Transcript PPT
RISC vs. CISC Dhiraj Parashar Shiva Prasad Behera Vivek Sharma 7/27/2016 CS654 Overview Introduction Key arguments Comparisons Post-RISC Current Trends 7/27/2016 CS654 CISC Evolution Storage and Memory – High cost of memory. – Need for compact code. Support for high-level languages Ease of adding new microinstructions Marketing Strategy 7/27/2016 CS654 CISC Effects Moved complexity from s/w to h/w Compact code Ease of compiler design (HLLCA) Easier to debug Lengthened design times Increased design errors 7/27/2016 CS654 RISC Evolution Increasingly cheap memory Improvement in compiler technology Patterson: “Make the common case fast” 7/27/2016 CS654 RISC Effect Move complexity from h/w to s/w Provided a single-chip solution Better use of chip area Better Speed Feasibility of pipelining – Single cycle execution stages – Uniform Instruction Format 7/27/2016 CS654 Key arguments RISC argument – for a given technology, RISC implementation will be faster – current VLSI technology enables single-chip RISC – when technology enables single-chip CISC, RISC will be pipelined – when technology enables pipelined CISC, RISC will have caches CISC argument – CISC flaws not fundamental (fixed with more transistors) – Moore’s Law will narrow the RISC/CISC gap (true) – software costs will dominate (very true) 7/27/2016 CS654 Role of Compiler:RISC vs. CISC CISC instruction: MUL <addr1>, <addr2> RISC instructions: LOAD A, <addr1> LOAD B, <addr2> MUL A, B STORE <addr1> RISC is dependent on optimizing compilers 7/27/2016 CS654 Comparisons The Case for RISC (1980) – Introductory paper advocating RISC Colwell et al. (1985) – Comparison studies misleading – Envisions use of techniques from both Clark, Bhandarkar (1990) – MIPS M/2000 vs. VAX 8700 – Unfair comparison (?!) 7/27/2016 CS654 Post-RISC Architecture Additional functional units for superscalar Additional “non-RISC” (but fast) instructions Increased pipeline depth Branch prediction Out of order execution 7/27/2016 CS654 Current Trends P6 - x86 instructions decoded into RISClike instructions (ROps) Intel called this hack CRISC. This concept was so moronic that even Intel could not market it! IA-64 - dependence on compilers for scheduling Athlon – both direct execution and microprogrammed instructions 7/27/2016 CS654 Thanks! 7/27/2016 CS654