Transcript Update of high speed networking in Hungary István Tétényi, Hungarnet/NIIF, Hungary

Update of high speed networking
in Hungary
István Tétényi, Hungarnet/NIIF,
Hungary
E-mail: [email protected]
16. May 2005.
1
Overview
•
•
•
•
•
Introduction
NGN-Hungarnet (infrastructure only)
CEF
inisHungary
This
not a technical presentation!
CEF in .cz-.hu
Conclusions
16. May 2005.
2
Background
• Representing the Hungarian research
networking community – Hungarnet/NIIF
• Hungarnet has got 19 years of history
• Serving ~700 institutions and ~600 000
users
• Personal involvement in Pan European
research networking projects
16. May 2005.
3
The seven ages of networking
(a well-known story)
stages/acts
• analogue circuits
• X.25
All the world's a stage,• managed leased digital
copper
circuit
And all the men and women
merely players
• ATM
optics
(William Shakespeare
- As You Like It )
• SDH 
•
•
16. May 2005.
leased lambda 
dark fiber based switched
lambda network (CEF) 
4
NGN-Hungarnet
Evolution of high speed networking (1)
High speed connections in Hungarnet
40
35
connections in Budapest
countryside connections
34
32
number of connections
31
29
30
26
25
25
23
22
20
14
15
11
10
6
5
5
0
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Year
16. May 2005.
Yearly average growth:
• Budapest – 223%
• country side – 193%
5
NGN-Hungarnet
Evolution of high speed networking(2)
Aggregated capacity
70
capacity in Budapest
Yearly average growth:
• Budapest - 244%
• country - 273%
capacity in the country
60
50
Gbps
SDH
DF/10GE
73.8

60.0
DF/STM-16
40

35.5
33.7
30
17.1
20
16.9
13.1
6.4
10
0.8
0.6
0.9 1.2
0
1999
16. May 2005.
2000
2001
date
2002
2003
2004
6

NGN-Hungarnet
10G usage trends (1)
16. May 2005.
7
NGN-Hungarnet
10G usage trends (2)
Daily average traffic evolution in the last 16 months in Hungarnet
12.00
10.00
Debrecen
Pécs
Veszprém
Szeged
Miskolc
Győr
BIX
Elte
GEANT
BME
2.5G
10G
Daily traffic[Tbyte]
8.00
Nr. of months traffic to double:
21
effect of private peerings
Trunk capacity growth is yearly: 250%
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
16. May 2005.
Jan
Feb
March
Apr
May
Jun
July
Aug
Sep
Months
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
March
Apr
8
NGN-Hungarnet
Change of peering policy
• Traditional peering with ISPs in Hungary via the
Budapest Internet Exchange (BIX) only
• Problems:
– capacity, resiliency, mean time to repair
• Solutions:
–
–
–
–
16. May 2005.
Capacity upgrade with BIX to 10GE
Direct peering with big ISPs and back-up via BIX
Dark fiber (longer distance), GE used, planned 10GE
Aggregated peering capacity: 17Gbps
9
CEF in Hungary
DF experience
•
•
•
•
•
Nr of DF connections: 38
Total length: 410km
Inter city: 10%
Within city: 90%
Just as good as managed services
16. May 2005.
10
CEF in Hungary
Viability
Telco/market view
(updated)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
telecommunication companies # is
limited
investors do not invest in the telco
segment
dramatically decreasing profit in
traditional voice
telecommunication market shrink is
being compensated by broadband
and mobile voice
Telco’s focus is broadband: ADSL
or WiMax (quick ROI)
competition is very limited for
nation-wide high-speed services
CapEx is scarce
16. May 2005.
Research network view
(updated)
•
•
•
•
•
•
Hungarnet budget is not improving
government support is uncertain
higher prices for high speed
services
experience with long range dark
fiber is limited
reliability is an issue
Is CEF viable countrywide?
11
CEF in Hungary
Possibilities
•
Limited
availability of dark fiber for inter-city routes
Optical infrastructures in Hungary
•
•
•
•
•
Jászberény
Telcos handle DF asVeszprém
an asset Budapest
Jászberény
Veszprém
Budapest
Szolnok
Lack of interest in investing
local fiber-loop
Szolnok
Sz.fehérvár
Sz.fehérvár
Kecskemét
Szombathely
Kecskemét
Szombathely
Not much interest in selling pure
infrastructure
Dunaújváros
Dunaújváros
Zalaegerszeg
Zalaegerszeg
Békéscsaba
IRU is not
anKeszthely
option
Békéscsaba
Hm.vásárhely
Szekszárd
Hm.vásárhely
Szekszárd
Keszthely
Situation is not
going to change
soon:
Baja
Nagykanizsa
Optical infrastructures in Hungary
– single provider - 11 -routes,
S.patak
S.patak
– dual-providers - 14 routes,
Eger
Salgótarján
Eger
Salgótarján
– three providers
–
9
routes
lack
of
competition
Nyíregyháza
Gyöngyös
Nyíregyháza
Mosonmagyaróvár
Mosonmagyaróvár
Miskolc
Miskolc
Gödöllő
Gödöllő
– four providers – Győr
4 routes
Gyöngyös
Piliscsaba
Tatabánya
Győr Tatabánya Piliscsaba
– five providers
– 3 routes
Debrecen
Sopron
Debrecen
Sopron
Baja
– EU
structural funds
from 2007
1
Szeged
11
Szeged
Kaposvár
Kaposvár
2
14
– Hungarian broadband strategy might include FTTx targets
Nagykanizsa
3
9
5
3
Pécs
Pécs
• Conclusion:
limited possibilities
4
4
16. May 2005.
12
CEF in Hungary
Plans in 2005
•
•
New public procurement
Lease expires in November 2005:
– 23 SDH connections 34/155Mbps
– 15 DF connections in Budapest
•
Target:
– Min: managed GE country side, DF in Budapest
– Max: DF everywhere
– Realistic: passive WDM countryside, DF in Budapest
•
Constrains:
–
–
–
–
–
•
capacity upgrade is a must
development cap-ex is nil in 2005
budget limit is very tight
longer term financial commitments need special authorization for NREN
lack of competition
Conclusion: great challenge
16. May 2005.
13
CEF in .cz vs. .hu
CESNET- Hungarnet cost comparision
• CESNET financial figures 2003 TF-NGN meeting
Hungarnet-10 CESNET-10 CESNET-10
in Cambridge
leased
lit
leased
100%
339%
678%
• Both
NRENs
aim is
to optimize price/performance
Hungarnet-2.5
CESNET-2-5
CESNET-2.5
leased
lit
leased
100%
105%
141%
• Hungarnet
chose
a mixed
route due to the
attractive pricing
90
80
70
€/Mbps/yr
60
50
40
• CESNET approach is mainstream 
30
20
• Hungarnet approach is „down-to-earth” 
10
0
Hu
nga
rne
t ( 10
16. May 2005.
) - 04
Hu
nga
rne
t ( 2.
5)- 0
CE
SN
ET(
2.5
4
)-0
3- l i
t
Hu
nga
rne
t ( 2.
5)- 0
CE
SN
ET(
2.5
1
)-0
3-
CE
SN
ET(
10)
-0
l'd
3-
l it
CE
SN
ET(
10)
-0
3- l'
d
14
Conclusions
•
•
•
•
•
•
Hungarnet network is continuously growing
Nation-wide CEF availability is uncertain
Cross-border circuit soon with AMREJ
Difficult public procurement in 2005
GEANT2 services open new options
More government support required to keep
rate of development
16. May 2005.
15