XM - European Parliament

Download Report

Transcript XM - European Parliament

European Parliament

2014-2019

Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

2015/2103(INL)

7.9.2016

AMENDMENTS 1 - 67

Draft opinion Dita Charanzová

(PE585.496v01-00) Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL))

XM

AM\1103635XM.docx

United in diversity

PE589.122v01-00

XM

AM_Com_NonLegOpinion

XM

PE589.122v01-00 2/2 AM\1103635XM.docx

Amendment 1 Notis Marias Draft opinion Recital A

Draft opinion

λαμβάνοντας υπόψη ότι η ρομποτική

μπορεί

στον μετασχηματισμό προς το καλύτερο της κοινωνίας μας· να διαδραματίσει ρόλο

λαμβάνοντας υπόψη ότι η ρομποτική και η τεχνητή νοημοσύνη μπορούν να οδηγήσουν σε καινοτομίες και νέα επιχειρηματικά μοντέλα, και ότι η Ένωση πρέπει να ενστερνιστεί τις εξελίξεις στον τομέα αυτό για να προωθήσει την ψηφιακή ενιαία αγορά·

Amendment

λαμβάνοντας υπόψη ότι η ρομποτική

θα μπορούσε

να διαδραματίσει ρόλο στον μετασχηματισμό προς το καλύτερο της κοινωνίας μας· Or. el

Amendment 2 Philippe Juvin Draft opinion Recital A

Draft opinion

considérant que la robotique peut contribuer à transformer notre société pour un mieux ; que la robotique et l'intelligence artificielle peuvent déboucher sur des innovations et de nouveaux modèles d'entreprise et que l'Union doit profiter des évolutions dans ce domaine pour faire progresser le marché unique numérique ;

Amendment

considérant que la robotique peut contribuer à transformer notre société pour un mieux ; que la robotique et l'intelligence artificielle

participent activement à la numérisation de l'économie dans un grand nombre de secteurs tels que l'industrie, la construction ou l'aéronautique et

peuvent déboucher sur des innovations et de nouveaux modèles d'entreprise et que l'Union doit profiter des évolutions dans ce domaine pour faire progresser le marché unique numérique ; Or. fr AM\1103635XM.docx

3/3 PE589.122v01-00

XM

Amendment 3 Jiří Maštálka Draft opinion Recital A

Draft opinion

vzhledem k tomu, že robotika může hrát roli v procesu přeměny naší společnosti na vyšší úroveň; vzhledem k tomu, že robotika a umělá inteligence mohou vést k inovacím a novým obchodním modelům a že Unie musí držet krok s vývojem v této oblasti, aby pokročila s vytvářením jednotného digitálního trhu;

Amendment

rozvoj technologií sice roste, ale naše sociální systémy nemohou tak rychle reagovat; vzhledem k tomu, že

Or. cs

Amendment 4 Vicky Ford Draft opinion Recital A

Draft opinion

can

DSM; whereas robotics can play a role in transforming our society for the better; whereas robotics and artificial intelligence lead to innovations and new business models, and the Union must embrace developments in this area to advance the

Amendment

DSM;

whereas robotics are not new;

whereas robotics can

and do

play a role in transforming our society for the better; whereas robotics and artificial intelligence lead to innovations and new business models, and the Union must embrace developments in this area to advance the Or. en

Amendment 5 Virginie Rozière

XM

PE589.122v01-00 4/4 AM\1103635XM.docx

Draft opinion Recital A

Draft opinion

considérant que la robotique peut contribuer à transformer notre société

pour un mieux profiter

; que la robotique et l'intelligence artificielle peuvent déboucher sur des innovations et de nouveaux modèles d'entreprise et que l'Union doit des évolutions dans ce domaine pour faire progresser le marché unique numérique ;

Amendment

considérant que la robotique peut contribuer à transformer notre société ; que la robotique et l'intelligence artificielle peuvent déboucher sur des innovations et de nouveaux modèles d'entreprise et que l'Union doit

se saisir

ce domaine pour faire progresser le marché unique numérique ; des évolutions dans Or. fr

Amendment 6 Jiří Maštálka Draft opinion Recital A a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Aa.

vzhledem k tomu, že rozvoj robotiky a umělé inteligence může současně vést k tomu, že práci, kterou dnes vykonávají lidé, převezmou do značné míry roboti a existují obavy, že v oblasti robotiky nebude možné zajistit tolik pracovních míst, kolik jich podle očekávání zanikne, je tedy nutné odpovědět na otázky, jak využít potenciál uvolněných lidských zdrojů a jak zajistit lidem důstojné životní podmínky s přihlédnutím k omezenému počtu pracovních příležitostí;

Or. cs

Amendment 7 Andreas Schwab

AM\1103635XM.docx

5/5 PE589.122v01-00

XM

Draft opinion Recital A a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Aa.

whereas in particular service robots are soon to be considered fully operational in sectors currently not accessible for industrial robots such as homes, offices and hospitals where they will be used to generate benefits for citizens, employees, and patients, as well as for general productivity;

Or. en

Amendment 8 Marc Tarabella Draft opinion Recital A a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

A bis. considérant que malgré les avantages indéniables apportés par la robotique, cela risque d'entraîner une modification du marché du travail car des tâches attribuées jusqu'alors aux êtres humains seront exécutées par des robots ;

Or. fr

XM

Amendment 9 Virginie Rozière Draft opinion Recital A a (new)

Draft opinion

PE589.122v01-00 6/6

Amendment

A bis. considérant que les robots fonctionnent de plus en plus à proximité de l'homme, les aspects de sécurité et de responsabilité devraient être les

AM\1103635XM.docx

préoccupations centrales de toute réglementation future ;

Or. fr

Amendment 10 Enrico Gasbarra Draft opinion Recital A a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

A bis. considerando l'importante incremento nella vendita e produzione di robot tra 2010 e 2014, pari a quasi il 30 percento per il solo anno 2014, con particolare riferimento all'industria elettronica;

Or. it

Amendment 11 Philippe Juvin Draft opinion Recital A a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

A bis. considérant que le marché des services de robotique est en constante croissance ;

Or. fr

Amendment 12 Notis Marias Draft opinion Recital B

AM\1103635XM.docx

7/7 PE589.122v01-00

XM

Draft opinion

το 2025 λαμβάνοντας υπόψη ότι η προστιθέμενη αξία από τον ψηφιακό μετασχηματισμό της ευρωπαϊκής μεταποιητικής βιομηχανίας,

αντιπροσωπεύει το 15% του ΑΕΠ της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης,

ανέρχεται σε 1,25 τρισεκατομμύρια ευρώ

Ευρώπη

1 ·

που

θα μπορούσε να

, και ότι η έγκριση αυτόνομων και ρομποτικών τεχνολογιών θα μπορούσε να έχει ως αποτέλεσμα ανταγωνιστικό πλεονέκτημα για την

__________________ 1 Μελέτη STOA, Διερεύνηση επιστημονικών προοπτικών, Παράρτημα 1, σ. 37.

Amendment

λαμβάνοντας υπόψη ότι η προστιθέμενη αξία από τον ψηφιακό μετασχηματισμό της ευρωπαϊκής μεταποιητικής βιομηχανίας, θα μπορούσε να ανέρχεται σε 1,25 τρισεκατομμύρια ευρώ το 2025 1 · __________________ Μελέτη STOA, Διερεύνηση επιστημονικών προοπτικών, Παράρτημα 1, σ. 37.

Or. el

XM

Amendment 13 Virginie Rozière Draft opinion Recital B

Draft opinion

considérant que la valeur ajoutée de la transformation numérique de l'industrie manufacturière européenne, qui représente 15 % du PIB de l'Union, pourrait s'élever à 1 250 milliards d'EUR en 2025 concurrentiel pour l’Europe ; 1 et que l'adoption de technologies robotiques et autonomes pourrait entraîner un avantage __________________ STOA, étude scientifique prospective, annexe 1, p. 37.

Amendment

matière d’emploi ;

1 et que l'adoption de technologies robotiques et autonomes pourrait entraîner un avantage

considérant également que les technologies robotiques autonomes ont des conséquences en

__________________ 1 STOA, étude scientifique prospective, annexe 1, p. 37.

PE589.122v01-00 8/8 AM\1103635XM.docx

Or. fr 1

Amendment 14 Philippe Juvin Draft opinion Recital B

Draft opinion

Amendment

contribuer à accroître la production industrielle européenne et

entraîner un avantage concurrentiel

majeur

pour l’Europe ; __________________ 1 STOA, étude scientifique prospective, annexe 1, p. 37.

Or. fr

Amendment 15 Enrico Gasbarra Draft opinion Recital B a (new)

Draft opinion

AM\1103635XM.docx

9/9

Amendment

B bis. considerando i benefici in termini di efficienza e risparmio che lo sviluppo della robotica può comportare per il mercato interno, in particolare nei settori dei trasporti, della sanità e dell'assistenza, nonché la possibilità di ridurre il rischio di esposizione umana a condizioni nocive e pericolose;

Or. it PE589.122v01-00

XM

Amendment 16 Marietje Schaake Draft opinion Recital B a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Ba.

whereas machine learning offers enormous economic and innovative benefits for society by vastly improving the ability to analyse data, while also raising challenges to ensure non discrimination, due process, access to information and comprehensibility in decision-making processes;

Or. en

Amendment 17 Julia Reda, Jan Philipp Albrecht Draft opinion Recital B a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

Ba.

whereas developments in the field of medical applications, such as robotic prostheses and implants, make persons carrying them vitally reliant on the availability of maintenance, repairs, and enhancements;

Or. en

Amendment 18 Virginie Rozière Draft opinion Recital B a (new)

XM

PE589.122v01-00 10/10 AM\1103635XM.docx

Draft opinion Amendment

B bis. considérant que le développement de la robotique et de l'intelligence artificielle ont des conséquences sur l'emploi, et donc sur les mécanismes de financement des régimes de sécurité sociale et de retraite ;

Or. fr

Amendment 19 Enrico Gasbarra Draft opinion Recital B b (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

B ter. considerando che la protezione dei dati e il rispetto della proprietà intellettuale devono essere oggetto di considerazione nello sviluppo di tutti i nuovi paradigmi tecnologici e produttivi;

Or. it

Amendment 20 Enrico Gasbarra Draft opinion Recital B c (new)

Draft opinion

AM\1103635XM.docx

11/11

Amendment

B quater.

considerando che molti paesi terzi hanno assunto orientamenti e legislazioni adeguate sulla robotica e che anche alcuni Stati membri hanno avviato riflessioni specifiche in materia;

Or. it PE589.122v01-00

XM

Amendment 21 Notis Marias Draft opinion Paragraph 1

Draft opinion

τονίζει ότι είναι απαραίτητη μια προσέγγιση σε επίπεδο ΕΕ για να αποφευχθεί ο κατακερματισμός της εσωτερικής αγοράς και, ταυτόχρονα, υπογραμμίζει τη σημασία της αρχής της αμοιβαίας αναγνώρισης στη διασυνοριακή χρήση των ρομπότ και των ρομποτικών συστημάτων· υπενθυμίζει ότι οι δοκιμές, η πιστοποίηση και η έγκριση κυκλοφορίας στην αγορά δεν απαιτείται να πραγματοποιηθούν παρά μόνο σε ένα μέλος· διαγράφεται

Amendment

Or. el

XM

Amendment 22 Virginie Rozière Draft opinion Paragraph 1

Draft opinion

souligne la nécessité d'une stratégie à l'échelle européenne pour éviter la fragmentation du marché intérieur et insiste parallèlement sur l'importance du principe de reconnaissance mutuelle dans l'utilisation transfrontalière de robots et de systèmes robotiques ; rappelle que les essais, la certification et l'autorisation de mise sur le marché ne

doivent

avoir lieu que dans un seul État membre ; PE589.122v01-00 12/12

Amendment

devraient

avoir lieu que dans un seul État membre

l'ordre public

;

, dans la mesure où les robots et systèmes robotiques ne portent pas atteinte à

Or. fr AM\1103635XM.docx

Amendment 23 Vicky Ford Draft opinion Paragraph 1

Draft opinion

Stresses that an EU-level approach

is needed to avoid

approval fragmentation in the internal market, and at the same time underlines the importance of the mutual recognition principle in the cross-border use of robots and robotic systems; recalls that testing, certification and market

is only necessary

in a single Member State;

Amendment

Stresses that an EU-level approach

can facilitate development by avoiding

fragmentation in the internal market, and at the same time underlines the importance of the mutual recognition principle in the cross-border use of robots and robotic systems; recalls that testing, certification and market approval

should only be required

in a single Member State; Or. en

Amendment 24 Julia Reda, Jan Philipp Albrecht Draft opinion Paragraph 1

Draft opinion

Stresses that an EU-level approach is needed to avoid fragmentation in the internal market

underlines the importance of the mutual recognition principle in the cross-border use of robots and robotic systems that testing, certification and market approval is only necessary in a single Member State; , and at the same time

;

recalls

Amendment

Stresses that an EU-level approach is needed to avoid fragmentation in the internal market

; stresses that this should be supplemented by effective market surveillance which includes access to software where necessary, and that market surveillance authorities need to be equipped with strict legal remedies and powers to recall and sanction infractions;

Or. en

Amendment 25 Maria Grapini

AM\1103635XM.docx

13/13 PE589.122v01-00

XM

Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

1 a.

subliniază importanța luării de măsuri pentru sprijinirea IMM-urilor și a start-up-urilor din domeniul roboticii care creează noi segmente de piață în acest sector sau care utilizează roboții în activitatea lor;

Or. ro

Amendment 26 Philippe Juvin Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

1 bis. encourage le développement d'une stratégie européenne ambitieuse pour la recherche et l'innovation en robotique afin de développer au mieux son potentiel pour la croissance et l'emploi en Europe ;

Or. fr

XM

Amendment 27 Vicky Ford Draft opinion Paragraph 2

Draft opinion

with Believes that harmonised standardisation

for robotics

and calls on the Commission to engage

international standardisation bodies to

work further on improving is necessary

standards

in this field

; PE589.122v01-00 14/14

Amendment

Recognises that significant numbers of international standards exist and are applied across the industry, which address interoperability and safety; recognises that standards should respond to a demonstrated need from the industry; considers that further development of

AM\1103635XM.docx

industry standards helpful for new industrial and private applications; encourages European and

international standardisation bodies to

review their own future development where a need is shown

; for robotics standards

may prove and consider

Or. en

Amendment 28 Enrico Gasbarra Draft opinion Paragraph 2

Draft opinion

reputa necessaria la normazione armonizzata della robotica e invita la Commissione a collaborare con gli organismi internazionali di normazione ai fini di un ulteriore miglioramento delle norme in questo settore;

Amendment

tecnologiche; ritiene che il mercato interno e l'industria europea trarrebbero beneficio dalla definizione rapida di un quadro normativo e regolamentare uniforme sulla robotica, in modo da dotare gli Stati membri di standard comuni efficaci e moderni che possano anticipare le ulteriori evoluzioni

Or. it

Amendment 29 Andreas Schwab Draft opinion Paragraph 2

Draft opinion

Believes that harmonised standardisation for robotics is necessary AM\1103635XM.docx

15/15

Amendment

Believes that harmonised standardisation for robotics is necessary

PE589.122v01-00

XM

and calls on the Commission to engage with international standardisation bodies to work further on improving standards in this field;

order to foster innovation,

and calls on the Commission to engage with international standardisation bodies to work further on improving standards in this field;

developing standards on robotics; welcomes in this respect the setting up of special technical committees, such as the ISO/TC 299 Robotics, dedicated exclusively to

Or. en

Amendment 30 Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová Draft opinion Paragraph 2

Draft opinion

field; Believes that harmonised standardisation for robotics is necessary and calls on the Commission to engage with international standardisation bodies to work further on improving standards in this

Amendment

standardisation for robotics is necessary and Believes that harmonised

should be part of the EU's standardisation priorities;

calls on the Commission to engage

more actively

with international standardisation bodies

partners

standards in this field;

and improve cooperation with international

to work further on improving Or. en

XM

Amendment 31 Philippe Juvin Draft opinion Paragraph 2

Draft opinion

estime que la normalisation harmonisée pour la robotique est nécessaire et demande à la Commission de collaborer avec les organisations internationales de normalisation pour poursuivre les travaux sur l'amélioration des normes dans ce PE589.122v01-00 16/16

Amendment

estime que la normalisation harmonisée pour la robotique est nécessaire

développer des standards communs, sûrs et de haut niveau dans ce domaine d'avenir ; souligne qu'il est essentiel de

et demande à la Commission de AM\1103635XM.docx

domaine ; collaborer avec les organisations internationales de normalisation pour poursuivre les travaux sur l'amélioration des normes dans ce domaine ; Or. fr

Amendment 32 Virginie Rozière Draft opinion Paragraph 2

Draft opinion

Amendment

estime que la normalisation harmonisée pour la robotique

et l'intelligence artificielle consommateurs

; est nécessaire et demande à la Commission de des normes dans ce domaine

continuer à

collaborer avec les organisations internationales de normalisation pour poursuivre les travaux sur l'amélioration

et garantir le plus haut niveau de protection des

Or. fr

Amendment 33 Notis Marias Draft opinion Paragraph 2

Draft opinion

πιστεύει ότι είναι

απαραίτητη

η εναρμονισμένη τυποποίηση για τη ρομποτική και καλεί την Επιτροπή να συνεργαστεί με διεθνείς οργανισμούς τυποποίησης προκειμένου να συνεχίσει την περαιτέρω βελτίωση των προτύπων σε αυτόν τον τομέα· AM\1103635XM.docx

17/17

Amendment

πιστεύει ότι είναι αυτόν τον τομέα·

θεμιτή

XM

Amendment 34 Enrico Gasbarra Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

2 bis. considera essenziale che l'Unione europea indichi un quadro normativo ispirato a principi etici che possano riflettere la complessità della materia della robotica e delle sue numerose implicazioni sociali;

Or. it

XM

Amendment 35 Jiří Maštálka Draft opinion Paragraph 3

Draft opinion

má za to, že roboti vyvinutí pro výrobu i osobní užívání by měly podléhat předpisům upravujícím bezpečnost výrobků a ochranu spotřebitele; je přesvědčen, že by se každá politika v oblasti robotiky měla věnovat otázkám ochrany údajů

odpovědnosti

kybernetické bezpečnosti; PE589.122v01-00 18/18

Amendment

má za to, že roboti vyvinutí pro výrobu i osobní užívání by měly podléhat předpisům upravujícím bezpečnost výrobků a ochranu spotřebitele

zvláštních bezpečnostních záruk a certifikačních postupů

; je přesvědčen, že by se každá politika v oblasti robotiky měla věnovat otázkám ochrany

na základě osobních

údajů

a soukromí, práva duševního vlastnictví, občanskoprávní

odpovědnosti

výrobu a používání robotů, , zejména odpovědnosti za škodu a její náhradu, etického a morálního rámce pro vývoj,

kybernetické bezpečnosti

, registrace pokročilých robotů a dopadu robotiky na životní prostředí, a zejména by se měla zaměřit na otázku zaměstnanosti;

Or. cs AM\1103635XM.docx

Amendment 36 Jiří Pospíšil Draft opinion Paragraph 3

Draft opinion

Considers that

robots developed for

both manufacturing and individual use should be subject to product safety and consumer protection rules;

believes that issues of

data protection, liability and cybersecurity

should be addressed in any policy on robotics

;

Amendment

Considers that both manufacturing and individual use subject to product safety and consumer protection rules

standards and addressing the heightened risk of accidents resulting from interaction with, or working in proximity to, humans the current EU legal framework on

protection, liability and cybersecurity

the dynamic flow of data that may arise when robots become more autonomous and which is based on existing technical standards;

;

of robots

should be

ensuring minimum safety points to the need to adjust

data

Or. en

Amendment 37 Maria Grapini Draft opinion Paragraph 3

Draft opinion

consideră că atât roboții creați pentru procesele de producție, cât și cei creați pentru uz individual trebuie să respecte normele privind siguranța produselor și protecția consumatorilor; consideră că orice politică privind robotica trebuie să trateze chestiunile legate de protecția datelor, răspunderea și securitatea informatică; AM\1103635XM.docx

19/19

Amendment

atrage atenția asupra importanței pe care o au regulile de testare a modului de reacție a roboților asupra protecției consumatorilor;

PE589.122v01-00

XM

Or. ro

Amendment 38 Kaja Kallas, Dita Charanzová Draft opinion Paragraph 3

Draft opinion

Considers that robots developed for both manufacturing and individual use should be subject to product safety and consumer protection rules; believes that issues of data protection, liability and cybersecurity should be addressed in any policy on robotics;

Amendment

highlights the importance of privacy and security by design in the development of robots;

Or. en

Amendment 39 Virginie Rozière Draft opinion Paragraph 3

Draft opinion

considère que les robots mis au point tant pour la fabrication que pour un usage individuel devraient être soumis à des règles en matière de sécurité des produits et de protection des consommateurs ; estime que toute politique en matière de robotique devrait tenir compte des questions de protection des données, de responsabilité et de cybersécurité ;

Amendment

d'éthique,

de protection des données, de responsabilité

, des conséquences sur l'emploi et la formation,

et de cybersécurité ; Or. fr PE589.122v01-00 20/20 AM\1103635XM.docx

Amendment 40 Andreas Schwab Draft opinion Paragraph 3

Draft opinion

Amendment

Considers that robots developed for both manufacturing and individual use should be subject to product safety and consumer protection rules; believes that issues of data protection

, including third party data

robotics; , liability and cybersecurity should be addressed in any policy on Or. en

Amendment 41 Vicky Ford Draft opinion Paragraph 3

Draft opinion

Amendment

Considers that robots developed for both manufacturing and individual use should be subject to product safety and consumer protection rules

where appropriate

robotics; ; believes that issues of data protection, liability and cybersecurity should be addressed in any policy on Or. en

Amendment 42 Notis Marias Draft opinion Paragraph 3

AM\1103635XM.docx

21/21 PE589.122v01-00

XM

Draft opinion

θεωρεί ότι τα ρομπότ που αναπτύχθηκαν τόσο για χρήση στον τομέα της παραγωγής αγαθών όσο και για προσωπική χρήση θα πρέπει να υπόκεινται σε κανόνες σχετικά με την ασφάλεια των προϊόντων και την προστασία των καταναλωτών· πιστεύει ότι τα ζητήματα προστασίας των δεδομένων, της ευθύνης και της ασφάλειας στον κυβερνοχώρο θα πρέπει να λαμβάνονται υπόψη στο πλαίσιο κάθε πολιτικής σχετικά με τη ρομποτική·

Amendment

θεωρεί ότι τα ρομπότ που αναπτύχθηκαν τόσο για χρήση στον τομέα της παραγωγής αγαθών όσο και για προσωπική χρήση θα πρέπει να υπόκεινται σε κανόνες σχετικά με την ασφάλεια των προϊόντων και την προστασία των καταναλωτών· πιστεύει ότι τα ζητήματα προστασίας των της ευθύνης και της ασφάλειας στον κυβερνοχώρο θα πρέπει να λαμβάνονται υπόψη στο πλαίσιο κάθε πολιτικής σχετικά με τη ρομποτική·

προσωπικών

δεδομένων, Or. el

Amendment 43 Julia Reda, Jan Philipp Albrecht Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

3a.

Stresses that in the continental European understanding of authors' rights, intellectual creation is tied to the personality of the author; therefore, artificial agents such as computers or robots cannot be perceived to be authors, and information produced by them cannot be eligible for copyright protection;

Or. en

Amendment 44 Virginie Rozière Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new)

PE589.122v01-00 22/22 AM\1103635XM.docx

Draft opinion Amendment

3 bis. estime que la responsabilité civile des robots est une question capitale qui devrait être traitée au niveau de l'Union afin de garantir un haut niveau de sécurité juridique et de protection des consommateurs ;

Or. fr

Amendment 45 Marc Tarabella Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

3 bis. souligne la nécessité de prendre en considération les conséquences éventuelles de l'utilisation de la robotique sur le marché du travail et, à plus long terme, sur les systèmes de protection sociale ;

Or. fr

Amendment 46 Arne Gericke Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new)

Draft opinion

AM\1103635XM.docx

23/23

Amendment

3a.

betont, dass beim Einsatz von Robotern immer die Würde des Menschen im Mittelpunkt stehen muss - gerade, wenn es um den Bereich der Krankenpflege geht;

Or. de PE589.122v01-00

XM

Amendment 47 Maria Grapini Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

3a.

subliniază faptul că odată demonstrată utilitatea roboților trebuie asigurată accesibilitatea lor pe piață, respectând principiul echității;

Or. ro

XM

Amendment 48 Julia Reda, Jan Philipp Albrecht Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new)

Draft opinion

PE589.122v01-00 24/24

Amendment

3b.

Points out that for the field of vital medical applications such as robotic prostheses, continuous, sustainable access to maintenance, enhancement, and in particular software updates that fix malfunctions and vulnerabilities needs to be ensured; to this end, a person carrying such a device is to be considered the full owner of the device and all its components, including software source code; considers this necessary to retain the means to support these vital devices, for example if support is no longer carried out by a supplier; therefore, additionally suggests the creation of independent trusted entities that retain the technology necessary to provide persons carrying these devices with such care, including the means to assemble and install software updates on the device; supports creating an obligation for manufacturers to provide these independent trusted

AM\1103635XM.docx

entities with comprehensive design instructions as well as source code to this end, similar to the legal deposit of publications in a national library;

Or. en

Amendment 49 Virginie Rozière Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

3 ter. considère que les conséquences de la robotisation devraient être mieux prises en compte dans les politiques de l'emploi des États membres ;

Or. fr

Amendment 50 Virginie Rozière Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

3 quater.

demande à la Commission de mettre en place un cadre de formation adapté afin d'éviter une pénurie de professionnels des TIC ;

Or. fr

Amendment 51 Andreas Schwab Draft opinion Paragraph 4

AM\1103635XM.docx

25/25 PE589.122v01-00

XM

Draft opinion

Recognises that robotics and AI technologies are increasingly used in autonomous vehicles; notes that some Member States are already enacting or considering legislation in this area in particular;

stresses that overregulation in robotics and robotic systems should be avoided, and calls instead for future-proof minimum harmonisation, especially in relation to autonomous vehicles

Amendment

Recognises that robotics and AI technologies are increasingly used in autonomous vehicles; notes that some Member States are already enacting or considering legislation in this area in particular

, which could result in a patchwork of national legislation hampering the development of autonomous vehicles a single set of EU rules striking the right balance between the interests of users, businesses and other concerned parties while avoiding overregulation in robotics and robotic systems

;

calls, therefore, for

Or. en

Amendment 52 Notis Marias Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion

αναγνωρίζει ότι οι τεχνολογίες της ρομποτικής και της τεχνητής νοημοσύνης χρησιμοποιούνται όλο και περισσότερο σε αυτόνομα οχήματα· σημειώνει ότι τα κράτη μέλη έχουν ήδη θεσπίσει ή εξετάζουν την εισαγωγή νομοθεσίας στον τομέα αυτόν·

τονίζει ότι θα πρέπει να αποφεύγεται η υπερβολική ρύθμιση σε ό,τι αφορά τη ρομποτική και τα ρομποτικά συστήματα , και

ζητεί αντ' αυτού μια

ελάχιστη,

αυτόνομα οχήματα

ανθεκτική στον χρόνο, εναρμόνιση ιδίως σε σχέση με τα

Amendment

Or. el PE589.122v01-00 26/26 AM\1103635XM.docx

Amendment 53 Jiří Maštálka Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion

uvědomuje si, že robotické systémy a technologie umělé inteligence jsou stále více používány v autonomních vozidlech; poznamenává, že některé členské státy již zavádějí nebo zvažují zavedení zvláštní právní úpravy v této oblasti; zdůrazňuje, že by regulace robotiky a robotických systémů neměla být nadměrná, a požaduje spíše minimální harmonizaci, která by obstála i v budoucnu, zejména ve vztahu k autonomním vozidlům.

Amendment

ohledem na otázku odpovědnosti za škodu a její náhradu

; zdůrazňuje, že by regulace robotiky a robotických systémů neměla být nadměrná, a požaduje spíše minimální harmonizaci, která by obstála i v budoucnu, zejména ve vztahu k autonomním vozidlům.

, a to zejména s

Or. cs

Amendment 54 Philippe Juvin Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion

est conscient de l'usage de plus en plus fréquent de technologies liées à la robotique et à l'intelligence artificielle dans les véhicules autonomes ; relève que certains États membres légifèrent déjà dans ce domaine en particulier ou envisagent de le faire ; souligne qu'il convient d'éviter une surrèglementation en matière de robotique et de systèmes robotiques

et demande plutôt une harmonisation minimale pérenne, notamment en ce qui concerne les véhicules autonomes

Amendment

est conscient de l'usage de plus en plus fréquent de technologies liées à la robotique et à l'intelligence artificielle dans les véhicules autonomes

, tels que les voitures autonomes et les drones civils

; relève que certains États membres légifèrent déjà dans ce domaine en particulier ou envisagent de le faire; souligne qu'il convient d'éviter une surrèglementation en matière de robotique et de systèmes robotiques

mais qu'il est nécessaire d'assurer un haut niveau de sécurité, de protection des données et de la vie privée

AM\1103635XM.docx

27/27 PE589.122v01-00

XM

Or. fr

Amendment 55 Kaja Kallas Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion

Recognises that robotics and AI technologies are increasingly used in autonomous vehicles; notes that some Member States are already enacting or considering legislation in this area in particular; stresses that overregulation in robotics and robotic systems should be avoided, and calls instead for future-proof

minimum

harmonisation, especially in relation to autonomous vehicles.

Amendment

, in order to avoid fragmentation of the single market

. Or. en

XM

Amendment 56 Virginie Rozière Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion

le faire ; est conscient de l'usage de plus en plus fréquent de technologies liées à la robotique et à l'intelligence artificielle dans les véhicules autonomes ; relève que certains États membres légifèrent déjà dans ce domaine en particulier ou envisagent de

souligne qu'il convient d'éviter une surrèglementation en matière de robotique et de systèmes robotiques et demande plutôt une harmonisation minimale pérenne, notamment en ce qui concerne les véhicules autonomes

PE589.122v01-00 28/28

Amendment

demande une coopération réglementaire accrue afin de modifier certains accords internationaux tels que la convention de Vienne sur la circulation routière du 8 novembre 1968 et la convention de La Haye du 4 mai 1971 sur la loi applicable en matière d'accidents de

AM\1103635XM.docx

la circulation routière

Or. fr

Amendment 57 Jiří Pospíšil Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion

Recognises that robotics and AI technologies are increasingly used in autonomous vehicles; notes that

Member States are already enacting or considering some

legislation in this area in particular;

stresses that overregulation in robotics and robotic systems should be avoided, and

calls instead for future-proof minimum harmonisation, especially in relation to autonomous vehicles.

Amendment

Recognises that robotics and AI technologies are increasingly used in autonomous vehicles; notes that

the

legislation

which has already been enacted

in this area in particular

Member States, or which is being considered

in some should reflect the common need for harmonized standardization for robotics, while avoiding overregulation

; calls instead for future-proof minimum harmonisation, especially in relation to autonomous vehicles.

Or. en

Amendment 58 Enrico Gasbarra Draft opinion Paragraph 4

Draft opinion

prende atto del crescente utilizzo della robotica e delle tecnologie di intelligenza artificiale nei veicoli autonomi; osserva che alcuni Stati membri hanno già adottato normative specifiche in questo settore, o stanno valutando di farlo; sottolinea

la necessità di evitare

una regolamentazione della robotica e dei sistemi robotici e invita

, invece, eccessiva

a procedere a nell'ambito AM\1103635XM.docx

29/29

Amendment

l'importanza di dotarsi di

una regolamentazione

efficace

nell'ambito della robotica e dei sistemi robotici e invita a procedere a un'armonizzazione adeguata PE589.122v01-00

XM

un'armonizzazione

minima

concerne i veicoli autonomi.

adeguata alle esigenze future, in particolare per quanto alle esigenze future, in particolare per quanto concerne i veicoli autonomi.

Or. it

Amendment 59 Notis Marias Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

4α.

αναγνωρίζει ότι η αλόγιστη ανάπτυξη των τεχνολογιών της ρομποτικής και της τεχνητής νοημοσύνης ενέχει σοβαρούς κινδύνους για την κοινωνία και την οικονομία· καλεί την Ένωση και τα κράτη μέλη να ενθαρρύνουν την εκκίνηση ενός δομημένου δημοσίου διαλόγου σχετικά με τις επιπτώσεις της ανάπτυξης των εν λόγω τεχνολογιών το γρηγορότερο· καλεί τους παράγοντες που συμμετέχουν στην έρευνα που διεξάγεται στους τομείς της ρομποτικής και της τεχνητής νοημοσύνης να αναπτύξουν μία κριτική προσέγγιση των αντικειμένων των ερευνών τους και να τροφοδοτήσουν εποικοδομητικά τον δημόσιο διάλογο·

Or. el

Amendment 60 Vicky Ford Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new)

Draft opinion

PE589.122v01-00 30/30

Amendment

4a.

Believes that in the case of autonomous vehicles there may not necessarily be a need to replace or alter

AM\1103635XM.docx

the legal situation relating to insurance as current practices and relationships between operator, manufacturer and insurer may adequately cope with the introduction of new technologies, as has been the case in the past;

Or. en

Amendment 61 Maria Grapini Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

4a.

consideră că robotica poate contribui la consolidarea și dezvoltarea unei piețe unice digitale funcționale de aceea este necesară uniformizarea reglementărilor în domeniul roboticii în piața internă, aceasta venind atât în sprijinul IMM-urilor, cât și a consumatorilor;

Or. ro

Amendment 62 Enrico Gasbarra Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new)

Draft opinion

AM\1103635XM.docx

31/31

Amendment

4 bis. chiede alla Commissione di presentare delle linee-guida sui principi etici che accompagnino le future normative in materia di robotica, in particolare nell'obiettivo di definire standard lungimiranti e adatti alle modifiche tecnologiche future;

Or. it PE589.122v01-00

XM

Amendment 63 Dita Charanzová Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

4a.

Underlines that the use of robotics in healthcare is already a growing market, especially in telerobotic surgical procedures, in which Europe leads; asks the Commission to ensure conditions to allow the increased use of such practices;

Or. en

Amendment 64 Marietje Schaake Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

4a.

Calls on the Commission to increase funding for interdisciplinary studies of the societal impacts of artificial intelligence and machine learning processes;

Or. en

Amendment 65 Notis Marias Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new)

Draft opinion

XM

PE589.122v01-00 32/32

Amendment

4β.

καλεί τα κράτη μέλη και την Επιτροπή να μελετήσουν ενδελεχώς τις

AM\1103635XM.docx

επιπτώσεις που θα έχει στο άμεσο μέλλον η αυξημένη χρήση ρομποτικών συστημάτων στην εργασία και να πλαισιώσουν την εξέλιξη αυτή με νομοθεσία που θα στοχεύει σε όσο το δυνατόν πιο ομαλή τεχνολογική μετάβαση για τους εργαζομένους.

Or. el

Amendment 66 Enrico Gasbarra Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new)

Draft opinion Amendment

4 ter. ritiene importante che l'Unione europea si doti di una Agenzia per la Robotica, che possa coordinare e facilitare il lavoro normativo delle istituzioni europee e degli Stati membri;

Or. it

Amendment 67 Enrico Gasbarra Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new)

Draft opinion

AM\1103635XM.docx

33/33

Amendment

4 quater.

della robotica; ritiene importante prestare particolare attenzione alle implicazioni etiche e sul mercato interno rappresentate dai test produttivi delle nuove tecnologie

Or. it PE589.122v01-00

XM - European Parliament

Transcript XM - European Parliament

European Parliament

2015/2103(INL)

AMENDMENTS 1 - 67

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

XM

Directory