Ms. Lucy Claridge, Head of Law, Minorities Rights Group International (MRGI) - Litigating the right to development
Download ReportTranscript Ms. Lucy Claridge, Head of Law, Minorities Rights Group International (MRGI) - Litigating the right to development
Litigating the Right to Development Lucy Claridge MRG Endorois decision Article 22 African Charter: (1) All peoples shall have the right to their economic, social and cultural development with due regard to their freedom and identity and in the equal enjoyment of the common heritage of mankind. (2) States shall have the duty, individually or collectively, to ensure the exercise of the right to development. Endorois decision • RTD is both constitutive and instrumental • Five main criteria: equitable, non-discriminatory, participatory, accountable and transparent, with equity and choice as overarching themes • Freedom of choice • Inadequate consultation and unequal bargaining power • Active, free and meaningful participation (para 277) (para 277) (para 278) (paras 281 , 282) (para 283, 289) Endorois decision • • • • Result of development should be empowerment Capabilities and choices must improve RTD is allied to effective participation Free, prior and informed consent – development/investment projects having major impact • Increase in well-being • State bears the burden for creating conditions favourable to a people’s development (para 283) (para 289) (para 291) (para 294) (para 298) After Endorois • justiciable • clear duty on national state • development not just economic and not just national development • process as well as outcome, with particular emphasis on participation • importance of choice and well-being After Endorois • RTD to be invoked more routinely • Duties on non-state actors (conservation/ tourism/ foreign investors)