Sustainable Elimination of Iodine Deficiency: Perspectives for Lithuania ARNOLD TIMMER, UNICEF REGIONAL OFFICE 17 December 2003
Download ReportTranscript Sustainable Elimination of Iodine Deficiency: Perspectives for Lithuania ARNOLD TIMMER, UNICEF REGIONAL OFFICE 17 December 2003
Sustainable Elimination of Iodine Deficiency: Perspectives for Lithuania ARNOLD TIMMER, UNICEF REGIONAL OFFICE 17 December 2003 Overview • Central Eastern Europe & Central Asia • Examples relevant to Lithuania • Indicators used: – Households consuming iodized salt (table salt) – Iodine status: urinary iodine (table salt, other salt) – TSH – Newborn children protected from brain damage due to iodine deficiency Iodine Deficiency: The Problem Cretinism Goiter At risk of mental Impairment 10-15% IQ loss Worldwide: 41 million newborns still unprotected: 113.000 per day! Middle East/ North Africa Latin America/ Caribbean 2 million 3 million South Asia 17 million CEE/CIS 4 million East Asia/ Pacific 7 million Sub-Saharan Africa 8 million Lithuania • + 32,000 newborns per year • This means 28,800 newborns not protected • With decreasing population, future generation needs to be protected! • Investment in USI = better intelligence among newborn = better learning and earning = benefiting economy of the country In 31 countries, > 90% households consume iodized salt UNICEF 2000 In 36 countries, 50-89% households consume iodized salt UNICEF 2000 In 38 countries, <50% households consume iodized salt UNICEF 2000 Production of Iodized Salt (unofficial data) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Uk ra in e Ru Uz ssia be ki sta n Be lar us M ol Ka dova za kh sta n Ar m en i Ge a or gia Ta jik ist ur km an en ist an 0 IS production in 1999 or 2000, % of total IS production in 2001 or 2002, % of total Considerations • Mandatory legislation – The minimum to eliminate iodine deficiency: • All table salt iodized • Food grade salt iodized: staple foods bread, bakery products, and others if possible • Expectations from communication activities: – Without mandatory law: no behaviour change of all people achievable, cost is high, not sustainable – Lithuania: 20% households used iodized salt after the campaign in 2000, then dropped to 10% – With mandatory law: raise awareness, inform public and main actors, use logo and slogan • WHO guidelines – Iodization levels: minimum 20-40 ppm iodine – Iodized salt is safe - 1994 Salt Iodization in other countries • Switzerland: – voluntary law since 1922 – 94% use of iodized salt after 60 years of public awareness raising; food producers use iodized salt • Netherlands: – Iodization of “all” table and bread/pasta salt (through voluntary system) – 65% use iodized salt • Austria: – Mandatory iodization for all salt – Respected by EU regulatory system Salt Iodization in other countries • Denmark: – – – – 1920: voluntary iodization of table salt 1982: iodization prohibited 1998: voluntary iodization of all salt 2000: mandatory iodization of all table (retail) salt and salt for bread – 100% use iodized salt today! • Turkey: – – – – Mandatory law for table salt being implemented 64% use iodized salt in 2002 Iodine status not sufficient: median = 53 mcg/L None of food grade salt is iodized mcg/L 120 UIE in Lithuania, 1995 100 80 Median 75 60 40 20 0 Median Urinary Iodine levels in 28 schools Lithuania • + 32,000 newborns per year • This means 28,800 newborns not protected • With decreasing population, future generation needs to be protected! • Investment in USI = better intelligence among newborn = better learning and earning = benefiting economy of the country