exchange.ppt

Download Report

Transcript exchange.ppt

Economic Anthropology

Economic Anthropology

Economics is the study of production, distribution, and consumption of resources.

Economic Anthropology studies economics in a comparative perspective

.

A society’s economy consists of:

• Production • Distribution • Consumption

Economizing and Maximization

Classical economic theory assumes that individuals universally act rationally, by economizing to maximize profits, but comparative data shows that people frequently respond to other motivations than profit.

The Trobrianders produce far more yams than they can ever eat and often simply allow them to rot. Why?

Exchange

“The act of giving or taking one thing in return for another”

What kinds of things are exchanged?

In order for social relationships to exist we must exchange something whether it is

the communicative exchange of language,

the economic and/or ceremonial exchange of goods

or the exchange of spouses.

i.e. exchange is important for the establishment and maintenance of social relationships

“If Friends make gifts, Gifts Make Friends

Marcel Mauss

Patterns of exchange and circulation, lead us to the heart of social and cultural organization WHO WHAT WHERE WHEN WHY HOW exchange relationships what is the significance and meaning of what is exchanged what is the significance and meaning of where it is exchanged on what occasions social reasons ceremony, mechanisms

WHAT IS A GIFT?

What kinds of gifts are there?

Who do we give gifts to?

When do we give gifts?

How do we give gifts?

Why do we give gifts?

IS THERE SUCH A THING AS A FREE GIFT?

What are the consequences of not reciprocating?

Are there bonds of obligation?

Is there some competitiveness involved in gift giving?

How do we feel when we haven’t received a gift of at least equal value?

What if the gift returned is of higher value?

Marcel Mauss 1925: The Gift: The Form and Reason for

Exchange in Archaic Societies

Mauss points to three fields of obligation: to give, to receive and to repay Gifts, according to Mauss, create relationships not only between individuals but between groups, relationships which take the form of total prestations 1872 - 1950

What rule of legality and self-interest, in societies of a backward or archaic type, compels the gift that has been received to be obligatorily reciprocated? What power resides in the object given that causes its recipient to pay it back?” (Mauss 1925)

The Potlatch

A form of ceremonial exchange of gifts employed by indigenous groups on NW coast of BC (Tlingit, Haida, Tsimshian and Kwakiutl (Kwakwaka'wakw))

E.S. Curtis, 1915 Aboriginally, The Kwakiutl, were very rich and their fishing grounds supplied them with considerable surplus Beginning of summer they dispersed to go hunting, gather roots and berries, fish for salmon in the rivers At the onset of winter they concentrated in small villages During this period social life became extremely intense

POTLATCH: The word means ‘to feed’ or ‘to consume’ held in connection with events in the life cycle, initiations, marriages, house building, funerals, assumption of certain dance privileges.

extravagant and lavish preparations including much food preparation and the creation of masks and art work are made by the host as gifts for the guests

The most central symbol of wealth, power and prestige is the copper, a shield-shaped plate of beaten copper that usually has a painted or engraved representation of a crest animal on its surface. Contemporary coppers as well as older ones frequently bear animal names - Sea Lion, Beaver face - probably referring to the crest of their original owners.

The Kwakiutl chief Tulthidi prepares to give away his valuable copper in honor of his son

Broken copper Tsimshian: Gitsan, British Columbia Collected by G.T. Emmons, prior to 1914 Chilkat Blanket" 1890-1900, Tlingit

Because of all the gifts, a traditional potlatch took years to prepare

A large potlatch held in 1921 was said to take 17 years of preparation

A modern day potlatch may take about a year to prepare and cost $10,000.

C. 1900

Today potlatch gifts include coffee mugs, socks, hand knit blankets and clothes, as well as carved masks and murals Parties, as they are now sometimes called, commemorate a significant event in an extended family's or clan's collective life. They are held today for baby showers, namings, weddings, anniversaries, special birthdays, graduations, and as memorials for the dead Twined grass basket Nootka/Makah, British Columbia/Washington Cedar carrying basket with handles

Why would they spend years accumulating wealth only to give it away - or even throw the objects into the sea?

Potlatch at Fort Rupert, British Columbia, 1898

Social Significance

potlatch celebrations are a significant representation of the host's status and the display of rank and title

In return for giving away food and wealth they get recognition of their status and that of their lineage.

Marriages for one’s children and places in the brotherhoods are only won during the potlatch

Potlatches become very competitive

aspiring leaders use competitive potlatching to move up the system.

The potlatch is a system of gift exchange--- material goods are exchanged for social recognition and power

The obligation to give The obligation to receive The obligation to reciprocate

Prestation

More than simple exchange

Also includes reciprocity and the various obligations

‘It is not individuals but collectives that impose obligations of exchange and contract upon each other

What is exchanged is not solely property and wealth, but relationships

Total Social Phenomenon

Exchange is simultaneously economic, political, legal, social aesthetic etc.

Studying these phenomena can lead to understanding society as a whole

Thomas and Jane Carlyle’s Christmas Presents

Renowned 19th century English historian and essayist

Spent Christmas in the 1850s with Lord and Lady Ashburton (wealthy Scottish banker) Thomas and Jane Carlyle Lord and Lady Ashburton

In 1851 The Ashburton’s gave Christmas presents to the Carlyles

Mrs Carlyle got a scarf and a bracelet

Thomas got a jigsaw puzzle

both were well received

In 1855 Mrs Carlyle received a black silk dress - A novelty because it was only recently that they were produced by machine

Mrs Carlyle claimed that she was being insulted.

What do we have to know to be able to understand those meanings attributed to these gifts?



class,



social mobility,



matrimony,



patronage,



employment,



manufacturing processes,



issues of style,



conventions of gift-giving.

Gift Exchange does not operate according to market laws, but the social rules of power, symbol, convention, etiquette, ritual, role and status.

Economic Anthropology:

Substantivist -

economic affairs are embedded in social institutions and cannot be studied separately from other social institutions social structures

kinship system

political structure

religious ideologies -people in nonindustrial economies function with different logic than capitalist economies. Exchanges occur for reasons other than economic benefit

culturally unique values

group benefits

“rational” culturally relative

Formalists •

maximization of personal gain

supply-demand relationships

“rational” decision-making

individual self interest

economy can be analyzed independent of other social structures and institutions

research tools of western economics applicable

Karl Polanyi Divided economies into three types according to the dominant mode of distribution 1. reciprocity-- The return of a gift or prestation 2. redistribution -- collection from members of a group and then redistribution within this group. E.g. tribute, taxes 3. market --involves money and profit 1886-1964

Marshal Sahlins Stone Age Economics (1972)

A material transaction is usually a momentary episode in a continuous social relation.

The social relation governs the nature of the immediate exchange and the flow of goods

Sahlins suggests that there are 3 types of reciprocity that form a continuum that correlates with kinship and social distance.

1930-

Reciprocity: exchange between social equals • Generalized • Balanced • Negative

Generalized reciprocity

e.g. gifts, or sharing, helping, generosity.

between close kin and friends

highly moral – no expectation of return

Generalized reciprocity is correlated with



Rank



relative wealth and need



food



Geographic distance

Balanced reciprocity

• • • • •

return expected delayed exchange maintains ties with more distant people A precise balance between the things exchanged Important in e.g.. peace making death payments and marriage alliances.

Kula Ring – Balanced Reciprocity

Kula Ring: vast inter-island system of exchange of certain classes of ritual objects — men’s armbands and bracelets mwali soulava

exchange within Massim linguistic group

not a system of “commercial trade” in utilitarian objects (most islands self-sufficient in staple foods & goods)

objects acquired, displayed, and then passed on

Like the crown jewels, their value is symbolic There is no practical utility Each valuable has its own name and history Owning them provides the owner prestige and pride

at each meeting, “visiting” partner bestows gift on home partner

the same object that he received from his other partner a few months or years earlier

over time, value (rarity) of objects exchanged increases, as does renown of the partners necklaces

A

armbands

A B B C C D D

Kula Ring had been cited as an example of the economic irrationality of “savages”…

took great risks for “fanciful” ends

not survival or commerce, but to obtain “baubles”

pursued out of “sheer habit”

the Kula Ring is a vital institution which contributes to the security and continuity of Massim cultures

needs to be seen within the total context of Massim society

ripped out of context, it appears irrational, “savage”

Negative Reciprocity

• • • • •

less common impersonal, distrustful not based on ongoing social relations exchange without money taking items by force Haggling at the market of Riobamba, Ecuador

Reciprocity:

   

Generalized value unspecified return not immediate long term view no gratitude expected Balanced

 

Equal value Expectation of

immediate return Similar to trade or barter

Creating AND satisfying obligations

Common in more distant kin relationships Negative

Personal gain is primary motivator

something for nothing - haggling - bargaining - theft/seizure - cheating Self Interest Prevalence in band societies

intertribal tribe village lineage family social distance determines the nature of the exchange

Redistribution

Exchange among social unequals

centralized accumulation and reallocation of wealth (taxes, tributes, tithes, spoils)

maintain power, superior status (internally)

keep constituents happy, maintain standard of living

use wealth to leverage power (externally)

leveling mechanisms

typical mode of exchange in chiefdoms and some non industrial states These workers in Yunnan Province, China, strive for an equal distribution of meat.

Redistribution in Western Society

Taxes Food Bank

Market exchange

value preset by impersonal “market forces”

exchange occurs presumably independent of and uninfluenced by social relations

usually involves money, a widely agreed on abstract symbol used to measure value