Transcript braun oxford
Using Egalitarian Items to Measure Gender Role Equality: a Cross National Experiment
Michael Braun GESIS-ZUMA Mannheim, Germany 3 rd ESRC Research Methods Festival, Session 45, July 2008, Oxford
Overview
Traditional or egalitarian formulation of gender role items Methods and Data Results Conclusions
Traditional or egalitarian formulation of gender role items
Traditional or egalitarian formulation of gender role items
With traditional items support for egalitarian roles cannot be expressed Traditional item: "A man's job is to earn money; a woman's job is to look after the home and family" Protests of respondents Modern trends not visible But: Do egalitarian items work?
Egalitarian item: "A man and a woman should share housework and childcare, so that both can combine work and family"
Methods and Data
Methods and data
Quantitative methodological survey (East and West Germany, Hungary, Canada, Spain) Qualitative data from probing questions (Germany)
Items of methodological survey
"It is good if the man stays at home and cares for the children and the woman goes out to work“ "A man and a woman should share housework and childcare, so that both can combine work and family"
Results
Quantitative Evidence
Men’s job: money – Women’s job: family
(GR-Ideology)
Role reversal Career for both
GR-Ideology with
Role reversal
GR-Ideology with
Career for both
Germany West East 2.7
3.7
3.8
-.28* .27* 3.3
3.9
4.3
-.10* .20* Hungary Canada 2.5
4.4
4.1
-.11* .22* 4.1
3.0
4.1
-.26* .17* Spain 3.4
3.3
4.0
-.33* .27*
Different non-traditional ideology schemas: "It is good if the man stays at home and cares for the children and the woman goes out to work."
• "It is time that roles in society are reversed, in such a way that men assume more responsibility for family and household ..." • "Why should that be worse than if the woman stays at home? However, it could well be that one shares." • "Exactly as unfulfilling as it is for a woman, it is for a man. In addition, it is not honored by society. I would not like my husband to stay for a longer time at home." • "In my opinion there should not be a role reversal when it comes to labor-force participation, but instead a solution which enables both partners to combine their jobs and household work/ childcare." • "If it is o.k. with the family, nothing speaks against it. Individuality is asked for."
Different non-traditional ideology schemas: "A man and a woman should share housework and childcare, so that both can combine work and family"
• "Under the aspect of equality of opportunity of the genders this does not ... need any justification." • "It depends, for some women it is completely fulfilling just to do the household chores, as well as it is for some men, people have to negotiate this among themselves. However, both should be satisfied with the situation." • "Sweeping judgments like these are from time immemorial. The pluralistic society will develop the most diverse forms, which all could co-exist as being of equal value. This is what I hope at least."
Emphasis on the traditional father role: "A man and a woman should share housework and childcare, so that both can combine work and family"
• "The child should feel that it is equally loved by both parents." • "As far as raising children by both parents is concerned, I agree; the other aspect is something in addition and everyone can deal with it as he or she likes." • "With this argument: no. Well, because I do not like the argument that they should divide job and household chores to the same degree. Yes, they should share the raising of the children equally, but not because they can combine job and family, but ... because the children have both mother and father to the same degree."
Conclusions
Conclusions
Quantitative evidence from surveys: – lack of discrimination between traditional and non-traditional respondents Qualitative evidence from probing interviews: – existence of different non-traditional ideology schemas – emphasis on traditional father role
Conclusions
For non-traditional respondents different non-traditional positions exist: – gender equality – facilitating labor-force participation of both partners – enhancing individuality weak agreement with any specific egalitarian solution
Conclusions
For traditional respondents multiple stimuli might provoke a non-conformist respondent behavior.
Parts of the items are ignored (e.g. facilitation of female labor-force participation) and others are focused on (e.g. the traditional role of the father)