Mandated Volunteering: An Experimental Approach Sara Helms, Erik Angner, Brian Scott, Sarah Culver
Download ReportTranscript Mandated Volunteering: An Experimental Approach Sara Helms, Erik Angner, Brian Scott, Sarah Culver
Mandated Volunteering: An Experimental Approach Sara Helms, Erik Angner, Brian Scott, Sarah Culver (Univ. of Alabama at Birmingham) Prepared for the ESA World Meeting, June 30, 2007, at LUISS in Rome, Italy Sara wishes to thank the UAB ADVANCE grant, funded by the National Science Foundation (SBE-0245090). The researchers would like to thank the Center for Ethics and Values in the Sciences, the Center for Economic Education, and the Dept of Finance, Economics, and QM at UAB. Background • Field data suggest ambiguity • Using a public goods game, we examine the impact of mandates on the decision to donate time to benefit a charity • Preliminary evidence suggests that the mandate lowers the time donated, and reduces the variance of time donations Previous work • Very little experimental work on volunteering behavior • Empirical evidence on impact of mandated volunteering (Helms, 2007) • Eckel, Grossman and Johnston (2005) use public goods game to examine money donations to charity • Our experiment is modeled after their game, but examines time donations to charity Experimental setup • Students randomly selected into treatment, control groups • Control: Students permitted to stay from 0 – 100 minutes • Treatment: Students told to stay for 25 minutes minimum. Permitted to stay up to 100 minutes • Each minute student completes menial task, US$0.20 allocated to charity of students’ choice Preliminary results Average, in minutes (std dev) Average US$ donated Control (N = 14) 56.50 (38.77) $11.30 Forced (N = 13) 49.85 (22.75) $9.97 Future Work • More participants • Sensitivity test– framing problem? • Alter experiment design– length of mandate, etc. • More games to study volunteer behavior and forced volunteering Grazie.