Nano by Numbers M. Stopa Outline 1. Introduction to semiconductor quantum dots. 2. The Coulomb blockade and Coulomb oscillations: manipulating the charge on a quantum dot.

Download Report

Transcript Nano by Numbers M. Stopa Outline 1. Introduction to semiconductor quantum dots. 2. The Coulomb blockade and Coulomb oscillations: manipulating the charge on a quantum dot.

Nano by Numbers
M. Stopa
Outline
1. Introduction to semiconductor quantum
dots.
2. The Coulomb blockade and Coulomb
oscillations: manipulating the charge on a
quantum dot one electron at a time.
3. Double quantum dots: honeycomb stability
diagram.
4. Example from fluid dynamics: non-linearity
and the importance of computation.
5. Electronic structure of quantum dots: selfconsistent solution of Schrödinger and
Poisson equations.
6. Arrays of quantum dots, basic results.
7. Another nanoscale system.
What is an artificial atom ?
How do you make a semiconductor quantum dot ?
crystal growth and surface lithography
Quantum dots: growth and lithography
V(z)
air or vacuum
AlGaAs
+++++++++
2DEG
Donor layer
(e.g. silicon)
1000
Angstroms
POINT:
High mobility
several
microns
GaAs
Conduction
band profile
substrate
2DEG 
Two
Dimensional
Electron Gas
E-beam lithography
plunger
Apply negative
voltage to gates
air or vacuum
AlGaAs
+++++++++
2DEG
GaAs
substrate
2DEG
Later: capacitance model for quantum dot energy
Vertical quantum dots
GaAs
AlGaAs
Vg
Seigo Tarucha and co-workers, circa 1997.
What are the Coulomb blockade and
Coulomb oscillations ?
Inducing charge with gate
Vary “plunger” gate
voltage
Effective continuous positive charge
is induced by gate
“helium”
(N=2,N=3)
Like increasing nuclear charge !
(N=2,N=3)
(N=2,N=3)
(N=1,N=2)
(N=1,N=2)
(N=1,N=2)
N.B. “small” sourcedrain bias
At some specific voltage, we have a bi-stable point
where either N=2 or N=3 is allowed energetically
Coulomb oscillations
The gate induces a
fictitious charge ρ
ρ = CgVg
The total charge is the
N electrons plus this
fictitious charge
Q = ρ - Ne
The total energy is just
E = Q2/2C
Where C is the dot
self-capacitance
Q=0 here
N
3
2
1
0
Coulomb diamond: beyond
linear source-drain
wyala
Small source-drain
bias
s
X
d
Increase source-drain
bias
s
d
(N,N+1)
wyala
double dots
series
one
current
path
parallel
two
current
paths
double dot circuit
Vg1
Vg2
effective charges
Q1  C1Vg1  N1e  1  N1e
Q2  C2Vg 2  N2e  2  N2e
Energy of double dot
U Q1 , Q2   1Q   2Q  Q1Q2
2
1
First: inter-dot
capacitance set to
zero
wyala
2
2
Depends on capacitance
between dots Cint
Vg1
“stability
diagram”(N(n1,1,Nn22))
Stability diagram
Going across diagonal changes
total number NT= N1+ N2 by two
Vg2
Double dot “honeycomb stability” diagram
Vg1
NT 3
?
2
1
0
For series double dot, (linear) current
only flows at triple points
Current through a series double
dot
Inter-dot capacitance increases from A to F.
noninteracting
(1,1)
(0,0)
C. Livermore et al.
Science 274, 1332 (1996)
dots coupled into
a single dot
Q. Can you make a “vertical” double
dot and if so, what is it called ?
Quantum Big Mac
Computational Nanoscience: parallel with fluid dynamics
UL
Re 

ratio of inertial
effects to viscous
effects in the flow
Slides courtesy of Howard Stone
Osborne Reynolds
(1842–1912)
Increasing complexity of flows with increasing Reynolds
number: flow past a circular cylinder
Re=1
Re=26
~ laminar
Re=41
Re=10
Re=2000
turbulence
Point: transition to turbulence computed not “derived.”
Reference: Van Dyke, Album of Fluid Motion
Why is computational fluid dynamics
important ?
(First, fluid dynamics of enormous practical importance).
Transition from “laminar flow” to turbulence occurs in
Couette flow and Poiseuille flow when Reynolds
number becomes high enough.
Observed in experiment and verified by numerous
numerical studies.
Not “understood” according to any theory (or, more
exactly, understood differently according to many
theories).
 u

2
   u.u    g -p   u
 t

Navier-Stokes equation is non-linear
Basic idea of non-linearity:
a quantity depends on itself.
“Most” equations studied in physics are linear, e.g.:
Schrödinger equation
Poisson equation
Maxwell’s equations
my focus
In electronic structure, non-linearity arises from
the ability of the electron to influence its
surroundings (recall introduction):
the potential in the gap changes when the
electron enters due to polarization response of
the medium.
N.B. the electron does not directly interact with itself.
Electronic structure of lateral semiconductor
heterostructures: quantum dots
Basic real atom
Artificial
atom
Self-consistency = non-linearity
2


e 
  i  A   e r   Vxc r  n r    n n r 
c 


   r  
2
4e

 r 
N
2
 r     r   leads r    donorsr 
n1
Nothing new about self-consistent electronic structure. What is new is the ability
to manipulate nanometer scale objects like quantum dots. Some introduction….
Electronic structure of lateral
semiconductor heterostructures
Inputs:
1. Wafer profile
2. Donor
profile/concentration
3. Gate
pattern/voltages
4. Temperature
5. Magnetic field
band offset
effective mass
dielectric constant
g factor
spin-orbit coupling
Outputs:
1. electrostatic potential (r)
2. charge density (r)
3. for a confined region (i.e. a
dot)
1. eigenvalues Ei
2. eigenfunctions i
3. tunneling coefficients i
4. total free energy F(N,Vg,T,B)
EXAMPLE I
Chaotic quantum dot:
eigenfunctions and periodic orbits
Note: here treating donor layer as “jellium.”
Periodic orbits calculated by
solving Hamilton’s equations
in the effective 2D selfconsistent potential.
EXAMPLE 2,3,4
Examples of SDFT results
Triple dot rectifier
Single photon detector
 1
M. Stopa, PRL 88,
146802 (2002)
 3
Influence of disorder
on statistics of
quantum dot level
spacings
 2
Evolution of magnetic field
induced compressible and
incompressible strips in a
quantum dot
S. Komiyama et al., in
preparation
M. Stopa, Superlattices and
Microstructures, 21, 493-500
(1997).
EXAMPLE 5
Modelling an STM tip probing a 2DEG heterostructure
Vacuum/AlGaAs
Surface gate pattern
donor
layer
50 nm
50 nm
AlGaAs/GaAs
1 aB*=10 nm, 1 Ry*=5.8 meV
More
complicated still
Array of quantum dots
Vg=0 for all “gates”
Vth=e/2Ceff
Comparison with gedanken
experiment
What’s this ?
Transport in ion channels 
protein  2
 H O  80
2
Basic channology
• Channels are proteins
• ~2000 types
• control flow of Na+, K+, Cl-, Ca+
• channel types selective
• channels open and close (a.k.a. gating)
• measured in the laboratory
• complex noise behavior
Open questions
• Channel gating mechanism ?
• Microscopic basis for channel
selectivity ?
• Sources of current noise ?
• Folding or bending in channel
protein ?
• Molecular structure ?
(cf. Roderick MacKinnon et al.)
Course notes from Univ. Calif.
Nice intro to
at San Francisco
channels
http://www.keck.ucsf.edu/~hackos/channels.htm