Transcript 19-05-0036-00-0000_Matthew_Shermans_Comment_resolution.ppt

Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Matthew Sherman’s Comments to 802.19
P&P
Date: 2005-Sept-20
Authors:
Name
Company
Address
Phone
email
Tom Siep
CSR
2425 N. Central
Expressway,
Richardson, TX
75040
+214 558
4358
[email protected]
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.19. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in
this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE
Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit
others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.19.
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement
"IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents
essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the TAG of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to
reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair
<[email protected]> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being
developed within the IEEE 802.19 TAG. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <[email protected]>.
Submission
Slide 1
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
•
Comment 1 – Section 2
–
Comment 2 – General
•
Comment 3 – General
–
•
State that a membership list will be maintained by the TAG.
The P&P needs a section on rules for an appeal.
Comment 4 – Section 2.2
–
Mat recommended that the vice chair be elected instead of being appointed.
•
Comment 5 – General
•
Comment 6 – Section 1
–
–
The P&P needs to include an order of precedence of other documents (802 P&P, Roberts Rules).
The section on the functions of the TAG is not necessary. Check other WG P&P.
•
Comment 7 – Section 5.1.2
•
Comment 8 – Section 5.2
–
–
•
In section on interim sessions always say "interim sessions" not just "sessions."
Under maintenance of the P&P say it has to be at a plenary or electronic ballot.
Comment 9 – Section 6
–
Reference voting rules in 802 (in a meeting and electronically).
•
Comment 10 – Section 5.2
•
Comment 11 – Section 6.2
–
–
Drop the rule that says the SEC needs to approve a revised P&P.
What is a "Charter?"
•
Comment 12 – Section 6
•
Comment 13 – Section 6.2.3 and 6.2.4
–
–
•
Summary
The P&P must have a procedure for electing officers.
•
–
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Clarify that the TAG comments on aspects of the draft that affect coexistence and the CA document.
Why do individuals mark comments as binding or non-binding since the algorithm does not utilize that information?
Comment 14 – Section 6.2.3
–
Clarify what to do with the comments that receive support of over 25% and less than 2/3.
Submission
Slide 2
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Comment 1 – Section 2
• Comment: The P&P must have a procedure for electing
officers.
• Resolution: Add: Chair and vice chair shall be elected by
majority vote at a Plenary session.
Submission
Slide 3
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Comment 2 – General
• State that a membership list will be maintained by the
TAG.
• Add: Chair is responsible for maintenance of the TAG
membership list.
Submission
Slide 4
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Comment 3 – General
• The P&P needs a section on rules for an appeal.
• Add:
– The membership may override a decision by the chair with a 75%
of members who vote “yes” or “no” on the appeal.
– An individual not satisfied by TAG resolution of an appeal shall be
referred to the Executive Committee of the LSMC.
Submission
Slide 5
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Comment 4 – Section 2.2
• Mat recommended that the vice chair be elected instead
of being appointed.
• Done
Submission
Slide 6
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Comment 5 – General
• The P&P needs to include an order of precedence of
other documents (802 P&P, Roberts Rules).
• Declined: this is specified by our chartering
organization pp5, section 1 of March 2005 802 P&P.
Submission
Slide 7
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Comment 6 – Section 1
• The section on the functions of the TAG is not
necessary. Check other WG P&P.
• Declined, this describes the scope of the group. It is
informative and helps the reader to set context. This is
just like section 2 of the 802 P&P that describes the
LMSC scope.
Submission
Slide 8
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Comment 7 – Section 5.1.2
• In section on interim sessions always say "interim
sessions" not just "sessions.“
• OK
Submission
Slide 9
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Comment 8 – Section 5.2
• Under maintenance of the P&P say it has to be at a
plenary or electronic ballot.
• Add: (3) Votes must be taken either at plenary
meetings or by electronic ballot.
Submission
Slide 10
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Comment 9 – Section 6
• Reference voting rules in 802 (in a meeting and
electronically).
• Declined: not clear what need there is for a reference to
LMSC rules when they have precedence.
Submission
Slide 11
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Comment 10 – Section 5.2
• Drop the rule that says the SEC needs to approve a
revised P&P.
• Accepted
Submission
Slide 12
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Comment 11 – Section 6.2
• What is a "Charter?“
• Accepted reworded:
– The TAG supports the creation…
Submission
Slide 13
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Comment 12 – Section 6
• Clarify that the TAG comments on aspects of the draft
that affect coexistence and the CA document.
• Declined: Section 1 states: “The TAG also votes as a
body on coexistence issues in wireless working group
letter ballots that are accompanied by coexistence
assurance (CA) documents.” Also, section 6.2.2 states:
“TAG members evaluate the CA document and draft to
determine the correctness or completeness of the CA
document.”
Submission
Slide 14
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Comment 13 – Section 6.2.3 and 6.2.4
• Why do individuals mark comments as binding or nonbinding since the algorithm does not utilize that
information?
• Declined: The TAG does use the attribute to determine
if the lack of satisfaction of the comment will prevent
TAG approval of a CA document.
Submission
Slide 15
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc
Sept 2005
doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0036r0
Comment 14 – Section 6.2.3
• Clarify what to do with the comments that receive
support of over 25% and less than 2/3.
• Accepted: will reword to make it clearer: “…it shall be
identified as a binding comment”
Submission
Slide 16
Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio Plc