District Implementation of Effective Practices: Using an RTI model to Implement Functional Behavioral Assessment Rob Horner University of Oregon www.pbis.org.

Download Report

Transcript District Implementation of Effective Practices: Using an RTI model to Implement Functional Behavioral Assessment Rob Horner University of Oregon www.pbis.org.

District Implementation of Effective Practices:
Using an RTI model to Implement
Functional Behavioral Assessment
Rob Horner
University of Oregon
www.pbis.org
Goals
• Summarize an integrated model for behavior
support systems within a school.
• Define role of function-based support
• Clarify protocol for moving from functional
behavioral assessment to behavior support plan
design/implementation.
School-Wide
Positive Behavior
Support
Primary Prevention:
School-/ClassroomWide Systems for
All Students,
Staff, & Settings
~5%
~15%
~80% of Students
Tertiary Prevention:
Specialized
Individualized
Systems for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
Secondary Prevention:
Specialized Group
Systems for Students
with At-Risk Behavior
CONTINUUM of SWPBS
TERTIARY PREVENTION
• Function-based support
• Wraparound/PCP
Audit
• Special Education
~5%•
1. Identify existing practices
•
~15%
•
•
•
•
•
by tier
2. Specify outcome for each effort
SECONDARY PREVENTION
Check in/out
3. Evaluate
implementation
Targeted social
skills instruction
Peer-based supports
accuracy & outcome
Social skills club
effectiveness
Eliminate/integrate based on
PRIMARY4.
PREVENTION
• Teach & encourage positive
outcomes
SW expectations
• Proactive SW discipline
5. Establish decision rules (RtI)
• Effective instruction
• Parent engagement
•
~80% of Students
School-Wide
Positive Behavior
Support
Primary Prevention:
School-/ClassroomWide Systems for
All Students,
Staff, & Settings
~5%
~15%
~80% of Students
Tertiary Prevention:
Specialized
Individualized
Systems for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
Secondary Prevention:
Specialized Group
Systems for Students
with At-Risk Behavior
A Context for PBS
• Behavior support is the redesign of
environments, not the redesign of individuals
• Positive Behavior Support plans define changes
in the behavior of those who will implement the
plan.
▫ A behavior support plan describes what
we will do differently.
Major Changes in Behavior Support
• Prevention
 Teaching as the most effective approach
 Environmental redesign, Antecedent Manipulations
• Function-based support
 Functional assessment
 Team-based design and implementation of support
• Comprehensive Interventions
 Support plans with multiple elements
 Link Behavior Support to Lifestyle Plan
 Person-centered planning, Wraparound, Systems of Care
• Systems Change
 Intervention at the “whole-school” level
 Systems that nurture and sustain effective practices
 Systems that are durable
Purposes of Behavior Support Plan
• Define critical features of environments where
the focus person will be successful.
▫ Behavior support plans describe what we will do
differently to establish these critical features.
• Facilitate consistency across multiple
implementers.
• Provide professional accountability.
Behavior Support Elements
Problem
Behavior
*Team
*Specialist
Functional
Assessment
*Hypothesis statement
*Competing Behavior Analysis
*Contextual Fit
Content of
Support Plan
* Strengths
*Implementation Plan
Fidelity of
*Technical Adequacy
Implementation
* Preferences
* Lifestyle vision
Impact on
Behavior and
Lifestyle
Behavior Support Elements
Problem
Behavior
*Team
*Specialist
Functional
Assessment
*Hypothesis statement
*Competing Behavior Analysis
*Contextual Fit
Content of
Support Plan
* Strengths
*Implementation Plan
Fidelity of
*Technical Adequacy
Implementation
* Preferences
* Lifestyle vision
Impact on
Behavior and
Lifestyle
FBA Updates
• Emphasize “Levels” of FBA
• Gathering information to generate summary
statements.
• Build capacity for schools/districts to:
▫ Conduct FBA
▫ Move from FBA to BSP
Functional Behavioral Assessment
• Defined:
▫ Functional behavioral assessment is a process for
identifying the events that reliably predict and
maintain problem behavior.
Ingram
Outcomes of a
Functional Behavioral Assessment
• Operationally defined problem behavior(s)
▫ By response class
• Identify routines in which the problem behavior is most
and least likely to occur
• Define the antecedent events (triggers; setting events)
that predict when the problem behavior is most likely
• Define the ONE consequence that contributes most to
maintaining the problem behavior in that routine.
• Summary Statement of findings.
Levels of
Functional Behavioral Assessment
• Informal Functional Behavioral
Assessment
 Done in school by typical teachers/staff
 Done as part of normal daily problem solving
• Level I: Simple FBA
 Done by trained members of school setting
 Typically involves interview(s), and brief observation
• Level II: Complex FBA
 Done by behaviorally trained member of school or district
 Typically involves interviews and observation
• Level III: Functional Analysis
 Done by trained behavior analyst
 Involves interviews, direct observation, and systematic
manipulation of conditions.
Building FBA Capacity
Teachers School
District
Behavior
Staff
Specialist Specialist Analysts
Informal
FBA
X
Level I:
Simple FBA
X
X
Level II:
Complex FBA
X
X
X
Level III:
Functional
Analysis
X
X
X
X
Organizing for Individual Student Supports
District
School
CICO Team
PBS
Team
Student Support Team
Team Responsibilities
School
PBS Team
School-wide
Systems
Universal
Screening
CICO
Team
2-3 members of
School PBS Team
Simple FBA
Student selection
CICO operation
CICO data
CICO and SST
team supervision
Data System
Student
Support Team
Report to School
PBS Team
Design of BIP
District Support
Implement BIP
Advanced FBA
Monitor BIP and
Individual support
report to School
FTE/ resources
PBS team
Levels of
Functional Behavioral Assessment
• All levels of FBA focus on the same basic
goals:
▫ Define the behavior of concern
 Determine if behavior is a response class
▫ Identify the events that reliably predict occurrence
and non-occurrence
▫ Identify the consequences that maintain the behavior
in the most common “predictor conditions”
▫ Identify setting events that increase likelihood of
problem behavior.
• Summary statement
▫ Setting Event  Antecedent  Prob Beh  Consequence
FBA Summary Statement
Setting Events
Triggering
Antecedents
4
2
Allergies
In room with
Noise and/or
many people
Problem
Behavior
1
Head Hit
Maintaining
Consequences
3
Avoid
noise/people
Maintaining Consequence
• Always identify the consequence in “context”
▫ Define the behavior, routine, Sd…then ask about
consequence
• Typically define the most powerful consequence.
Avoid labeling multiple consequences.
Identifying Maintaining Consequences
Given a Problem Behavior
Get: Object, Activity, Sensation
Social
Precise
Event
Object/
Activity
Precise
Event
Avoid: Object, Activity, Sensation
Physiological
Social
Object/
Activity
Physiological
Precise
Event
Precise
Event
Precise
Event
Precise
Event
Primary Purposes of Functional
Behavioral Assessment
• The primary purpose of functional behavioral
assessment is to improve the effectiveness and
efficiency of behavior support.
 Behavior support plans built from functional
assessment are more effective
 Didden et al., 1997
Newcomer & Lewis, 2006
 Carr et al., 1999
Ingram, Sugai & Lewis-Palmer
 Ellingson, et al., 2000; Filter (2004)
• Create order out of chaos
 Define contextual information, where, when, with whom,
etc.
FACTS
• Professional accountability
Demo
Examples
• Review video




Define problem behavior
Define context (antecedents)
Define maintaining consequence
Define possible setting events.
Effective Environments
• Problem behaviors are irrelevant
▫ Aversive events are removed
▫ Access to positive events are more common
• Problem behaviors are inefficient
▫ Appropriate behavioral alternatives available
▫ Appropriate behavioral alternatives are taught
• Problem behaviors are ineffective
▫ Problem behaviors are not rewarded
▫ Desired behavior ARE rewarded
Place Summary Statement in
Competing Pathways Model
• Use information from interviews and
observations to summarize:




Problem behavior
Antecedent Triggers
Maintaining Consequences
Setting Events
Setting Events
Triggering
Antecedents
Desired
Alternative
Typical
Consequence
Problem
Behavior
Maintaining
Consequences
Acceptable
Alternative
Acceptable Alternative:
1.Same consequence
2.Socially acceptable
3.Very efficient
Desired
Alternative
Play with
others
Setting Events
Reprimand
during
prior class
Triggering
Antecedents
Playground
Typical
Consequence
Peer social
interaction
Problem
Behavior
Maintaining
Consequences
Scream at
/ threaten
others
Get access
to game or
equipment
Acceptable
Alternative
Use “pass”
Ask
supervisor
Leading a Team from FBA to BSP
• 1. Summarize FBA
• 2. Define goals of BSP process:




Make problem behavior irrelevant
Make problem behavior inefficient
Make problem behavior ineffective
Do all this in a contextually appropriate manner
• 3. Lead discussion to identify options




Ask questions, don’t give solutions
Paraphrase, elaborate, integrate
Always bring group back to FBA logic
Produce multiple ideas (elements)
COMPETING PATHWAYS
BEHAVIOR SUPPORT
PLANNING
Make Problem Behavior
Irrelevant
Examples of Interventions
Make Problem
Behavior
Inefficient
Make
Problem
Behavior
Ineffective
And Positive
Behavior
More
Effective
Leading a Team from FBA to BSP
• 4. Given an array of possible BSP elements, shift
discussion to contextual fit.
▫ What elements are feasible, acceptable, sustainable?’
▫ What is the smallest change that will produce the largest
effect?
• Contextual Fit:
▫ The extent to which the people who will implement a
behavior support plan find the elements of the plan




Consistent with their personal values
Consistent with the professional skills
Consistent with the resources available in the setting
Consistent with the available administrative support
Leading a Team from FBA to BSP
• 5. Transform ideas for BSP elements into a
formal plan for implementation
▫ Who will do what, when, and how will we know?
Outline of a Behavior Support Plan
• Set Up (description, strengths, vision)
Outline
• Assessment (FBA, Person-Centered Plan, Wraparound)
 Operational Descriptions, Routines, FA Hypotheses
• Prevention
• Teaching/Education
• Consequence Procedures
 Minimize reward for problem behavior
 Ensure regular, clear reward for positive behavior
 Punishers (if needed)
• Define safety/emergency procedures (if needed)
• Evaluation and Monitoring for Improvement
 Steps for implementation
BSP Template
Examples:
Define (a) summary statement (b) prevention,
(c) teaching, (d) consequences
• Emmit
• Eric
• Rayette
▫ FACTS
▫ Behavior Support Plan
Summary
• Invest in building consensus around FBA summary statement.
• Recruit strategies that are local, practical, but still consistent
with FBA…(Lead don’t tell). Recruit local knowledge
• Build efficient plans (the smallest changes that produce the
largest effect)
• Ensure that the plan includes procedures for getting
implementation to occur.
• Always include procedures for evaluation
▫ Are we doing what we said we would do?
▫ Is the process having an effect on the student?