Transcript I 75 Industry Workshop - FDOT District Six Construction

I-75 and Palmetto
Express Lanes
PRESENTATION FOR
Industry Workshop
January 8, 2013
PRESENTED BY
Robert Bostian, Jr., PE
Nadir Rodrigues, PE
FDOT District 4
Judy Solaun-Gonzalez, PE
FDOT District 6
Agenda







OPENING REMARKS
PROJECT OVERVIEW
DISTRICT 4 SEGMENTS
DISTRICT 6 SEGMENT
PROCUREMENT PROCESS AND SCHEDULE
NEXT STEPS
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE)
Opening Remarks
 Jim Wolfe, PE, District 4 Secretary
 Gus Pego, PE, District 6 Secretary
Regional Managed
Lanes Network
4
Regional Managed
Lanes Network
Workshop Objectives
 Project Challenges
• Open Express Lanes to traffic in 2017
 Communicate to industry:
• Project scope and available information
• Procurement timeline and process for the 7 Design-Build
contracts and the 4 CEI contracts
 Solicit industry feedback to enhance project
development and procurement process
• One on One Meetings with Contractor Teams
• Focus on corridor-wide issues
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Lead Agency Roles
 Collaborative management effort between D4, D6 and
FTE
 District 4 (I-75 from NW 170th St. to I-595) – 15 miles
• 5 D-B segment contracts, 3 CEI contracts and ITS/Tolling
Integration contract
 District 6 (SR 826 from W Flagler St. to NW 154th St. / I-75
from SR 826 to NW 170th St.) – 13 miles
• 1 D-B contract and 1 CEI contract
 FTE
• Toll Equipment contract(s) for 12 toll gantries
Project Limits
 SR 826 from W Flagler St. to
I-75 and I-75 from SR 826 to
I-595 (Total 28 miles)
• D6 Segment - SR 826 from
W Flagler St. to NW 154th St.
and I-75 from SR 826 to NW
170th St. (13 miles)
• D4 Segment - I-75 from NW
170th St. to I-595 (15 miles)
Key Components
 Express Lanes direct connections
to SR 826, HEFT and I-595
 Intermediate EL Ingress/Egress
locations
NW 25th St.
NW 74th St.
NW 138th St.
Miami Gardens Dr.
Miramar Pkwy.
Sheridan St.
Griffin Rd.
Royal Palm Blvd.
 Accommodation of BRT
• Access to the Palmetto Metrorail
Station at NW 74th St.
 Integrated ITS/Tolling systems
 Sound barrier walls (where
warranted per PD&E Noise Study
and Reevaluation)
 Emergency Response provisions
75 Express Typical
Section
 I-75 Express Lanes in median from SR 826 to I-595
(18 miles)
• Barrier separated typical section
• 1 to 2 lanes in each direction
 Drainage improvements to include french drains, infield
ponds and linear retention swales extending to LA R/W line
Palmetto Express Typical
Section
 Palmetto Express Lanes in median from W Flagler St. to
NW 154th St. (10 miles)
• Tubular delineator separation between EL and GP lanes
• 1 to 2 lanes in each direction
Transit
Components
 Accommodation of Bus
Rapid Transit (BRT)
• BB&T Center to NW 74th St.
Palmetto Metrorail Station
 Future Park and Ride
facilities under
consideration
• Griffin Rd.
• Pines Blvd. (not part of PD&E
Preferred Alt. – options
under evaluation)
• Miami Gardens Dr.
ITS/Tolling





All electronic tolling – 12 gantry locations
Congestion pricing
Three destination toll rate signing
Integrated ITS and tolling
Operational jurisdictions
Express Lanes
Configuration
Tolling Strategy
Project Video
Project Video
DISTRICT 4 SEGMENTS
Project Status (NEPA)
 I-75 PD&E (NW 103rd St. to I-595) – LDCA March 2012
 SIMR and Design Change/Construction Advertisement
Reevaluations – under FHWA review
•
•
•
•
•
Advancement of Express Lanes improvements
Addition of Sheridan St. ingress/egress
No C-D concept for I-75/HEFT Interchange
Wetland mitigation credits procurement
Pembroke Road Overpass update
 Conceptual Environmental Resource Permit (ERP)
• Submitted application package July 2012 (joint D4/D6 submittal)
• Permit pending receipt of mitigation bank reservation letter
Project Segmentation
Segment Limits/Scope
Elements
 Logical project limits established per segment
• Prescriptive RFP criteria for corridor continuity
Construction
Segment
FPID#
I-75 Limits
Approx.
Length (mi.)
Additional Information
1.3
Includes 2 toll gantries.
1.7
Segment B
421707-2 From NW 170th St. to South of
HEFT Mainline
421707-3 From South of HEFT Mainline
421707-8 to South of Miramar Pkwy.
3.6
Segment C
421707-4 From South of Miramar Pkwy.
to South of Sheridan St.
Includes I-75 Express Lanes (EL) Bridge over HEFT Mainline; NB I-75
(widening), EL’s & NB HEFT Ramp Bridge (3) over C-9 Canal; and NB
& SB EL Ramps over I-75 (2)
Includes I-75 EL Bridge over C-4 Canal and 2 toll gantries.
421707-5 From South of Sheridan St. to
North of Griffin Road
421707-6 From North of Griffin Road to
I-595
3.7
Includes I-75 EL Bridge over C-11 Canal and 2 toll gantries.
4.7
Includes Reversible Ramp Bridge for I-75 to I-595 EL connection;
Ramps R-1, R-2 and R-4 connections to I-595; and 1 toll gantry.
15.0
Includes corridor-wide installation of the fiber optics for the ITS
backbone and toll systems integration with the Traffic Management
Center (TMC) central control software and ITS and toll systems
testing.
Segment A
Segment D
Segment E
421707-7 From NW 170th St. to I-595
Corridor-Wide
421707-9
ITS/Tolls
Integration
TOTALS
15.0
Ongoing Activities








Design Analysis
Right of Way
Drainage
Environmental
Utility Coordination
Geotechnical
Landscape
Public Outreach
Design Analysis
 Develop Concept Plans & Criteria
•
•
•
•
Typical Sections
Horizontal & Vertical Geometry
Master Signing, ITS and Lighting Plans
Structures
 D6 Coordination
• Project Scope, Delivery Method & Limits
 FTE Coordination
• I-75/HEFT Interchange Reevaluation (no C-D concept)
• Tolling Infrastructure Requirements
 Coordination with Adjacent Projects
 Emergency Response Strategies & Coordination
Right of Way
 Permanent easements are recommended for two drainage
outfalls in Segments C and D
• Acquisition process ongoing by FDOT
• Interim discharge mechanisms can be provided within existing R/W,
enabling acquisition without construction schedule impacts
 FDOT’s intent is that all other project construction activities
be conducted within the existing R/W
Drainage

All conceptual drainage and permitting analysis has been based on the full build-out of the
PD&E Preferred Alternative, including:
•
•
•
•
•


Conceptual Drainage Report
BHR Memo
Cross Drain Analysis
Permit Plans
Permit Sketches
Linear dry detention swales throughout project limits for treatment and attenuation, except
between county line and Bass Creek Road where exfiltration trench will be utilized
Wet detention ponds within infield areas for treatment, attenuation, and floodplain
compensation
Permitting
 FDOT to obtain conceptual permits based on ultimate
build-out of PD&E Preferred Alternative
•
•
•
•
•
Joint FDEP/SFWMD/USACE ERP (RAI #3 completed)
SFWMD ROW Occupancy Permit (RAI #1 completed)
SFWMD Water Use (Dewatering) Master Permit (approved)
CBWCD Stormwater Permit (RAI #1 completed)
SBDD Stormwater Permit (approved)
 D-B Firm responsible for obtaining (per segment):
• SFWMD Standard General ERP(s)
• CBWCD and SBDD Paving and Drainage Permit(s)
• Special Conditions documentation in support of SFWMD Master
Dewatering Permit requirements
• Any additional permit modifications and/or mitigation required by
USACE due to design/construction changes
Sound Barriers
 PD&E Study recommended
16 locations for new or
replacement sound barriers
north of NW 170th St.
• 12 of the 16 recommended
walls to be constructed as part
of the Express Lanes Projects
 Noise reevaluation ongoing
 Sound barrier limits and
heights to be provided to
D-B Firms
Contamination
 Reports prepared
• Phase I Contamination Screening Evaluation Report
• Phase II Impact to Construction Assessment Report
• Bridge Asbestos Containing Materials Reports
 Level II testing identified 2 contamination-impacted
groundwater zones in vicinity of the corridor and minor
arsenic impacts to soil at various corridor locations
• Soil Management Plan provided in Phase II Report
 Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM’s) identified for:
• NB and SB I-75 bridges over Snake Creek
• Bass Creek Road bridge over I-75
• Miramar Parkway bridge over I-75
Other Environmental
 Wetlands/Wood Stork Suitable Foraging Habitat
• Wetland Evaluation Report (WER) prepared
• Mitigation credit purchase for wetland impacts (ITB ongoing)
• D-B Firm responsible for permits/costs of any additional impacts
 Protected Species
• Endangered Species Biological Assessment Report prepared
• Section 7 Consultation conducted with FWS and SFH for wood
stork
 Archaeological Sites
• Cultural Resources Assessment Survey (CRAS) prepared
• Construction in vicinity of site 8BD3163 (within I-75 R/W north of
Pembroke Road) to be monitored
Utility Coordination
 Utility Kick-Off Meeting with UAO’s conducted on
May 18, 2012
 Follow-up Utility Workshop with UAO’s conducted on
September 28, 2012
 Refining Utility Base Map of existing facilities
 Refining Potential Utility Conflict Matrix
 Field investigations (below and above ground) ongoing
within proximity of sound barrier locations/aerial facility
crossings
 Quality Level “B” Designation performed in potential
conflict areas
 Utility reimbursement eligibility under FDOT Legal review
Geotechnical
 PD&E Geotechnical Reports & additional Soil Boring
Logs for Bridges, MSE Walls, Sound Barrier Walls &
Roadway will be provided
 Boring Data approximate spacing:
• Roadway median borings - 500 feet
• Bridge borings - alternate bent locations (no borings drilled in
water bodies)
• MSE Wall borings - 500 feet
• Sound Barrier Wall borings - 250 feet
 Organic Soils / Unsuitable Materials to be removed
within 6 feet (minimum) below existing grade
Landscape
 Landscape Concept Design to be provided to D-B Firms
• Screening/buffering areas without sound barrier walls
• Bold performing landscape design in select corridor locations
 Adheres to FDOT’s new “Business of Beautification” initiative
 D-B Firm responsible for
relocation of designated
desirable native trees
where impacted by
construction
• Corridor tree survey
conducted
Public Outreach
 Recent and ongoing outreach efforts:
• Elected Official briefings
• Broward MPO TCC & CIR presentations on November 26 & 27, 2012,
respectively
• TIP/STIP Amendment presentation to Broward County MPO on
December 13, 2012
• New website (75-Express.com) launched on December 16, 2012
• Public announcement of Industry Workshop and January 15, 2013
Public Information Meeting
 Communication tools – media, website, e-mail, Facebook,
Twitter, fact sheets, newsletters, etc.
 D-B Firms responsible for providing ongoing support to
Public Information Officer for:
•
•
•
•
Community Awareness Program
Public meeting / workshops
Technical assistance
Display graphics
Additional Scope
Considerations
 Segment C – Pembroke Rd. Overpass
• Broward County design plans currently Phase IV status
• Consideration of Pembroke Rd. bridge and MSE walls
construction within LA R/W as part of Segment C
• Broward County contractor will construct east/west roadway
approaches and walls up to LA R/W
 Segment D – I-75/Sheridan St. interchange
• Advancement of full and partial interchange improvements under
consideration
Engineering Data
Available for RFP

 Electronic survey data
 Existing Utilities Base Map
and Potential Conflict
Matrix
 Segment Concept Plans

 Typical Section Package

 Pavement Design Report

 Design Variations
 Right of Way Maps

 Master Signing, ITS and
Lighting Plans
 Landscape Concept

Design
Conceptual Permits
• FDEP/SFWMD/ACOE ERP
• SFWMD Standard Right of
Way Occupancy
• CBWCD / SBDD
SFWMD Water Use Permit
Drainage Concept Report
BHR Memo and Cross
Drain Analysis Report
Sound barrier and retaining
wall requirements and
locations
Geotechnical Reports
DISTRICT 6 SEGMENT
D6 Project Overview
 Project Limits: SR 826 from W Flagler St. to NW 154th St.
and I-75 from SR 826 to NW 170th St. (FM 432687-1)
 Project Length: 13 miles
 Delivery Method: 1 Design Build Contract
 Estimated Maximum Construction Cost: $270 million
Key Dates:
 Advertisement Date: March 15, 2013
 Technical Proposals Due: September 9, 2013
 Price Proposals Due: November 8, 2013
 Contract Execution Date: December 4, 2013
D6 Project Scope







Single and dual Express Lanes
Category II structure connecting I-75 EL to SR 826 EL
Widening along SR 826 where public R/W is available
Toll gantries, housing and increase in ITS backbone capacity
Ramp signaling along SR 826
Sound barrier walls and new landscaping along I-75
Additional lighting along I-75 Express Lanes
Additional Scope
 Additional overbuild, milling and resurfacing along SR 826
• NB: 0.212 miles
• Estimated cost: $2.8M
SB: 1.053 miles
 7 RRR Projects and 1 Safety Project
• Estimated cost: $1.6M
Project Status (NEPA)
 SR 826 PD&E Study (W Flagler St. to NW 103rd St.) –
LDCA January 2013
• Advancement of Express Lanes Improvement as an interim
solution
• Interchange and other mainline improvements to be addressed
by future PD&E
 SIMR and Design Change/Construction Advertisement
Reevaluations – under FHWA review
• Advancement of Express Lanes improvements
• Modification of I-75 /Palmetto Interchange to bring the express
lanes at grade along SR 826
Ongoing Activities











Design Analysis
Project Coordination
Right of Way
Preliminary Drainage Design
Environmental / Permitting
Contamination Investigation
Utility Coordination
Geotechnical Investigation
Landscape Conceptual Design
Overall ITS Concept of Operations
Public Outreach
Design Analysis
 Develop Concept Plans & Criteria
• 30% Roadway concept plans
• Horizontal & Vertical Geometry
• Structures
• Bridge Concept Reports
•
•
•
•
•
•
Signing Concept Master Plan
Lighting Concept Master Plan
ITS Concept Master Plan
Landscape Concept Master Plan (I-75)
Tree inventory (SR 826)
MOT Concept Master Plan
Design Analysis
 Typical Section Package
 Pavement Design Package
 Exceptions and Variations
• Approved by FDOT and FHWA
• Lane width and shoulder width
exceptions along SR 826
SR 826 INSIDE SHOULDERS
Width
%
< 4’
1
4’ - < 8’
41
8’ - < 10’
6
10’ - < 12’
12
12’
40
TOTAL
100
Project Coordination
 Coordination with Adjacent Projects
• Palmetto Improvement Program – Section 5
• District 4 I-75 Express Lanes: Segments A, B, and C
• NW 25th Street Viaduct
 FTE Coordination
• Tolling Infrastructure Requirements
• FTE contractor to install gantry equipment + testing
 Emergency Response Strategies & Coordination
• Fire Rescue
• FHP
• Road Rangers
Right of Way
 FDOT’s intent is that all project construction activities be
conducted within the existing public R/W
 Transfer of R/W from Miami Dade County for widening
south of Okeechobee is complete
 Easements
• Construction easements acquired from Miami-Dade County for
Frontage Road construction activities
• TCE requested along FEC Right of Way (east of SR 826)
 Coordination with FEC and MDT for bridge widening over
tracks (in progress)
Drainage
 Analysis based only on the implementation of Express
Lanes along I-75 and SR 826 corridors
• Concept Drainage Report
• Peter’s Pike Canal Hydraulic Calculations
• Permit Plans & Sketches




Master Drainage Plan includes 36 major basins
Addition of French drains
Modifications to the existing weirs
No additional trench drains allowed except when
replacing existing trench drains
Environmental
 Wetlands/Wood Stork Suitable Foraging Habitat
• Wetland Evaluation Report (WER) prepared
• Mitigation credit purchase for wetland impacts (ITB ongoing)
• D-B Firm responsible for permits/costs of any additional impacts
 Protected Species
• Endangered Species Biological Assessment Report prepared
• Section 7 Consultation conducted with FWS for wood stork
 Archaeological Sites
• Cultural Resources Assessment Survey (CRAS) prepared
• No archaeological sites within project limits
Sound Barriers
 PD&E Study recommended 4
locations for replacement or new
sound barriers south of NW 170th
St.
•
•
•
•
NW 170th St to NW 162nd St
NW 154th St to 143rd St
East side of NW 87th Ave (W 28th Ave)
West side of NW 87th Ave (W 28th Ave)
 Noise reevaluation ongoing
 Sound barrier limits and heights
will be provided to D-B Firms
Permitting
 Conceptual Environmental Resource Permit (ERP)
• Submitted application package July 2012 (joint D4/D6 submittal)
• Permit pending receipt of mitigation bank reservation letter
 D6 to obtain conceptual permits based on
implementation of Express Lanes on I-75 and SR 826
corridors
• Joint D4/D6 FDEP/SFWMD/USACE Permits (RAI #3 completed)
• SFWMD Standard ROW Occupancy Permit (pending ERP)
• DRER Permit for modification to the Peter’s Pike Canal (pending)
 D-B Firm responsible for:
• SFWMD ERP modification (for construction)
• Dewatering permits as required (i.e. – SFWMD, Miami-Dade
County)
• Any additional permits or mitigation required by permit agencies
due to design/construction changes
Contamination
 Reports prepared
• Phase I Contamination Screening Evaluation Report
• Phase II Impact to Construction Assessment Report
• Bridge Asbestos and Lead Containing Materials Reports
 Level II assessment identified 2 contamination-impacted
groundwater zones along SR 826 corridor
 No asbestos or lead containing materials identified
 Removal, handling, transport and disposal of
contaminated/hazardous materials will be performed via
separate CAR contract by the Department
Utility Coordination
 UAO Utility Kick-Off Meeting conducted January 26, 2012
 Follow-up Utility Workshop with UAO’s conducted
October 17, 2012
 Refining Utility Base Map of existing facilities
 Refining Potential Utility Conflict Matrix
 Obtaining Utility Work Schedules for proposed relocates
• Florida Gas Transmission
• City of Hialeah
• AT&T
 D-B Firm responsible for all field investigations
 D-B contract to include relocation of MDC Water & Sewer
8-inch watermain
Geotechnical
 For I-75, PD&E as well as subsequent roadway and wall
reports of boring log data to be provided
 For SR 826, existing geotechnical information from
previous projects is available as well as subsequent
asphalt cores
 Organic soils / unsuitable materials
• Within minimum 6 feet below existing grade must be removed
• Deeper than 6 feet may require mitigation (i.e. - geotextile
reinforcement)
Landscape
 Landscape Concept Design to be provided to D-B Firms
•
•
•
•
Landscaping will enhance the character of the corridor
Landscape enhancements will partially screen sound barriers
Bold, low maintenance landscape design
Invasive exotic removals
 Adheres to FDOT’s new “Business of Beautification”
initiative
 D-B Firm responsible for relocation of designated
desirable native trees where impacted by construction
 Corridor tree survey conducted along SR 826
 New landscaping and relocation cost estimate: $5 million
Public Outreach
 Recent and ongoing outreach efforts:
•
•
•
•
•
Elected Official briefings
Miami-Dade MPO presentation – October 2011
SR 826 Public Workshop
SR 826 Public Hearing
Upcoming Public Workshop for I-75 in Miami-Dade County
 New website (www.palmettoexpresslanes.com) is under
development
 Public advertisement campaign will begin after obtaining
LDCA for SR 826 PD&E
 D-B Firm responsible for providing on-going support for:
•
•
•
•
Community Awareness Program
Public Meetings / Hearings / Workshops
Graphic renderings
Technical assistance
Engineering Data
Available for RFP
 Electronic survey data
 Existing Utilities Base
Map and Potential
Conflict Matrix
 Concept Plans & BCRs
 Typical Section Package
 Pavement Design Report
 Design Variations /
Exceptions
 Master Signing, ITS and
Lighting Plans
 Landscape Concept
Design
 Conceptual Permits
• FDEP/SFWMD/ACOE
Permits
• SFWMD Standard Right of
Way Occupancy
• DRER
 SFWMD Water Use Permit
 Drainage Concept Report
 Sound barrier and
retaining wall locations
and requirements
 Geotechnical Reports
Aesthetic Requirements
 Category II Structure (flyover)
• Weathering steel box girder
• Segmental construction
 Bridge widening along Palmetto
• Shall match existing bridge in type and color
 Retaining walls
• Shall match existing walls in type and color
 Aesthetic Level 2
Maintenance
and Incident Management
D-B Firm will be responsible for:
 Routine maintenance activities, from right of way to right
of way, for project length
 Long term maintenance of traffic associated with
Incidents
 Additional Road Rangers
PROCUREMENT PROCESS AND
SCHEDULE
D-B Procurement Process
D-B Segments and ITS/Tolls Integration
 Standard FDOT two-phase D-B approach
 Phase I – Expanded Letter of Interest
 Phase II – Technical Proposal
• Alternative Technical Concept (ATC) meetings
• Page Turn meeting
• Question & Answer Session
 Price Proposal
 D4 Final selection formula (adjusted score)
• Bid Price Proposal / Technical Score
 D6 Final selection formula (adjusted score)
Bid Price Proposal + (Proposed Contract Time x Time Value Cost)
Technical Score
 D6 Approved Incentive: $5.25 million
Key Considerations for D4
ELOI’s / Technical Proposals
 Corridor continuity and functionality
• Coordination and compatibility between adjacent projects
•
•
•
•
Geometrics
Signing
ITS
Lighting
 ITS/Tolls integration
• Contractor coordination for expedited completion of ITS /tolls
infrastructure/devices, testing and corridor opening
 Project commitments
• Expedited construction of sound barrier walls
 Preservation of ultimate corridor improvements footprint
Key Considerations for D6
ELOI’s / Technical Proposals
 Corridor continuity and functionality
• Coordination and compatibility between adjacent projects
•
•
•
•
Geometrics
Signing
ITS
Lighting
 ITS/Tolls integration
• Contractor coordination for expedited completion of ITS /tolls
infrastructure/devices, testing and corridor opening
 Project commitments
• Expedited construction of sound barrier walls
• Expedited construction of safety project
 Preservation of ultimate corridor improvements footprint
• MDX Interim and Ultimate Gratigny expansion project
• I-75 Ultimate improvements
 Project Experience
• D-B team technical capability
• Competent Design/Construction Project Managers
• Recent and relevant projects of similar complexity
CEI Procurement Process
 D4 – 3 contracts to utilize Witness and Hold
• Contract 1 – Segments E and D
• Includes CEI oversight for Segments A thru E and ITS/Tolls Integration
• Ad Date: JAN 7, 2013
• Contract 2 – Segments A and B
• Ad Date: JUN 2013
• Contract 3 – Segment C
• Ad Date: AUG 2013
 D6 – 1 contract to utilize Traditional CEI Scope
• Ad Date: May 2013
• Select from Expanded Letter of Interest (ELOI)
D4 Procurement Schedule
Segment E
Procurement Activity
Date
Advertisement
January 28, 2013
Expanded Letters of Interest Due
February 15, 2013
Shortlist Posting
March 14, 2013
Final RFP Provided to D-B Firms
March 20, 2013
Technical Proposals Due
May 20, 2013
Price Proposals Due
July 3, 2013
Anticipated Award Date
July 25, 2013
Anticipated Execution Date
August 1, 2013
D4 Procurement/
Construction Schedule
Segments A-D & ITS/Tolls Integration
 To be advertised on 7 to 13 week intervals
 ITS/Tolls Integration advertisement follows ITS Final Plans
(Segment A) – tentative February 2015
 Corridor opening 2017
D6 Procurement Schedule
D6 Segment
Procurement Activity
Date
Advertisement
March 15, 2013
Expanded Letters of Interest Due
April 5, 2013
Shortlist Posting
April 24, 2013
Final RFP Provided to D-B Firms
April 25, 2013
Technical Proposals Due
September 9, 2013
Price Proposals Due
November 8, 2013
Anticipated Award Date
November 27, 2013
Anticipated Execution Date
December 4, 2013
D6 Procurement/
Construction Schedule
 D6 D-B contract includes ITS/Tolls Integration
 Corridor opening 2018 – based on maximum allowable
construction time
 D6 programmed a $5.25 million incentive to open facility
to users as soon as possible
NEXT STEPS
Next Steps
 D4 one-on-one meetings – Jan. 8-10 @ D4 Headquarters
• D4 Management Team – discuss D4 and D-B Firm
questions/issues
• Segment E Technical Review Committee (TRC)
 D4 Segment E Draft RFP posted on FDOT D-B website
 D4 Segments A thru D planned ads to be posted January
2013
 D6 Segment draft RFP to be posted on website – early
February 2013
 D6 Segment one-on-one meetings – mid February 2013
 Available project information
• 75 Express (D4 Segments) – website 75-Express.com
• SR 826 / I-75 Express Lanes – website page
www.palmettoexpresslanes.com
Project Contacts
 For District 4 Project
•
before advertisement:
• after advertisement:
Robert Bostian, Jr., PE
Project Manager
office: (954) 777-4427
e-mail: [email protected]
Esther Brandt
Contract Coordinator
office: (954) 777-4620
email: [email protected]
 For District 6 Project
•
before advertisement:
• after advertisement:
Judy Solaun-Gonzalez, PE
Senior Project Manager
office: (305) 470-5207
e-mail: [email protected]
Harry Orvil
RFP Procurement
office: (305) 470-5394
email: [email protected]
QUESTIONS?
DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS
ENTERPRISE (DBE)