Transcript GEO Task AR-07-02 Architecture Implementation Pilot, Phase 2 (AIP-2) Kickoff Workshop NCAR Mesa Laboratory 25-26 September 2008

GEO Task AR-07-02
Architecture Implementation Pilot,
Phase 2 (AIP-2)
Kickoff Workshop
NCAR Mesa Laboratory
25-26 September 2008
AIP-2 Kickoff Opening Plenary
Time
Topic
Speaker
9:00
Introduction
George Percivall
9:10
Welcome to NCAR/UCAR
Dr. Richard Anthes,
UCAR President
9:20
Context of AIP, GCI, CFP Process
George Percivall
9:50
End-to-end use case
Doug Nebert
10:30
Refreshment Break
10:45
Session synopsis *11
11:50
logistics for breakouts
12:00
Lunch
Session leads
Welcome to NCAR/UCAR
Dr. Richard Anthes
UCAR President
Thank you NCAR!
• Richard Anthes
• Peter Backlund
• Carol Park
GEO Architecture and Data Committee
Task AR-07-02
Architecture Implementation Pilot
George Percivall
Open Geospatial Consortium
Task AR-07-02 Point of Contact
September 2008
Architecture Implementation Pilot
• AIP-1 Results
• The GEOSS Common Infrastructure
• AIP-2 Call for Participation
• Responses to the CFP
• Schedule for Phase 2
GEO Task AR-07-02
Architecture Implementation Pilot
• Lead incorporation of contributed
components consistent with the GEOSS
Architecture…
• …using a GEO Web Portal and a GEOSS
Clearinghouse search facility
• …to access services through GEOSS
Interoperability Arrangements
• …support GEOSS Societal Benefit Areas
Slide 7
AIP Phase 1 Results
• Elements of the GEOSS Common Infrastructure
(GCI) – Initial Operating Capability established
• Effective development process for GEO
– CFP, Kickoff, Execution, etc.
– ~120 organizations participated
– Methods for international coordination
• 10 Demonstrations of Initial Operating Capability
• Prepared “Architecture Implementation Report”
AI Pilot has broad international participation that
could only have occurred with GEO.
High interest & momentum supporting GEOSS vision.
Slide 8
GEOSS Common Infrastructure
AIP Phase 1 Results in 2007
• 64 Components & 75 Services registered (21 Nov 07)
• Interoperability Arrangement recommendations to the
Standards and Interoperability Forum (SIF)
• User interfaces to services
– GEO Web Portals: Compusult, ESA, ESRI
– Community Portals (27)
– Application Clients (13)
• Multiple organizations providing
– GEOSS Clearinghouse
– Community Catalogues
– Data Services
Slide 10
AIP Phase 2 Priorities
• Identify and register solutions that are available in
GEOSS as complete application solutions used on
a regular basis by a Community of Interest.
• Services and schemas exposed in well-documented,
ideally standard, ways and demonstrated as
interoperable with other solutions (in the scenarios).
• Coordination and integration activity through
'externality analysis' to relationships, dependencies
and issues with related topics.
Slide 11
AIP Phase 2 Themes
• Augment the GEOSS Common Infrastructure
• Emphasize SBAs identified by UIC/ADC collaboration
• Develop operational persistence;
– "persistent exemplars”
• Refine GEOSS AIP Architecture definition
– Service and Component types
– Interoperability Arrangements
• Further open the AIP Development Process to all
interested parties
Slide 12
AI Pilot Development Approach
Participation
AR-07-02 Architecture Implementation Pilot
Evolutionary Development Process
Concept
Development
Participation
Call for
Participation
Updates for each step
Architecture
Documentation
Continuous interaction
with external activities
Participation
Kick-off
Workshop
Participation
Development
Activities
Baseline
Operational Baseline and Lessons Learned for next evolutionary spiral
Participation
Persistent
Operations
(AR-07-01)
AIP-2 CFP Responses (34 to date)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
ACRF
BKG
Caribbean Flood Team
CIESIN
CNES and ERDAS
Compusult
EPA AirNow
ERDAS Titan
ESA
ESIP AQ Cluster
ESRI
ESRI Canada
EuroCryoClim
GEO-Ukraine
Giovanni
ICAN
ICT4EO
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
INCOSE
IP3
ISPRA
JAXA
Mines Paris Tech
NASA World Wind
NOAA/NASA GOES-R and GMU
CSISS
NOAA IOOS
NOAA NCDC
NOAA SNAAP
Noblis
Northrop Grumman
Spot Image
SURA/NIMSAT/GoMOOS
USGS
VIEWS
Washington University in St. Louis
AIP Phase 2 - CFP (Call For Participation )
• CFP Main Document
– Master Schedule
– Themes 2008
– How to respond to CFP
• Annex A: Development plan
– Development phases; Communication Plan
– Relationship to GCI task force
• Annex B: Architecture
Slide 15
GEOSS AIP-2 CFP Annex B Developers
CFP Annex B – Architecture
• Enterprise Viewpoint
– Value of Earth Observations
• Information Viewpoint
– Earth Observations schemas and encodings
• Computational Viewpoint
– SOA services; broadcast; media distribution
• Engineering Viewpoint
– Components types and interoperability arrangements
• Technology Viewpoint
– Component Instances, Operational Criteria
GEOSS Enterprise Viewpoint
GEOSS Information System
Enterprise Viewpoint
•
•
•
•
GEO community objective: “system of systems”
Societal benefit areas
Data sharing principles
Interoperability arrangements
• SBAs for the 2nd Phase of AIP-2
– Disaster Response
– Air Quality and Health
– Climate Change and Biodiversity
– Renewable Energy
Information Viewpoint
• Maps, features, coverages, and observations
• Spatial Referencing; Coordinate Reference Systems
• Registry Model
• Metadata
• Encoding Formats
• Alerts and Feeds
Computational Viewpoint
• Service oriented architecture (SOA)
– Publish-Find-Bind
• GEOSS Functions via SOA
– Services for Discovery, Access, Processing, etc.
– Events
• GEOSS Functions via broadcast
– GEONETCast
• GEOSS Functions via Media
Definitions
• component: a part of GEOSS contributed by a GEO
Member or Participating organization. Components
may expose service interfaces to provide access to
earth observation-related functions and/or data.
Components are described in the GEOSS
Component Registry.
• service: Functionality provided by a component
through component system interfaces. Services
communicate primarily using structured messages,
based on the Services Oriented Architecture view of
complex systems. Services are described, along with
information about their operating organizations, in the
GEOSS Service Registry.
CFP Architecture – Component Types
Client Tier
GEO Web
Site
GEOWeb
Web
GEO
GEO
Web
Portal
Portal
Portal
Community
Portals
Business Process Tier
GEOSS Registries
Components
Client
Applications
GEOSS
Clearinghouse
Services
Alerts/Feeds
Servers
Portrayal
Servers
Workflow
Management
Infrastructure
Registries
Processing
Severs
Other
Services
Standards
Requirements
Best Practices
Community
Catalogues
Access Tier
GEONETCast
Product
Access
Services
Sensor
Web
Services
Model
Access
Services
Other
Services
GEOSS Registries Interaction
UDDI
ebRS
Z39.50/ OGC
JAXR SRU CSW Web UI
Z39.50/
SRU Web UI
GEOSS Standards Registry
GEOSS
Components
offer
GEOSS Component
and Service
Registry
GEOSS
Services
expose
GEOSS
Standards
reference
may
become
nominate
U.S.A.
GEO Members
and
Participating
Organizations
GEOSS Special
Arrangements
External
Standards
Bodies
IEEE
SIF
Subject
Matter
Experts
Test Facility for Service Registration
• Provide a means for service operators and
technology providers to get feedback on the efficacy
of their interfaces and applications in implementing
and using GEOSS Interoperability Arrangements
• Facility will also enable periodic checking as to the
availability and reliability of registered components
and services,
• To these ends, the Test Facility needs to be a
permanent, sustainable resource.
CFP Architecture – Operational Persistence
•
Length of commitment
– Upon registering a service, a service provider must specify the length of
time for which the service will be offered (preferably ‘continuous operation’).
– Consider multiple years
•
Level of service
– services are expected to be available at least 99% of the time, except when
otherwise required by the nature of the service.
– This allows for approximately 7 hours of down time a month
– Being achieved regularly by servers, Biggest problem is network provider
– Performance (perhaps by specifying number of simultaneous connections)
•
Termination
– GEO may “de-list” a server
– non-functioning components of the Network will diminish the operational
and marketing value of the Network in general for all participating
organizations.
Slide 26
AIP-2 CFP Responses (34 to date)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
ACRF
BKG
Caribbean Flood Team
CIESIN
CNES and ERDAS
Compusult
EPA AirNow
ERDAS Titan
ESA
ESIP AQ Cluster
ESRI
ESRI Canada
EuroCryoClim
GEO-Ukraine
Giovanni
ICAN
ICT4EO
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
INCOSE
IP3
ISPRA
JAXA
Mines Paris Tech
NASA World Wind
NOAA/NASA GOES-R and GMU
CSISS
NOAA IOOS
NOAA NCDC
NOAA SNAAP
Noblis
Northrop Grumman
Spot Image
SURA/NIMSAT/GoMOOS
USGS
VIEWS
Washington University in St. Louis
Goals for Participation in GEOSS AIP
• Better awareness of community interoperability efforts
• Better understanding and use of proposed GEOOS standards
• Standardization of intra- and inter-system data exchange
• Leveraging and reuse of existing resources through service-chaining
• Increased value of existing development investments
• Improved resource availability and decision-making for end users
Analysis of CFP Responses
• Analysis conducted by Doug Nebert, Josh
Lieberman, Herve’ Caumont, Ingo Simonis, George
Percivall
• Each CFP response reviewed by at least 2 persons
• Summarized contributions in categories
– SBA/CoP/Scenarios
– Transverse Technology topics
• For each category
– Primary and Secondary Participants identified
– Topics within the category
• Results posted on-line
AIP-2 Response Analysis Categories
• SBA, Communities of Practice, Scenario Sessions
– Disaster Response
– Biodiversity and Climate Change
– Renewable Energy
– Health - Air Quality
• Transverse Technology sessions:
– Catalogues, Clearinghouse, Metadata
– Data Product Access: service, schema, encoding
– Sensors and Models Access: service, schema, encoding
– Workflow for derived product and alert generation
– Clients: portals and applications clients
– Test Facility for Service Registration
AIP-2 SBA/CoP/Scenario session leaders
Disaster Response SBA
– Ron Lowther, Northrop Grumman; Didier
Giacobbo, Spot Image; Stuart Frye, NASA;
• Health SBA: Air Quality
– David McCabe, EPA; Frank Lindsay, NASA;
Stefan Falke & Rudy Husar, Washington Univ.
• Biodiversity and Climate
– Stefano Nativi, CNR
• Energy SBA
– Thierry Ranchin, Mines Paris Tech; Ellsworth
LeDrew, Univ Waterloo
AIP-2 Transverse session leaders
•
•
•
•
•
•
Catalogues, Clearinghouse, Metadata
– Doug Nebert, USGS; Josh Lieberman OGC/Traverse;
Kengo Aizawa, JAXA
Data Product Access
– Herve' Caumont, OGC/ERDAS, Glenn Rutledge NOAA NOMADS,
Hans Peter Plag Task AR-07-03
Sensors and Models Access
– Anwar Vahed, ICT4EO; Luis Bermudez SURA; Don Sullivan,
NASA
Workflow for products and alerts
– Liping Di, GMU; Greg Yetman, CIESIN;
Satoshi Sekiguchi, GEOGrid
Clients: portals and application clients
– Nadine Alameh, NASA-WW; Herve' Caumont, OGC/Erdas
Test Facility for service registration
– Doug Nebert, USGS; Jolyon Martin, ESA
Coordinating GEO Tasks in CFP Responses
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DI-06-09 Use of Satellites for Risk management
DI-07-01 Risk management for floods
EC-07-01 Global Ecosystem Observation and Monitoring
Network
DA-07-04 Sensor Web Enablement for In-Situ Observing
Network
DA-07-06 Data Integration and Analysis System
DA-06-05 Basic Geographic Data
AR-07-03 Global Geodetic Reference Frames
AR-07-01 Enabling Deployment of a GEOSS Architecture
AI Pilot Development Approach
Participation
AR-07-02 Architecture Implementation Pilot
Evolutionary Development Process
Concept
Development
Participation
Call for
Participation
Updates for each step
Architecture
Documentation
Continuous interaction
with external activities
Participation
Kick-off
Workshop
Participation
Development
Activities
Baseline
Operational Baseline and Lessons Learned for next evolutionary spiral
Participation
Persistent
Operations
(AR-07-01)
AIP Phase 2 Master Schedule
Architecture Workshop
CFP Release Announcement
CFP Clarification Telecon
CFP Responses for Kickoff due
AIP-2 Kickoff Workshop
Status & Interim results to GEO Plenary
AIP-2 results transition to operations
February 2008
26 June 2008
18 July 2008
1 September 2008
25-26 September 2008
November 2008
1st quarter of 2009
Potential Milestones for AIP-2
AIP-2 Kickoff Workshop
25-26 September 2008
Key design decisions complete:
Some posted in Best Practice Wiki
November 2008
Scenario storyboards developed
December 2008
Service registration Complete
Scenario Testing complete; Screen captures
Operational baseline defined
AIP-2 results transition to operations
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
1st quarter of 2009
Architecture Implementation Pilot
• AIP-1 Results
• The GEOSS Common Infrastructure
• AIP-2 Call for Participation
• Responses to the CFP
• Schedule for Phase 2
Thank you!
• NCAR hosting of the Kickoff
– Richard Anthes, Peter Backlund, Carol Park
• OGC acknowledges sponsorship from
– European Commission
– European Space Agency
– USGS
– ERDAS
– Northrop Grumman
AIP-2 Kickoff Opening Plenary
Time
Topic
Speaker
9:00
Introduction
George Percivall
9:10
Welcome to NCAR/UCAR
Dr. Richard Anthes,
UCAR President
9:20
Context of AIP, GCI, CFP Process
George Percivall
9:50
End-to-end use case
Doug Nebert
10:30
Refreshment Break
10:45
Session synopsis *11
11:50
logistics for breakouts
12:00
Lunch
Session leads