Transcript Patent Pools - Managing Intellectual Property
Managing Intellectual Property International Patent Forum 2011 Slide subtitle
LICENSING AND TECH TRANSFER
MAKING THE MOST OUT OF YOUR PATENT Gustav Brismark Vice President, Patent Strategy & Portfolio Management
Ericsson AB
Slide title
THE USE OF PATENTS
› A patent gives the right to exclude others › In telecom, patents are licensed Do not add objects or
Slide title
END-USER VALUE
The value an end-user derives from a service increases when the
number of other users
using the same kind of service increases Do not add objects or Co-operation in an
open innovation
process in telecom on new standards provides economy-of-scale It reduces the risk and investment for new entrants and
increases competition The standard specification
is the basis for technology transfer through licensing
Slide title
TECHNOLGY TRANSFER
– THROUGH FRAND LICENSING Excluding M2M connections 9 000 8 000 7 000 6 000 5 000 4 000 3 000 2 000 1 000 0 2008 Reported subscriptions per system standard 2009
2010
2011 2012 2013 2014 LTE/TD-LTE WCDMA/HSPA GSM/GPRS/EDGE TDSCDMA Mobile WiMAX CDMA Other
Source: Internal Ericsson
2015 This slide contains forward looking statements Do not add objects or
FRAND licensing is a mass market enabler
Source: Internal Ericsson
Slide title
FRAND – WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
› FRAND commitment means
no blocking
– – Essential patents licensed Fair return on R&D investments patents ›
Market accessible
– to new entrants Tech transfer possible through Reasonable cumulative royalty › FRAND – Gives incentive for further
innovation
– – Makes it possible for new companies to
enter
the market Has a proven track record of global market
success
Fair compensation
Waiving monopoly
Do not add objects or
Slide title
DEFINING
FRAND
› Reasonable
cumulative
rates – Patent Landscape – Estimated value of technology › Reasonable
individual
– Patent Share – Reflect the contribution rate ›
Bilateral
negotiation ›
Legal
enforcement ›
Complete
declarations ›
Evidence
of essentiality Do not add objects or
Slide title
ANTITRUST CONSIDERATIONS – TELECOM STANDARDS LIKE 3GPP
Do not add objects or › 3GPP* standardization is a collaborative process › – – – – Rules designed to be
compliant
Membership is open to anyone The process involves all stakeholders Consensus driven decisions with competition law Technical considerations only for decision making › – Members are bound by 3GPP rules
Non-members
may abuse market power gained from having their technology included in the standard – May indeed merit competition law intervention * 3GPP is a project which has been assigned the responsibility, from regional standards bodies, to develop global specifications for GSM, WCDMA and LTE technologies
Slide title
ANTITRUST CONSIDERATIONS – STANDARDIZATION IN THE EU
› The EC has revised their guidelines on
horizontal cooperation
› Among the issues raised in this context, was that of
joint discussions
of licensing terms › It is Ericsson’s position that joint discussions on a
reasonable maximum cumulative
– may lead to lower costs for consumers Lowers barriers of entry – – Increases transparency Reduces total costs for commercialization › Such discussions are a prerequisite to form
Patent Pools
› That need has been
acknowledged by EC
Guidelines Technology Transfer Do not add objects or
Slide title
FRAND – BALANCE OF INTERESTS
IPR owner EQUIPMENT industry FRAND is intended to maintain the delicate balance between the interest of the intellectual property holder and the needs of the broader set of companies that need access to the essential intellectual property
“The essentials of intellectual property”,
Signals Research group, 2010 Do not add objects or