Transcript Amy Wangdahl, CSP Director, Office of Maritime and Agriculture

Amy Wangdahl, CSP
Director, Office of Maritime and Agriculture
Occupational Safety & Health Administration
• Enforcement Update
• Hot Issues
• Standards and Guidance
• I2P2 Game
Enforcement Update
 OSHA Staff (Federal)
 Regional Offices
 Local Area Offices
 CSHOS
 Consultation
 Workers
 Worksites
2,305 (2012)
10
90
~ 865
~ 150
130 million
8 million
FY 2009 – FY 2013
Inspections Conducted
As of
July 5 2013
50,000
39,004
40,993
40,648
40,961
40,000
30,027
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY 2009 – FY 2013
% Programmed vs. % Unprogrammed
100%
80%
62%
60%
60%
40%
38%
58%
40%
59%
56%
42%
44%
41%
20%
0%
FY09
FY10
Programmed
FY11
FY12
Unprogrammed
FY13
FY 2009 – FY 2013
% Complaint Inspections
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
17%
FY09
20%
FY10
21%
FY11
23%
FY12
24%
FY13
FY 2009 – FY 2013
% Inspections In-Compliance
100%
80%
60%
40%
25%
23%
24%
24%
27%
20%
0%
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY 2009 – FY 2013
Total Violations Issued
120,000
100,000
87,663
96,742
85,513
80,000
78,727
59,022
60,000
40,000
20,000
0
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY 2009 – FY 2013
% Total Violations Issued As Serious
100%
80%
77%
77%
73%
73%
76%
60%
40%
20%
0%
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY 2009 – FY 2013
% Total Violations Issued As Serious, Willful, Repeat,
& Unclass
100%
81%
82%
80%
78%
77%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY 2009 – FY 2013
% NIC Inspections With Only Other-Than-Serious
Violations Cited
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
10%
FY09
10%
FY10
11%
FY11
12%
FY12
11%
FY13
FY 2009 – FY 2013
% Inspections With Violations Contested
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
7%
FY09
8%
FY10
11%
FY11
11%
FY12
7%
FY13
FY 2009 – FY 2013
Average Current Penalty Per Serious Violation
$2,500
$2,133
$2,153
FY11
FY12
$2,023
$2,000
$1,500
$970
$1,053
$1,000
$500
$0
FY09
FY10
FY13
FY 2009 – FY 2013
% Construction Inspections
100%
80%
61%
60%
60%
56%
55%
53%
40%
20%
0%
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY 2009 – FY 2013
Significant Cases
.
250
215
200
150
219
164
131
120
100
50
0
FY09
FY10
FY11*
FY12*
FY'13*
* FY’11 – FY’13 figures include cases under OSHA’s revised significant case procedures and new
penalty system.
FY 2009 – FY 2013
Egregious Cases
25
20
20
14
15
1. Employer had knowledge of
hazard
2. Made no reasonable effort to
eliminate the hazard
3. One of these factors:
• Fatality or large number of
injuries
• High rates of
injuries/illnesses over time
• Extensive history of prior
violations
• Employer conduct = bad
faith
10
5
4
4
2
0
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY 2009 – FY 2013
Fatality Investigations
1,250
1,000
797
804
820
848
750
579
500
250
0
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
Maritime Fatalities – FY 2013
 FY 2013 – 7 fatalities reported
 4 – Longshoring




Fall from scaffold
Drowning
Worker caught between 2 steel beams
Worker crushed by crane
Fatalities – FY 2012
 Shipyards - 6
 Fall from deck of yacht
to concrete dock
 Natural causes (2)
 Struck by pressurized
sand blast pot lid
 Shipbreaking – struck
by section of rake
 Crushed by falling load
of steel plates
 Longshoring - 6
 Caught between mast
and overhead of forklift
 Run over by forklift
 Crushed by falling
container
 Struck by steel roll pins
 Struck by moving crane
 Fall from suspended
platform
FY 2013
Top 10 Most Cited Standards
General Industry
1. Hazard Communication
2. Electrical, Wiring Methods
3. Lockout/Tagout
4. Respiratory Protection
5. Powered Industrial Trucks
6. Machine Guarding
7. Electrical, General
Requirements
8. Bloodborne Pathogens
9. Personal Protective Equipment
10. Guarding Floor & Wall
Openings
Construction
1. Fall Protection
2. Scaffolding
3. Ladders
4. Fall Protection, Training
Requirements
5. Hazard Communication
6. Head Protection
7. Eye & Face Protection
8. Excavation Requirements
9. Aerial Lifts
10. Safety & Health Provisions
FY 2013
Top 10 Most Cited Standards
For Maritime Industry)
1. Respiratory Protection
2. Hazard
6. Powered Industrial
Communication
3. Electrical, Wiring
Methods
4. Electrical, General
Requirements
5. Electrical, Wiring
Design & Protection
7.
8.
9.
10.
Trucks
First Aid & Lifesaving
Facilities
Abrasive Wheel
Machinery
Machine Guarding
Cranes & Derricks
FY 2013
Top Standards With
The Most Willful Violations Cited
1. Fall Protection
2. Excavation
3. General Duty Clause
4. Machine Guarding
Maritime Steering Committee
Meets in conjunction with MACOSH to discuss maritime
industry and OSHA maritime concerns
Members:
 National Office
 Training Institute
 Salt Lake City Technical Center
Regional Representatives:





Region 1
Region 3
Region 5
Region 7
Region 9
Katie Nishimura
Angelo Costa
Bill Donovan
Brian Drake
Jack Reich
Region 2
Region 4
Region 6
Region 8
Region 10
Kevin Sullivan
John Vos
David Doucet
(No Maritime)
Randy White
Maritime Directives
 Shipyard Employment (“Tool Bag”) Directive - 2006 ***
 Longshoring/Marine Terminal (“Tool Shed”) Directive - 2012
 Authority Over Vessels/Facilities on or Adjacent to US Navigable






Waters/Outer Continental Shelf (“Jurisdiction”) Directive – 2010
Maritime Cargo Gear Regulations/1919 Certification Directive – 2003 ***
Subpart T – Commercial Diving Operations - 2011
Subpart B – Confined/Enclosed Spaces and Other Dangerous
Atmospheres in Shipyard Employment – 2010
Subpart I – Enforcement Guidance for PPE in Shipyards - 2011
OSHA Field Operations Manual (FOM) - Chapter 10 Maritime - 2011
National Emphasis Program (NEP) on Shipbreaking - 2010
***Currently Updating
Hot Issues
 Workplace Violence
 As of 2/28/13 – six citations (5(a)(1)) have been issued in
health care and social services setting
 One to correctional facility
 Four to night retail establishments
 12 Hazard Alert Letters
 Health Hazards
 Methylene Chloride – bathtub refinishers
 Diesel exhaust
 Silica during hydraulic fracturing
Hot Issues
 Heat campaign
 Raise awareness of hazards of working outdoors in hot
weather
 Directive issued in July 2012 to expedite inspections and
citation issuance
 Region 6 (Dallas) has LEP
 Conducted 140 heat related inspections
 Temporary Workers
 Reports of temporary workers killed 1irst day on the job
 Training was inadequate
 OSHA will continue to ensure these workers are
protected using enforcement, outreach and training
• MACOSH
• Regulatory Agenda
• Guidance Documents
MACOSH
 Last meeting of 2010-2012 Charter – July 2012 – Seattle,
WA
 Request for Nominations – August, 2012
 Notice of Reestablishment of Charter – April, 2013
 Previous Charter Accomplishments:
 Shipyard Workgroup – 8 recommendations
 Longshore Workgroup – 13 recommendations
Regulatory Agenda
Update
Published July 3, 2013
 Final Rules
 Items Nearing Proposal
 New Major Initiatives
 Recently Completed Actions
Final Rules
 Electric Power Generation, Transmission and
Distribution (Subpart V)
 1910 and 1926 standards will be the same
 Most industries already in compliance with proposal
 Several new provisions increase protection for electrical
power workers
 Expected to publish July 2013
 Walking Working Surfaces and Personal Fall
Protection (Subparts D&I)
 Updates standards for slips, trips and fall and establishes
requirements for personal fall protection systems
 Expected to publish November 2013
 Vertical Tandem Lifts (Remand)
 Two provisions not being enforced, court ordered remand
 New date of April 2014
Items Nearing Proposal
 Silica – NPRM anticipated in July 2013
 Beryllium – NPRM anticipated in October 2013
 Revocation of Periodic Records – NPRM/DFR
anticipated in July 2013
 This rule will revoke requirements for employers to
prepare and maintain periodic records certifying that
the employer performed the required tests and
inspections on machinery
Other Major Initiatives
 Combustible Dust
 Injury and Illness Prevention Program
 Infectious Diseases
 Review/Lookback of OSHA Chemical Management
Standards
 Process Safety Management and Flammable Liquids
Combustible Dust
 Purpose: To address combustible dust hazards
through a comprehensive standard
 ANPRM published in 2009, stakeholder meetings in
2009 and 2010; Expert Forum held 2011
 Current regulatory initiatives:
 Regulatory alternatives under development
 Economic impacts being assessed
 Next Step: Initiate SBREFA
 Concurrent guidance initiatives
Injury & Illness Prevention Program
 Purpose:
 Protect worker safety and health by requiring employers to
implement an injury and illness prevention program
 Six core elements: Management leadership, Worker
Participation, Hazard Identification, hazard prevention and
control, education and training, and Program evaluation and
improvement
 2010 – Series of stakeholder meeting held
 SBREFA
 Next Steps:
 Complete the SBREFA process
 Publish Proposed Rule
Infectious Diseases
 Purpose:
 Protect workers in health care and high-risk
environments from infectious disease hazards
 TB, chicken pox/shingles, measles and emerging
diseases such as SARS and pandemic flu
 Published RFI in May 2010
 Next Steps:
 Initiate SBREFA
Review/Lookback of OSHA
Chemical Management Standards
 Purposes:
1) explore ways to more efficiently update PELs,
2) explore non-PEL options for managing exposure to
chemicals,
3) inform stakeholders & public of regulatory and legal
framework in which OSHA must operate
 Next Steps:
 Publish RFI
Process Safety Management and
Flammable Liquids
 Purpose:
 Consider the revision of the Process Safety Management
standard to address gaps in safety coverage or an update
of the Flammable Liquids and Spray Finishing standards
based on the latest consensus standards
 Next Steps:
 Publish RFI
Recently Completed Actions
 Hazard Communication/GHS
 Consensus Standards Updates – Signage
 Consensus Standards Updates – PPE-Head Protection
 Consensus Standards Updates – Acetylene
Hazard Communication 2012
 Final Rule published in the Federal Register on
March 26th, 2012
 Hazard Communication website provides
additional information, guidance materials:
http://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/index.html
Consensus Standard Update –
Head Protection
 Updates consensus standards referenced in OSHA
Head Protection Standards
 Significant Z89.1 changes – permits additional
testing for:
 Hard hats worn backwards
 Helmets at colder temperatures
 For high visibility coloring of helmets
 DFR published November 16, 2012
Consensus Standard Update Signage
 Updates the reference to the version of consensus standards (1967
version of ANSI Z53.1 Safety Code for Marking Physical Hazards and
the Identification of Certain Equipment; 1968 version of ANSI Z53.1
Specification for Accident Prevention Signs) included in three OSHA
standards (1910.97, Nonionizing radiation; 1910.145, Specifications for
accident prevention signs and tags; and 1910.261, Pulp, paper, and
paper-board mills).
 NPRM/DFR published June 13, 2013
 NPRM comment period ends July 15, 2013
 Direct Final Rule effective September 11, 2013
Standards Improvement Project IV
 PURPOSE:
 Eliminate unnecessary paperwork
 Clarify or eliminate unnecessary employer duties
 Update standards and eliminate inconsistencies or
duplication
 Miscellaneous revisions
 RFI published December, 2012
•
•
•
Shipyard
Longshoring/Marine Terminals
Soon to be completed
Shipyard Guidance Products
All online – not printed yet ***
 Eye Protection Against Radiant Energy (Spanish
translation)
 Working Alone in Shipyards (Fact Sheet)
 Hot Work on Hollow or Enclosed Structures in
Shipyard Employment (Quick Card & Fact Sheet)
 Ventilation in Shipyard Employment
 Guidelines for Safe Entry and Cleaning of Vessel
Sewage Tanks (Fact Sheet)
Longshore /Marine Terminals
Guidance Products
 Mechanics Working in the Yard during Marine Terminal
Operations (Quick Card)
 Mechanics Working on Power Equipment in the Yard in
Marine Terminals (Quick Card & Fact Sheet)
 Freeing Inoperable Semi Freeing Inoperable SemiAutomatic Twist Locks (SATLs)
 Working Safely on the Apron or Highline during Marine
Terminal Operations (Quick Card)
 Servicing Multi-piece and Single-piece Wheel Rims (Quick
Card)
 Top and Side Handler Safety (Quick Card)
 The Safety of Intermodal Containers Repair (Fact Sheet)
Guidance Documents
Coming Soon….
Shipyards:
 Electrical SHIPS
 Shipyard eTool Update
 Shipyard Digest
 Safe Lighting Practices in
Shipyard Employment
(Quick Card)
 Hazard Communication in
Maritime (Fact Sheet)
Longshoring:
 Single-Piece and Multi-Piece
Rim Wheels (Fact sheet)
 Dock Rail Safety (Fact Sheet)
 Hot Work on Hollow and
Enclosed Structures (Fact
Sheet)
 Recovery of Person in the
Water (Guidance Document)
 Log Handling Operations
(Guidance Document)
 Longshore Digest
Why Simulation Based Training?
Well-designed simulation or game-based learning applications work
because they leverage many known principles of active learning
environments.
 Motivation: Structures of engagement from game design ensure
learners stay motivated throughout the learning experience.
 Retrieval: Learners are asked to use knowledge immediately,
cementing each new idea through application.
 Goal-directed practice: Knowledge and skills are reinforced through
focused, relevant practice.
 Targeted feedback: Actionable feedback is provided so that learners
can make meaningful progress with each round of practice.
Purpose
Help users understand key elements of the hazard
identification process.
 Collect information
 Observe/inspect workplace
 Investigate incidents
 Involve workers
 Prioritize hazards*
Apply the elements together to identify hazards.
49
Learning Goals
 Help employers get better at identifying hazards in their
workplaces.
 Understand the importance of Hazard Identification as
a key to good business and protecting workers.
 Point to OSHA resources
 Website
 Pamphlets
 Consulting group
Scenarios
Construction

 OSHA Training Institute
 Saw
 Manufacturing
 Mixer
 Owner
 Scaffolding
 Worker
 Fall Protection
51
Main Scenarios
Manufacturing
Construction
 Parts Manufacturing
 Small Store
 20 weeks
 30 days
 75-90 hazards
 3 Phases
 15 workers
 40-50 hazards/phase
 14 pieces of equipment
 ~10 worker/phase
52
Scoring
Make as much money as possible & keep workers safe
Time:
 Used to complete actions in
the game.
 Can be converted to profit.
Profit:
 Earned based on your
remaining time.
 Can be used to fix hazards.
Safety Culture
Completing safety related actions each turn increases your
safety culture score.
53
Hazard Occurrence
 Random hazards occur in a set number at the start of
each game.
 Hazards can cause accidents until they are controlled
even if they haven’t been discovered.
 Since some mitigations lose effectiveness over time
some hazards will recur after they have been
controlled.
Incidents
 Incidents are chosen probabilistically between turns, based on
the number and type of unmitigated hazards that exist in the
scenario.
Incidents automatically
cost the player a certain
amount of money
(referencing the Safety
Pays program).
A description of the
incident is given, along with
a chance to conduct an
investigation.
Manufacturing: Worker
 Member of a Safety Committee:
 10 actions to find as many hazards as possible in one
area of the Manufacturing Facility
 Talk to co-workers
 Inspect area/equipment
 Search “paper” resources
Mini Games
Four Equipment Inspection Games
57
Mini Games
 The goal is to identify as many hazards as possible.
 Focus is on specific hazards as opposed to the larger hazard
identification process seen in the main game.

 Animated: watch the worker complete an action

 Rotate the equipment 360 to identify hazards

 Talk to the employee
58
Demo
http://www.etceteraedutainment.com/demo/hazid/
59