–Bike Propulsion System Design Of Sno Joe Fitzpatrick & Jeremy Lindeman

Download Report

Transcript –Bike Propulsion System Design Of Sno Joe Fitzpatrick & Jeremy Lindeman

Design Of Sno–Bike Propulsion System
Joe Fitzpatrick & Jeremy Lindeman
Advisor: Prof. Eben C. Cobb
Mechanical Engineering Department
All Terrain Possibilities:
Abstract:
Using the screw propulsion system over alternative propulsion systems has its
benefits:
The goal of this MQP was to design a bolt on snow propulsion system to a
Yamaha YZ 125 dirt bike. This system will allow the dirt bike to be used in snow and
dirt conditions, where the typical wheel design would fail. The design solution was a
system made up of two horizontal cylinders parallel to each other mounted to the
rear swing arm of the dirt bike. These cylinders are attached by a frame that bolts on
to the rear swing arm of the dirt bike. Each cylinder has a helical sweep cut running
the length of the cylinder. From the cut is a protruded fin, making the cylinder look
like a screw lying on its side. The two cylinders will spin in opposite directions of
each other to create a forward thrust.
a. Ability to travel through:
1. Snow
2. Sand
3. Water
b. Swamp and mud Buggy's
c. Boats and Submarines
d. Lunar travel
With the possibilities to have a system that will allow movement from; side to side and
in place rotation, makes it very agile. With independent control over each screw it
could produce a vehicle capable of handling changing terrain conditions.
Design Concepts:
•
Bikes have been used on snow before. The most common method for converting them for
snow conditions, was to stud the tires.
•
Another method of snow travel is track systems, these are available for ATV’s and is used
for snowmobiles.
Building the Screw:
1. Construction of the cylinder.
The cylinder is made from wrapping aluminum
sheet metal around four aluminum wheels
equally spaced on a shaft.
2. Attaching the fin in a helical sweep pattern to the
cylinder.
The pattern for the screw path was laid out on the cylinder, then small
pieces of aluminum angle iron where bent and twisted to match the helical sweep
path.
Material Selection:
One of the concerns with building a bolt on system is the extra wait and strain on the
engine. It was important to keep the overall weight of the vehicle similar to that of the
original. Without being able to adapt the engine or modify the bike in way. Materials that
were considered for the cylinders were, PVC and rubber for the cutting fin. The problem
with these materials was they did not satisfy the strength demands needed for the system.
Aluminum was chosen for its light weight and strength.
Gear Train:
The gear train from the engine output to the screws had some design problems:
1.
The axis of spin for the screws had to be perpendicular from the output shaft on the engine.
.
Solution:
Analysis:
This design concept has endless potential. Due to the dirt bike
constraints we were limited in what we could accomplish. Although there is
potential for a bolt on system that would be universal to any dirt bike or other
ATV’s. Weight was one of the major concerns for this system. By not having
the ability to access certain materials and manufacturing processes, the
system had to be constructed out of common materials and simple
manufacturing techniques. Some CNC machining was used for construction
of a hub for the rear sprocket and inner screw wheels. Other parts bought or
reused from the bike.
Final Product:
Recommendations:
2.
The power had to be transferred from the perpendicular shafts down to the screw shafts.
Solution:
It would have been a better design to have
fewer spinning shafts. Using a spinning hub over for
the rear axis shaft would have eliminated one spinning
shaft, and would have allowed for a better frame
attachment.
It also would have been ideal to have the two
screws cast out aluminum or some other material. This
would provide a smoother fin and would save weight.
Instead of attaching this type of propulsion to
an existing vehicle, it would be best to center the
vehicle on the screws. Also using two independent
electronic motors for each screw would increase the
directions of travel.