Case Study : Meuse River Basin Jan Joziasse Deltares Sacha de Rijk (KWR)

Download Report

Transcript Case Study : Meuse River Basin Jan Joziasse Deltares Sacha de Rijk (KWR)

Case Study : Meuse River Basin
Ruud Baartmans (TNO)
Willy van Tongeren (TNO)
Jan Joziasse
Deltares
Final Conference June 24 - 25
Maastricht, The Netherlands
Sacha de Rijk (KWR)
1
Introduction case study: Dutch Meuse
 Internal discussions
 System approach required for decision support
 How to deal with historic pollution and other types of
diffuse pollution
 Visits to water boards and RWS
 Point sources largely eliminated
 Lack of focus on chemical status
 Measures should be taken on national or EU policy level
Final Conference June 24 - 25
Maastricht, The Netherlands
2
Case approach followed
Additional interviews
-
Water boards
Rijkwaterstaat Waterdienst
Ministry of VROM
WFD project office
CSN
RIWA Maas
Results evaluated in inquiry
Final Conference June 24 - 25
Maastricht, The Netherlands
3
Meuse River Basin
 Length: 905 km; Dh: 384 m
 From Pouilly-en-Bassigny (Fr)
through the Ardennes (Be)
to the North Sea (NL)
 Catchment area: 35,000 km2
 Population: 8.8 million
 Rain river; large differences
between summer and winter
discharge (< 10 – 3,000 m3/s)
 Source of water for drinking
water production, agriculture,
industry
 Important for navigation
Final Conference June 24 - 25
Maastricht, The Netherlands
4
Specific challenges
• International river basin:
five countries/six regions
(FR, LU, WL, FL, GE, NL)
• Fear to get “punished” by
the EU when the ambition
level is set too high
Final Conference June 24 - 25
Maastricht, The Netherlands
5
Lessons learned from case study (1)
Focus on diffuse emissions
reduction
e.g.
cadmium,
PAH,
pesticides,
fertilizers,
pharmaceuticals,
...
Source: RIVM Report 607633001 / 2008
Final Conference June 24 - 25
Maastricht, The Netherlands
6
Lessons learned from case study (2)
Delay for achieving good chemical
status expected until 2015, 2027, or
later...
100
80
60
EQS
Sce 1
Sce 2
40
20
Sce 2
Sce 1
EQS
2050
2040
2030
2020
2010
2000
0
 reconsider WFD demands / EQS
 adjust ambition level
(take more /other measures)
 effect of measures?
Final Conference June 24 - 25
Maastricht, The Netherlands
7
Lessons learned from case study (3)
Translocation
needs more attention
 main river systems
 brook systems
Final Conference June 24 - 25
Maastricht, The Netherlands
8
Lessons learned from case study (4)
Growing importance of emerging
substances
 look beyond WFD demands
 pay attention to extreme conditions
(floods, calamities)
Final Conference June 24 - 25
Maastricht, The Netherlands
9