooctane [ a ] = -34.6

o  HO C 6 H 13 H H 3 C OH (-)-2-octanol [ a ] = -9.9

o  Br HO + Br C 6 H 13 HO H CH 3 (+)-2-octanol [ a ] = +9.9

o © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Stereochemistry of the S N 2 reaction C 6 H 13 C 6 H 13 NaOH H Br HO H S N 2 H 3 C (-)-2-bromooctane CH 3 (+)-2-octanol [ a ] = -34.6

o [ a ] = +9.9

o optical purity = 100% A

Walden

inversion.

P. Walden,

Uber die vermeintliche optische Activät der Chlorumarsäure und über optisch active Halogen bernsteinsäre

,

Ber.

, 26, 210 (1893) © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

1.

2.

The S N 1 mechanism CH 3 CH 3 -C-CH 3 + OH Br CH 3 CH -C-CH OH rate = k[(CH 3 ) 3 CBr] 3 3 + Br CH 3 H 3 C C CH 3 Br slow H 3 CH 3 C C + CH 3 + OH H 3 CH 3 C C + CH 3 fast + Br CH 3 H 3 C C OH CH 3 © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Carbocations G.A. Olah,

J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,

94, 808 (1972) CH 3 CH 3 CH 3 CH 2 CH 3 CHCH 3 CH 3 CCH 3 + + + + 1 o 2 o 3 o sp 2 © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Carbocation stability R R C R + 3 o > R C H + R 2 o > R C H + H 1 o > H C H + H Hyperconjugation stabilizes the positive charge.

H H H H H © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Stereochemical consequences of a carbocation 1.

CH 3 H 3 C C CH 3 Br slow H 3 CH 3 C C + CH 3 + Br C 6 H 13 H H 3 C Br (-)-2-bromooctane [ a ] = -34.6

o OH H 2 O S N 1 ?

© E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Stereochemical consequences of a carbocation 1.

CH 3 H 3 C C CH 3 Br slow C 6 H 13 H H 3 C Br (-)-2-bromooctane [ a ] = -34.6

o OH H 2 O S N 1 H 3 CH 3 C C + CH 3 + Br (+)-C 6 H 13 CHOHCH 3 reduced optical purity Why?

© E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Stereochemical consequences of a carbocation C 6 H 13 H H 2 O HO C 6 H 13 H + CH 3 X CH 3 inversion predominates retention © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Carbocation rearrangements (CH 3 ) 3 CCH 2 Br C 2 H 5 O S N 2 (CH 3 ) 3 CCH 2 OC 2 H 5 Williamson ether synthesis C 2 H 5 OH S N 1 (CH 3 ) 2 CCH 2 CH 3 OC 2 H 5 + (CH 3 ) 2 C=CHCH 3 a rearrangement and elimination © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Carbocation rearrangements + CH 3 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 + CH 3 CH 2 CHCH 3 1 o 2 o + H C C + H + R C C + R 1,2 hydride and alkyl shifts © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Carbocation rearrangements (CH 3 ) 3 CCH 2 Br + (CH 3 ) 3 CCH 2 H 3 C CH 3 H + CH 3 H H 3 C CH 3 + CH 2 CH 3 C 2 H 5 OH CH 3 H 3 C CH 2 CH 3 + H OC 2 H 5 H 3 C CH 3 + CH 2 CH 3 -H + CH 3 H 3 C CH 2 CH 3 + H OC 2 H 5 H 3 C CH 3 CH 2 CH 3 OC 2 H 5 © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

OH Steric effects in the S N 2 reaction   Br HO Br HO + Br Look at the transition state to see how substituents might affect this reaction.

 HO  Br © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Steric effects in the S N 2 reaction  HO  Br The order of reactivity of RX in these S N 2 reactions is CH 3 X > 1 o > 2 o > 3 o © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Steric effects in the S N 2 reaction RBr + I RI + Br reactivity CH 3 Br 150 > CH 3 CH 2 Br 1 > (CH 3 ) 2 CHBr 0.01

> (CH 3 ) 3 CBr 0.001

I   Br I   Br I   Br I   Br © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Structural effects in S N 1 reactions 3 o > 2 o > 1 o > CH 3 X R-X  +  R X R + + X HCO 2 H RBr + H 2 O ROH + HBr (CH 3 ) 3 CBr > (CH 3 ) 2 CHBr > CH 3 CH 2 Br > CH 3 Br 100,000,000 45 1.7 1 © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Nucleophilicity Rates of S N 2 reactions depend on concentration and nucleophilicity of the nucleophile.

A base is more nucleophilic than its conjugate acid: CH 3 Cl + H 2 O  CH 3 Cl + HO  CH 3 OH CH 3 OH 2 + slow fast The nucleophilicity of nucleophiles having the same nucleophilic atom parallels basicity: RO > HO >> RCO 2 > ROH >H 2 O © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Nucleophilicity When the nucleophilic atoms are different, their relative strengths do not always parallel their basicity.

In protic solvents, the larger the nucleophilic atom, the better: I > Br > Cl > F In protic solvents, the smaller the anion, the greater its solvation due to hydrogen bonding. This shell of solvent molecules reduces its ability to attack.

© E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Nucleophilicity Aprotic solvents tend to solvate cations rather than anions. Thus the unsolvated anion has a greater nucleophilicity in an aprotic solvent.

© E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Polar aprotic solvents O H N H 3 C CH 3

N,N

-dimethylformamide DMF (H 3 C) 2 N O P N(CH 3 ) 2 N(CH 3 ) 2 hexamethylphosphoramide HMPA H 3 C O S CH 3 dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO These solvents dissolve ionic compounds.

© E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Solvent polarity Cl H H H I Cl   I more polar transition state less solvated than reagents A protic solvent will decrease the rate of this reaction and the reaction is 1,200,000 faster in DMF than in methanol.

© E.V. Blackburn, 2011

R-X Solvent polarity  +  R X R + + X less polar more polar greater stabilization by polar solvent The transition state is more polarized.

Therefore the rate of this reaction increases with increase in solvent polarity.

A protic solvent is particularly effective as it stabilizes the transition state by forming hydrogen bonds with the leaving group.

© E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Solvent polarity Explain the solvent effects for each of the following second order reactions: a) 131 I + CH 3 I  CH 3 131 I + I Relative rates: in water, 1; in methanol, 16; in ethanol, 44 b) (

n

-C 3 H 7 ) 3 N + CH 3 I  (

n

-C 3 H 7 ) 3 N + CH 3 I Relative rates: in

n

-hexane, 1; in chloroform, 13 000 © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Leaving group ability Weak bases are good leaving groups.

They are better able to accommodate a negative charge and therefore stabilize the transition state.

Thus I is a better leaving group than Br .

I > Br > Cl > H 2 O > F > OH © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

S N 1 v S N 2 S N 1 S N 2 kinetics: 1st order second order reactivity: 3 o > 2 o > 1 o > CH 3 X CH 3 X > 1 o > 2 o > 3 o rearrangements no rearrangements partial inversion inversion of configuration eliminations possible © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Functional group transformations using S N 2 reactions R = Me, 1 o , or 2 o CN R-CN nitrile 'R C C R C C R' alkyne © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

ROH + HX - an S N reaction ROH + HX RX + H 2 O HX: HI > HBr > HCl ROH: 3 o > 2 o > 1 o < CH 3 OH HBr or CH 3 CHCH 3 OH NaBr/H 2 SO 4 CH 3 CHCH 3 Br © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Experimental facts 1. The reaction is acid catalyzed 2. Rearrangements are possible CH 3 H H 3 C C C H OH CH 3 HCl CH 3 H H 3 C C C Cl H CH 3 3. Alcohol reactivity is 3 o > 2 o > 1 o < CH 3 OH © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

The mechanism 1. ROH + HX + ROH 2 + X + 2. ROH 2 + R + H 2 O + 3. R + X RX © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

Reaction of primary alcohols with HX 1. ROH + HX 1 o + ROH 2 + X + 2. ROH 2 + X   + X R OH 2 RX + H 2 O S N 2 HX: HI > HBr > HCl © E.V. Blackburn, 2011

© E.V. Blackburn, 2011