Transcript Final Report

Final Report
Valutazione dell'efficacia di Sublic contro Septoriosi su
frumento duro - 2013
Author: Gianfranco
Date: Pradolesi
Terremerse Trial Code: TEF20013
Sponsor
MAKHTESHIM AGAN ITALIA S.r.l.
Via Zanica, 19 24050
Grassobbio (BG) - Italy
Contractor
TERREMERSE SOC. COOP.
Via Cà del Vento, 21
48012 Bagnacavallo (RA) - Italy
Sommario
1.
Site description .............................................................................................................................................4
1.1
General Trial Information .................................................................................................................................. 4
2.1
Trial Location ..................................................................................................................................................... 4
3.1
Objectives/Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 5
4.1
Contacts ............................................................................................................................................................. 5
5.1
Crop Description ................................................................................................................................................ 6
6.1
Pest Description ................................................................................................................................................. 6
7.1
Site and Design .................................................................................................................................................. 6
8.1
Soil Description .................................................................................................................................................. 6
9.1
Moisture and Weather Conditions .................................................................................................................... 6
10.1
Application Description ..................................................................................................................................... 8
11.1
Crop Stage At Each Application ......................................................................................................................... 8
12.1
Pest Stage At Each Application .......................................................................................................................... 8
13.1
Application Equipment ...................................................................................................................................... 9
14.1
Additional Information (Validation List Comments).......................................................................................... 9
2.
Map ............................................................................................................................................................ 10
3.
Trial Treatments .......................................................................................................................................... 10
4.
AOV Means Table ........................................................................................................................................ 11
5.
Assessment Data Summary .......................................................................................................................... 14
Page 3 of 15
1.
Site description
Ricerca & Sviluppo Terremerse
Valutazione dell'efficacia di Sublic contro Septoriosi su frumento tenero - 2013
Trial ID: TEF20013
Protocol ID: TEF20013
Project ID:
1.1
Location:
Trial Year: 2013
Investigator: Dr. Gianfranco Pradolesi
Study Director: Gianfranco Pradolesi
Sponsor Contact: Mirco Storari
General Trial Information
Study Director: Gianfranco Pradolesi
Investigator: Gianfranco Pradolesi
Discipline:
Trial Status:
Initiation Date:
Completion Date:
2.1
F fungicide
F one-year/final
17-4-13
3-7-13
Trial Reliability: GOOD
Planned Completion Date: 23-10-13
Trial Location
City: Camerlona
Country: ITA Italy
State/Prov.: Ravenna
Postal Code: 48123
Climate Zone: EPPO Mediterranean
Latitude of LL Corner °: 44,4463444 N
Longitude of LL Corner °: 12,12688333 E
Altitude of LL Corner, Unit: 0,00 m
Official Trial ID: TEF20013
Conducted Under GEP: Yes
Page 4 of 15
3.1
Objectives/Conclusions
Objectives:
Valutare l'attività di Sublic + Nutryaction contro la Septoriosi su frumento duro
Conclusions:
Sommario
La prova è stata eseguita a Camerlona, in provincia di Ravenna, in una tipica area di coltivazione del
frumento, sia tenero che duro, dove il complesso della Septoriosi (Septoria spp.) frequentemente causa
gravi perdite di produzione andanda danneggiare le ultime foglie preposte al riempimento della granella.
In questa prova sono impostate 3 tesi, con un disegno sperimentale a blocchi randomizzati con 4 ripetizioni
e parcelle di 17,5 mq (7 m per 2,5 m). La miscela di Sublic + Nutryaction è stata confontata con l'attività di
un specifico fungicida a base di strobilurine (Opera: epossiconazolo + piraclostrobin), attivo su Septoriosi. I
trattamenti sono stati eseguiti alla comparsa della "foglia a mbandiera", in data 18 aprile 2013, utilizzato
una barra laterale innescata con CO2 portante 5 ugelli modello TeeJet 110/03 e calibrata per irrorare un
volume pari a 300 l/ha di soluzione. Nessuna altro fungicida è stato impiegato successivamente sulle tesi
trattate.
Per quanto concerne i rilievi su Septoriosi è stata valutata complessivamente su 4 punti lineari di 1 m
ciascuna la severità di malattia sulla penultima e sull'ultima foglia ad inizio maturazione lattea (20 maggio
2013). E' stato eseguito anche un rilievo specifico sulla Fusariosi della spiga (Fusarium spp.) stimando la
severità su 50 spighe per parcella scelte casualmente. Inoltre sono stati ricavati anche i dati quantiqualitativi (resa areica, proteine e peso specifico) andando a raccogliere le singole ripetizioni mediante una
mietitrebbia parcellare in data 3 luglio 2013.
Conclusioni
I dati batometrici ottenuti sulla Septoriosi purtoppo hanno mostrato un incremento significativo della
malattia sulla penultima foglia proprio sulle parcelle trattate con Sublic + Nutryaction. Sulla foglia a
bandiera non si sono avuti riscontri significativi, ma numericamente parlando Sublic Nutryaction ha
continuato a mostrare una maggiore presenza di malattia. Per quanto concerne la Fusariosi della spiga
nessun trattamento ha mostrato un’efficacia significativa rispetto il grado di malattia del testimone non
trattato.
I dati produttivi hanno mostrato una maggiore produzione areica nella tesi trattata con Opera, anche se
non in modo statisticamente significativo, mentre Sublic + Nutryaction si è distinta per un maggiore
contenuto proteico, significativo rispetto alle altre tesi a confronto. Anche per quel che riguarda il peso
specifico della granella non si sono avuti dati significativi, ma solo tendenzialmente la tesi trattata con
Opera ha mostrato un leggero incremento.
In definitiva in questa prova Sublic + Nutryaction non ha evidenziato un’efficace protezione delle ultime
foglie contro la Septoriosi anche a fronte di una attacco non troppo elevato.
4.1
Contacts
Study Director:
Organization:
Address:
City+State/Prov:
Postal Code:
Country:
Gianfranco Pradolesi
TERREMERSE Soc. Coop.
Via Cà del Vento, 21
Bagnacavallo - Ravenna
Mobile No.: +393357800261
48012
E-mail: [email protected]
ITA Italy
Page 5 of 15
Investigator:
Organization:
Address:
City+State/Prov:
Postal Code:
Country:
5.1
Gianfranco Pradolesi
TERREMERSE Soc. Coop.
Via Cà del Vento, 21
Bagnacavallo - Ravenna
Mobile No.: +3933578002361
48012
E-mail: [email protected]
ITA Italy
Crop Description
Crop 1: TRZDU Triticum durum
Variety: San Carlo
Durum wheat
Planting Date: 22-10-12
Planting Method: SEEDED seeded
Planting Equipment: FE
Field Equipment
Planting Rate, Unit: 190 KG/HA
6.1
Pest Description
Pest 1 Type: D Code: SEPTSP Septoria sp.
Common Name: Septoria sp.
Pest 2 Type: D Code: FUSASP Fusarium sp.
Common Name: Fusarium sp.
7.1
Site and Design
Treated Plot Width:
Treated Plot Length:
Treated Plot Area:
Replications:
% Slope:
8.1
2,5 m
7 m
17,5 m2
4
0,0
Treatments: 3
Site Type:
Experimental Unit:
Tillage Type:
Study Design:
FIELD
field
1 PLOT
plot
CONTIL conventional-till
RACOBL Randomized Complete Block (RCB)
Soil Description
Texture: SIL silt loam
Fert. Level: G good
Soil Drainage: G good
9.1
Moisture and Weather Conditions
Overall Moisture Conditions: SLIWET slightly wet
Closest Weather Station: IMetos 2
Distance, Unit: 1,5 km
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Date
1-4-13
2-4-13
3-4-13
4-4-13
5-4-13
6-4-13
7-4-13
8-4-13
9-4-13
10-4-13
11-4-13
12-4-13
13-4-13
14-4-13
15-4-13
16-4-13
17-4-13
18-4-13
19-4-13
Amount
1,2
13,6
0
1,8
31,2
0
0,2
1,2
2,2
0
0,2
0,6
0
0
0
0
0,4
0
0
Unit
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
Min
Temp
9,46
9,12
8,48
8,56
10,23
9,97
9,22
8,37
9,96
11,46
12,19
16,24
14,51
13,71
14,36
14,76
15,48
16,04
16,96
Max
Temp
4,94
7,72
4,62
1,22
8,97
4,02
4,53
2,67
6,11
7,9
3,12
10,93
7,39
5,34
5,59
7,62
8,08
6,74
8,52
Temp
Unit
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Relative
Humidity
100
100
96
100
100
100
98
99
100
100
97
89
91
98
93
92
87
87
99
Page 6 of 15
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
20-4-13
21-4-13
22-4-13
23-4-13
24-4-13
25-4-13
26-4-13
27-4-13
28-4-13
29-4-13
30-4-13
1-5-13
2-5-13
3-5-13
4-5-13
5-5-13
6-5-13
7-5-13
8-5-13
9-5-13
10-5-13
11-5-13
12-5-13
13-5-13
14-5-13
15-5-13
16-5-13
17-5-13
18-5-13
19-5-13
20-5-13
21-5-13
22-5-13
23-5-13
24-5-13
25-5-13
26-5-13
27-5-13
28-5-13
29-5-13
30-5-13
31-5-13
1-6-13
2-6-13
3-6-13
4-6-13
5-6-13
6-6-13
7-6-13
8-6-13
9-6-13
10-6-13
11-6-13
12-6-13
13-6-13
14-6-13
15-6-13
16-6-13
17-6-13
18-6-13
19-6-13
20-6-13
21-6-13
22-6-13
23-6-13
24-6-13
25-6-13
26-6-13
27-6-13
28-6-13
29-6-13
30-6-13
10,4
6,2
4,2
0
0,2
0,2
0
0,2
0,2
0
1
1
13,6
0,4
0,2
1,6
0,4
24,2
1,8
0,2
5,2
0,8
4,8
1,6
0
0,2
7,6
0,2
0
0,2
2,2
0
0
4,4
1,4
5,6
0,8
0
0
0
0,8
0
0
0,2
0
0
7,6
0
0,2
0
1,2
4
0,2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,2
1,2
10,4
0,2
0
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
15,22
13,77
13,27
12,29
13,07
14,84
15,98
16,55
18,11
17,18
16,45
18,34
17,18
17,67
18
16,95
17,21
17,29
17,59
18,95
19,08
17,91
17,16
16,26
15,58
17,6
17,62
17,35
17,01
18,06
15,55
15,18
15,76
16,95
12,49
9,76
14,56
17,02
15,73
17,04
14,38
15,07
16,69
18,4
17,85
16,78
19,25
18,65
19,68
20,82
19,23
18,9
20,06
20,86
21,11
20,97
24,29
25,11
25,32
25,98
25,83
26,89
25,92
23,5
23,8
19,85
20,69
17,63
18,35
15,98
18,36
19,77
12,43
10,88
8,59
6,4
4,24
5,78
9,79
10,66
12,66
13,06
11,98
14,1
13,25
10,86
12,79
13,12
14,76
14,42
12,15
10,82
14,56
13,88
12,2
9,26
5,49
8,78
14,84
12,89
8,43
11,81
6,82
5,78
8,34
13,2
5,92
4,08
8,49
8,23
9,75
12,4
7,98
8,62
11,6
11,55
8,76
7,22
12,6
11,52
10,42
10,5
11,79
12,66
11,41
11,13
11,5
8,36
15,02
15,18
14,74
16,84
16,84
16,32
17,16
11,9
12,48
11,71
11,59
12,72
12,21
10
9,58
8,58
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
99
99
99
99
99
93
97
14
0
21
16
25
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
36
69
1
0
42
63
4
1
0
1
51
81
77
22
42
82
80
72
71
91
74
85
43
92
59
71
28
1
42
26
5
48
22
31
18
6
39
74
93
61
42
41
5
59
64
55
91
57
6
0
14
86
86
Page 7 of 15
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
1-7-13
2-7-13
3-7-13
4-7-13
5-7-13
6-7-13
7-7-13
8-7-13
9-7-13
10-7-13
11-7-13
12-7-13
13-7-13
14-7-13
15-7-13
16-7-13
17-7-13
18-7-13
19-7-13
20-7-13
21-7-13
22-7-13
23-7-13
24-7-13
25-7-13
26-7-13
27-7-13
28-7-13
29-7-13
30-7-13
31-7-13
10.1
0
0,2
0
0
0
0
0,2
0
0
0
23,4
1,8
13,6
16,4
0,2
0
0
0,2
0
0
0
0
0,2
0
0
0
0
0
2,2
0
0
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
9,75
11,65
13,15
18,07
15,19
17,55
16,91
16,62
15,8
15,61
17,03
19,53
18,52
15,89
14,25
15,88
15,09
13,2
15,27
14,38
14,86
14,8
13,83
15,5
17,78
18,31
17,98
18,52
17,52
15,35
13,39
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
90
91
83
87
88
88
93
93
92
95
99
99
100
97
98
65
68
34
42
58
11
1
31
43
100
22
56
49
96
89
92
Application Description
Application Date:
Appl. Start Time:
Appl. Stop Time:
Application Method:
Application Timing:
Application Placement:
Applied By:
Air Temperature, Unit:
% Relative Humidity:
Wind Velocity, Unit:
Dew Presence (Y/N):
% Cloud Cover:
Next Moisture Occurred On:
Time to Next Moisture, Unit:
11.1
20,52
21,65
22,88
24,72
24,3
25,27
24,05
23,5
24,01
23,84
22,19
24,23
23,13
22,76
23,26
22,83
22,79
22,44
23,31
23,42
23,18
23,74
24,37
25,45
26,18
26,56
27,09
28,18
24,68
23,52
22,48
A
18-4-13
11:00
11:15
SPRAY
PRAPSY
FOLIAR
G.Pradolesi
23,3 C
54
0 MPS
Y yes
0
20-4-13
2 DAY
Crop Stage At Each Application
A
Crop 1 Code, BBCH Scale: TRZDU BCER
Stage Scale Used:
BBCH
Stage Majority, Percent: 37
100
12.1
Pest Stage At Each Application
Pest 1 Code, Type, Scale:
Stage Majority, Percent:
Pest 2 Code, Type, Scale:
Stage Majority, Percent:
A
SEPTSP D
SPORUL 100
FUSASP D
PRINFC 100
Page 8 of 15
13.1
Application Equipment
Appl. Equipment:
Equipment Type:
Operation Pressure, Unit:
Nozzle Type:
Nozzle Size:
Nozzle Spacing, Unit:
Nozzles/Row:
Boom Length, Unit:
Boom Height, Unit:
Spray Volume, Unit:
Mix Size, Unit:
Propellant:
Tank Mix (Y/N):
A
CO2 Sprayer
BACSPR
1,8
BAR
FLAFAN
110/03
50 cm
5
2,5 m
1 m
300 L/ha
3 liters
COMCO2
Y yes
14.1 Additional Information (Validation List Comments)
F, fungicide = fungicide
F, one-year/final = one-year/final|6
GOOD = Good quality
Ravenna, RA = ITA
N, N = North
E, E = East
m = meters
TRZDU, BCER, Triticum durum, = US
KG/HA = kilogram seed per hectare
SEEDED, seeded = seeded
FE, Field Equipment = Field Equipment
D, Disease, G-BYRD7, G-DisStg = Disease, such as a fungus, bacteria, or virus
SEPTSP, Septoria sp., = US
FUSASP, Fusarium sp., = US
m = meter
FIELD, field = field
PLOT, plot = plot
CONTIL, conventional-till = conventional-till
RACOBL, Randomized Complete Block (RCB) = Randomized Complete Block (RCB)
SIL, silt loam = silt loam
G, good = good
G, good = Good / medium / adequate drainage with aeration not likely to harm crop growth
SLIWET, slightly wet = slightly wet
km = kilometer
mm = millimeter
C = Celsius
SPRAY = spray
PRAPSY = before appearance of symptoms
FOLIAR = foliar
MPS = meter per second
Y, yes = yes
DAY = day
BBCH = BBCH uniform plant stages
37 = Flag leaf just visible, still rolled|BCER
SPORUL = Sporulation
PRINFC = Pre-Infection
CO2 Sprayer, BACSPR, 1.8, BAR, FLAFAN, 110/03, 50, cm, 5, , , , , , , , , , 2.5, m, 1, m, , , , , , , , , 300, L/ha, 3, liters, , COMCO2, Y, yes = Backpack CO2 sprayer
equipped with a hand-held boom with five flat-fan 110-03 nozzles spaced 50 centimeters apart.
BACSPR = backpack sprayer, knapsack sprayer, hand held sprayer
BAR = bar
FLAFAN = flat - fan
cm = centimeter
L/ha = liters per hectare
liters = liters of mix
COMCO2 = compressed co2
Page 9 of 15
2.
Map
1
3
2
2
3
1
B
D
3
1
2
3
1
2
A
C
3.
Trt
No. Type
1 FERT
FERT
2 FUNG
3 CHK
Trial Treatments
Treatment
Form Form
Name
Conc Unit
Sublic
30 %
Nutryaction
41 %
OPERA
183 G/L
Untreated Check
Form
Rate Growth Appl
Type Rate Unit Stage
Code
L
2 l/ha
A
L
2 l/ha
A
SE
1,25 l/ha
A
Additional Treatment Information
Type
FERT = Fertilizer
FUNG = Fungicide or Bactericide
CHK = Check or Untreated
Treatment Name
Nutryaction, 41, %, L = Nutryaction (N 1%; C 10%; organic matter 30%)
OPERA, 183, G/L, SE = epossiconazole 50 g/l + pyraclostrobin 133 g/l
Untreated Check, , , = Not treated|
Form Unit
% = percent active ingredient in formulated product on a weight/weight basis (same as %aw/w)
G/L = grams active ingredient per liter formulated product (same as ga/l)
Form Type
L = liquid|Liquid||Y|--> Old term - will fail validation in most customized ARM study definitions
SE = suspo-emulsion|Liquid|||A fluid, heterogeneous formulation consisting of a stable dispersion of active ingredients in the form of solid particles and fine
globules in a continuous water phase.
Rate Unit
L/ha = Liters Product per Hectare (US=GAL/A)|T
Replications: 4, Untreated treatments: 3, Design: Randomized Complete Block (RCB), Treatment units: Treated 'Plot' experimental unit size, Dry Form. Unit: %,
Treated 'Plot' experimental unit size Width: 2,5 meters, Treated 'Plot' experimental unit size Length: 7 meters, Application volume: 300 L/ha, Mix size: 3 liters,
Mix overage: 900 mL, Format definitions: G-All7.def, G-All7.frm
Page 10 of 15
4.
AOV Means Table
Pest Type
Pest Code
Pest Scientific Name
Pest Name
Crop Code
BBCH Scale
Crop Scientific Name
Crop Name
Crop Variety
Part Rated
Rating Date
Rating Type
Rating Unit
Sample Size, Unit
Collection Basis, Unit
Number of Subsamples
Days After First/Last Applic.
Trt-Eval Interval
Plant-Eval Interval
ARM Action Codes
Trt Treatment
Rate
No. Name
Rate Unit
1 Sublic
2 l/ha
Nutryaction
2 l/ha
2 OPERA
1,25 l/ha
3 Untreated Check
LSD (P=.05)
Standard Deviation
CV
Bartlett's X2
P(Bartlett's X2)
D Disease
SEPTSP
Septoria sp.
Septoria sp.
TRZDU
BCER
Triticum durum
Durum wheat
San Carlo
LEAF2 C
20-5-13
PESSEV
%
4 m
1 LEAF
1
32 32
32 DA-A
210 DP-1
AL APC
Appl
Code
1
A
17,935 a
A
(-138,0%)
A
6,595 b
(12,5%)
7,537 b
(0,0%)
StDev
0,239
D Disease
SEPTSP
Septoria sp.
Septoria sp.
TRZDU
BCER
Triticum durum
Durum wheat
San Carlo
LEAF1 C
20-5-13
PESSEV
%
4 m
1 LEAF
1
32 32
32 DA-A
210 DP-1
AL APC
D Disease
FUSASP
Fusarium sp.
Fusarium sp.
TRZDU
BCER
Triticum durum
Durum wheat
San Carlo
HEAD C
27-5-13
PESINC
%
50 HEAD
100 HEAD
1
39 39
32 DA-A
217 DP-1
AL APC
2
StDev
3
6,301 a 0,341
13,8 a
(-152,1%)
(-16,4%)
0,079
2,178 a 0,149
17,3 a
(12,9%)
(-46,5%)
0,127
2,500 a 0,208
11,8 a
(0,0%)
(0,0%)
0,3157t
0,4517t
0,1824t
0,2611t
17,72
41,02
3,216
1,864
0,20
0,394
D Disease
FUSASP
Fusarium sp.
Fusarium sp.
TRZDU
TRZDU
BCER
BCER
Triticum durum Triticum durum
Durum wheat
Durum wheat
San Carlo
San Carlo
HEAD C
PLOT C
27-5-13
3-7-13
PESSEV
YIELD
%
T-MET
50 HEAD
1 PLOT
1 HEAD
1 ha
1
1
39 39
76 76
32 DA-A
76 DA-A
217 DP-1
254 DP-1
AL APC
TRZDU
BCER
Triticum durum
Durum wheat
San Carlo
PLOT C
3-7-13
PROCON
%
1 PLOT
1 ha
1
76 76
76 DA-A
254 DP-1
StDev
0,2
4
StDev
5
StDev
6
0,387 a 0,116 5,033 a 1,067 15,00 a
(2,9%)
0,1
0,947 a 0,105 6,508 a 0,398 14,65 b
(-138,0%)
0,1
0,398 a 0,026 5,318 a 0,885 14,90 ab
(0,0%)
0,15t
0,1585t
1,2467
0,09t
0,0916t
0,7205
7,32
47,63
12,82
2,275
4,762
2,347
0,321
0,092
0,309
Replicate F
0,385
0,670
6,617
Replicate Prob(F)
0,7678
0,6010
0,0248
Treatment F
5,601
2,291
3,260
Treatment Prob(F)
0,0424
0,1823
0,1101
Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)
t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.
Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.
1,001
0,4544
3,374
0,1043
2,003
0,2151
4,717
0,0588
Page 11 of 15
StDev
0,29
0,25
0,18
0,258
0,149
1,0
0,604
0,74
6,250
0,0282
5,850
0,0390
Pest Type
Pest Code
Pest Scientific Name
Pest Name
Crop Code
BBCH Scale
Crop Scientific Name
Crop Name
Crop Variety
Part Rated
Rating Date
Rating Type
Rating Unit
Sample Size, Unit
Collection Basis, Unit
Number of Subsamples
Days After First/Last Applic.
Trt-Eval Interval
Plant-Eval Interval
ARM Action Codes
Trt Treatment
Rate
No. Name
Rate Unit
1 Sublic
2 l/ha
Nutryaction
2 l/ha
2 OPERA
1,25 l/ha
3 Untreated Check
LSD (P=.05)
Standard Deviation
CV
Bartlett's X2
P(Bartlett's X2)
TRZDU
BCER
Triticum durum
Durum wheat
San Carlo
PLOT C
3-7-13
HLW
kg
1 PLOT
1 hL
1
76 76
76 DA-A
254 DP-1
Appl
Code
7
A
77,83 a
A
A
80,55 a
77,65 a
StDev
3,11
0,70
1,27
2,861
1,654
2,1
5,651
0,059
Replicate F
2,307
Replicate Prob(F)
0,1764
Treatment F
3,869
Treatment Prob(F)
0,0833
Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)
t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.
Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.
Pest Type
D, Disease, G-BYRD7, G-DisStg = Disease, such as a fungus, bacteria, or virus
Pest Code
SEPTSP, Septoria sp., = US
FUSASP, Fusarium sp., = US
Crop Code
TRZDU, BCER, Triticum durum, = US
Part Rated
LEAF2 = leaf 2
LEAF1 = leaf 1
HEAD = head
PLOT = plot
C = Crop is Part Rated
Rating Type
PESSEV = pest severity
PESINC = pest incidence
YIELD = yield
PROCON = protein content
HLW = weight 100 Ltr (hl)
Rating Unit
% = percent
T-MET = ton (metric=1000 kg)
kg = kilogram
m = meter
HEAD = head
PLOT = total plot
LEAF = leaf
HEAD = head
ha = hectare
hL = hectoliter
Page 12 of 15
Plant-Eval Interval
210 DP-1 = 1 TRZDU 22-10-12
217 DP-1 = 1 TRZDU 22-10-12
254 DP-1 = 1 TRZDU 22-10-12
Page 13 of 15
5.
Assessment Data Summary
Pest Type
Pest Code
Pest Scientific Name
Pest Name
Crop Code
BBCH Scale
Crop Scientific Name
Crop Name
Crop Variety
Part Rated
Rating Date
Rating Type
Rating Unit
Sample Size, Unit
Collection Basis, Unit
Number of Subsamples
Days After First/Last Applic.
Trt-Eval Interval
Plant-Eval Interval
ARM Action Codes
Trt Treatment
Rate
No. Name
Rate Unit
1 Sublic
2 l/ha
Nutryaction
2 l/ha
Appl
Code Plot
A
102
A
203
301
402
Mean =
2 OPERA
1,25 l/ha A
101
202
303
401
Mean =
3 Untreated Check
103
201
302
403
Mean =
D Disease
D Disease
D Disease
D Disease
SEPTSP
SEPTSP
FUSASP
FUSASP
Septoria sp.
Septoria sp.
Fusarium sp.
Fusarium sp.
Septoria sp.
Septoria sp.
Fusarium sp.
Fusarium sp.
TRZDU
TRZDU
TRZDU
TRZDU
TRZDU
TRZDU
BCER
BCER
BCER
BCER
BCER
BCER
Triticum durum Triticum durum Triticum durum Triticum durum Triticum durum Triticum durum
Durum wheat
Durum wheat
Durum wheat
Durum wheat
Durum wheat
Durum wheat
San Carlo
San Carlo
San Carlo
San Carlo
San Carlo
San Carlo
LEAF2 C
LEAF1 C
HEAD C
HEAD C
PLOT C
PLOT C
20-5-13
20-5-13
27-5-13
27-5-13
3-7-13
3-7-13
PESSEV
PESSEV
PESINC
PESSEV
YIELD
PROCON
%
%
%
%
T-MET
%
4 m
4 m
50 HEAD
50 HEAD
1 PLOT
1 PLOT
1 LEAF
1 LEAF
100 HEAD
1 HEAD
1 ha
1 ha
1
1
1
1
1
1
32 32
32 32
39 39
39 39
76 76
76 76
32 DA-A
32 DA-A
32 DA-A
32 DA-A
76 DA-A
76 DA-A
210 DP-1
210 DP-1
217 DP-1
217 DP-1
254 DP-1
254 DP-1
AL APC
AL APC
AL APC
AL APC
1
2
37,500
21,250
11,250
11,250
17,935t
7,500
5,000
6,250
8,000
6,595t
5,000
11,250
7,500
7,500
7,537t
3
17,500
8,750
2,000
4,250
6,301t
2,000
1,000
3,250
3,000
2,178t
3,000
5,250
2,000
1,000
2,500t
4
8,0
10,0
20,0
22,0
13,8t
16,0
12,0
26,0
18,0
17,3t
10,0
10,0
14,0
14,0
11,8t
5
0,080
0,180
0,480
0,960
0,387t
1,220
0,460
1,520
0,760
0,947t
0,360
0,400
0,320
0,520
0,398t
6
4,580
3,840
6,320
5,390
5,033
6,080
7,040
6,490
6,420
6,508
4,480
4,670
5,810
6,310
5,318
15,00
15,30
15,10
14,60
15,00
14,60
14,60
15,00
14,40
14,65
14,80
15,10
15,00
14,70
14,90
Page 14 of 15
Pest Type
Pest Code
Pest Scientific Name
Pest Name
Crop Code
BBCH Scale
Crop Scientific Name
Crop Name
Crop Variety
Part Rated
Rating Date
Rating Type
Rating Unit
Sample Size, Unit
Collection Basis, Unit
Number of Subsamples
Days After First/Last Applic.
Trt-Eval Interval
Plant-Eval Interval
ARM Action Codes
Trt Treatment
Rate
No. Name
Rate Unit
1 Sublic
2 l/ha
Nutryaction
2 l/ha
Appl
Code Plot
A
102
A
203
301
402
Mean =
2 OPERA
1,25 l/ha A
101
202
303
401
Mean =
3 Untreated Check
103
201
302
403
Mean =
TRZDU
BCER
Triticum durum
Durum wheat
San Carlo
PLOT C
3-7-13
HLW
kg
1 PLOT
1 hL
1
76 76
76 DA-A
254 DP-1
7
74,70
75,60
80,50
80,50
77,83
79,70
81,30
80,30
80,90
80,55
77,20
76,20
78,00
79,20
77,65
Pest Type
D, Disease, G-BYRD7, G-DisStg = Disease, such as a fungus, bacteria, or virus
Pest Code
SEPTSP, Septoria sp., = US
FUSASP, Fusarium sp., = US
Crop Code
TRZDU, BCER, Triticum durum, = US
Part Rated
LEAF2 = leaf 2
LEAF1 = leaf 1
HEAD = head
PLOT = plot
C = Crop is Part Rated
Rating Type
PESSEV = pest severity
PESINC = pest incidence
YIELD = yield
PROCON = protein content
HLW = weight 100 Ltr (hl)
Rating Unit
% = percent
T-MET = ton (metric=1000 kg)
kg = kilogram
m = meter
HEAD = head
PLOT = total plot
LEAF = leaf
HEAD = head
ha = hectare
hL = hectoliter
Plant-Eval Interval
210 DP-1 = 1 TRZDU 22-10-12
217 DP-1 = 1 TRZDU 22-10-12
254 DP-1 = 1 TRZDU 22-10-12
Page 15 of 15