Transcript 下載/瀏覽

Investigation of a Novel Five-Phase
Modular Permanent-Magnet In-Wheel
Motor
Ping Zheng , Yi Sui , Jing Zhao , Chengde Tong , T.A. Lipo , Fellow, IEEE, and Aimeng Wang
Department of Electrical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150080 China
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison,
WI, 53706 USA Department of Electrical Engineering, North China Electric Power University,
Baoding, 071003, China
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 47, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2011, Page(s): 4084 ~ 4087
Adviser :Ming–Shyan Wang
Student :Ming- Yi
Student ID:
Chiou
Ma120122
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
Outline
• I. INTRODUCTION
• II. THE CHOICE OF
ELECTROMAGNETIC SCHEMES
• III. DESIGN OF FIVE-PHASE FAULTTOLERANT MOTOR
• IV. FAULT-TOLERANT ABILITY
• V. CONCLUSION
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
2
I. INTRODUCTION
THE permanent-magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs) are more
and more widely , owing to advantages of high efficiency and
power density compared. traditional induction machines. However,
for applications that require extremely high reliability, such as
military equipments, aircrafts and electric vehicles, the traditional
three-phase PMSMs are confronted with severe challenge, so some
researchers turn to the investigation of multiphase PMSM systems
for better fault tolerant capability.
Generally, the torque of traditional three-phase PMSM drive
system will decreases dramatically in case of major failures,
especially for in-wheel motor driven vehicles . multiphase motors
are valuable , they are reliable and can perform well with relatively
low technology support . Compared with traditional three-phase
PMSMs, the multiphase fault-tolerant PMSM could greatly increase
the reliability and fault-tolerant capability of the electric vehicle
drive system . In this paper, analysis and finite- element method
(FEM) simulations are made to a novel five-phase modular
permanent-magnet in-wheel motor.
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
3
II. THE CHOICE OF
ELECTROMAGNETIC SCHEMES
Compared with traditional three-phase PMSMs, multiphase
PMSMs have some unique characteristics, such as complete
electric isolation, effective magnetic isolation, complete physical
isolation between phases, effective thermal isolation, the ability
to limit short-circuit current between phases, and the ability to
tolerate short circuit between turns. So in order to design a
multiphase PMSM with fault-tolerant ability, all of the previously
mentioned characteristics must be considered.
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
4
1) The Choice of Phase Number:
The multiphase PMSM should continue to produce the rated power in case of
single phase failure. Hence, if the phase number of the machine is N, the power of
each phase should be designed to be 1/(N-1) times of the rated power. If less phase
number is employed, the power rating of one single phase should be higher. For
example, if the machine is four-phase PMSM, the power of each phase should be
over-rated by about 33.3%, while for the traditional three-phase PMSM, it should be
50%. In order to realize electric isolation between phases, each phase is driven by a
single four-switch inverter, so the number of the power components increases with
the phase number. Moreover, the probability of phase failure also grows with the
increase of phase number. To choose appropriate phase number, the complexity,
cost and fault-tolerant ability of the system need to be considered. In this paper, the
five-phase scheme is employed and the over-rated power of one phase is 25% of
normal rating.
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
5
2) The Choice of Slot/Pole Combination:
Each phase of the motor should be an independent module. Compared
with double-layer windings, the winding factor of single-layer armature winding
is smaller. Moreover, the harmonic components of back electromotive force
(EMF) and the magneto motive force (MMF) of single-layer windings is higher,
so the torque pulsation and the noise of the motor is quite severe. Theoretically,
the number of the stator slots is integer times of five. Considering unilateral
magnetic force, even number of slots should be preferred. Due to the low
winding factor of the armature winding, pole number should be close but not
equal to the slots number. If the slots number is Q, the poles pairs is p and n is
an integer larger than zero, then the combination could be calculated by (1) and
(2):
Considering the in-wheel drive application, the numbers of slots and poles are
designed to be 40 and 42 respectively with the armature winding factor of 0.985.
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
6
III. DESIGN OF FIVE-PHASE FAULTTOLERANT MOTOR
A. Model Design of the Motor
In this section, 40-slot concentrated winding stator
is investigated. There are four coils for each phase
and the electrical angle shift of adjacent phases
winding is 72 . The tooth between adjacent phases
is called fault-tolerant tooth. Considering actual
requirement, outer-rotor structure is employed and
Nd-Fe-B-45SH is selected as permanent magnet
material. A novel five-phase fault-tolerant PMSM
was designed here, and the main dimensions of the
five-phase motor are listed in Table I. The stator
slots were designed deep enough to obtain large
inductance. Magnetic path of the yoke is short, so
the magnetic flux density of yoke is designed to be
relatively higher.
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
7
B. Shape of the Fault-Tolerant Tooth
In this paper, only width of the fault-tolerant teeth is investigated, as
shown in Table II. Results indicate that 12 mm is the optimal width of faulttolerant teeth, so 12 mm is selected for the following analysis. Fig. 1 shows
the finite element model of the in-wheel motor with 12 kW rated power and
450 rpm rated speed.
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
8
C ‧ Electromagnetic Performance of the Motor
Fig. 2 shows the no-load back EMF of the motor.
The amplitude of the back EMF is 288 V, and the
waveform is approximately trapezoidal. The rated
torque of the motor, denoted by TN , is 254.4Nm .
Fig. 3 shows the cogging torque of the motor. It can
be seen that fractional slots are employed in the
fault-tolerant motor to minimize the cogging torque.
In Fig. 4, the motor was fed with rated current. It is
observed that the average torque Tav is 260.3Nm
larger than TN , Due to the increase of phase
number, pulsation of the load torque is only 1.23%.
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
9
IV. FAULT-TOLERANT ABILITY
In this section, the following failures are considered:
1) Open Circuit of One Phase:
2) Open Circuit of Two Adjacent Phases:
3) Open Circuit of Two Non-Adjacent Phase:
4) One Phase Short Circuit:
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
10
1) Open Circuit of One Phase:
Suppose a-phase is open circuit, the current of other healthy phases
should be increased to 1.25 times of the normal value to provide the same
torque. In Fig. 5, the average torque value is 240Nm , basically meeting
the requirement of torque. In case of a-phase open-circuit, the magnetic
field is asymmetric, so the pulsation of load torque is larger with the value
of 28.4%. Increasing the current amplitude of other healthy phases could
compensate the output torque given the loss of one phase. Current angles
of healthy phases can be controlled to reduce torque pulsation. Besides,
currents of healthy phases should have the same amplitude value and
maintain symmetrical. some typical equations are given by(3):
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
11
Fig. 6 shows the torque behavior with the 36 angle shift of
current vector from phase B to phase A. The average torque
value is 239 , with 10.5% pulsation. The average torque is a
slightly decreased, but the torque pulsation is reduced
dramatically, which demonstrates that the motor can work well
under condition of one phase open circuit.
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
12
2) Open Circuit of Two Adjacent Phases:
In this section, suppose A, B phases are open circuit. Fig. 7
shows the torque performance with three healthy phases fed
with symmetric current. The amplitude of current is 1.25 times
of rated value leading to reduced average torque of about
131.7 Nm with pulsation of 21.2%.
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
13
3) Open Circuit of Two Non-Adjacent Phase:
In this section, suppose A, C phase is open continuously due to fault.
Fig. 8 shows the torque performance with three-phase fed with
symmetric current. The amplitude of current is 1.25 times of the rated
with the value of 20.83 A. The average torque value is 168 Nm, with
26.2% pulsation. The results indicate that the motor could survive two
non-adjacent open-circuit conditions, with a little torque reduced. The
results of above analysis indicate that the machine can survive with
acceptable value and pulsation under open circuit fault of two phases.
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
14
4) One Phase Short Circuit:
In this section, suppose a-phase is in short circuit fault. In
this case, currents of other healthy phases are controlled
to be 1.25 times of the rated value to maintain torque
output. Fig. 9 shows the current of short-circuit phase.
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
15
V. CONCLUSION
•
1) For five-phase fault-tolerant PMSM, the slot number is
recommended to be integer times of 10, and the pole number
is recommended to be the slot number 2.
•
2) The 40-slot/42-pole combination is selected for the wheel
driven application in this paper, and the electromagnetic design
shows that it can meets the requirements in EV application.
•
3) The fault-tolerant tooth was optimized with FEM, and better torque
curve is achieved.
4) The fault-tolerant ability was analyzed under four fault conditions;
research results indicate that the drive system can survive these
fault conditions.
•
5) Through proper current control strategies, different fault tolerant
performances can be obtained.
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
16
REFERENCES
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
[1] E. Chiricozzi and M. Villani, “Analysis of fault-tolerant five-phase IPM synchronous motor,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Industrial
Electronics,Cambridge, Nov. 2008, pp. 759–763.
[2] B. C.Mecrow, A. G. Jack, and J. Haylock, “Fault tolerant permanent magnet machine drives,” in Proc. IEE Electric Power Applicat.,
Newcastle, Nov. 1996, vol. 143, pp. 433–437.
[3] S. Green, D. J. Atkinson, A. G. Jack, and B. C.Mecrow, “Sensorless operation of a fault tolerant PM drive,” in IEE Elect. Power
Applicat., London, Mar. 2003, vol. 150, pp. 117–125.
[4] L. Parsa and H. A. Toliyat, “Five-phase permanent-magnet motor drives,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat., vol. 41, pp. 30–37, Jan. 2005.
[5] E. Levi, M. Jones, S. Vukosavic, A. Iqbal, and H. Toliyat, “Modeling, control, and experimental investigation of a five-phase seriesconnected two-motor drive with single inverter supply,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 54, pp. 1504–1516, Jun. 2007.
[6] A.G. Jack, B.C.Mecrow, and J. Haylock, “A comparative study of permanent magnet and switched reluctance motors for high
performancefault-tolerant applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat., vol. 32, pp. 892–895, Jul. 1996.
[7] M. T. Abolhassani and H. A. Toliyat, “Fault-tolerant interior-permanent- magnet machines for hybrid electric vehicle applications,” IEEE
Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 56, pp. 1146–1152, Jul. 2007.
[8] W. Ouyang and T. A. Lipo, “Modular permanent magnet machine with fault tolerant capability,” in Proc. Applied Power Electronics
Conference and Expo., Washington, DC, Feb. 2009, pp. 930–937.
[9] L. Parsa, N. Kim, and H. A. Toliyat, “Field weakening operation of a high torque density five phase permanent magnet motor drive,”
Elect. Machines Drives IEEE, vol. 15, pp. 1507–1512, May 2005.
[10] L. Parsa andH.A. Toliyat, “Five-phase permanent magnetmotor drives for ship propulsion applications,” in Proc. IEEE Electric Ship
Technologies Symp., Jul. 2005, vol. 23, pp. 371–378.
[11] P. Zheng, J. Zhao, J. Q. Han, J. Wang, Z. Y. Yao, and R. R. Liu, “Optimization of the magnetic pole shape of a permanent-magnet
synchronous motor,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 43, pp. 2531–2533, Jun. 2007.
[12] N. Bianchi, S. Bolognani, and M. D. Pré, “Impact of stator winding of a five-phase permanent-magnet motor on post-fault operations,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 55, pp. 1978–1987, May 2008.
[13] N. Bianchi, S. Bolognani, and M. D. Pré, “Strategies for the fault-tolerant current control of a five-phase permanent-magnet motor,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat., vol. 43, pp. 960–970, Jul. 2007.
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
17
THE END THANKS
Renewable & Intelligent Power System Lab.
18