Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment Integrity - Service - Excellence Sustainable Communities Approach Paula Shaw Program Manager AFCEE 3 June 2010

Download Report

Transcript Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment Integrity - Service - Excellence Sustainable Communities Approach Paula Shaw Program Manager AFCEE 3 June 2010

Air Force Center for Engineering
and the Environment
Integrity - Service - Excellence
Sustainable Communities Approach
Paula Shaw
Program Manager
AFCEE
3 June 2010
1
Introduction


Implementing Current Directives
 New Facilities
 Existing Facilities
Crossroads
 Sustainable Communities
Integrity - Service - Excellence
2
Current Directives

Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct05) – Aug 05

New facilities, 30% more efficient than ASHRAE 90.1
 Installation of advanced meters

Executive Order (EO) 13423 – Jan 07

Reduce Energy Consumption 30% by 2015
 Reduce Water use 16% by 2015
 All new construction must incorporate High Performance
and Sustainable Buildings (HPSB) Guiding Principles
(Federal MOU – Jan 06)
 15% of existing buildings must be HPSB by 2015

Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA07) – Dec 07

New buildings reduce fossil fuel generated energy 55% by
2010 to 100% by 2030

30% hot water supplied by solar water heaters
 Restore predevelopment hydrology
Integrity - Service - Excellence
3
Current Directives

EO 13514, Leadership in
Environmental, Energy, and Economic
Performance – Oct 09
 reinforces and expands
requirements of EO 13423

GHG reporting requirements for scope
1, 2, & 3
 Federal facilities planned after 2020
shall be zero-net-energy
 Allows flexibility for compliance (§8)

Each agency shall develop,
implement, and annually update an
integrated Strategic Sustainability
Performance Plan and will prioritize
agency actions based on lifecycle
return on investment
Holistic call to
response
I naction
t e g r ifor
t y sustainability
- S e r v i c e - Erequires
x c e l l e holistic
nce
4
Current AF Policy

Goals – focus on new construction

Reduce environmental impact and total ownership cost
 Improve energy efficiency and water conservation
 Provide safe, healthy and productive built environments

Policy signed Jul 2007 based on LEED version 2.2
In FY09 - 100% of each MAJCOM’s MILCON vertical construction
projects (w/climate control) will be capable of LEED Silver certification
 10% of total MILCON per FY, will be selected for formal LEED
registration/certification

As of:
The key to success is setting sustainable development goals early
I n t e g r i tprogramming
y - Service &
- Ebudgeting
xcellenc
e
in the planning,
process
5
Recent AF Achievements




8 LEED certified
completed facilities
736 homes Silver certified
FY09: 46 projects on track
for formal LEED Silver
certification and 4
projects on track for
formal LEED Gold
certification (69% of
eligible projects)
Approx 300 AF projects
LEED registered, seeking
certification
C-17 Hangar, Travis AFB, CA – LEED Silver
I n the
t e gcurrent
rity - S
e rSDD
v i c ePolicy
- E x cwith
e l l einternal
nce
Exceeding
AF
goals!
6
Culture Change
SDD/LEED Workshops

Organic understanding of sustainability
and LEED essential to success of
program

Conducted 16 workshops since Dec 2007
with over 1000 in attendance

Training requirement transitioned to AFIT
 First course offerings: 2Qtr FY10

USAFA, SDD/LEED class offered Fall 09

97 AF LEED Accredited Professionals
Integrity - Service - Excellence
AF Policy Revision
Revision of policy memorandum nearing final draft
All vertical construction will be formally LEED certified – Silver is the
minimum certification level
 Incorporates Federal HPSB requirements
 Clarifies requirements for all project types

AF Weather Facility, Offutt AFB, NE – LEED Gold Certified
Integrity - Service - Excellence
8
Existing Facilities
HPSB Pilot Study

15% of existing building inventory must be HPSB by 2015

AFCEE conducted initial test for HPSB surveys





5 AF installations: 30 buildings surveyed
Each building has ~ 40 aspects
Over 75% of HPSB aspects are installation-wide aspects
Average score: 70%
Requirements more difficult to achieve are:
Energy Efficiency
Water Conservation
Metering
Commissioning
Daylighting
Thermal Comfort
Ventilation

Will not reach 2015 goal with new construction alone!
I napproach:
t e g r i t y -~21,000
S e r v i cfacilities
e - Exc
e l l840,000
e n c e data elements
Existing building
9
HPSB Compliance
10
I n t “Green”
e g r i t y -buildings
S e r v i c eone
- Eat
x cae time
llence
HPSB Strategy
11
IRemove
n Define
tReport
e g r i specific
t applicable
yon- SF
S e rrather
v i ccategory
e -than
E x cfacilities
ecodes
l lfacilities
ence
non-applicable
HPSB Strategy
Building-by-building
approach
Installation approach
• Each building has ~40 HPSB aspects
• Each installation has ~30 HPSB aspects
• Many aspects are the same for every building
on the installation
• Transfer requirements for energy & water
reductions to the installation
• Must perform energy & water calculations/
modeling on every applicable building
• Augment successful Energy Audit program
to address energy & water performance at the
building level
Requires ~ 840,000 data points
Reduces burden to ~70, 000 data points
Approaching requirement by SF vs. number of buildings, the 15% HPSB
I n AF
t e gcould
r i t y be
- Smet
e r v by
i c eas- few
E x cas
e l 184
l e n facilities
ce
goal for
Crossroads

Multiple federal sustainability requirements

All establish multiple goals for energy
reduction, water reduction, storm water
management, use of renewable energy, etc.

Requirements frequently overlap/conflict

Opportunity to identify a compliance
strategy holistically
Align compliance paths to minimize reporting burden
Integrity - Service - Excellence
Sustainable Communities

Sustainable Communities Initiative
 Effort to holistically define sustainability at
the installation level
 Very early stages of development

Comprehensive and synergistic approach:
 Environmental Management Systems
 Asset Management principles

Compliance/conformance driven

LEED-like scoring approach

Exploring potential implementation of Strategic
Sustainability Performance Plan (SSPP)
Mission
Community
Environment
Triple Bottomline
structure 14
I nincorporated
t e g r i t y - Sinto
e r v Sustainable
i c e - E x c e lCommunities
lence
As of:
Sustainable Communities
Traditional Installation Stovepipes
Integrity - Service - Excellence
Sustainable Communities
Ideal world
work
I n t–
eg
r i t yall
- requirements
S e r v i c e - E xunder
c e l l eone
n c eumbrella
Sustainable Communities
Categories & Scorecard Snapshot
COMMUNITY
DESIGN &
DEVELOPMENT
MISSION
READINESS
ENERGY &
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS
MATERIALS &
WASTE
MANAGEMENT
WATER EFFICIENCY
TRANSPORTATION
NATURAL
INFRASTRUCTURE
COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT
BUILT
INFRASTRUCTURE
INNOVATION &
REGIONAL
Categories
I n t e g defined
r i t y - Sby
e r Requirements
v i c e - E x c e l and
l e n Credits
ce
Sustainable Communities
Categories & Scorecard Snapshot
MISSION
READINESS
ENERGY &
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS
MATERIALS &
WASTE
MANAGEMENT
WATER EFFICIENCY
TRANSPORTATION
NATURAL
INFRASTRUCTURE
COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT
BUILT
INFRASTRUCTURE
INNOVATION &
REGIONAL
COMMUNITY
DESIGN &
DEVELOPMENT
Categories
I n t e g defined
r i t y - Sby
e r Requirements
v i c e - E x c e l and
l e n Credits
ce
Sustainable Communities
Categories & Scorecard Snapshot
COMMUNITY
DESIGN &
DEVELOPMENT
MISSION
READINESS
ENERGY &
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS
MATERIALS &
WASTE
MANAGEMENT
WATER EFFICIENCY
TRANSPORTATION
NATURAL
INFRASTRUCTURE
COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT
BUILT
INFRASTRUCTURE
INNOVATION &
REGIONAL
Categories
I n t e g defined
r i t y - Sby
e r Requirements
v i c e - E x c e l and
l e n Credits
ce
Sustainable Communities
Scorecard & Credit Template
Requirements
I n t e g r i t and
y - SCredits
e r v i c edefined
- E x c eby
l l Templates
ence
20
Holistic Solution

Opportunity to create a paradigm shift
 Incremental steps towards sustainability are suboptimal
 Current approach to Federal Mandates – large data burden

Enterprise Solution: Sustainable Communities
 Triple Bottom Line is incorporated into the structure of
Sustainable Communities
 LEED-like approach using sustainability credits
 Allows installations to select, prioritize and pursue credits
 Measure of self-improvement

Identifying how Sustainable Communities can the SSPP
Integrity - Service - Excellence
21
Just a thought . . .
“Nothing is as powerful as an idea whose
time has come.”
Victor Hugo
Integrity - Service - Excellence