Transcript Juttysuns Law Page 2015 - September Issue

Juttysuns Law Page
October 2016
1
Ad Charges
per issue
in this place
is
Rs.1500/-
ü§†®ê¡v
English & Tamil
Issue: 6
ñô˜-2
Þî› - 6
« ð x
8 ð‚èƒèœ
݃Aô‹ ñŸÁ‹ îI›
Monthly - 8 Pages
Vol No: II.
ô £
October
2016 / Ü‚«ì£ð˜, 2016
Ü‚«ì£ð˜ 2015
Annual Rs.120/݇´ ê‰î£ Ï.120/-
SingleCopyRs.10/
îQŠHóF Ï.10/-
â®†ì˜ - ªõOJ†ì£÷˜ âv.ó£ñ ßvõ˜ô£™
Law and Public Administration News Journal
«îCò Ü÷Mô£ù ê†ì‹ ñŸÁ‹ ªð£¶ G˜õ£è„ ªêŒFèœ ê…C¬è
Lake Louis....Sun set during early fall season
Lake Louis is about 168 km from Siva’s home in Canada. It takes
normally 2 hours to reach there. Siva’s family visit very often whenever
find time. The lake’s max depth is 230 ft. The galciers feed the this lake.
The emerald color of this lake is due to rock flour carried into lake by the
melting glacier water. This lake freezes in winter as early as in Dec.
People play ice hockey, ice skating, sledging on this lake. Some of the
hikes around this lake have fantastic view.
There is luxury hotel on the shore of this lake called Fairmont’s Chateau
Lake Louise.
It was built early 19th century by the Canadian Pacific Railway.
Siva Sutty.
The Photogiant,
Canada.
Madras High Court has delivered this “landmark verdict ‘ ’
People whose complaints are not accepted and acted upon by police
cannot anymore directly rush to the High Court with a ‘ direction petition’
asking police (Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry) to register FIR.
It has levied the following procedure,
1.
One has to first approach the jurisdictional police station with
complaint
2.
If it deserves preliminary inquiry, police must issue community
service receipt (CSR)
3.
If after preliminary inquiry, police concluded that no FIR need to
be registered and the complaint required closure, it should be
reported to the complainant.
4.
Then the complainant should send the complaint to the Superintendent of police by Registered post with a covering letter
5.
If there was inaction still, they must file Private complaint before
the Judicial mMagistrate under section 156 (3)
6.
If approached Magistrate must pass orders within 15 days, either
issuing direction to police or dismissing petition.
7.
Police should register within a week after receiving the order.
8.
In case of failure by Police the Magistrate shall initiate prosecution against the officer.
9.
If the police fail to fail to complete the inquiry within 6 weeks, the
victim could invoke Section 482 and move the HC for relief.
The order restores the power of Judicial Magistrate courts and jurisdictional Police
stations and at the same time, holds them accountable for rendering time bound
justice to victims...
It is a “landmark verdict” and a welcome one by Indian Public..
CA.V.Ravindran, Salem
99941 33388
2
October 2016
Juttysuns Law Page
ð°F- 18
Ü¡¹œ÷
õ£êè«ó
Dear Readers
Þ¶ ê†ìŠðˆFK¬è.
ê†ì‹ ÞòŸøŠð´õ ñ†´‹
ñQî˜èœ, Üî¡ ðò¬ù
ÜÂðM‚èˆ
ªî£ìƒ°õF™¬ô.
ê†ìƒèœ ñQî˜èÀ‚° â†ì
«õ‡´‹.
Üî¬ù ñ‚èœ ãŸè «õ‡´‹.
ê†ìƒèÀ‚°
ñQî˜èœ
膴Šðì «õ‡´‹.
Üî¡ Hø«è ê†ìƒè÷£™
ñ‚èÀ‚° ðô¡ à‡ì£Aø¶.
ê†ìƒèœ e¶ ñ‚èÀ‚° ðò‹
õ‰î£™ ñ†´«ñ ê†ìeø™èœ
ãŸðì£ñ™ Þ¼‚°‹.
àJ˜ e¶ ðò‹ ♫ô£¼‚°‹
ðò‹ Þ¼‚Aø¶.
àôèˆF™ ñ£Ÿøƒèœ ãŸðì
«õ‡´ªñ¡ø£™, â‡íƒèœ
⿈¶ õ®M™ ðF‚èŠðì
«õ‡´‹.
ï™ô 輈¶‚è÷£è ðô¼‹
ãŸÁ‚ 輈¶‚è÷£è âˆî¬ù«ò£ Þ¼‚èô£‹.
Ýù£™ ܬõ ܬùõ¼‚°‹
â†ì «õ‡´‹.
 ªê£™ô «õ‡®ò¬î
嚪õ£¼õK캋 ªê¡Á
ªê£™L‚
ªè£‡®¼‚è
º®ò£¶.
⿈¶ õ®M™ ï‹ è¼ˆ¶‚è¬÷ Ü„C™ ðFˆ¶ ¬õˆ¶
M†ì£™ , Üî¬ùŠ ð®‚è
«õ‡®òõ˜èœ, ⊫ð£¶
«õ‡´ñ£ù£½‹ ð®Šð£˜èœ.
ãŸÁ‚ ªè£œ÷ º¡ õ¼ðõ˜èœ
ãŸÁ‚ ªè£‡´ ªêò™ð´ˆîˆ
ªî£ìƒ°õ£˜èœ.
Þ¶

ñ£Ÿøƒè¬÷
à¼õ£‚°Aø¶.
¹Fò
¹Fò
輈¶‚èœ
ªê£™Lªè£‡«ìJ¼‚è
«õ‡´‹ â¡ð¶ õó«õŸèˆî‚èî£è Þ¼‰î£½‹, å«ó
輈¬î ðô º¬ø ªê£™L‚
ªè£‡«ìJ¼‚è «õ‡´‹.
ÜŠ«ð£¶

ܶ
ñQî˜èÀ‚° ↴‹.
ªê¡ø ÞîN™ ªê£¡ù Ü«î
輈¬îˆ  Þ‰î ÞîN½‹
ªê£™A«ø¡.
ñQî˜è÷£™ ãŸð´ˆîŠð†ì
ê†ìƒèœ ñQî˜è÷£™ ñF‚èŠðì «õ‡´‹.
ñ£íõŠð¼õˆF™ Üˆ
«î¬õò£ù
ð‚°õˆ¬î
ãŸð´ˆî «õ‡´‹.
ªð£¶ ÞìƒèO™ ñ£íõ˜èœ
ï쉶 ªè£œÀ‹ º¬ø Hø¬ó
î¬ô°Qò„
ªêŒõî£è
Þ¼‚è‚Ã죶.
ªê¡¬ù ¬ñô£ŠÌ˜ ð°FJ™
ðô ðœO‚Ãìƒèœ Þ¼‚A¡øù.
Fùº‹ ðœO º®‰¶ «ð¼‰F™
ªê™½‹ ñ£íõ˜èœ, °PŠð£è
å¼ ðœO‚Ãìˆ¬î„ «ê˜‰îõ˜èœ
å«ó
Ä꽋,
°öŠðˆ¬î
à¼õ£‚A‚
ªè£‡«ì ªê™õ¬îŠ ðô
º¬ø ð£˜‚è º®Aø¶.
܉î ðœO G˜õ£èˆF¡
èõùˆFŸ°
ªè£‡´
ªê™õîŸè£è Þƒ«è °PŠH´A«ø¡.
(Þ‰îŠ ðˆFK¬è¬ò Üõ˜èÀ‚°‹
ÜŠ¹A«ø¡)
«ð¼‰¶
è‡ì‚ì¬ó»‹,
®¬óõ¬ó»‹ Üõ˜èœ I辋
ÞNõ£è ïìˆFù£˜èœ.
²î‰Fóˆ¬î îõø£èŠ ðò¡ð´ˆ¶õ¬î
ÜÂñFˆ¶‚
ªè£‡«ìJ¼‚è‚Ã죶.
ªð£¶Š Hó„ê¬ùè¬÷ ⿈¶
Íôñ£è
ªè£‡´
õ‰¶
ê‹ð‰îŠð†ì G˜õ£èˆF¡
èõùˆFŸ° ªè£‡´ ªê™ô
«õ‡´‹.
ªñ†ó£v àò˜cFñ¡ø õ÷£èˆF™
ðô
Hó„ê¬ùèœ
Þ¼‚A¡øù.
܃«è õ¼‹ ªð£¶ñ‚èÀ‚°
ãŸð´A¡øù å¼ Hó„ê¬ù
ðŸP õö‚èPë˜ H.ݘ.ó«ñw
𣹠Üõ˜èœ ݃AôˆF™
â¿F ܶ Üõó¶ ⮫ì£Kò™
ð°FJ™
Þ‰î
ÞîN™
ªõOò£A»œ÷¶.
Þ«î
«ð£™
ªñ†ó£v
àò˜cFñ¡ø õ÷£èˆF™ àœ÷
Þîó Hó„ê¬ùè¬÷Š ðŸP»‹
Üõ˜ â¿î «õ‡´‹.
ñŸø õö‚èPë˜èÀ‹ â¿î
«õ‡´‹.
Üî¬ù Þ‰îŠ ðˆFK¬è
ªõOJ´õ¶ì¡ àKòõ˜èO¡
èõùˆFŸ° ªè£‡´ ªê™ô¾‹, «ñ™ïìõ®‚¬è â´‚°‹õ¬ó Ü¬î‚ è‡è£E‚辋
Þ‰î ê†ìŠðˆFK¬è ªêŒ»‹
â¡ð¬î ªîKMˆ¶‚ ªè£œA«ø¡.
Ý‚è̘õñ£ù Mñ˜êùƒè¬÷
ï‹ ðˆFK¬è õó«õŸAø¶.
⿶‹ð® «è†´‚
ªè£œA«ø¡.
Juttysuns Law Page
October 2016
ð°F- 17
From Executive Editor’s desk
Part-6
Quote:
Lawyer and Judge
LITIGANT CRY
Litigants come forward for a
P.I.L.?
In the High Court of Judicature it is not
only the High Court that is functioning
inside the campus, but there are Courts
like City Civil Court, Small Causes
Court, Labour Court, Industrial Tribunal Court, Sales Tax Tribunal and more
particularly Family Court. If statistics
is taken the Litigants are more and frequently coming for the Civil Courts
above mentioned more particularly
Family Court.
(2) On a Survey you can find out that
the Litigants are forced to be in the
queue for getting the entry pass and
they come without even taking breakfast so as to get the pass before the
Court starts functioning. Why this situation?
ANSWER:
Can it not be undone when the Litigants are paying the Court Fee and the
registry note that the case was registered and case is in the computer. On
that day when the case was numbered
why not the Authorities issue. An Identity Card a mere a paper authorizing
him to have ingress and gress to that
3
Coined by. B.R.R.
LAWYER
Advocate B.R.Ramesh Bapu
Court premises. So that Identity Card
permanently can be issued and can be
shown when they come to the Court.
If the Authorities wants the Court can
charge a sum of Rs.20/- for the Identity Card permanently till the case is
over. In the Era of communication it is
not difficult this suggestion thereafter
in may be put into use and see by a
trial and error can be adopted whole
of the Tamil Nadu.
(2) A pathetic and pell-mell is going on
in the queue where irrespective of the
age the Litigants will have to stand for
a minimum of an hour to enter. When
the Authorities will look into it and
make some arrangement. When number of public interest Litigants are going on why not a Lawyer who is having the kindness and service mind to
the Litigants come forward for a P.I.L.?
– B.R. Ramesh Bapu
JUDGE
: My Lord! Justice is not a cloistered virtue and must suffer the scrutiny of
Ordinary Person.
: O’ I See! Tolerance is three fold thresh hold
(i)Respect
(ii) Institution
(iii) Open Court. Nobody can brow beat Judges.
LAWYER
JUDGE
: I think to do THINGS through!
: Then you are making illegal pecuniary gain for yourself and client.
It is criminal conspiracy.
LAWYER
: My client in a fit of anger over lapsided Love Stabbed his fiancée 54
times because he had 54" chest.
: Do not make me loose my temper.
Do not compare your client’s chest to our Respected P.M.
JUDGE
LAWYER
JUDGE
: I was held up in Traffic turmoil of well wishers of our C.M. who is in the
Hospital in the way.
: I have no leisure in these time of strife.
LAWYER
JUDGE
: My client wrote the cover story My Lord!
: I can not judge by its cover. Produce the story.
LAWYER
: Nobody dies or commit suicides by biting “Junction” box electric wire,
My Lord! It is safely joined together.
: At this ‘Juncture’ It is impossible to say whether it is suicide or after
death electrocution.
JUDGE
LAWYER
JUDGE
LAWYER
JUDGE
LAWYER
JUDGE
LAWYER
JUDGE
: I expect from this Hon’ble Court the same standards of Probity and
accountability of other institutions.
: Democracy expects openness and openness is the concomitant of free
society. Truth is bitter.
: My Lord! My client is the owner of the App which promotes itself as a
way to “Plan your family on the go” allows women to select a sperm
donor.
: The Government is not running it online. This is reproduction via phone.
Denigration of Fatherwood.
: My Lord! My client is agitated over the crows when it makes sound and
hence he shot and murdered them.
: In a husky voice said. A group of crows is called “Murder”
: My client lost her husband in the accident at the young age of 30. She
lost the company.
: Yes. In Legal Parlance “Consortium” is the right of the spouse to the
Company, Care, help, comfort, guidance, Society Solace, affection and
sexual relations with her mate. Award her 5 lacks for Consortium Loss by
order of Consortium of Lord Shiva and Parvathy.
Advertisement
Tarriff Per Issue
Full page - Rs.6000/Half Page - Rs. 3000/Quarter Page - Rs.1500/Semi Quater Rs.750
Visiting card size Rs. 300/-
4
October 2016
Juttysuns Law Page
ªê¡ø Þî› ªî£ì˜„C
°ŸøMò™ õö‚°ˆ b˜¾èœ AKIù™ «èv ô£’v
ê†ìˆîI› ÜPë˜, ¹ô¬ñ «õƒèì£êô‹, â‹.ã.H.â™.,
õö‚èPë˜ / «ï£†ìK ðŠO‚, î…ê£×˜
°Ÿø Mê£ó¬í º¬ø„ ê†ì‹ (Criminal Procedure Code)
2014-Ý‹ ݇´ õö‚°ˆ b˜¾èœ
11. å«ó âFK‚° âFó£è å«ó è£õ™
G¬ôòˆF™
å«ó
°ŸøˆFŸè£è
Þó‡ì£õ¶ º¬ø ºî™ îèõ™
ÜP‚¬è¬òŠ ðF¾ ªêŒò º®ò£¶. -
2014 Cri LJ 2199 (AP) (A).
12. èìˆîŠð†´ °‹ð™
èŸðNŠ¹ ïì‰î¶. ð£F‚èŠð†ì
ªð‡E¡ îJì‹ ªðøŠð†ì
îèõ¬ô‚ ªè£‡´, “Ýœ è£íM™¬ô”
â¡Á ºî™ îèõ™ ðF¾„ ªêŒòŠð†ì¶.
ê‹ðõˆFŸ°Š Hø° ð£F‚èŠð†ì ªð‡
è£íŠð†ì Hø° Üõó¶ õ£‚°ÍôˆF¡
Ü®Šð¬ìJ™ ñŸªø£¼ ºî™ îèõ™
ÜP‚¬è ðF¾ ªêŒòŠð†ì¶. ܶ
«î¬õòŸø‹. - 2014 Cri LJ 3162
(Ker) (A).
13. âFK‚° âFó£ù ºî™ îèõ™
ÜP‚¬è, Þ‰Fò î‡ì¬ù„ ê†ì‹,
HK¾èœ 294, 323, 506 àì¡ HK¾ 34Þ¡ W› ðF¾„ ªêŒòŠð†ì¶.
Þó‡ì£õ¶
ºî™
ÜP‚¬è,
܆ìè£êƒèœ î´Š¹„ ê†ì‹, HK¾
3(1)(1) ñŸÁ‹ Þ‰Fò î‡ì¬ù„ ê†ì‹,
HK¾èœ 307, 326, 294, 506H àì¡ HK¾
34-Þ¡
W›
ðF¾
ªêŒõ
àˆîóMìŠð†ì¶. å«ó ê‹ðõˆFŸ°
Þ«î «ð£¡Á Þó‡´ ºî™ îèõ™
ÜP‚¬è ðF¾ ªêŒî¶ ê†ìˆFŸ°
ºóí£ù‹. Üîù£™, °Ÿø Mê£ó¬í
º¬ø„ ê†ì‹ 482-Þ¡ Wö£ù
ÜFè£óˆ¬îŠ ðò¡ð´ˆF Þ¶ Þ󈶄
ªêŒòŠð´Aø¶. - 2014 Cri LJ (NOC)
78 (MP).
HK¾ 482 :
1. °ŸøMò™ ïìõ®‚¬è¬ò
Þ󈶄 ªêŒò„ ªê£™L ñ è™
ªêŒòŠð†ì¶ - ñ¬ùMJ¡ ñ£ñù£˜,
ñ£Iò£˜
ÞF™
âFKèœ,
Üõ˜èÀ‚ªèFó£è, Þ‰Fòˆ î‡ì¬ù„
ê†ì‹, HK¾èœ 498-Ü, 323, 504, 506,
452 ñŸÁ‹ õóî†ê¬íˆ î¬ì„ ê†ì‹,
HK¾èœ
3,4-Þ¡
W›
°Ÿø…꣆ìŠð†ì¶. ªî£ì‚èˆF™
ñ¬ùMJ¡ °Ÿø„꣆´ èíõ¡
e«îò£°‹. ñŸøð® ñ£ñù£˜, ñ£Iò£˜,
îù£˜
e¶
°Ÿø…
꣆ìŠð´õªî¡ð¶ ªð£¶õ£ù‹.
Üõ˜èœ e¶ °PŠH†ì °Ÿø„꣆´
ⶾI™¬ô. ñ£ñù£˜, ñ£Iò£˜,
îù£¼‚° âFó£ù ïìõ®‚¬èèœ
îœÀð® ªêŒòŠð´A¡øù. - 2014 Cri
LJ (NOC) 159 (Utr) (A).
2. ñ¬ùMJ¡ Þó‡´ ¬ñˆ¶ù˜,
ªè£¿‰îù£¼‚° âFó£è, Þ‰Fòˆ
î‡ì¬ù„ ê†ì‹, HK¾èœ 498, 323, 504,
506 ñŸÁ‹ õóî†ê¬íˆ î¬ì„ ê†ì‹,
HK¾èœ
3,4-Þ¡
W›
°Ÿø…
꣆ìŠð†ì¶. Üõ˜èœ îQò£è
õC‚Aø£˜èœ â¡Á‹ ñ¬ùMJ¡ °´‹ð
õ£›M™ Ü‚è¬ø ªè£œõF™¬ô â¡Á‹
꣆CòƒèOL¼‰¶ ªîKò õ¼A¡ø¶.
Üõ˜èÀ‚° âFó£è Þ¶«ð£¡ø
°Ÿø„꣆¬ì ²ñˆ¶õ¶ Þò™ð£ù‹.
¬ñˆ¶ù˜ ñŸÁ‹ ªè£¿‰îù£¼‚°
âFó£ù
°Ÿø„꣆´
îœÀð®
ªêŒòŠð´Aø¶. - 2014 Cri LJ (NOC)
170 (Utr) (A).
Þ‰Fò„ ꣆Cò„ ê†ì‹
2014-Ý‹ ݇´ õö‚°ˆ
b˜¾èœ
HK¾ 3 :
1. Þø‰¶ «ð£ùõ¼ì¡
è¬ìCò£è å¼õ˜ è£íŠð†ì£˜ â¡ð¬î
Ü®Šð¬ìò£è‚ ªè£‡´ Üõ¼‚°ˆ
î‡ì¬ù õöƒ°î™ Ã죶. - 2014
Cri LJ 2371 (SC) (B).
2.
âFK
°õŠ
ðò¡ð´ˆFò Ý»îˆ¬îˆ î£‚è™
ªêŒòM™¬ô â¡ðîù£™ ܶ Üó² îóŠ¹
õö‚°
Þ™ô£îè«õ£
âF˜
G¬ôJùè«õ£ ªêŒ¶ M죶. -
2014 Cri LJ 3589 (SC) (á).
HK¾ 3 :
ñóí õ£‚°Íô‹ - G˜õ£èˆ
¶¬ø ï´õó£™ êKò£ù â„êK‚¬è»ì¡
â´‚èŠð†ì¶ - Þø‰¶ «ð£ùõ˜
ÞøŠð º¡ù˜ ñóí õ£‚°Íô‹
ÜOŠðîŸè£ù
«îè
G¬ô¬òŠ
ªðŸP¼‚Aø£ó£ â¡ðîŸè£ù ꣡Pî¬öŠ
ªðŸø Hø«è ñóí õ£‚°Íôˆ¬îŠ ðF¾
ªêŒî£˜. Þø‰¶ «ð£ùõK¡ õ£‚°Íô‹
ãŸÁ‚
ªè£œ÷Šð†´,
ñóí
õ£‚°Íôñ£è‚ ªè£œ÷Šð†ì¶. ܶ
«èœM-ðF™ º¬øJ™ Þ¼‚Aø¶
â¡ðîŸè£è Üî¬ù Gó£èKˆî™ Ã죶.
- 2014 Cri LJ 2727 (SC) (A).
Þ‰Fòˆ î‡ì¬ù„ ê†ì‹
2014-Ý‹ ݇´ õö‚°ˆ
b˜¾èœ
HK¾ 120-B :
àì½ø¾ ãŸð†ì¶. âFK °Ÿø õö‚°„
êFJ™ ß´ð†ì, Üõ˜ Þ‰Fòˆ
î‡ì¬ù„ ê†ì‹, HK¾ 376-àì¡ Ãì,
HK¾ 120-B-Þ¡ W¿‹ °Ÿø‹ ¹K‰¶œ÷£˜.
- 2014 Cri LJ 1194 (MP).
HK¾ 147 :
1. îóŠHù˜èÀ‚A¬ìJ™ GôŠ
Hó„C¬ù, âFK Hó„C¬ùJ™ Gô‹
îù‚°„ ªê£‰îñ£ù¶ â¡Á àK¬ñ
ªè£‡ì£®ù£˜. ð£F‚èŠð†ìõ˜ ÜF™
i´ 膮 îù¶ °´‹ðˆî£¼ì¡ õCˆ¶
õ‰î£˜. ÝÁ âFKèœ ê†ì M«ó£îñ£è
å¡Á î ð£F‚èŠð†ìõK¡ i†¬ì
Þ®ˆ¶ ªê£ˆªî£NŠ¹„ ªêŒ¶œ÷£˜èœ.
âFKèO¡ ªêòŸð£´ â‰îMî ÞùˆF¡
Ü®Šð¬ìJ½‹ âöM™¬ô. ܶ
º¿õ¶‹
àK¬ñJò™
ñ
ªè£‡ì‹. ܶ °ŸøMò™ â‡í‹
ªè£‡ìî™ô. âFKèœ ê‰«îèˆF¡
ðô¬ùŠ ªðÁõ àK¬ñ à¬ìòõ˜è÷£õ£˜èœ. - 2014 Cri LJ 977 (Pat).
2. âFK èôè‹ ªêŒîî£è¾‹
ê†ìM«ó£îñ£ù ÆìˆF™ Þ¼‰îî£è¾‹ î¡Q„¬êò£è‚ ªè£´ƒè£òˆ¬î
ãŸð´ˆFòî£è¾‹ ‚èŠð†ì£˜.
ê‹ðõ‹ 25 ݇´èÀ‚° º¡ ïì‰î¶.
âFK õö‚èñ£ù °Ÿøõ£Oò™ô. ñKò£¬î
I°‰î å¼ °´‹ðˆ¬î„ «ê˜‰îõó£õ£˜.
Üõ˜ ñù à¬÷„ê™ Ü¬ì‰¶œ÷£˜. º¡
ÜÂðMˆî î‡ì¬ù è£ô‹ õ¬óJ™
î‡ì¬ù °¬ø‚èŠð†ì¶. - 2014 Cri
LJ 78 (Raj).
HK¾ 279 :
1. ªè£¬ô„ ªêŒòŠð†ìõ˜
âFKèO¡ °´‹ð õ£›M½‹ ñŸÁ‹
âFKè÷£™ ïìˆîŠð´‹ è™M GÁõù
Mò£ð£óˆF½‹ Hó„C¬ùèœ ªêŒî£˜.
ªè£¬ô„ ªêŒòŠð†ì£˜, °Ÿø‹ â‰î
õ¬èJ™ ïì‰î¶ â¡ðî¬ù»‹, °Ÿø‹
ªêŒòŠð†ì¾ì¡ âFKèœ ê‹ðõ
Þ숬î M†´ æ®M†ì¬î»‹
𣘂°‹«ð£¶, °ŸøˆFŸè£ù êF G¬ô
ìŠð†®¼‚Aø¶
Üîù£™
âFKèÀ‚°ˆ
î‡ì¬ùòOˆî¶
êKò£ù«îò£°‹. - 2014 Cri LJ 34
1. ®ó‚, vÆìK™ «ñ£FòF™
Þ¼ ê«è£îó˜èœ Þø‰¶ «ð£ù£˜èœ.
Mðˆ¶, ®ó‚ õ‡®¬ò 憮òõ˜
ºó†´ˆ îùñ£è¾‹, èõùI™ô£ñ½‹
憮ò Mðˆ¶ ãŸð†ìªî¡Á
ê‹ðõˆ¬î «ïó®ò£èŠ 𣘈î ꣆C
꣆Cò‹ ÜOˆF¼‚Aø£˜. âFK
è£õ™¶¬øJùó£™ ªð£Œò£è Þ‰î
õö‚A™ «ê˜‚èŠð†´œ÷£˜ â¡ø
õ£îˆ¬î ãŸè º®ò£¶. cFñ¡ø‹ ñÁ
ÝŒM™ ꣆Còˆ¬î ÝŒ¾ ªêŒõîŸè£ù
ºè£‰Fó‹ ⶾI™¬ô. âFK‚°ˆ
î‡ì¬ù ÜO‚èŠð†ì¶ êKò£ù«îò£°‹. - 2014 Cri LJ (NOC) 55
(SC) (C).
(HP).
2. ªð‡ªí£¼ˆF °Ÿø„ êFJ¡
«ðK™ ê†ìŠð®ò£ù 裊ð£÷KìI¼‰¶
èìˆîŠð†´ èŸðN‚èŠð†ì£˜. Üõœ
ê†ì M«ó£îñ£è ðô ïð˜è÷£™
¹í˜„C‚° à†ð´ˆîŠð†ì£œ. âFK,
Þ‰Fòˆ î‡ì¬ù„ ê†ì‹, HK¾èœ
120B, 365, 366A, 368- Þ ¡ W ›
°ŸøI¬öˆîõó£õ£˜. - 2014 Cri LJ
2. âFK, pŠ¬ð ºó†´ˆîùñ£è¾‹, èõùñŸø õ¬èJ½‹ 憮
õ‰¶ ݆«ì£ K‚û£M™ «ñ£Fù£˜.
݆«ì£ K‚û£M™ ðòí‹ ªêŒî
ðòEèœ è£òñ¬ì‰î£˜èœ. Üõ˜èO™
å¼õ˜ Þø‰¶ «ð£ù£˜. °Ÿø‹ ªêŒî
õ£èù‹ â‰îŠ ð‚èˆF™ õ‰î¶ â¡ð¶
°Pˆ¶,
õ£Œªñ£N
꣆Cò‹
ÜOˆîõ˜èœ å¼õ¼‚ªè£¼õ˜ ºó‡ð£ì£ù õ¬èJ™ ꣆Cò‹ ÜOˆ¶œ÷£˜èœ. Þ¶, õ£èù‹ ºó†´ˆîùñ£è¾‹, èõùñŸø º¬øJ½‹
æ†ìŠð†ì¶ â¡ðŠ «ð£¶ñ£ù
꣆Cò‹ Ý裶. ¹ô¡ Mê£ó¬í
ÜFè£K¬ò Mê£K‚è£î¶ âFK‚°‚
°‰î般î ãŸð´ˆ¶õ‹. ꉫîèˆF¡
ðôQ¡ «ðK™ âFK M´î¬ô„
ªêŒòŠð´õ àK¬ñ»¬ìòõó£õ£˜ .
3162 (Ker) (B).
3. âFKJ¡ ªðŸ«ø£˜ âFK»ì¡
õC‚Aø£˜èœ. Üõ˜èÀ‚° âFK‚° º¡¹
F¼ñíñ£ù¶ ªîK»‹. Ýù£™ Üõ˜èœ
܉î à‡¬ñ G¬ô¬ò‚ °Ÿø õö‚°ˆ
ªî£´ˆîõ¼‚°ˆ ªîKM‚èM™¬ô. °Ÿø
õö‚°ˆ ªî£´ˆîõ¼‚°‹ âFK‚°‹
F¼ñí‹ ïì‰î¬îò´ˆ¶ °Ÿø õö‚°ˆ
ªî£´ˆîõK¡ ê‹ñîˆ¶ì¡ âFK‚°‹
°Ÿøõö‚°ˆ ªî£´ˆîõ¼‚°‹ Þ¬ìJ™
- 2014 Cri LJ 4580 (Ker).
3. õ£èù æ†´ï˜ ºó†´ˆîùñ£è õ£èùˆ¬î 憮 ꣬ôJL¼‰î
I¡è‹ðˆF™
«ñ£F
«êî
ãŸð´ˆFù£˜. Üõ¼‚° âFó£èŠ ªð£¶„
ªê£ˆ¶‚èÀ‚°„ «êî‹ M¬÷Mˆî™
î´Š¹„ ê†ì‹, 1984, HKM 3(2)(Ü)-Þ¡
W› ÞÁF ÜP‚¬è î£‚è™ ªêŒòŠð†ì¶.
Ü‰î‚ °Ÿø„꣆´ îœÀð® ªêŒòŠð´õKò‹. - 2014 Cri LJ
4580 (Ker).
HK¾ 302 :
1. âFK 37 «ð¬ó‚ ªè£¡øF™
ß´ð†ì ‚èŠð†ì£˜. Þ‰î
õö‚° ÜKF‹ ÜKî£ù õö‚裰‹.
Þ‰î„ ê‹ðõ‹ 20 ݇´èÀ‚° º¡ù˜
ïì‰î¶. Þ¼Šðõ˜èÀ‚°‹ Þ™ô£îõ˜èÀ‚°‹ Þ¬ìJ™ ïì‰î »ˆîñ£°‹ Þ¶.
âFK Þó‡ì£õ¶ õ¬èJùˆ¬î„
«ê˜‰îõó£õ£˜. âFK, õÁ¬ñ ñŸÁ‹
ÞùˆF¡ Ü®Šð¬ìJ™ Þ‰î‚ °ŸøˆF™
ß´ð†®¼Šð õ£ŒŠH¼‚Aø¶. Þ‰î„
ê‹ðõˆF™ ªð‡èœ ñŸÁ‹ °ö‰¬îèœ
è£òñ¬ìòM™¬ô. ¹ô¡ Mê£ó¬í
ÜŸðñ£ùî£è Þ¼‚Aø¶. ݬèò£™,
ÞF™ ñóí î‡ì¬ù õöƒAò¶
Gò£òñ£ùî£è£¶. - 2014 Cri LJ 50
(SC) (D).
2. âFK èŸðNˆ¶‚ ªè£¬ô
ªêŒî£˜. °Ÿø‹ ªè£´¬ñò£ù‹.
âFKJ¡ ï숬î I辋 «ñ£êñ£ùªî¡Á ðF¾¼‚èœ è£‡H‚èM™¬ô.
Üîù£™ âFK‚° ñóíî‡ì¬ù
MFˆî¶ Gò£òñ£ùî£è£¶. - 2014 Cri
LJ 314 (SC) (E).
3. î£ˆî£ å¼ õò¶ °ö‰¬î¬òˆ
îù¶ ¬èJ™ ¬õˆF¼‰î£˜. âFK ñ¶
°®Šðˆ î£Mì‹ Ï.100/«è†ì£˜.
Üî¬ùˆ
î£
ªè£´‚èM™¬ô. Üîù£™ ݈Fóñ¬ì‰î
âFK °ö‰¬îJ¡ º‚Aòñ£ù ð°FJ™
¶Šð£‚Aò£™ ²†ì£˜. ÜF™ °ö‰¬î
Þø‰¶ «ð£ù¶. °ö‰¬î¬ò„ ²´‹«ð£¶
âFK ñ¶ ܼ‰F Þ¼‚èM™¬ô. âFK‚°‚
ªè£¬ô‚ °ŸøˆFŸè£è¾‹ ñŸÁ‹
ð¬ì‚èô¡èœ ê†ì‹, HK¾ 27Þ¡ W¿‹
î‡ì¬ù ÜO‚èŠð†ì¶. âFK‚°
ñóíî‡ì¬ù ÜO‚è‚îò Ü÷¾‚°
Þ¶ ÜKF‹ ÜKî£ù õö‚è™ô. -
2014 Cri LJ 1568 (SC) (C).
4. ñóíî‡ì¬ù è´…C¬øˆ
î‡ì¬ùò£è‚ °¬ø‚èŠð†´ G˜íJ‚èŠð†ì¶. âFK å¼ õò¶ °ö‰¬î¬ò‚
ªè£¬ô ªêŒF¼‚Aø£˜. ÞF™ ñóí
î‡ì¬ù ªè£´‚è‚îò Ü÷¾‚° Þ¶
ÜKF‹ ÜKî£ù õö‚è™ô. âFK
º¡ùî£è Þ¼ðˆ¶ ï£¡° °Ÿø
õö‚°èO™ ê‹ð‰îŠð†®¼‚Aø£˜. ÜF™
Í¡Á, ªè£¬ô õö‚°è÷£°‹. Þó‡´,
ªè£¬ô ºòŸC õö‚°è÷£°‹. Þˆî¬èò
Å›G¬ôèO™ º¡ùî£è„ C¬øJ™ Þ¼‰î
è£ôƒèœ «ð£è 20 ݇´ è´… C¬øˆ
î‡ì¬ù â‰îMîñ£ù èN¾I™ô£ñ™
MF‚èŠð´Aø¶. - 2014 Cri LJ 1568
(SC) (D).
ªî£ì¼‹
Juttysuns Law Page
Advocate V.Srinivasan,
Chennai
102, Additional Law Chamber,
Madras High Court
The three main organs of our constitution are
(1) Executive,
(2) Judiciary and
(3) Legislature.
The executive’s power rest on administration on the whole while that of judiciary mainly on the ambit of interpretation of Laws and Rules to abide by
the rule of law and that of legislature
for formulating/ rules and regulations
and generally there could be no overlapping of their respective jurisdiction.
In view of various legislations cropping
up in modern times especially based
on religious racial or regional aspects,
interpretation or intervening by the judiciary has beg me inevitable.
So in the exercise of powers – Restraint
may not be over the judiciary alone and
that be from the executive as well as
legislature / also should be forthcoming.
In certain cases, like journalists views
unbiased even, are taken as one sided
and motives attributed – rightly or
wrongly and in such cases there should
be judicial enforcement.
An absolute necessity and that to be
honoured respected instead of deeming judiciary as exercising its jurisdiction beyond limit.
In view of volatile state of things prevailing, better be it good sense should
prevail in discharging their respective
wings especially when we witness log
jam in parliament or legislative assemblies keeping up decency and decorum while conducting proceeding treating our constitution to be for, of, and
by the people in democratic set up.
ð¬ìŠð£Ÿø™ I‚è
õö‚èPë˜
⿈î£÷˜è¬÷
îƒèœ Fø¡è¬÷
ªõOŠð´ˆî
õó«õŸA«ø£‹
⮆ì˜,
ü§†®ê¡v ô£ «ðx
October 2016
5
6
October 2016
Juttysuns Law Page
HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955
ªê¡ø Þî›
( September 2016 )
ªî£ì˜„C
“animus deserendi” there
can be no desertion. In the instant
case, there is demonstration of
surge of an urge to live together
and thus, to resume cohabitation.
In other words, there is luculent
indication of
“animus
revertendi” to the matrimonial
home.
Mere departure from home on
being unable to stand the
conditions prevalent there and
sojourn with parents fro while are
not pointers to desertion as
envisage under the Act. One must
rise to the occasion and be
prepared to shed “Teedium vitat”.
The respondent did return only to
be greeted by the command of “no
entry”. After all, how long should
an Indian woman suffer the fate of
having “milk in breasts and tears
in eyes”? It is time to grant her
emancipation. The husband should
realize his obligation and play his
role ideally and really.It appears
that the appellant is determined to
see that the respondent is not in.
The inbred question then is as to
who has deserted and who is
deserted. The expression “without
reasonable cause and without the
consent” as employed in the
explanation, inserted by Act No.
68 of 1976 and quoted above,
must mean that the conduct of the
other party should not be such as
may reasonably cause formation of
requisite “animus deserendi”.
It might, sound tautologous to
define desertion. Yet enough light is
shed by the Explanation (supra). In
modern society, the wife is certainly
entitle to comfort and company of
the husband and has a right to live
with dignity. The husband cannot
have vote of veto. The wife has to
be treated properly. If the wife is
forced to leave matrimonial home on
failure of the husband to provide her
with protective umbrella of safety,
then such as act, decreed by fate,
cannot be given insignia of desertion.
Montiage once observed that,
“A goods marriage would be between a blind wife and a deaf husband”. Time has come to prove him
wrong. Let wife have eyes and husband ears and let them live in harmony not antimony with real concern for each other. Harmony, not
anomie, is the need of hour. There
has to be tolerance with sense of reciprocity.
It is well to remember that the
Constitution of India has now provided Fundamental Duties in Articles
51A. One of the duties is to “renounce practice derogatory to the
dignity of women”.
In the case on hand, the wife is
keen to come in but the husband is
equally keen on see her out and
away. In the view of this Court, little
misunderstanding here and there
should be accepted as normal wear
and tear of life. It is evidence that
precative attitude entreated the appellant to refrain from breaking the
bond of the marriage. Yet he did not
relent, and failed to come to terms
with himself. In such setting, the inbred-illation is that the wife has not
wronged but is wronged ruthlessly
on matrimonial front. Parties ought
to know it was time to bid goodbye
to priggery and to face facts of life.
It is no point leaving the partner despite impeccability, in lurch. In this
view of the matter, I find that the trial
Court was thus, right in repelling this
ground too, unsustainable on facts
and untenable in law.
It is apt to remember that the institution of marriage is not in the need
of being a damaged of destroyed. The
conduct, indicating obduracy and obsession with plea of divorce, operates
as an escutcheon on the reputation of
the appellant as a husband. Such a recalcitrant attitude can earn no encomium. It was thus, essential to think of
coalescence. After all, marriage is not
like partnership “at will” and both the
parties should at defending it rather
than dissolving it. Sunilkumar v.
Usha, 1994 (1) HLR 691 (MP).
Saroj Rani v.
Sudharshan Kumar Chadha,
(1984) 4 SCC 90:1984, All India Hindu Law Reporter 713
(SC),
In
the Supreme Court held that if the
Court is satisfied that there is a permanent break down of the marriage, it may
be justified to grant divorce.
In this case, the marriage has not
broken so far and the divorce could be
granted merely on assumptions.
In Deepak Natkar v. Smt.
Deepadi Natkar, 1997(1) HLR
22(MP) (DB). Brother S.K.
Dubey, J.,
after considering the case-laws, held
that whenever the wife is visiting the
husband’s place on holidays from her
place of service, and the husband himself is neglecting to treat her properly,
it could not be said to be causing mental cruelty to the husband, and in such
a case, divorced could not be granted.
In the case of Vibha v. Dinesh,
1991 MPLJ 1975 : 1992 (2) All India Hindu Law Reporter 504 (MP),
against it was held that cruelty and desertion to the husband by the wife has
to be judged in the facts and circumstances of each case. When the wife
is in Government employment and has
occasionally been visiting the place of
husband whether she gets leave, it
could never be said that there was any
desertion on the part of wife. When
the wife feels financially insecure, she
was not bound under the service to
live with the husband permanently.
In the case, at the time of the marriage the appellant was fully aware
that the respondent was in Government employment for quite some time.
It was never insisted or aged that after
marriage the respondent will leave her
service and live with the appellant permanently. Laxman Rao v. Vidya
Chouhan, 1997 (1) HLR 62 (MP).
In the celebrated English decision
King v. King, 1952 (2) All 584, Lord
Normand observed while defining cruelty as under:
“The general rule in all question of cruelty is that the whole matrimonial relationship must be considered, and that
rule is of special value when the cruelty consists not of violent acts but is
injurious reproaches, complaints accusations of taunts. Wilful accusations
may be made which are not true and
for which there are no probable
grounds and yet they may not amount
to cruelty. To make an obvious example,
they may have been provoked by the
cruel conduct of the other spouse.
There is in many cases no easy rule,
no clear line of demarcation which diTo be continued
in next issue.
In the case of Bhawna Advani
v. Manohar Advani, 1992
MPLJ 40: 1992 (I) All India
Hindu Law Reporter 549 (MP),
it was held that for proving desertion,
willful negligence on the part of the
spouse has to be proved beyond
doubt. When the wife has been visiting the place of the husband it could
not be said that she had willfully neglected deserted the husband.
Source:
Massey 4000 ++
Law Points
on Civil Laws,
By Kamal Publishers,
New Delhi
Juttysuns Law Page Advertisement Tarriff Per Issue Starts from Rs.300/- onwards
Juttysuns Law Page
October 2016
‘ ªð¼ñ£«ù! c õ£ö„ ªê£¡ù õN «õÁ.
c õ£›‰¶ 裆®ò õN «õÁ!- àˆîõ˜
‘ M«õè‹ àœ÷õ«ù ªüJ‚è «õ‡´‹
â¡ð¶ àôè î˜ñ GòF !’ - ÿ A¼wí˜
ñè£ð£óîˆ¬îŠ ð®‚°‹ èÀ‚° cF ¹è†®J¼‚èô£‹.
ܬùõK캋, « è † è ˆ ܬ c ªêŒòM™¬ô.
«î£¡Á‹ «èœM Ü«ïèñ£è
Þ¶õ£èˆ î£Q¼‚°‹.
«õ‡ì£‹ Þ‰î Åî£†ì‹ â¡Á
ã¡ î´‚èM™¬ô A¼wí£?
«è†èŠð†ì «èœM»‹ ðèõ£¡
ÿ A¼wíK¡ êKò£ù ðF½‹!
ÿA¼wíK¡ °ö‰¬îŠð¼õ‹
ºî«ô,
Üõ¼‚°Š
ðEM¬ìèœ ªêŒ¶, «î«ó£†®,
ð™«õÁ «ê¬õèœ ¹K‰îõ˜
àˆîõ˜.
Þõ˜
îù¶
õ£›ï£O™,
îù‚ªèù ñè«÷£, õóƒè«÷£ è‡íEì‹ «è†ìF™¬ô.
¶õ£ðó»èˆF™ îñ¶ Üõî£óŠ
ðEèœ º®ˆ¶ M†ì G¬ôJ™
àˆîõKì‹ ÿ A¼wí˜
‘’ àˆîõ«ó, Þ‰î Üõî£óˆ-F™
ðô˜ â¡Qì‹ ðô õóƒèÀ‹,
ñèÀ‹ ªðŸP¼‚A¡øù˜.
Ýù£™, cƒèœ ⶾ«ñ «è†ìF™¬ô, ãî£õ¶ «èÀƒèœ.
î¼A«ø¡. àƒèÀ‚°‹ ãî£õ¶ ñèœ ªêŒ¶ M†«ì
âù¶ Üõî£óŠ ðE¬ò º®‚è
G¬ù‚A«ø¡ ’’ â¡ø£˜.
àˆîõ˜, îù‚ªèù ⶾ«ñ
«è†è£M†ì£½‹, CÁõò¶
ºî«ô è‡íQ¡ ªêò™è¬÷
èõQˆ¶ õ‰î àˆîõ¼‚°,
è‡íQ¡ ªê£™ å¡Á‹,
ªêò™ å¡Áñ£è Þ¼‰î h¬ôèœ, ¹Kò£î ¹Fó£è Þ¼‰îù.
ÜîŸè£ù è£óí, è£Kòƒè¬÷ˆ
ªîK‰¶ ªè£œ÷ M¼‹Hù£˜.
‘ ªð¼ñ£«ù! c õ£ö„ ªê£¡ù
õN «õÁ. c õ£›‰¶ 裆®ò
õN «õÁ!
c ïìˆFò ñè£ð£óî ï£ìèˆF™,
c ãŸø ðˆFóˆF™, c ¹K‰î
ªêò™èO™ âù‚°Š ¹Kò£î
Mûòƒèœ ðô à‡´.
Üè™ô£‹ è£óíƒè¬÷
ÜPò Ýõô£è Þ¼‚A«ø¡.
G¬ø«õŸÁõ£ò£? â¡ø£˜
àˆîõ˜.
‘ î£ó£÷ñ£è‚ «èœ àˆîõ«ó’,
ªê£™ô‚ 裈F¼‚A«ø¡’
â¡ø£˜ A¼wí˜.
àˆîõ˜ «è†è Ýó‹Hˆî£˜.
‘’ è‡í£! ºîL™ âù‚° å¼
M÷‚è‹ «õ‡´‹.
c,
ð£‡ìõ˜èO¡
àŸø
ï‡ð¡.
࡬ù
Üõ˜èœ
Ýðˆð£‰îõù£è ï‹Hù£˜èœ.
ïìŠð¬î ñ†´ñ™ô, ïì‚èŠ
«ð£õ¬î»‹ ï¡èP‰î ë£Qò£ù c, àŸø ï‡ð˜ ò£˜
â¡ð c ÜOˆî M÷‚èˆF¡ð®, º¡ùî£è«õ ªê¡Á
‘ î¼ñ£ «õ‡ì£‹ Þ‰î
Å싒 â¡Á î´ˆF¼‚èô£‹. 㡠܊𮄠ªêŒòM™¬ô.
«ð£è†´‹.
M¬÷ò£ì Ýó‹Hˆî¶‹,
î¼ñ¡
ð‚è‹
ÜF˜wì‹
Þ¼‚°‹ð® ªêŒ¶, õ…êè˜-
î¼ñ¡ ªê™õˆ¬î Þö‰î£¡.
¬ì Þö‰î£¡.
ù»‹ Þö‰î£¡.
Åò î‡ì¬ùò£è
Üõ¬ù
ܫ
M†®¼‚èô£‹.
î‹Hè¬÷ Üõ¡ ðíò‹ ¬õˆî
«ð£î£õ¶
c
ê¬ð‚°œ
¸¬ö‰¶ î´ˆF¼‚èô£‹.
ܬ c ªêŒòM™¬ô.
‘’ Fªó÷ðF ÜF˜wì‹ I‚èõœ.
Üõ¬÷Š ðEò‹ ¬õˆ¶ Ý´,
ܬùˆ¬î»‹
F¼ŠHˆ
î¼A«ø¡ ‘ ’ â¡Á êõ£™
M†ì£¡ ¶K«ò£îù¡.
ÜŠ«ð£î£õ¶ àù¶ ªîŒiè
ê‚Fò£™ Ü‰îŠ ªð£Œò£ù
ðè¬ì‚ 裌èœ, î¼ñ‚°„
ê£îèñ£è M¿‹ð® c ªêŒF¼‚èô£‹.
ܬ c ªêŒòM™¬ô.
ñ£ø£è Fªó÷ðFJ¡ ¶A¬ô
àKˆ¶,
ÜõO¡
ñ£ù‹
ðP«ð£°‹ G¬ô ãŸð†ì«ð£¶
 c ªê¡Á, ‘ ¶A™ î¡,
¶ªó÷ðF ñ£ù‹ 裈«î¡’
â¡Á ñ£˜ ‚ ªè£‡ì£Œ.
ñ£Ÿø£¡ å¼õ¡, °ôñèœ
C¬è¬òŠ H®ˆ¶ Þ¿ˆ¶ õ‰¶,
Åî˜ê¬ðJ™ ðô˜ º¡Q¬ôJ™, Üõœ ݬìJ™ ¬è
¬õˆî Hø°, â…Cò ñ£ù‹
â¡ù Þ¼‚Aø¶?
âî¬ù‚ 裈îî£è c ªð¼¬ñŠð´Aø£Œ?
ÝðˆF™ àî¾ðõ¡ ù
Ýðˆð£‰îõ¡?
Þ‰î G¬ôJ™ àîõ£î cò£
Ýðˆð£‰îõ¡?
c ªêŒî¶ î¼ññ£?
â¡Á è‡a˜ ñ™è‚ «è†ì£˜
àˆîõ˜.
ðèõ£¡ CKˆî£˜.
‘ àˆîõ«ó!
M«õè‹ àœ÷õ«ù ªüJ‚è
«õ‡´‹ â¡ð¶ àôè î˜ñ
GòF.
¶K«ò£îù‚°
Þ¼‰î
M«õè‹ î¼ñ‚° Þ™¬ô.
Üîù£™

î¼ñ¡
«î£Ÿø£¡’
â¡ø£¡ è‡í¡.
àˆîõ˜ 㶋 ¹Kò£¶ F¬èˆ¶
GŸè, è‡ù¡ ªî£ì˜‰î£¡.
‘¶K«ò£îù‚° Åî£ìˆªîKò£¶.
Ýù£™,
ðíò‹
¬õ‚è
ÜõQì‹ ãó£÷ñ£ù ÝvF
Þ¼‰î¶.
‘ ðíò‹  ¬õ‚A«ø¡. â¡
ñ£ñ£ ê°Q, ðè¬ì¬ò ༆®„
Åõ£˜’ â¡ø£¡ ¶K«ò£îù¡.
ܶ ¶K«ò£îùQ¡ M«õè‹.
î¼ñ‹
ܶ
«ð£ô«õ
M«õèˆ¶ì¡ ªêò™ð†´,
‘ï£Â‹ ðíò‹ ¬õ‚A«ø¡,
Ýù£™ ⡠꣘ð£è â¡
¬ñˆ¶ù¡ ÿ A¼wí¡
ðè¬ì¬ò ༆´õ£¡’ â¡Á
ªê£™LJ¼‚èô£«ñ!
ê°Q»‹
ï£Â‹
ÅJ¼‰î£™
ò£˜
ªüJˆF¼Šð£˜èœ?
 «è†°‹ â‡E‚¬èè¬÷„ ê°Qò£™ ðè¬ì‚
裌èO™ «ð£ìˆî£¡ º®»ñ£?
Ü™ô¶
Üõ¡
«è†°‹
â‡E‚¬èè¬÷ â¡ù£™
«ð£ìˆî£¡ º®ò£î£?
«ð£è†´‹, î¼ñ¡ ⡬ù
݆ìˆF™ «ê˜ˆ¶‚ ªè£œ÷
ñø‰¶ M†ì£¡ â¡ð¬îò£õ¶
ñ¡Qˆ¶ Mìô£‹.
Ýù£™ Üõ¡ M«õèI™ô£ñ™
ñŸªø£¼ ñ£ªð¼‹ îõ¬ø»‹
ªêŒî£¡.
‘ ä«ò£! MF õêˆî£™ Åî£ì
効‚ªè£‡«ì«ù!
Ýù£™ Þ‰î Mûò‹ ÿ
A¼wí¼‚° ñ†´‹ ªîKò«õ
Ã죶 è쾫÷,
Üõ¡
Åì ñ‡ìðˆ¶‚° õó£ñ™
Þ¼‚è
«õ‡´‹’
â¡Á
«õ‡®‚ ªè£‡ì£¡.
⡬ù ñ‡ìðˆ¶‚°œ õó
º®ò£îõ£Á,
Üõ«ù
⡬ù‚ 膮Š «ð£†ì£¡.
 ܃° õó‚Ã죶 â¡Á
â¡Qì«ñ «õ‡®‚ ªè£‡ì£¡.
‘ò£ó£õ¶ îù¶ H󣘈î¬ùò£™
⡬ù‚
ÊHì
ñ£†ì£˜è÷£’ âù ñ‡ìðˆ¶‚°
ªõOJ™ 裈¶‚ ªè£‡®¼‰«î¡.
Hñ¬ù»‹, ܘü§ù¬ù»‹,
ï°ô ê裫îõ˜è¬÷»‹ ¬õˆ¶
Þö‰î
«ð£¶
Üõ˜èÀ‹
¶K«ò£îù¬ù,F†®‚
ªè£‡´‹, îƒèœ èF¬ò
â‡E, ªï£‰¶ ªè£‡´‹
Þ¼‰î£˜è«÷ îMó, ⡬ù‚
ÊHì ñø‰¶ M†ì£˜è«÷!
Ü‡í¡ Ý¬í¬ò G¬ø«õŸø ¶„ê£îù¡ ªê¡Á,
Fªó÷ðFJ¡ C¬è¬òŠ H®ˆî«ð£¶ Üõ÷£õ¶ ⡬ù‚
ÊH†ì£÷£?
Þ™¬ô,
ÜõÀ‹ î¡ ðôˆ¬î«ò ï‹H,
ê¬ðJ™ õ‰¶ õ£îƒè¬÷„
ªêŒ¶ ªè£‡®¼‰î£«÷ åNò,
⡬ù‚ ÊHìM™¬ô.
ï™ô«õ¬÷
¶„ê£îù¡
¶A½Kˆî«ð£¶‹, î¡ ðôˆî£™
«ð£ó£ì£ñ™
‘’ ýK ýK Üðò‹ A¼wí£
Üðò‹ âù‚ °ó™ ªè£´ˆî£œ’’
ð£…ê£L.
ÜõÀ¬ìò ñ£ùˆ¬î‚ 裂è
ÜŠ«ð£¶

âù‚°„
ê‰î˜Šð‹ A¬ìˆî¶.
ܬöˆ- ªê¡«ø¡.
Üõœ ñ£ùˆ¬î‚ 裂è õN
ªêŒ«î¡.
Þ‰î ê‹ðõˆF™ â¡ e¶ â¡ù
îõÁ? â¡Á ðFôOˆî£¡
è‡í¡.
‘ ’ܼ¬ñò£ù
M÷‚è‹
è‡í£, Üꉶ M†«ì¡,
Ýù£™ ãñ£øM™¬ô. ࡬ù
7
Þ¡ªù£¼ «èœM «è†èô£ñ£?
‘«èœ’ â¡ø£¡ è‡í¡.
‘’ÜŠð®ò£ù£™ ÊH†ì£™
 c õ¼õ£ò£’’? cò£è,
cF¬ò
G¬ô
ì
Ýðˆ¶‚èO™ à¡ Ü®òõ˜èÀ‚° àîõ õóñ£†ì£ò£?
¹¡ù¬èˆî£¡ è‡í¡.
‘’ àˆîõ£, ñQî õ£›‚¬è
Üõóõ˜ è˜ñ M¬ùŠð®
ܬñAø¶.
 ܬî ï숶õ¶‹ Þ™¬ô,
ÜF™ °Á‚A´õ¶‹ Þ™¬ô.
 ªõÁ‹ ꣆C Ìî‹.
ïìŠð¬îªò™ô£‹ ܼA™
G¡Á
𣘈¶‚
ªè£‡´
GŸðõ«ù!
ܶ  ªîŒõ î˜ñ‹’
â¡ø£¡ è‡í¡.
ï¡ø£J¼‚Aø¶ A¼wí£,
ÜŠð®ò£ù£™ c ܼA™ G¡Á,
ï£ƒèœ ªêŒ»‹ b¬ñè¬÷ªò™ô£‹ 𣘈¶‚ ªè£‡®¼Šð£Œ. ï£ƒèœ îõÁè¬÷„
ªêŒ¶
ªè£‡«ìJ¼‰¶,
ð£õƒè¬÷‚ °Mˆ¶, ¶¡ðƒè¬÷ ÜÂðMˆ¶‚ ªè£‡«ì
Þ¼‚è «õ‡´‹. ÜŠð®ˆî£«ù? â¡ø£¡ àˆîõ˜.
‘ àˆîõ«ó,  ªê£¡ù
õ£êèƒèO¡ à†ªð£¼¬÷
ï¡ø£è à혉¶ 𣼃èœ.
 ꣆C Ìîñ£è GŸð¬î
cƒèœ àí¼‹«ð£¶ àƒè÷£™
îõÁè¬÷«ò£, bM¬ù謫ò£
G„êòñ£è ªêŒò º®ò£¶.
ܬî cƒèœ ñø‰¶ M´‹«ð£¶
 âù‚°ˆ ªîKò£ñ™
ªêò™è¬÷„ ªêŒ¶ Mìô£‹
â¡Á ⇵Al˜èœ. ð£FŠ¹‚° àœ÷£°‹ ê‹ðõƒèœ
Gè›õ¶‹ ÜŠ«ð£¶ .
‘ âù‚°ˆ ªîKò£ñ™ Åî£ìô£‹’
â¡Á î¼ñ¡ G¬ùˆî£«ù,
ܶ  Üõù¶ Ü…ë£ù‹.
 ꣆C Ìîñ£è ⊫𣶋
♫ô£¼ì‹ Þ¼Šðõ¡
â¡ð¬î î¼ñ¡ à혉F¼‰î£™, Þ‰î Åì G蛄C
«õÁMîñ£è º®‰F¼‚°‹
Ü™ôõ£?
â¡ø£¡ ÿ A¼wí¡.
àˆîõ˜ õ£ò¬ì‰¶ ð‚FŠ
ðóõêˆF™ Ý›‰î£˜.
Ýè£! âˆî¬ù Ýöñ£ù
õ‹! âˆî¬ù àò˜‰î
êˆò‹.
ðèõ£¬ùŠ ÌTŠð¶, H󣘈î¬ù ªêŒõ¶‹, Üõ¬ù
àîM‚°
ܬö‚°‹
æ˜
à혾 ù!
ÜõQ¡P
æ˜
ܵ¾‹
ܬêò£¶’
â¡ø ï‹H‚¬è õ¼‹«ð£¶
Üõ¡ ꣆C Ìîñ£è ܼA™
GŸð¬î âŠð® àíó£ñ™
Þ¼‚è º®»‹?
Üî¬ù ñø‰¶ M†´ âŠð®„
ªêòô£Ÿø º®»‹?
Þ‰î õˆ¬îˆ  ðèõˆ
W”
º¿õF½‹
è‡ù
ܘü§ù‚° àð«îCˆî£¡.
ܘü§ù‚è£è
«î¬ó„
ªê½ˆF õN ïìˆFù£«ù
îMó ܘü§ù¡ ÞìˆF™
ù G¡Á Üõ‚è£èŠ
«ð£ó£ì-M™¬ô.
ܶ  ðèõ£Q¡ «ñ¡¬ñ!
æ‹ ï«ñ£ ï£ó£òí£?
8
October 2016
Regd: Registrar of News for India No. TNBIL / 2015 / 63806
Postal Regd: TN / CH / [C] 520 / 15-17 Date of Publication on 5th of every month. Posted on 10th & 11th of Every Month
To repeal certain enactments and to amend certain other enactments.
BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-sixth Year of the Republic of India as follows:—
1. This Act may be called the Repealing and Amending (Fourth) Act, 2015.
2. The enactments specified in the First Schedule are hereby repealed to the extent mentioned in the fourth column thereof.
3. The enactments specified in the Second Schedule are hereby amended to the extent and
in the manner mentioned in the fourth column thereof.
4. The repeal by this Act of any enactment shall not affect any other enactment in which the
repealed enactment has been applied, incorporated or referred to;
[Short title.]
Repeal of certain enactments.
[Amendment of certain enactments.]
[Savings.]
As INTRODUCED IN
LOK SABHA
Bill No. 194 of 2015
and this Act shall not affect the validity, invalidity, effect or consequences of anything
already done or suffered, or any right, title, obligation or liability already acquired, accrued
or incurred, or any remedy or proceeding in respect thereof, or any release or discharge of
or from any debt, penalty, obligation, liability, claim or demand, or any indemnity already
granted, or the proof of any past act or thing; nor shall this Act affect any principle or rule
of law, or established jurisdiction, form or course of pleading, practice or procedure, or
existing usage, custom, privilege, restriction,
exemption, office or appointment, notwithstanding that the same respectively may have
been in any manner affirmed or recognised or derived by, in or from any enactment hereby
repealed;
nor shall the repeal by this Act of any enactment revive or restore any jurisdiction, office,
custom, liability, right, title, privilege, restriction, exemption, usage, practice, procedure or
other matter or thing not now existing or in force.
THE FIRST SCHEDULE
(See Section 2)
REPEALS
Year
(1)
No.
(2)
2013
2
2013
3
2013
2013
13
19
2013
22
2013
24
2013
29
2013
14
2014
8
Short Title
(3)
Extent of Repeal
(4)
The Prevention of Money-laundering (Amendment) The whole.
Act, 2012
The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment The whole.
Act, 2012
The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013
The whole.
The National Highways Authority of India
The whole.
(Amendment) Act, 2013
The Securities and Exchange Board of India
The whole.
(Amendment) Act, 2013
The Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order
The whole.
(Amendment) Act, 2013
The Representation of the People (Amendment Sections 2 and 3.
and Validation) Act, 2013
THE SECOND SCHEDULE
(See section 3)
AMENDMENTS
The Sexual Harassment of In sections 6, 7 and 24,—
Women at Work Place(Prevention, Prohibition and
Redressal) Act, 2013
(i)
for the words “Local Complaints Committee”, wherever
they occur, the words “Local Committee” shall be
substituted;
(ii)
for the words “Internal Complaints
Committee”, wherever they occur, thwords “Internal
Committee” shall be substituted.
The Governors (Emoluments, In section 2,—
Allowances and Privileges)
Amendment Act, 2014
(i)
the words and figure “section 2 of” shall be omitted;
(ii)
after the brackets and words “(hereinafter referred to as the
principal Act)”, insert the words and figure “in section 2”.
Juttysuns Law Page
Licenced to Post under Registered News Magazine Posted at Patrika
Channel, Egmore, RMS / 1.
If undelivered, Please return to
Posted on Oct 10th, 2016
POST BOX NO: 2943
S.Rama Eashwarlal
Editor - Publisher
MYLAPORE,
CHENNAI-600 004
Email: [email protected]
Mobile, Whatsapp 9444114347
https:// www.facebook.com/
JuttysunsOnline 1464810003841471
http://www.juttysunsnews.com/
STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS
The Central Government’s resolve to bring reform in the legal system
of the country, to make it more accessible to the common man and to
imbibe the principles of rule of law, has, inter-alia, began with the review
of enactments which are obsolete, redundant and unnecessary.
In fulfilment of this objective, the Central Government has
undertaken a comprehensive review of laws and the legal system with a
view to remove incoherent and redundant laws.
2.
The primary initiative in this direction was taken to constitute
a Committee to review the laws which are obsolete and redundant and can
be repealed. A two member Committee was constituted for review of
obsolete laws for repeal. The said Committee, based on various Reports of
the Law Commission and P. C. Jain Commission, examined the Central
Acts which are not relevant or no longer needed and which can be repealed
either in whole or in part.
3.
The two member Committee identified 1741 Central Acts
out of existing 2781 Central Acts lying on the Statute-Book as on 15th
October, 2014. The Acts identified for repeal by the said Committee are
categorized as (i) 777 Central Acts identified for repeal wholly or in part;
(ii) 83 Central Acts relating to State subjects to be repealed by State
Legislatures; (iii) 624 Central Appropriation Acts enacted up to the year
2010; and (iv) 257 Appropriation Acts enacted by Parliament for the States
under President’s Rule to be repealed by such states. The Law Commission,
in its 248th, 249th, 250th and 251st Reports on “Obsolete Laws: Warranting
Immediate Repeal”, inter alia, recommended for repeal of 289 Acts.
4.
As a step forward towards this direction, the Central
Government has undertaken the following initiatives towards achieving its
objective to repeal obsolete and redundant laws. The following Acts, namely,
(i) the Repealing and Amending Act, 2015 (17 of 2015) to repeal 35 Acts;
(ii) the Repealing and Amending (Second) Act, 2015 (19 of 2015) to repeal
90 Acts have been enacted and (iii) the Appropriation Acts (Repeal) Bill,
2015 (to repeal 758 Appropriation Acts) as passed by the House of the
People on 11th May, 2015 is pending in the Council of States. On remaining
Acts, action for repeal is at different stages.
5.
As part of the ongoing initiative of the Central Government,
the present proposal is to repeal 295 obsolete and redundant laws lying
unnecessarily on the Statute-Book. An appropriate saving clause has been
incorporated in the Bill. On being enacted, it would reduce obsolete laws
and bring in clarity to those for whose benefit the laws are enacted.
6.
The Bill seeks to achieve the aforesaid objectives.
D.V. SADANANDA GOWDA.
NEW DELHI;
The 20th July, 2015.
Subscriptions:
One Year. Rs.120/
Three Years Rs.300/
UNION BANK OF INDIA,
MYLAPORE, CHENNAI-600004
Current A/c No: 395701010041410
IFSC: UNBINO539571
Owned, Published and Printed by S.Rama Eashwarlal, Printed at Sairam Offset Printers, No. 27, Begam sahib 3rd street, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600002
and Published from 44/1, Tatchi Arunachalam Street, First Floor, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004, , Editor, S. Rama Eashwarlal.
Email: [email protected] Land Line: 044 2461 3547 Mobile: 94441 14347