Using the CEFR for assessing language competences in Finland Sauli Takala Policy Forum The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and the development.
Download ReportTranscript Using the CEFR for assessing language competences in Finland Sauli Takala Policy Forum The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and the development.
Using the CEFR for assessing language competences in Finland Sauli Takala Policy Forum The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and the development of language policies: challenges and responsibilities Organised by the Council of Europe Language Policy Division Strasbourg, 6 – 8 February 2007 How has the CEFR been used in language education in Finland? • Translated in 2003 • Widely used in various contexts Project Time Target group Purpose Use of CEFR Dialang (Phase 1) 19971999 (Young) Adults Diagnosis of profic. Nation. Certif. 20012002 Adults Certify profic. AMKKIA 20002001 Polytechnic Harmonise ass. Civil service Civil Certify servants profic. • Self-assessment • Assessment • Feedback • Scale equation • Level linkage •Scale equation • Level linkage • Level linkage 20022003 Citizen June1 Immig-ship 2003 rants Certify profic. (related to Nat. Cert.) • Set required level:B1 (via Nat Cert.) Project Time Target group Purpose Use of CEFR Immigration Oct. 2003 Ingrian ”repatr.” Certify • A2 level required proficiency • Computerized National 2004Curric. 7-19 Linkage to • Scale equation year olds CEFR • Level linkage Matric. 2001Exam. National 2007 Assessment Other 2001projects Upper second. Lower second. Certify • Level linkage proficiency Assess • Level linkage prof. levels (cf. ”European Indicator”) Various Link • Content courses, • Levels materials.. Linking Matriculation Examinations to the CEFR: What level is obtained at the end of the Upper Secondary School (age 19?) Level in the Matric Exam (19yrs) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% AEn BSw e A_ Fi AG er ARu CG er CRu CFr CSp BFi 0% A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 A- 10 years of study; B – 5 years of study; C: 3-5 years of study How to accommodate national grading and reporting systems and the CEFR (levels)? • Conversion tables? 300 C1> 250 200 Laudatur B2 Eximia B1 Magna Sum score Cum laude 150 A2 Lubenter Approbatur 100 Improbatur 50 0 CEFR Level Matric Grade (normal curve) Linking National Assessment outcomes to the CEFR: What level is obtained in English at the end of the Comprehensive School (age 15-16?) Level in English: grade 9 (15-16 years; 7 years of English) 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% B2> 29 B2> 23 B2> 25 B1 39 B1 32 A2 34 A2 40 Speaking Writing B1 41 A2 25 0% Receptive skills A1 A2 B1 B2> Linking examinations results has only begun. • More needs to be done: • Replication to verify tentative linkages. • International co-operation to develop competence in linking examinations/tests to the CEFR. • International co-operation in mutual verifying national efforts of linkage?