Transcript PowerPoint Political
Political
Quick Review Why the Iberians?
Both Spain and Portugal had strong military traditions Their countries were heavily urban Many of the people who came wanted to succeed and become noble. So they were driven Families were patriarchal, but women had an active role Already had a tradition as slave holding societies
Conquest
“God, Gold, and Glory.”
Why were the Spanish successful?
Horses, firearms, steel weapons, leadership, disease, internal divisions and rivalries among the Indian tribes
Three Periods in the development of Early Latin America
1.
1492-1570-conquest 2.
1570-1700-consolidation and maturity 3.
18 th century-reform and reorganization
The Moral Question
Take a minute and discuss: Can you justify Conquest Spread the holy word Control the Indian labor Free from unjust lords and bring salvation They were not fully human
Background
Agrarian Society Large Scale Farming Mining Silver and Gold Encomiendas and Haciendas Castas
The Spanish Bureaucracy
1. The King ruled through the Council
of the Indies: Located in Spain
Viceroy: High ranking noble who directly represents the king in Latin America 2 viceroyalties in the West Indies Mexico City Lima
The Spanish Bureaucracy
judicial divisions
2. Viceroyalties subdivided into 10 Controlled by audiencias: judicial courts Staffed by official royal magistrates
The Spanish Bureaucracy
3. Royally appointed magistrates carried
out laws on the local level
The Clergy were along branch of the state
Conversion Catholic church held great influence on the colonists
Brazil is Different
Portuguese The Portuguese and Spanish claims had been decided by the Treaty of Tordesillas Little in the region originally interested the Portuguese until the French showed interest in woods from the region Where the towns were established, and the Indians were peaceful, they began to establish sugar plantations with Indian, and then African slaves
Shifting
What was happening in Europe at this time with intellectual thought?
Spain more or less monopoly of the West Indies Unable to hold onto their mercantile interests Other countries wanted to trade Colonies were very self sufficient Loosing territories England, France and Holland
Crisis, The beginning of the
Charles II dies (Spain) NO HEIR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Was of the Spanish Succession Treaty of Utrecht Puts a French Family (Bourbon) on the thrown Allows England to trade Spanish Monopoly is broken Bourbon Reforms
Factories:
The Beginning
Established trading forts allowing trade from the interior Much is established with the consent of the African people.
El Mina Missionary efforts Europeans saw the Africans as pagan savages (just like the saw everyone else) Few permanent settlements This was for goods and slaves not for living
Patterns of Conquest
What the Portuguese did in Africa is seen throughout the history of the slave trade: Fortified trading stations Combo of force and diplomacy Alliances with local rulers Predominance of commercial relations
Who
The Portuguese were the main suppliers The Dutch got involved later on capturing El Mina The English wanted control for the plantations African states on the coast benefitted from the slave trade More inland states with firearms became suppliers
On the West Coast
Two important states that developed out of the slave trade Asante: Dealt with the Dutch dominated the gold coast until the 1820s Dahomey: With the use of guns, created its own autocratic society based on trading slaves
On the East Coast
Continued to trade luxury items with the Muslim world Some slaves got to Europe/America Islamization will connect the northern savanna with the western external slave routes This new phase with be more violent Linked Islam and the slave trade Movement to purify the Sufi Major impact of the pastoral people (Fulani)
South Africa
1652: The Dutch East India Company Colony Cape of Good Hope Provision post Dutch = Boers 1795: English take Cape Colony 1815 formal British Control Limited Boers landholding 1834: Britain outlaws slavery Great Trek: Boers leave top be free of government control in the North Moving into someone else's land