Danone Vs Wahaha
Download
Report
Transcript Danone Vs Wahaha
versus
Lessons for Joint Ventures in China :
A Happy Marriage but Painful Divorce
by Sacha Milchten & Antoine Ryckebusch
Company Presentation
Founded in 1987
Hangzhou Wahaha Group
Co. Limited owned by the
government of Hangzhou's
Shangcheng District.
Founded in 1973 from the
merger of Boussois-SouchonNeuvesel and Gervais Danone
1979 – 1985 : acquisition of
Amora, Maille, La Pie Qui
Chante, Carambar…
Zong Qinghou : Chairman and
managing director
In 1995, Peregrine
Investments Holdings
introduced Zong to Danone,
and discussions about joint
ventures began.
CEO : Franck Riboud
Who are the customers?
More than 1,500 first-level dealers
12,000 second-level dealers
35 provincial sales offices
2,500 sales team employees
2 million sales outlets across China
Suppliers
Important role of the water bottle
Kind of water
Exclusive deals with suppliers
Supplier relations
Who are the competitors?
Coca-Cola Co.
PepsiCo, Inc
Taiwan-founded companies Uni-President
Enterprise Corp. and Tingyi (Cayman Islands)
Holding Corp.
Success of Future Cola
Not worry too much about domestic competition
Imitations
What are the Key Success Factors of
this business?
Being good and tasty
Being a trustmark
Product quality
Find the good chinese partner
Innovation
Culture differences and Relations
To what extent are these KSF mastered
by the company
✔ Product quality
✗✔Culture
differences
Innovation
✔✔
Find
the
good
chinese
partner
and
Relations
good
and tasty
✔Being
Being
a trustmark
The Case :
Danone versus Wahaha:
Lessons for Joint Ventures in China
A Happy Marriage but Painful Divorce
Video
Background : Formation of the joint
venture
Established first JV in 1996
Danone owned 51%(invest $170 million) and Wahaha owned
49% of the shares.
Wahaha Group becomes a private company… But the
trademark belongs to the state !
Management of the JV and the creation
of competing non-JV companies
Management of the JV from one of the richest men in China :
Zong
The conflict : Creation of a series of companies that sold
the same products as the JV and used the Wahaha
trademark
Arbitration and Lawsuits
One of the arguments of Zong’s :
The JV agreement of 1996 was unfair.
Danone had intention to control China’s beverage market.
Foreign mergers and acquisitions should go through the
anti-monopoly check. ( China should promulgate AntiMonopoly Law as soon as possible.)
Dispute on the Wahaha Brand
Lessons to be learned
Don’t use technical legal techniques to assert or gain
control in a JV
Do not expect a 51% ownership interest in a JV will
provide effective control
Do not proceed with a JV formed on a weak legal basis :
the brand name.
The foreign party must actively supervise or participate
in the day-to-day management of the JV
Danone today in China
Danone breaks up with Wahaha Group .
With the end of the JV, Danone focus on other markets.
Danone has continued to pursue this strategy, and has
joint ventures with companies.
The Chinese beverage company's
expansion is no laughing matter
« Thank you Danone ! »
From milk to Future Cola
A"patriotic" brand soon international ?
Sources
Wahaha : l'empire contre attaque ! www.aujourdhuilachine.com
Steven M. Dickinson on the lessons to be learned from the tensions
within China’s largest beverage joint venture
www.chinaeconomicreview.com/cer/2007_09/Danone_v_Wahaha.
html
L'implantation de Danone sur le marché chinois http://danone-en-
chine.wikeo.be/a.html
The Chinese beverage company's expansion by Paula M. Miller
www.chinabusinessreview.com/public/0409/company_profile.html
Thank you !
Q&A…