Transcript The New Sim Regulatory Matrix Adoption Implementation Changes [PPT 7.94MB]

RAeS International Working Group (IWG)
WATS 2009 Briefing
(Time to use it, or lose it!)
WATS April 2009
Content
 What have we achieved ?

IWG purpose
 ICAO 9625 methodology
 27 into 7 equals 9625 – or does it?
 Issues & Concerns

Part Task Trainers
 Legacy FSTDs
 Next steps

Regulatory adoption
 What it means to you
1
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
1
Why Did We Do it ? - Evolution of FSTD Standards
 Regulatory changes


EASA from JAA
FAA Part 60
 Lack of harmonization


Lower Level Devices
Rotary wing FSTDs
 New aircraft types

A350, B787 ,VLJ
 New training types

MPL
 New technologies


Electric Motion
LCOS Projectors
Current regulations increasingly out of step with emerging FSTD
technologies and new pilot training methodologies
2
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
2
Ed Cook (FAA NSP) 1st March 2006 RAeS …
Today
ICAO 9625 Edition 2
3
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
Tomorrow
ICAO 9625 Edition 3
3
2006~2009 IWG Meetings

Meeting sponsors



Boeing, Airbus, CAAC, IATA, ICAO, RAeS, FAA, Thales, CAE
Approx 80 delegates from 16 countries

Regulatory community (FAA,NZCAA,CASA,CAAC,DGAC,TC,LBA,UK CAA,…)

Industry bodies (RAeS, FSEMC, IATA, ICAO,…)

Pilot associations (IFALPA,…)

Operators, Airlines & training centres (LFT,Alteon,CAE,Alaska,ATR,Delta,…)

FSTD & Aircraft manufacturers (Thales,CAE,FSI,MSI,Boeing,Airbus,..)
Industry Wide Briefings

WATS, FSEMC, EATS, APATS, RAeS, ICAO, EASA, JAA, FAA, CAAC, CASA
Largest ever FSTD industry harmonization effort
Estimated $10Million effort
(Industry lead and not OEM dominated!)
4
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
4
Methodology – Step 1 – Training Task Analysis

Agreed training tasks and training types to support licence and
rating requirements
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

5
EASA/ICAO/FAA training task lists
MPL1,2,3,4
Multi-crew Pilot License
IR
Initial Instrument Rating
PPL
Private Pilots License
CPL
Commercial Pilots
License
CR
Class Rating
TR
Type Rating
RL
Recurrent License
(Training & Checking)
RO
Recurrent Operator
(Training & Checking)
Re
Recency
(Take-off and Landing)
CQ
Continuing Qualification
IO
Initial Operator
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
(T) –
The FSTD feature fidelity
levels required for each
listed task that supports the
training objective.
 Training
to Proficiency (TP) –
The FSTD feature fidelity
levels required for each
listed task that supports the
training objective to
proficiency and allow testing
and checking towards the
issue of a licence, rating, or
qualification.
 Training
5
Methodology – Step 2 - Simulation Features

Agreed list of simulation features elements required to support any
individual training task
Environment Simulation
Aircraft Simulation
Environment
ATC
Flight
Model –
Aero &
Engine
Environment
Weather
Aircraft
Systems
Environment
Navigation
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
Ground
Handling
Environment
Aerodrome & Terrain
Flight
Controls &
Forces
Cueing Simulation
Cockpit
layout
Sound
Cue
Visual
Cue
6
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
Motion
Cue
6
Methodology – Step 3 - Training Task Matrix Concept

Combine data from Steps 1, and 2 into a single matrix
© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.
Training Types (14)
& Tasks(~150)
FSTD Simulation Features (12)

7
Fidelity Levels (4)
None
Generic
Representative
Specific
Use matrix to determine FSTD feature and fidelity requirements
by training task
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
7
Methodology – Step 4 – Rationalise Levels
ICAO
Proposed
Current
FAA
EASA
ICAO
ICAO
PC ATD
NG DSD
Basic ATD
I
BITD
Adv ATD
FTD 1
FNPT I
FTD 2
FNPT II
FTD 3
FNPT MCC
FTD 4
FTD 1
FTD 5
FTD 2
II
IWG
From 20+ to
7 FSTD Types
FTD 7
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
04/08/2016
IV
V
FTD 6
8
III
VI
VII
Level II
WATS April 2009
8
Results – IWG Summary Matrix
Training Types (14)
& Tasks(~150)
FSTD Simulation Features (12)
G
Harmonized
7 Device Types
9
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
9
If we exclude ab-initio levels…
Training Types (14)
& Tasks(~150)
FSTD Simulation Features (12)
10
04/08/2016
G
WATS April 2009
10
High Level Requirements for non Ab-initio Full Task FSTDs
Color legend
Lvl 1
Lvl 2
Lvl 3
Lvl 4
Lvl 5
Lvl 6
Specific
Represent.
Generic
PPL,
MPL1,
CPL
IR
Class
Rating
MPL2
TR, ATPL
IO,
RO, RL
MPL3
Cockpit &
Structure
Class,
enclosed
Generic,
Open
Class,
enclosed
Class,
enclosed
Aircraft
replica,
enclosed
Class,
enclosed
Instruments
& Panels
Flat Panel & Overlay
Hi Quality
Flat Panel
& Overlay
Non sim area
Open
Enclosed
Visual
display
200 x 40
Direct
45 x 30 Flat
Screen
Motion
Flt & Flt Ctrl
45 x 30 Flat
Screen
Class
rep.
Generic
Background
Chatter
WATS April 2009
+Full 3D
replication
Enclosed
200 x 40
Collimated
None
Reduced
6 DOF
Full
6 DOF
Aircraft
Specific
Class rep.
Aircraft
Specific
Specific
(All proc.)
Class rep.
Specific
(All proc.)
Background
Background
Chatter
Chatter
+ Dynamic
Automated
Environment
+ Dynamic
ATC
Environment
11
Class
rep.
None
Aircraft
replica,
enclosed
200 x 40
Collimated
Generic
Aircraft Representative
(Required Procedures)
None
TR, ATPL
MPL4
RE, RO, RL
IO, CQ
200 x 40
Direct
None
Aircraft
Systems
Air Traffic
Control
04/08/2016
11
200 x 40
Direct
High Quality
Flat Panel &
Overlay
Lvl 7
Non ab-initio Full Task FSTDs – 2 Types only
Training
Type, rating
or licence
PPL,
MPL1,
CPL
CR
IR
MPL2
TR,
ATPL
IO,
RO, RL
FAA
FTD L2/L3
+
Visual
FTD L3/L5
+
Visual
FTD L6
+
Visual
Level D(+)
EASA
FNPT I,II
FNPT II
MCC
FTD LII
+ Visual
Level D(+)
Level 4
Level 5
ICAO
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Training (T)
12
MPL3
TR, ATPL
MPL4
RE, RO, RL
IO, CQ
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
Level 6
Level 7
Proficiency (TP)
12
ICAO 9625 Level 7 FSTD – A new reality?
13
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
13
ICAO 9625 Edition 3 - Documentation Structure
ICAO 9625 Edition 3
Manual of Criteria
for the
Qualification of FSTDs
Volume 1
Volume 2
Aeroplanes
Helicopters
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Training Task Derived Flight
Simulation Requirements
Full Task Trainer
Part Task Trainer
Criteria
Criteria
(For FSTD
(For each simulation Feature
Types 1 to 7)
& Fidelity Level)
Defines…
• levels of fidelity of simulation
features required to support all
training tasks for a licence, rating ot
training type
14
04/08/2016
Defines…
• General Requirements
• Objective test requirements
• Subjective test requirements
WATS April 2009
Defines…
• General Requirements
• Objective test requirements
• Subjective test requirements
14
ICAO 9625 Edition 3 - How to use the Document
Doc9625 Part 1
Training Task
Derived Flight
Simulation
Requirements
Licence
or training Type
Doc 9625 Part 3
Flight Simulation
Feature & Fidelity
Level Criteria
Determine training tasks
for licence or training type
(Simulation Feature
Dependent)
Do training
tasks meet
requirement?
No
Ref Part 3
Non Standard Type FSTD
Determine changes to
FSTD feature / fidelity
level or training tasks
Ref Part 1
Determine Standard
FSTD type
Doc 9625 Part 2
FSTD Criteria
(Types 1 to 7)
Does FSTD
specification
meet general
requirements?
Ref Part 2
Determine SOCs and
testing requirements for
FSTD qualification
No
Ref Part 3
Determine SOCs and
testing requirements for
FSTD qualification
Construct QTG
15
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
15
Some obvious questions
 How do we address Part Task
Trainers if they need
qualifying?




Flat Panel Trainers
FTDs
BITDs
OTDs
 How does this apply to my
existing Simulators?


16
04/08/2016
Qualified to previous standards
Grandfather rights?
WATS April 2009
16
Part Task Trainers
 Where does the (M)FTD / Flat Panel
Trainer fit in as a part task trainer ?

Sometimes qualified

JAA FTD Level 1 , FAA Level 5 FTD
 Use Part 3 to determine

Training task suitability based on
levels of fidelity of FSTD simulation
features

Develop QTG as appropriate for
qualification if required



17
General requirements
Objective test requirements
Subjective test requirements
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
17
Existing FSTDs previously qualified
 How does my existing FSTD
compare vs. ICAO 9625 Edition 3?
 Use Part 3 to determine

Training task suitability based on
levels of fidelity of FSTD simulation
features

Develop QTG as appropriate for
qualification if required



General requirements
Objective test requirements
Subjective test requirements
 Grandfather rights applicability are
the NAAs perogative!

18
Not even mentioned in ICAO 9625
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
18
So what happens now?
2010
2005
 ICAO
Final draft with Secretary General
 End of June expected
IWG
 FAA

FAR
Part 60
Change 2
TBD
FAR
Part60
Change 1
30 May 08

2015
IWG
ICAO
9625
Issue 2,
2003
ICAO
9625
Issue 3,
2009
ICFQ
ICAO
9625
Issue 4
TBD
What Ed Cook said
JAR
STD-1A
Am. 3,
2003
 EASA

JAR-FSTD
A
(Aug 2008)
EASA currently slow to adopt
 ICFQ/IWG representation into EASA NPA process
CS-FSTD(A)
NPA 2008-22d
31 Oct 08 to
30 Apr 09
CS-FSTD(A)
Future
Publications
TBD
 Industry

9625 Edition 3 now a reference in recent specifications
 New products based on 9625 Edition 3 are appearing
 IATA ITQI outputs / FAA Test Standards review will kick off 9625 Edition 4?
19
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
19
What it means to industry
 ICAO 9625 Edition 3 enables...

Expansion of international standards to lowest level devices

Reduction of harmonization challenge from 27 to 7 FSTD types

Full Task and Part Task training device evaluation methodology

Evaluation of any type or vintage of FSTD for training suitability
The hard work has been done.
Its time to use it.
20
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
20
Thank you
21
04/08/2016
WATS April 2009
21