JasonITPresentation.ppt

Download Report

Transcript JasonITPresentation.ppt

GLAST Background Analysis
An examination of events recorded
by the LAT prototype detector
The Experiment
The minitower was exposed to cosmic rays:
•
Muons
•
Electrons / positrons
•
Photons
•
Protons
(Muons are the dominant component of CR
flux at the Earth’s surface)
Raw data is saved to disk for later analysis
Another minitower was delivered a few
weeks ago and we did a preliminary
analysis on that data
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
2
Data Analysis Plan
• Characterize the signature produced by
cosmic ray muons
• Quantify the effects of a threshold change
• Investigate a correlation to angle of
incidence
• Do preliminary studies on the second
minitower ( if time permits)
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
3
Particle Interaction
Strip pitch
0.228 mm
1536 strips / layer
Si
Si thickness
0.400 mm
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
4
Particle Interaction
1 hit
E
Si
h+
e-
11 September 2003
Strip pitch
0.228 mm
GLAST Background Analysis
5
Particle Interaction
2 hits
E
Si
h+
e11 September 2003
h+
eGLAST Background Analysis
6
Particle Interaction
Electron/hole pairs can drift to a neighboring
strip if the track passes through a “diffusion zone”
E
Si
approx 6 mm
11 September 2003
Strip pitch
0.228 mm
GLAST Background Analysis
7
Particle Interaction
1 - 3 hits
E
Si
11 September 2003
h+e h+
e-
h+e
GLAST Background Analysis
8
Background
•
•
•
•
•
The detector is not 100% efficient
EM showering can occur at any time
Scattering may occur within the detector
Electrical noise can create “hits”
Angular incidence will affect hit clustering
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
9
Background Background
•
•
•
•
The detector is not 100% efficient
EM showering can occur at any time
Scattering may occur within the detector
Electrical noise can create “hits”
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
10
The First Minitower
We expected to see
hits in every SSD…
z
y
x
All coords.
in mm
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
11
The Second Minitower
New prototype gives
much better results!
PRELIMINARY DATA
z
y
x
All coords.
in mm
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
12
Threshold Levels
Data from first minitower
A higher threshold yields more one-hit events in lieu of
events with multiple hits. This is what we expected.
What else is affected by the change? Efficiency!
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
13
Angular correlation
A track with a given
zenith angle can hit
one or multiple
strips depending on
its azimuthal angle
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
14
Angular correlation
A track with a given
zenith angle can hit
one or multiple
strips depending on
its azimuthal angle
11 September 2003
Dq
GLAST Background Analysis
Restricting the
azimuthal angle to a
small “pie slice” we
attain events in an
approximately twodimensional plane
15
Angular correlation
Dq
A track with a given
zenith angle can hit
one or multiple
strips depending on
its azimuthal angle
In each event, the bottom
layer will experience low
hit multiplicity…
11 September 2003
Restricting the
azimuthal angle to a
small “pie slice” we
attain events in an
approximately twodimensional plane
the top layer will show
a correlation between
zenith angle and strips hit
GLAST Background Analysis
16
Angular correlation
f
tan f = l / t
t
l
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
17
Data vs Monte Carlo
Data from first minitower
Cuts on experimental data:
• Single track events
~30% difference
• Single cluster per layer
Discrepancy
• Projected track is within 8
degrees from Y axis
• Number of strips hit in
each X layer averaged by
zenith angle
Reconstructed direction (deg)
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
18
Improved Monte Carlo
Data from first minitower
Features added to Monte
Carlo:
• Path length threshold
(128 mm = 0.32 MIPS)
~10% difference
Reconstructed direction (deg)
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
19
Further improvements
Data from first minitower
Features added to Monte
Carlo:
• Path length threshold
(128 mm = 0.32 MIPS)
Most points fit
within error bars!
•Diffusion zones (7 mm)
Reconstructed direction (deg)
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
20
Preliminary Comparisons
Data from second minitower!
Preliminary data from
new tracker yield a much
better fit!
PRELIMINARY DATA
Threshold in Monte
Carlo matches that used
during data taking
(114 mm = 0.29 MIPS)
Reconstructed direction (deg)
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
21
Summary
• Our expectations (threshold, geometry) have been
validated
• A simpler model (no complicated physics!) can be
easier to understand
• A simple model can represent a complicated
process
Thank you Xin Chen,
Tune Kamae and Eduardo do Couto e Silva !!!
11 September 2003
GLAST Background Analysis
22