Transcript Document 7111063
Sea Mine Warfare: An Assessment Update RDML M. A. Sharp, Program Executive Officer
23-26 July 2001
Program Executive Office Mine and Undersea Warfare
ZODIAC F-470 AN/AQS-14 ALMDS AN/ALQ-141 AN/AQS-20 AN/SQQ-89(V) CLOSED LOOP DEGAUSSING
A- CO I L DA T A B US
CLOSED LOOP DEGAUSSING
PO F E ED ER T O CO W E R I L D / G M PO O DI F I ED D / G W CO E R SU PP L I ES I L CL DG PR O CE SS O R HI G H- SP EE D DA T A B US M AG SH I P - B AS ED N ET I C S EN SO R S L - CO I L M - C O I L M UL T I PL EX ER
PMSNSW SQQ-34(V)CV-TSC PMSMDS PMS210 PMS403 PEO-MUW PMS411
AN/SQQ-89(V)
PMS490 DD-21 PMSEOD MCM 1 Class LMRS EMATT/MK 30 Targets MHC 51 Class VSW MCM MARINE MAMMAL SYSTEM RMS MCS 12 D ET SA B R E REMOTE ORDNANCE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEM REMOTE ORDNANCE NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEM ASSAULT BREACHING
July 2001 2
July 2001
PEO Top Four
•
Create a Navy Plan for Battle Space Dominance Under-the-Sea
•
Determine the Way Ahead for Naval Mining
•
Conduct End-to-End Assessment of Organic Mine Counter Measures Capability
•
Dedicated MIW Forces Roadmap to the Navy after Next
3
Current Mining Capability
QS & SLMM MK 65/63/62 QUICKSTRIKE MK 56 QS & SLMM MK 56 No Requirement MK 60 CAPTOR MK 67 SLMM SHALLOW 150 fsw MEDIUM 600 fsw DEEP
Current Status of USN Mines
July 2001
• • • • Quickstrike Mk 62/63/65 – Support for older Mods fully funded – Mod 3 procurement initiated this fiscal year – Air platform integration and algorithm development above core Submarine Launched Mobile Mine (SLMM) Mk 67 – Demil/Disposal directed by PR99 – Retention directed by POM02 SPP – Limited support until maintenance is reestablished in FY04 – Out of Service by 2010 Mine Mk 56 – Demil/Disposal directed by PR99 – Retention of contingency quantity directed by POM02 SPP – Minimal support for safety issues only – Out of Service by 2010 Encapsulated Torpedo (CAPTOR) Mk 60 – Demil/Disposal directed by PR99 – Out of service by end of this fiscal year – Some components retained for possible future mines developments
5
Mining Capability Beyond 2010
No Capability No Requirement MK 65/63/62 QuickStrike
SHALLOW 150 fsw MEDIUM 600 fsw DEEP
July 2001
Year 2010 Problem
• • • •
Limited Inventory-Shallow or Medium (Bottom) Water Only No Medium (Moored) or Deep Capability No Covert Mining Capability Infrastructure Atrophy
– –
Reduced budget No New development Planned or Programmed
–
U. S. Navy Core Competency Threatened with Extinction
7
30000
US Naval Mines Inventory
CAPTOR Mk 56 SLMM QS
July 2001
0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
8
Mining Infrastructure S&T and Development Work Force
250 200 150 100 Desert Storm Core Infrastructure S&T = 15 WY Dev = 21 WY Total = 36 WY 50 Core Infrastructure = 36 WY 0 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 Fiscal Year
July 2001
U.S. Mining Vision Integrated Littoral Battlespace Dominance
Mine Node Mine Node
10
July 2001
‘Top 4’ – Organic MCM
• • • • •
Will Organic MCM Systems satisfy the operational mine warfare requirements?
Led by overarching IPT Composed of three separate but related IPTs
–
Analysis
–
Research
–
System Engineering IPTs composed of N7/N8/PEO MUW, SURFLANT, CMWC, CSS representatives Provided interim report mid June, final report NLT 30 September
11
July 2001
Objectives
• • • •
Determine the technical capabilities of complete suite of organic systems (seven) and C4I in a coordinated (net-centric) warfighting role
– – –
Requirements CONOPS Technical Performance Describe capabilities and shortfalls
–
Identify “holes,” issues, and recommendations Formulate alternatives to shortfalls Recommend solutions
12
July 2001
E2E Assessment Team
Review Panel CINCLANTFLT CMWC PMA-299 N78 N763 N74 N752 N77 2 nd FLT Executive Board Co-chairs CAPT Lambert (PMS 403) CAPT Jimenez (PMS 210) CAPT Briggs (PMS 490) K. Haas (PMS 210) T. Stefanick (PMS 210) Core Team Cells Analysis Research Systems Engineering
13
Assessment Process
Integrate Concept of Operations and Employment AMCM LMRS RMS System Technical Parameters Probability of detection Probability of neutralization Endurance False alarm rate Other … Communications / Data flow Threats Baseline Scenario Development TACSITs Environmen Asset Availability
July 2001
Assessment Methodology Measures of effectiveness Modeling Fleet expertise Review Panel MIW Operational Requirements Identify Capabilities and Shortfalls Prioritize and Rank Recommendations
14
July 2001
‘Top 4’ - Dedicated MIW Forces Roadmap to the Navy after Next
•
MCM’s/MHC’s/New Payloads;
–
Plan for improvement not clear or funded.
•
MCS Replacement
–
Valid need for dedicated ship?
–
Expected life of Inchon
–
Realistic plan for way ahead
>
Convert existing ship?
>
New Construction of a unique ship?
>
Build an additional ship of an existing class?
•
MH-53 vs. MH-60
15
‘Top 4’ - Improving USW Battle Space Dominance
•
Advancing USW as a concept that includes ASW and MUW
•
Shallow water operations means we no longer have the luxury to keep ASW and MUW separate.
•
Assured access requires an Undersea Warfare Approach.
July 2001 16
July 2001 17
‘Top 4’ - Improving USW Battle Space Dominance
•
USW ESG refocused
•
Cross platform, leveraged efforts approach
•
Eliminate program redundancies/stovepipes
•
Capability and mission based
•
Marries ASW and MUW to assure access
•
Modified SUBTECH process
•
IPTs to explore future technologies which could contribute to mission accomplishment
•
Outcomes to affect FY02/03 execution and POM 04 planning
July 2001 18
Questions?
July 2001 19
July 2001
Differences from Force 21
• • • • •
Scope of Force 21 included dedicated MCM, End to End (E2E) analysis addresses only organic E2E is a technical assessment addressing interoperability of the suite of systems vs. a strictly operational analysis End to End study addresses C4I to a much greater degree than Force 21 Level of analysis of individual system timelines more detailed in End to End study End to End study uses most recent system performance estimates, rather than notional estimates or ORD thresholds
20
•
14 MCM-1 Class ships 4 Overseas Homeported 12 MHC-51 Class ships
•
2 Overseas Homeported 2 AMCM Sqdns (20 A/C total)
•
4 FWD Deployed
•
72 Hr Deployment Contingency Dedicated Forces
•
15 EOD MCM dets
•
2 EOD Marine Mammal dets
•
1 Very Shallow Water (VSW) det
•
72 Hr Deployment Contingency 1 MCS-12 Class ship
July 2001
An Integrated Force of Ships, Helicopters and Divers
21