Recent [Global DA] Developments at the Met Office Dale Barker, Weather Science, Met Office THORPEX/DAOS Meeting, 28 June 2011 © Crown copyright Met Office.
Download ReportTranscript Recent [Global DA] Developments at the Met Office Dale Barker, Weather Science, Met Office THORPEX/DAOS Meeting, 28 June 2011 © Crown copyright Met Office.
Recent [Global DA] Developments at the Met Office Dale Barker, Weather Science, Met Office THORPEX/DAOS Meeting, 28 June 2011 © Crown copyright Met Office Outline of Presentation • Where Are We Now? • What’s New: • Observation Sensitivities. • Resolution/climatological covariance upgrade (Nov 2010). • Hybrid 4D-Var, moist control Variable (July 2011). • What’s next? © Crown copyright Met Office Where Are We Now? © Crown copyright Met Office Operational NWP Models: Jun 2011 Global 25km 70L 4DVAR – 60km 60h forecast twice/day 144h forecast twice/day +24member EPS at 60km 2x/day NAE 12km 70L 4DVAR – 24km 60h forecast 4 times per day +24member EPS at 18km 2x/day UK-V (& UK-4) 1.5km 70L 3DVAR (3 hourly) 36h forecast Crown copyright Met Office 4©times per day What’s new? © Crown copyright Met Office Observation impacts: Model Comparison Richard Marriott Recent Operational Upgrades Parallel Suite 25 : Nov 2010 Global Data Assimilation - 4DVAR to 60km; CovStats from EC Ensemble Seasonal Forecast Model to L85 (from L38) Parallel Suite 26 : Mar 2011 Global Model – GA3.1 – Removal of Spurious Light Problem (since PS24) UK models - Improvements to Drizzle/Fog in (DrFog) + JULES Seasonal Forecast System - more members for 30day forecast Post-processing - Best Data via Blending/Lagging - 5000 sites UK4 run as Global Model Downscaler Parallel Suite 27 : Jul 2011 Global DA– Hybrid Data Assimilation, Moisture Control Variable, New Obs Global Model – Non-interactive Prognostic Dust UK DA – Doppler Radar Winds UK Model – More complete DrFog package © Crown copyright Met Office Climatological Covariances Training data Old (NMC method) New (ECStats) UM forecast differences T+30 – T+6 lagged UM T+6 ensemble(10) from EC analysis perturbations Resolution N216L70 N320L70 Period Jan 2007 1-17 Oct 2006 Cov model current unchanged © Crown copyright Met Office Impact Of N216 4D-Var + ECStats Verif Vs Obs (Above), Vs Anal(below) Res impact Vs Obs = +0.37 ECStats impact Vs Obs = -0.02 Joint impact Vs Obs = +0.17 Res impact Vs Anal = +1.50 ECStats impact Vs Anal = +4.11 Joint impact Vs Obs = +5.52 © Crown copyright Met Office Towards ‘Quasi-Continuous’ 4D-Var OPS (QG12) UM (QU06) UM model background analysis increment VAR N108 vguess (QG12) VAR N216 Hessian eigenvectors 1445 1503 1623 GMT Preconditioning N108 4D-Var reduces final N216 4D-Var cost from 21mins to 13mins Rick Rawlins SSMIS UAS + GPSRO to 60 km : November 2009 Solid: Control Dashed: GPSRO+SSMIS • DA covariances introduces slow temperature drift near model model. • Solutions: • Analysis increment ramping (reduce increments near top). • Additional data: GPS RO + SSMIS (Channels 21 and 22). © Crown copyright Met Office PS27: Global Data Assimilation Upgrade (July 2011) • Assimilation method • Hybrid 4D-Var algorithm: Coupling DA and MOGREPS. • Moisture control variable: Replacing RH with scaled humidity variable • Observation changes • Introduce METARS • GOES/Msat-7 clear-sky radiances, extra IASI (land) • Revisions to MSG clear-sky processing and GPSRO • Reduced spatial thinning (ATOVS/SSMIS/IASI/AIRS/aircraft) © Crown copyright Met Office PS27 Hybrid data-assimilation • Basic idea: Use data from MOGREPS-G to improve the representation of background error covariances in global 4D-Var: u response to single u observation: Climatological COV MOGREPS COV • MOGREPS is sensitive to the position of the front, and gives covariances that stretch the increment along the temperature contours. • Ensemble currently too small to provide the full covariance, so we blend the MOGREPS covariances with the current climatological covariances; i.e., we use a hybrid system: Hybrid COV © Crown copyright Met Office Pre-operational hybrid trials Verification vs. obs Better/neutral/worse NH TR SH Dec uncoupled (29 days) 29/94/0 6/117/0 12/109/2 Jun coupled 34/89/0 9/114/0 46/74/3 (28 days) Dec uncoupled: +1.2 Skill: RMSE: © Crown copyright Met Office Jun coupled: +1.6 Pre-operational hybrid trials Verification vs. own analyses Better/neutral/worse NH TR SH Dec uncoupled (29 days) 16/91/16 7/69/47 3/106/14 Jun coupled 49/63/11 9/86/28 18/82/23 (28 days) Dec uncoupled: -4.0 Skill: RMSE: © Crown copyright Met Office Jun coupled: -0.2 Pre-operational hybrid trials Verification vs. ECMWF analyses Better/neutral/worse NH TR SH Dec uncoupled (29 days) 35/79/0 39/75/0 14/100/0 Jun coupled (23/28 days) 51/63/0 27/87/0 46/66/2 Dec uncoupled: 1.721 (1.338%) Skill: RMSE: © Crown copyright Met Office Jun coupled: 1.337 (1.298%) PS27 Moisture control variable Limits on q/RH skew distribution • Plot shows O vs B B vs A similar • Near 0% or 100% RH, (A-B) is very skewed • Transform to a function of (A+B)/2 (Holm) – distribution is much more symmetric • This makes the analysis nonlinear • Much better fit of humiditysensitive satellite obs to background • Reduced spin-down of precipitation © Crown copyright Met Office Moisture control variable - improved fit of observations to background forecast © Crown copyright Met Office PS27: Impact of Package Components Combined Winter/Summer Results Hybrid 4D-Var NWP index NWP index vs obs vs anl +1.4 -1.9 Moisture control variable, replacing RH with scaled humidity variable 0 +1.2 Introduce METARS +0.8 +0.4 GOES/Msat-7 clear-sky radiances, extra IASI (land) +0.1 +0.1 Revisions to MSG clear-sky processing and GPSRO +0.2 -0.2 Reduced spatial thinning (ATOVS/SSMIS/IASI/AIRS/aircraft) +0.2 +0.4 © Crown copyright Met Office Global Modelling Centre Comparison Northern Hem. NWP Index (v. Anl) basket % diff relative to Met Office CAWC NCMRWF Met Office © Crown copyright Met Office KMA R What’s next? © Crown copyright Met Office Operational NWP Configs: Spring 2013 (Tentative) Global 16-20km 85L (85km top) Hybrid 4DVAR (50km inner-loop) 60 hour forecast twice/day 144 hour forecast twice/day 48/12member 40km MOGREPS-G 4*/day MOGREPS-EU Common NWP/reanalysis domain. 12Km 70L (40km top) 3D-Var (or NoDA) 48 hour forecast 12 members ; 4 times per day UKV 1.5km 70L (40km top) 3DVAR (hourly) 36 hour forecast 4 times per day 12 member 2.2km MOGREPS-UK Nowcasting Demonstration Project • 1.5 km NWP-based nowcasting system • Southern UK only • Hourly cycling, ~12 hour forecasts • To be run in experimental mode during London’s summer Olympics in 2012 • 3/4DVAR with Doppler winds/reflectivities. Result below fro 4 cases/10-20cycles per case: David Simonin DAE Techniques: Strategy Going Forward • Continue to optimize 4D-Var: SE + algorithmic changes. • Continue to develop hybrid for short/medium-term (1997-2015): • Increase ensemble size, more sophisticated localization, etc. • Consider replacing ETKF as ensemble perturbation generator. • Develop UKV DA hybrid 3/4D-Var (2012-2015). • Develop 4D-Ensemble-Var: • Code and test within current VAR framework (2011-2013). • Extend to an ‘Ensemble of 4D-Ensemble-Vars’ (2013-2015). • Retire PF model if/when 4D-Ensemble-Var beats 4D-PF-Var. • Coupled DA: Monitor DA developments in ESM components and increase modularity/sharing of algorithms where appropriate: ‘seamless DA’. Thank You Questions? © Crown copyright Met Office PS28 (late 2011): Prepare for 6 hour EPS Production Cycle 24 members 12 hourly Still MOGREPS-R domain at PS28 Not until PS30 © Crown copyright Met Office 12 members 6 hourly Fraction Of Beneficial Observations UKMO UM Fraction of Beneficial Obs Ship Satwind SSMIS Raob QSCAT Land Aircraft AMSUA 0.46 0.48 0.50 0.52 Conclusion: On average, 51-52% of observations are beneficial! 0.54 0.56 Richard Marriott