Transcript RDA IN THE UK

RDA IN THE UK
Summary of Survey Results
1
Overview

CILIP/BL & CIG
 Survey Monkey
 78 responses
 Awareness
of RDA
 Implementation Context
 Training needs
 Next Steps
2
Awareness of RDA
What is it?
Heard of it
Understand it
Explain it
RDA
3
39
15
9
ICP FRBR FRAD
25
6
10
32
36
43
5
18
11
2
5
1
“I know what [RDA] is, why it's been developed and where to find
more information about it“
“I have studied FRBR but it looks very complicated as a basis for
cataloguing rules”
“The terminology I find confusing, e.g. manifestations and expressions
- none of the glossaries seem to make clear exactly what these mean
at least not enough for me to explain it clearly to others.”
3
H a v e y o u a tte nd e d a ny R D A fa milia ris a tio n o r a wa re ne s s
e v e nts ?
Yes
No
60% of those answering yes attended CILIP Executive Briefings
20 % of those answering yes viewed ALA Webinars
4
R a te the fo llo wing is s ue s in o rd e r o f imp o rta nc e fo r tra ining :
MARC 21 and RDA
Differences between
AACR2 and RDA
RDA Elements and Core
Elements
Content and Carrier
Entities, atttributes and
relationships
Content, encoding and
display
2.70
2.80
2.90
3.00
3.10
3.20
3.30
3.40
3.50
3.60
“Training needs to be straightforward for non-professional cataloguers”
“How much the differences matter in day to day work.”
“…what changes do we need to make to [LMS] to gain the benefits”
“As I don't understand what most of these options are it's difficult to rank
them”
5
W i l l y o u r i n s ti tu ti o n i m p l e m e n t R D A ?
Ye s
No
T o o e a rly to sa y
“Advantages for cataloguing e-resources, digitisation projects”
“…Depends on decisions of record creators (e.g. BL, BDS) and
LMS suppliers”
“ Our initial reaction is not good - it would be more work therefore
more cost, which could not be coming at a worse time”
“I was under the impression that there was no choice in this. I
thought it was replacing AACR2.”
“Not even thought about it.”
6
“We may not be able to justify the cost of the Toolkit!”
Implementation Context
7
W ha t i s y o ur ro l e ?
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
er
D
ev
el
S
op
ys
er
te
m
s
L
ib
ra
ri
an
in
ra
T
S
ys
te
m
LI
S
du
ca
to
r
E
er
LI
S
T
ea
m
an
a
M
et
ad
at
M
Le
ad
ge
r
r
ito
E
d
a
rc
hi
vi
st
A
gu
er
lo
ta
C
a
Li
br
ar
ia
n
0.0%
Academic Library 58%
Public Library 14%
Government Library 10%
National Library 8.5%
Health Medical 7%
8
A p p ro xima te ly wha t p e rc e nta g e o f y o ur time is s p e nt c a ta lo g uing
o r c re a ting / e d iting me ta d a ta ?
Less than 25%
Between 25% and 50%
Between 50% and 75%
More than 75%
9
W ha t ty p e s o f re s o urc e s d o y o u c a ta lo g ue ? (T ic k a ll tha t a p p ly )
Ar
ch
iva
lM
Ca
at
rto
er
ia
gr
ls
ap
A
hi
rti
c
M cles
at
er
Da ials
ta
Se
e- ts
B
E- o ok
Jo s
u
Ep rn a
ls
h
Im em
ag er
es a
M
(
an Sti
l
M
ov u sc l)
rip
in
g
ts
O
bj Ima
ec
ge
ts
s
Pr /Re
in
a
Pr ted lia
in
te Bo
ok
Re d
J
ou s
co
rd
r
ed na l
So s
Sh
u
ee nd
t
W Mu
e b si
Pa c
ge
s
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Art-specific materials: e.g. exhibition catalogues, artists' books
Grey literature produced in-house
DVD feature films TV programmes. GMD change will have a big impact
Tactile and audio formats
10
W ha t p ro p o rtio n o f re s o urc e s a re c a ta lo g ue d in-ho us e ?
Don't know
100%
75%
50%
25%
0%
“…all catalogued in-house, but …mostly upgrading rather than original cataloguing”
“Level of cataloguing depends on type of material”
“Moving to shelf ready service for book supply”
“We do edit all records we download”
11
D o e s y o ur ins titutio n c re a te a utho rity re c o rd s fo r na me s , title s o r
s ub je c ts ?
Yes
No
We contribute name authorities to NACO
All name, subject and series headings are under authority control. We
don't download authority records
Subjects only - in house scheme
12
W hic h s y s te m(s ) d o y o u us e fo r c a ta lo g uing a nd me ta d a ta
c re a tio n/ e d iting ?
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
Vi
rtu
a
Vo
ya
ge
r
co
rn
Un
i
TL
C
Ta
lis
Al
ep
h
DSp
ac
e
ePr
in
ts
Fe
do
ra
Ho
riz
on
In
-h
ou
se
M
O
i
l
l
C
LC eni
um
Co
nn
e
Sy xio n
m
ph
on
y
0.0%
Others
Liberty
Open Galaxy
Spydus (Civica)
13
W hic h fo rma ts o r e nc o d ing s c he me s d o y o u us e ?
or
e
C
VR
A
UN
IM
AR
C
AR
C
UK
M
M
AR
C
21
IX
O
N
C
/E
A
EA
D
Du
bl
in
C
or
e
In
-h
ou
se
/lo
ca
M
l
O
DS
/M
AD
S
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
14
W hic h c a ta lo g uing rule s o r me ta d a ta ins truc tio ns d o y o u c urre ntly
us e fo r re s o urc e d e s c rip tio n a nd a c c e s s ?
120.0%
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0.0%
AACR2
Cartographic
Materials
DCRM(B)
In-house/local
ISAD(G)
15
What aspect of current rules
causes most difficulty?
• Applying them to
artefacts and non book
materials
• Easily adapting for local
practice - e.g. more
detailed local material
descriptions
• Expressing information
about media/format
• Multi-part works - one
record or several?
• None
• AACR2's relationship with
MARC21 and the
underlying database
• Punctuation
• Applicability to modern
resources such as
ebooks, DVDs, Web
resources etc.
• Serials peculiarities
16
Training Needs
17
What topics should training cover for each of
these categories of staff?
• It is important that the reasons for the adoption
of RDA are justified to decision makers and to all
stakeholders”
• “Need a very simple and basic training package
for most staff, and a more detailed offering for
cataloguer”
• “FRBR … is not really apparent in the records or
the catalogue display without different software
“ and treatment of legacy records”
• “cataloguers and system administrators need
practical hands on "this is how you do" type
training”
18
What is your preferred method for
delivery of RDA training
Develop in-house using own resources 47%
Deliver in-house using own trainers
41%
Deliver in-house using external trainers 28%
Deliver off-site
35%
Deliver on-line
35%
training likely to be organised by wider organisation. Hopefully all in-house
It depends on current financial constraints
I currently deliver MARC21 training to library assistant cataloguers so I would
be expected by senior managers to deliver RDA training
Welsh language requirement
19
How much time would your institution be
prepared to commit to training the following
groups of staff?
Man.
Cat.
Sys.
Ref.
Half day
90%
40% 60%
60%
1 day
22%
57% 65%
13%
2 days
0%
94% 19%
0%
More
8%
92% 17%
0%
20
H o w muc h wo uld y o ur ins titutio n b e willing to p a y (p e r c a p ita ) fo r
R D A tra ining
<£100
£100-£199
£200-£299
£300-£400
>£400
21
Comments
• We expect to do training in house.
• I would have thought it would be more
appropriate to charge mainly for time, with an
element for the number of attendees
• A lot less than £100!
• Our training budget is very limited. We could not
afford external training for all 10 cataloguers.
Perhaps the 2 professionals could attend
external training and cascade this to library
assistants.
22
Comments
• If the changes were profound, which they
are not likely to be in the short term, and
the benefits demonstrable, then I think it
might be acceptable to pay lots on
training.
• We would be obliged to issue a call for
tender
• funding would be for senior cataloguers
only (2-3) and this would be cascaded
23
W o uld y o u b e inte re s te d in a s s is ting CIG to o ffe r R D A tra ining to
o the r ins titutio ns ?
Yes
No
24
Next steps
• Post results on CIG Website
– Encourage discussion
• Invite new members to joint Task & Finish
Group
• Plan modules required
• Evaluate delivery options
• Prepare materials
25
Secondary colour palette
26
Default shapes
Descriptive text box
with
 level 1 bullets
 level 2
 level 3
Circle
with 14pt
bold text
Arrows and line styles
Rounded rectangle
(1.5pt stroke weight)
27
Example slide
Demand-driven strategy:
 Chosen markets
 One brand
 Relevant to users

Distinctive through:
 World class collection
 Value-added services
& expertise
Delivered through:
 User-focused staff
 E-platforms
 The right partnerships
Empowered,
flexible
& diverse
workforce
Open,
consultative
management
Staff who
feel valued
& recognised
TO HELP
PEOPLE
ADVANCE
KNOWLEDGE
TO ENRICH LIVES
Nonhierarchical,
agile decision
making
Strong
performance
management
28