Alexandrov Research Institute of Technology FEDERAL STATE UNITARY ENTERPRISE SOSNOVY BOR, RUSSIA
Download ReportTranscript Alexandrov Research Institute of Technology FEDERAL STATE UNITARY ENTERPRISE SOSNOVY BOR, RUSSIA
FEDERAL STATE UNITARY ENTERPRISE Alexandrov Research Institute of Technology SOSNOVY BOR, RUSSIA SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND VERIFICATION OF FUEL ROD MODEL USED IN COUPLED NEUTRONIC AND THERMAL-HYDRAULIC CODES L.M. Artemova, V.G. Artemov, Y.P. Shemaev Alexandrov Research Institute of Technology Sosnovy Bor, Russia SAPFIR_95&RC_VVER program package Fuel rod model considers: ― thermal expansion ― fuel swelling and cladding creep ― degradation of fuel thermal conduction ― change of gap conductance ― asymmetric disposition of pellets in fuel rod Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 3 Fuel diameter variation with burnup (VVER-1000) 1.025 experiment Relative change 1.02 1.015 calculation with TRANSURANUS, 2006 1.01 1.005 calculation with START-3, 2001 1 0.995 Burnup, MW·day/kg U 0.99 0 10 20 30 40 50 Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 60 70 4 Fuel rod diameter variation with burnup (VVER-1000) 0 -0.01 experiment -0.02 ∆D, mm -0.03 -0.04 calculation with TRANSURANUS, 2006 -0.05 -0.06 -0.07 Burnup, MW·day/kg U -0.08 0 10 20 30 Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 40 50 5 Variation of fuel rod geometry with burnup (RC models) 3.88 3.86 internal clad radius Radius, mm 3.84 pellet radius: model 3 (TRANSURANUS) 3.82 3.8 model 2 3.78 3.76 model 1 (START-3) burnup, MW•day/kgU 3.74 0 10 20 30 40 Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 50 60 6 Experiments at different burnup depth 3,88 internal clad radius 3,86 175 FPD 80 FPD 3,82 60 FPD 30 FPD Radius, mm 3,84 3,80 3 3,78 pellet radius: 2 3,76 1 burnup, MW•day/kgU 3,74 0 2 4 6 8 10 Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 12 14 7 Axial xenon oscillations 5 100 0 90 -5 80 model 1 -10 70 -15 60 -20 50 models 2 and 3 -25 -30 30 ICH readings experiment: -35 40 20 control rod position -40 10 time, h -45 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 60 70 8 control rod position, % axial offset, % (Rostov NPP, unit #1, 30 FPD) Axial xenon oscillations (Rostov NPP, unit #1, 60 FPD) 20 90 80 models 2 and 3 axial offset, % 70 0 60 -10 50 model 1 -20 40 30 -30 experiment: -40 ICH readings 20 control rod positon control rod position, % 10 10 time, h -50 0 10 20 30 40 0 50 Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 60 70 9 Spontaneous power reduction (Rostov NPP, unit #1, 80 FPD) 100 95 experiment 90 85 power, % ICH readings restored values model 1 80 75 70 65 models 2 and 3 60 55 time, h 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 6 7 8 10 Axial xenon oscillations (Rostov NPP, unit #1, 80 FPD) 60 models 2 and 3 40 ICH readings axial offset, % 20 0 model 1 -20 -40 time, h -60 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 35 40 11 Axial xenon oscillations (Zaporozhye NPP, unit #1, 175 FPD) 60 90 80 70 axial offset, % model 3 20 60 50 0 model 1 40 model 2 -20 30 20 experiment control rod position -40 time, h control rod position, % 40 10 -60 0 0 10 20 30 40 Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 50 60 12 Weight function for calculation of fuel effective temperature r 1 T r Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 13 Dependence of modeling results on pellets disposition 100 95 experiment: 90 ICH readings restored values power, % 85 axially aligned pellets 80 75 70 max misaligned pellets 65 misaligned pellets half-maximum effect 60 55 time, h 50 0 1 2 3 4 Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 5 6 14 Fresh fuel conduction Thermal conduction UO2, W/m·deg 9 VNIINM,1983 8 P. Lucuta,1996 7 W. Wiesenack, 1997 6 5 4 3 2 1 Temperature, 0K 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 2500 3000 15 Spontaneous power reduction (Rostov NPP, unit #1, 80 FPD) 100 95 ICH readings experiment: restored values 90 model 1 power, % 85 80 75 70 65 models 2 and 3 60 55 time, h 50 0 1 2 3 4 Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 5 6 16 Conclusions: Realistic evaluation of fuel temperature is needed for transients modeling Best agreement of modeling results with experiment is provided with: —model 3 (TRANSURANUS) of fuel swelling and cladding creep — fuel thermal conduction from VNIINM data base Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 17 THANK YOU ! Contacts: Ludmila Artemova Alexandrov Research Institute of Technology Sosnovy Bor, Leningrad region, Russia Tel. +7(81369) 60-619 e-mail:[email protected] Alexandrov Research Institute of Technoloqy 18