Transcript IEEE C802.16m-09/0020

Interference Mitigation using Conjugate Data Repetition for Cell Edge Users
Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_0020
Date Submitted: 2009-01-05
Source:
Kiran Kuchi, J. Klutto Milleth, Vinod R, Dileep M K,
Divagar , Padmanabhan M S,
Bhaskar R, Giridhar K
CEWiT, India
Voice:
E-mail:
[email protected],in,
[email protected]
Venue:
San Diego, USA. In response to the TGm Call for Contributions and Comments IEEE 802.16m-08/052 for
Session 59
Topic TGm SDD - section 20 (Interference Mitigation)
Base Contribution: IEEE C80216m-09_0020
Purpose: Presentation associated with comment tgmsdd_Kuchi_Kiran.cmtb associated with section 20 in SDD
To discuss in TGm for appropriate action. Notice:
This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the “Source(s)” field
above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release:
The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards
publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to
reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16.
Patent Policy:
The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures:
<http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6> and <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3>.
Further information is located at <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html> and <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat >.
Presentation Outline
• Motivation
• Conjugate Data Repetition (CDR)
– Improving cell edge performance
• For both data and common control channels
• Conclusions
• Proposed SDD Text
7/26/2016
2
Motivation
• Limited Spectrum
– Frequency reuse-1 is the most likely deployment mode
– Typical urban cell size has 200-300 m radius
– Interference limited in both uplink and downlink
– Very low cell edge data rates
• Provide uniform data rates throughout the cell
• Improve control channel coverage
• High Spectrum Efficiency
7/26/2016
3
Interference Mitigation
• Poor cell edge SINR in reuse-1 networks
– Severe co-channel interference (CCI)
– Multiple CCI up to 4-dominant interferers
– Typically cell edge SINR is in the [-6 0] dB range
– Nearly 30% of users in the sector are cell edge
users
• Re-use 1:3 is spectrally inefficient
• Gain of soft re-use is not adequate for cell-edge
users
7/26/2016
4
Interference Suppression in Legacy
WiMax Systems
•
•
•
•
•
2-antenna MMSE receiver nulls a single interferer
Pre-whitened MLD can suppress two interferers
Use single stream transmission i.e., POD/CL-div
However, cell edge users typically have 3-4 dominant interferers
Existing solutions
– For low SINR cell edge users
– Rate ½ QPSK and bit-level data repetition up to 6-times
• Bit level data repetition is spectrally inefficient
7/26/2016
CEWiT Confidential Information
5
Conjugate Data Repetition (CDR)
•
•
•
BS-1
Signal repetition in time/frequency
Conjugate symbol repetition across
adjacent subcarriers or adjacent
OFDM symbols
All cells synchronously transmit
data in conjugate symbol pairs for
select users
–
•
•
•
The network assigns a CDR frequency
partition in which the RBs from different
BSs overlap
BS co-ordination not required
MMSE filtering of complex, and
complex-conjugate signals provides
a high IC gain
MMSE IC for each RB independently
7/26/2016
BS-2
F1
X1
F1
Y1
F2
X1*
F2
Y1*
F3
X2
F3
Y2
F4
X2*
F4
Y2*
F5
P1
F5
P2
F6
X3
F6
Y3
F7
X3*
F7
Y3*
F8
X4
F8
Y4
F9
X4*
F9
Y4*
6
Conjugate Data Repetition
•
Basic Idea
– Each BS transmits data in conjugate symbol pairs on a pair of subcarriers
– 1st BS transmits
y1  hx  gxˆ1  n1
( x , x* )
y2  hx*  gxˆ1*  n2
– 2nd BS transmits ( xˆ1 , xˆ1 )
*
– Complex-conjugation on
y2
y2*  h* x  g * xˆ1  n2*
– After complex de-conjugation, the receiver has two copies of signal and interference with
different channel states
•
Signal
( h , h* )
•
Interference
(g , g*)
*
– Receiver jointly filters ( y1 , y2 )
– Receiver doesnot estimate interference channel. MMSE needs interference covariance only
7/26/2016
7
CDR-MMSE Receiver
•
CDR signal model
M
y  h x d   g l xl  n
 ,
 l 1
Signal
 Noise
Interferen ce
•
CDR-MMSE filtering,
 h1 
h * 
h 1
 h2 
 *
h2 
 g l ,1 
g* 
l ,1
gl   
 g l ,2 
 * 
 g l ,2 
z  wy
w  (1  h * R i1n h ) 1 h * R i1n
•
•
•
In Rayleigh fading channels, conjugation ensures that, the signal and interference
channel vectors h , g1 , g 2 ,.., g M  are linearly independent with probability 1
Linear independence ensures that MMSE provides full IC up to 2N-1 interferers
MMSE filter is applied to each RB independently
–
7/26/2016
High IC gain for each RB
8
CDR Frequency Partition
CDR Partition
Sector 1
Sector 2
Sector 3
Low SINR users
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7/26/2016
High SINR users
The CDR region is dedicated for cell edge users
CDR implementation
•
In a frequency reuse-1 system, the SINR of all the users in a cell are ranked in
descending order
•
All cells in the network synchronously allocate the bottom x% users to a CDR
frequency partition which is fixed for the entire network
The system can also employ CDR, FFR, and Reuse-1 in multiple disjoint frequency partitions
CDR can be implemented using the existing FFR framework
Operator can define a CDR frequency partition
9
Proposed Downlink CDR RB
Structure
P
D
D*
D
D*
P
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
P
D
D*
D
D*
P
P
D
D*
D
D*
P
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
P
D
D*
D
D*
P
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
P
D
D*
D
D*
P
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
P
D
D*
D
D*
P
P
D
D*
D
D*
P
D
D*
D
D*
D
D*
P
D
D*
D
D*
P
• Transmission format with CDR in 18 X 6 resource block
•Same pilot pattern for 2 and 4-Tx antennas
•Pilot-on-Pilot mode
• OL transmit diversity: Phase-Offset-Diversity (a.k.a rank1- precoding)
• CL transmit diversity: single stream MIMO
7/26/2016
10
CDR-MMSE Pilot Processing
•
Use BPSK pilots and preferably pilot-on-pilot mode.
– Step 1: Collect complex, and complex conjugate copies of the received pilots
M
g x
y p  hx p 

l
p ,l
l 1



Pilot tones
 np

Noise
Pilot tones of CCI
– Step 2: Estimate channel coefficients of desired signal using 2D-MMSE
• Assume uniform power-delay-profile
• Knowledge of interferer pilot sequences improves 2D-MMSE
– Step 3: Subtract signal contribution from the received samples
M
e p   g l x p ,l  nˆ p
l 1
– Step 4: Estimate noise-plus-interference covariance matrix

*
ˆ
R
in  E e p e p

• Each RB can be processed independently to obtain high IC gain
7/26/2016
11
Conjugate Data Repetition
• With N rx antennas, CDR provides 2N observations
– CDR doubles the number of copies of signal
• Full interference suppression up to 2N-1 interferers
• Typically 3-4 dominant interferers in re-use 1:1 systems
– Use POD, CDR, MMSE for cell edge users
• With 2-receiver antennas CDR-MMSE nulls 3-interferers
• CDR does not require active cooperation between BSs
• CDR does not require channel estimates of interferers
7/26/2016
12
Conjugate Data Repetition Contd.
• In 16m DL, basic unit for transmission is 1 RB
• In the CDR region
– Data is repeated in conjugate pairs in each RB
– CDR RBs can be allocated in localized, block
distributed or tone-wise distributed modes
– Different sectors can use different permutations
– CDR receiver processes each RB independently
7/26/2016
13
Conjugate Data Repetition Contd.
• Compatibility with other cell edge features
– Works with CL-diversity
– Best band scheduling feasible
– Restrict MIMO modes to
• Rank-1 pre-coding (2D-POD) and CL-beam forming
7/26/2016
14
CDR Requirements
• Define a CDR resource block structure
• Pilot support
– 16 pilots per RB
– Pilot-on-Pilot
• MIMO support
– OL Rank-1 precoding
– CL-diversity
• CDR can be implemented using the FFR framework
– The operator can define a CDR frequency partition
7/26/2016
15
CDR Implementation
• Define a CDR frequency partition
• Allocate common control channels in CDR partition
• Allocate low SINR cell edge users in the remaining CDR
partition
• CDR frequency partition size can be decided by the operator
based on QOS requirements
7/26/2016
16
Conclusions
 Due to limited spectrum, frequency re-use 1:1 is the expected deployment
mode in India
 Very important to improve cell edge performance
 CDR and rank-1 transmission (POD/CL-div) ensures high cell edge
performance
 CDR and FFR complement each other
 CDR can be implemented along with FFR in a frequency partition
 High cell edge throughput
 Reliable control channel decoding
 Use CDR for both common control channel and cell edge data users
 Define a CDR RB structure
7/26/2016
17
Proposed SDD Text
• Add section 20.5
• 20.5 Interference mitigation using conjugate
data repetition (CDR)
– Interference mitigation using conjugate data
repetition (CDR) will be supported for cell edge
users for data and/or control channels. CDR
includes simple repetition of modulated data.
7/26/2016
18