Mechanical Testing System Coupled with an Environmental Chamber for Hydrogels

Download Report

Transcript Mechanical Testing System Coupled with an Environmental Chamber for Hydrogels

Mechanical Testing
System Coupled with an
Environmental Chamber
for Hydrogels
Team: Charlie Haggart, Gabriel J. Martínez-Díaz,
Darcée Nelson, and Michael Piché
Client: Weiyuan John Kao, Ph.D.
Advisor: Paul Thompson
BME 400 Midsemester Presentation
10/18/02
Overview
 Problem
Statement
 Project Background
 Design Specifications & Constraints

Environmental Chamber
• Prototype Testing

Creep Testing System
• Design Alternatives
 Future
Work
 Acknowledgements
Problem Statement
 Test
compatibility of environmental chamber
built during BME 301 with Instron 1000
 Test

hydrogel samples using Instron 1000
Compare results with Instron 5548 data
 Design

and build creep testing system
Study viscoelastic properties of hydrogels
Background - Hydrogels
Cross-linked polymeric structures
Ability to absorb water and/or biological
fluids
Experience physical changes




Dependent on pH and temperature
Applications:


Drug delivery vessels, bandages, and skin
adhesives for wound/burn care
Background - BME 301
 Drafted
procedure to fabricate tension
stencils (used in making hydrogel
samples)

In accordance with ASTM standards
 Designed
and built environmental
chamber


Used in tensile testing of hydrogel samples
For use with Instron 1000 in 1313 Eng. Hall
Environmental Chamber
Design
Specifications/Constraints
temperature (25 – 40˚C) and pH
(4 – 8) of solution
 Withstand
 Cause
no interference with tensile testing
of hydrogel samples
 Solution
must not contact Instron 1000
Environmental Chamber Testing
Temperature Test




4 L deionized H2O
Physiological 37 °C
ASTM tensile test
duration - 0.5 to 5.0
minutes
Results: 2.5 °C drop
over 30 minutes
duration
37.5
37
Temperature (C)

36.5
36
35.5
35
34.5
34
0
5
10
15
20
Time (s)
Trial 1
Trial 2
25
30
35
Environmental Chamber Testing
 Grip


Sensitivity
Instron 2711 Series - lever action grips
Will grips be sensitive enough for tensile
testing of hydrogels?
• YES
• 80% of hydrogel samples fractured at gauge length
• 20% fractured at point of contact with lower grip
Environmental Chamber Testing
 Compatibility

with Instron 1000
Issue: Top plate (obstruction)
• Solution: Removal of plate

Issue: Protective seal (moisture)
• Solution: Machine new adaptor
Background - Creep Testing


Tests effects of prolonged
loading of a material
Monitors strain of a
material under a constant
stress for a long period of
time.
ΔL
strain  ε 
Li
F
stress  σ 
A
Components of Creep Testing
Apparatus
•
Specimen Grips
To hold specimen during testing
•
Extensometer
To measure the change in length of the
specimen
•
•
Loading device (Weights)
Chamber
To keep specimen in conditions for which the
creep properties are of interest
Product Design Specifications

Chamber



Extensometer



Accurate to 1 mm and precise
Capable of logging data for up to 1 day
Grips



Material: transparent, durable, easy to manufacture, insulating, and
resistant to corrosion
Must maintain constant temperature
Must allow for fracture at gauge length
Must not slip
Loading System (Weights)

Must be variable between 0 and 50 g.
Design Alternatives:
Digital Camera
 Take
pictures of sample at periodic
intervals
 Measurement scale on sample or on
chamber
 Sample elongation calculated from each
image
Design Alternatives:
Ultrasonic Transducers

Ultrasonic waves are
emitted from position
on the sample and
received from a fixed
location
 Time difference is
proportional to
displacement
Picture from http://www.piezotechnologies.com/
Design Alternatives:
Linear Displacement Transducer

Output voltage varies
with changes in
displacement

Examples


Linear Potentiometers
(resistance)
LVDTs (inductance)
Picture taken from
http://www.novotechnik.com/linear.html
Final Design
Testing
 PEG-diacrylate hydrogels
bone shape


In air
In distilled water
 10
samples tested
with ASTM dog-
Experimental Set-up
Preliminary Results
 Room Temperature




25 g weight applied to sample
Immediately stretched ~13 mm
No further creep up to 1 hour
Other samples withstood maximum loads of 85 to
>195 g, however, samples were dry and brittle at
this time
Preliminary Results
 Distilled Water



@ 40 ºC
Samples with 5-10 g broke after 5 sec.
Samples with 1g broke after 5 sec – 2 min
6/7 samples broke at the gauge length
Preliminary Conclusions
 All
samples should be placed in aqueous
solution prior to testing
 Samples should be tested within 24 hours of
cross-linking to minimize degradation
 Samples should be more homogenous
Future Work
 Tensile Testing


Prototype Testing
Tensile testing
 Creep Testing

Additional design considerations:
• Data acquisition and logging
• Temperature control

Prototype
Acknowledgements
 Professor
Kao
 Paul Thompson
 BME Department
 Professor Webster
 Bill Hagquist, ME Shop
 John Dreger, 1313 Eng. Hall
 Ralph Wiggam, Springfield Elementary