Transcript Helicoflex Seals
Helicoflex Seals
Stephen Haywood Rutherford Appleton Lab & Martin Gibson With input from Jason, Ian and Garlock
The Order
Ordered on Fri 10 Feb.
Arrive Mon 27 Mar – 6 weeks later.
Cost £23k
Understood
to be a simple change of coating Cu – therefore similar mechanical properties.
from Al to Qualify surface effects – crushing of Cu into Cu-Ni Housing.
Garlock quoted and supplied a “ D ” Seal make easier to compress.
– in order to Helicoflex Seals 2 Stephen Haywood 4 Apr 2006
First Assessment
Martin Gibson arrived.
was ready to test Seals when they Immediately realised they were difficult to tighten: Not able to completely compress.
Broke Ti bolt.
Should bottom out Seal: Stephen Haywood Helicoflex Seals 3 4 Apr 2006
Bottoming Out Seal
Bottoming out is important: Gives correct compression of Seal (good sealing, retain elasticity provided by internal spring).
Requires “groove” in Housing to be correctly designed.
When clamped in position, ensures that joint cannot flex .
Flexing may allow Seal to be compressed and then since elasticity is small (10%?), may not spring back and result in leak.
Seal nominally 1.64 mm (measure 1.68 mm).
Housing groove 1.2 mm Compressed by ~0.32 mm.
Implies 0.12-0.16 mm to go until bottom out. Helicoflex Seals 4 Stephen Haywood 4 Apr 2006
Seals in Housings
Stephen Haywood Helicoflex Seals 5 4 Apr 2006
PPF0
Stephen Haywood Helicoflex Seals 6 4 Apr 2006
Housing
Stephen Haywood Helicoflex Seals 7 4 Apr 2006
Investigation
Dissect old Al and new Cu Seals.
Jacket is solid metal.
Cu has larger Young’s Modulus than Al (factor of 2).
Cu supposed to be 0.25 mm thick; Al 0.30 mm – but Cu looks thicker (optical effect ?).
Cu Seal is much harder to twist . “ D ” Seal is not quite as we expected: Martin and Stephen trying to progress while Jason and Ian saturated with HEX work.
Stephen Haywood Helicoflex Seals 8 4 Apr 2006
Cu Seal
Stephen Haywood Helicoflex Seals 9 4 Apr 2006
Dissected Seals
Stephen Haywood Helicoflex Seals 10 4 Apr 2006
Were We Sold Wrong Seal?
We supplied design of Housings and asked for Cu Seal.
Seals are made to order, but not to measure.
The Seal we bought should be compressed by 0.34 0.1 mm.
Our Housing would require this seal to compress 0.44 mm.
No discussions about compression forces .
Should design Housing to suit a Seal.
Flukey (in retrospect) that this Seal does “suit” design.
Appears that compression forces for Al and Cu Seals are same – albeit Al not compressed enough and Cu required to be compressed to upper limit.
Cannot complain that we were sold wrong Seal.
Helicoflex Seals 11 Stephen Haywood 4 Apr 2006
Qualification
Pursued 1 st half work.
of Qualification to see if the Seals could Tightened Seals to nominal torque (100 or 170 cN.m).
Qualification : He Vac leak check 25 bar N 2 proof test 7 bar He leak check at 0 o C 1 bar He leak check at -35 o C (Thermal Cycle) (Pressure Cycle) Takes much longer than originally suggested.
8/9 OK so far; one fails investigated.
on 25 bar test – not yet Helicoflex Seals 12 Stephen Haywood 4 Apr 2006
Possibilities
Keep Al Seals – worried about corrosion.
Cu-plate Al Seals – already squashed; need new ones.
Some new type of material for seal ?
Cu Seal : Increase torque with washers & lubricant – damage Al clamp plates (bend; strip thread) Leave them not bottomed-out – Jason is not happy Change Housing – no way !
Thin washer to force earlier bottoming out – very fiddly Thin ring to force earlier bottoming out – very fiddly; not room Pre-squash by 0.2-0.3 mm Could Garlock supply a better suited Seal or modify existing Seals – I would be very nervous about this Helicoflex Seals 13 Stephen Haywood 4 Apr 2006
Questions
Does it work if only compress by ~0.2-0.3 mm – do surfaces (Seal/Housing) conform ?
How does Seal behave if pre-squash by ~0.2-0.3 mm – will compression forces required still be large ?
Will ask Garlock for advice.
Stephen Haywood Helicoflex Seals 14 4 Apr 2006
Pre-squash
Use washers and lubricate – allows torque to give greater compression (reduces friction).
Pre-squash by ~0.20 mm; ~0.24 mm to b-o; stops with ~0.10 mm to go – but ripped threads .
Use nuts .
Pre-squash by ~0.30 mm; ~0.14 mm to b-o; bottoms out – but badly bend Al compression plates .
Will repeat with new Al plates.
Check Al plates are Dural – as in production.
Helicoflex Seals 15 Stephen Haywood 4 Apr 2006
… And
If pre-squashing fails, consider washers .
Thin and hard to locate.
0.6 mm 0.8 mm When we have found solution which is OK: Mechanically – bottoms out, doesn’t wreck clamps/bolts Leak tight will qualify from scratch.
Note: assuming we replace Al Seals, must be very careful not to scratch Housings – use plastic tweezers .
Stephen Haywood Helicoflex Seals 16 4 Apr 2006