Proposed Revisions to Disposal Reporting System (DRS) and Adjustment Method (AM) Regulations

Download Report

Transcript Proposed Revisions to Disposal Reporting System (DRS) and Adjustment Method (AM) Regulations

Proposed Revisions to Disposal
Reporting System (DRS) and
Adjustment Method (AM)
Regulations
November 4, 2003
1
Diversion Rate Measurement
System
• The disposal-based method for measuring
diversion rates by jurisdiction started in 1995
• Diversion had never been measured in this
way before
• Adjustment Method (AM) and Disposal
Reporting System (DRS) regulations
established minimum standards to allow
for local flexibility
2
SB 2202 Review of Diversion
Rate Measurement System
• Required the Board to analyze the DRS and
submit a report to the Legislature including
recommendations for improvement
• Analyzed how the system was working
throughout the state after five years
• Identified issues and various potential
solutions
• Proposed revisions to regulations consistent
with the Board’s recommendation to the
Legislature
• Involved extensive stakeholder input
3
Informal Rulemaking Process
• 1st draft DRS and AM regulations sent out for
public review and comment in November
2002
• Two workshops on the 1st informal draft held
in December 2002 (1 North, 1 South)
• Four workshops on focused DRS sub-topics of
the 1st informal draft held in March 2003
(2
North, 2 South)
4
Informal Rulemaking Process
• 2nd draft DRS regulations sent out for
public review and comment in June
2003
• Two workshops on the 2nd informal draft
held in June 2003 (1 South, 1 North)
5
Informal Rulemaking Process
• Based on input received during the informal
process, significant changes were made to
the regulations
• The following slides will highlight proposed
revisions regarding the following areas, as
detailed in the agenda item:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Signage
Scales
Training
Origin surveys
Determining jurisdiction of origin
Reporting
State minimum standards
Adjustment Method
6
Comparison of Current Regulations,
1st Informal Draft Revised Text,
and Proposed Revised Text
for 45-day Comment Period
7
Signage
• Current Regulations
– No requirement
• 1st Informal Draft Text
– Post sign re: origin survey within 10 ft. of
gatehouse
• 45-day Formal Text
– Post sign re: origin survey in location
clearly visible to incoming vehicles
8
Scales
• Current Regulations
– No scales requirement
• 1st Informal Draft Text
– Scales required for stations and landfills with
annual average throughput >100 tons per day (tpd)
(>200 tpd for rural landfills)
– Weigh all loads unless host county has Board
approval to not weigh car and pickup loads
– Specified conversion factor for waste that is not
weighed
9
Scales (continued)
• 45-day Formal Text
– Scales required for stations and landfills
with annual average throughput >100 tpd
(>200 tpd for rural landfills and stations)
– Weigh all loads >1 ton (or >6 cubic yards)
– Use documented conversion factors to
estimate tonnage of waste that is not
weighed
10
Training
• Current Regulations
– No requirement
• 1st Informal Draft Text
– Training for relevant staff based on content of
specified sections of the DRS regs
• 45-day Formal Text
– Training for relevant staff on the DRS regs content
as it pertains to employees’ job duties (Board will
provide training modules.)
11
Origin Surveys
• Current Regulations
– One week per quarter minimum origin survey
period
• 1st Informal Draft Text
– Daily origin surveys for all loads
– One week per quarter survey allowed for car and
pickup loads and all loads at rural facilities
• 45-day Formal Text
– Same as 1st Informal Draft, except reference to
car and pickup loads changed to loads >1 ton
12
Determining Jurisdiction of
Origin
• Current Regulations
– All haulers provide origin information at time of
waste delivery or, if previous arrangements made,
within two weeks after the quarter ends
• 1st Informal Draft Text
– Origin information from commercial haulers based
on dispatcher records of generator locations
• 45-day Formal Text
– Commercial haulers provide waste origin based on
company records of hauler routes and generator
locations, billing records, or other relevant records
13
Determining Jurisdiction of
Origin (continued)
• 1st Informal Draft Text
– Commercial self-haulers provide gate attendant
with jurisdiction of origin information such as
waste collection address, hauler name, and phone
number
– Other self-haulers provide jurisdiction of origin
• 45-day Formal Text
– All other haulers provide gate attendant with
jurisdiction of origin (Facility operators may also
require these haulers to provide additional origin
information)
14
Quarterly Disposal Reports
• Current Regulations
– Each landfill and transformation facility
reports total tons disposed (or that
underwent transformation) allocated to
each jurisdiction
– Each landfill reports total tons of each type
of material used as alternative daily cover
(ADC) and alternative intermediate cover
(AIC) allocated to each jurisdiction
15
Quarterly Disposal Reports
(continued)
• 1st Informal Draft Text
– Report the total tons of the following waste
categories allocated to each jurisdiction and by
delivery source (station, direct haul or self-haul):
• Waste accepted
• C&D debris, inert debris, designated waste by
type, and all other waste disposed
• ADC, AIC, and beneficial reuse material listed
by type
• Material sent off-site for recycling
16
Quarterly Disposal Reports
(continued)
• 45-day Formal Text
– Report tons of disposal, ADC, and AIC by
jurisdiction as in current regulations
– Report tons of waste received by jurisdiction
– Report facility summary information:
• Total tons of each type of material used
beneficially on-site at landfill
• Total tons sent off-site for recycling
• Landfill waste-to-cover ratio
• Landfill compaction rate
17
Annual Methods Reports
• Current
– No requirement
• 1st Informal Draft Text
– Station, landfill, and transformation facility
operators report their facility DRS methods
such as frequency of origin surveys,
volumetric conversion factors used,
methods of tracking waste
18
Annual Methods Reports
(continued)
• 45-day Formal Text
– Annual reporting requirement as in the 1st
Informal Draft, with some minor changes
to report content
19
State Minimum Standards
• Current Regulations
– Keeping DRS records required as part of
the State minimum standards for transfer
stations
• 1st Informal Draft Text
– Also require keeping DRS records as part
of the minimum standards for a landfill
• 45-day Formal Text
– Same as 1st Informal Draft
20
Adjustment Method
• Current Regulations
– Use employment as reported by the California
Employment Development Department (EDD)
• 1st Informal Draft Text
– Use countywide EDD Industry or countywide
EDD Labor Force employment
– Use countywide EDD Industry in the nonresidential estimate and countywide EDD Labor
Force employment in the residential estimate
• 45-day Formal Text
– Same as 1st Informal Draft
21
Staff recommendation:
Direct staff to formally notice
the proposed revised DRS and
AM regulations
Questions?
22