Efficacy and Safety of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors During Elective Coronary Revascularization A meta-analysis of randomized trials performed in the era of stents and thienopyridines Winchester.
Download ReportTranscript Efficacy and Safety of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors During Elective Coronary Revascularization A meta-analysis of randomized trials performed in the era of stents and thienopyridines Winchester.
Efficacy and Safety of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors During Elective Coronary Revascularization A meta-analysis of randomized trials performed in the era of stents and thienopyridines Winchester DE, Wen X, Brearley WD, Park KE, Anderson RD, Bavry AA Disclosures • All authors have no conflicts to disclose • This research was supported by an unrestricted grant from the Florida Heart Research Institute Background and Context • Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) – Potent antiplatelet agents – Commonly used during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) • Contemporary PCI typically performed with: – Stents – Thienopyridines • Aim: To assess efficacy and safety of GPI in contemporary elective PCI • Hypothesis: Benefits of GPI will be minimal and bleeding risks will be elevated Methods • Meta-analysis of: – – – – – MEDLINE, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov Randomized controlled trials of GPI vs. control DerSimonian-Laird model for risk ratios (RR) STATA v11 (College Station, TX) Independent data extraction by two authors (WDB and KEP) – Verification and resolution of disagreements by two authors (DEW and AAB) Study Selection • 6,377 studies identified by search strategy – MeSH terms and keywords • Limited to humans and clinical trials – 648 studies remained • Abstracts hand searched and non-elective PCI studies were eliminated – 22 studies included in meta-analysis Outcomes • • • • Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction Major Bleeding Minor Bleeding All-cause mortality Baseline Characteristics • • • • Mean age = 63 years Mean percent female = 25% Median stent use = 98% Thienopyridine given prior to PCI in 94% (given after PCI in remainder) Periprocedural Infarction • 5.1% with GPI versus 8.3% with control • RR=0.66 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.79), p<0.0001 Major Bleeding • 1.2% with GPI versus 0.9% with control • RR=1.37 (95% CI 0.83 to 2.25), p=0.22 Minor Bleeding • 3.0% with GPI versus 1.7% with control • RR=1.70 (95% CI 1.28 to 2.26), p<0.0001 Mortality • 0.3% with GPI versus 0.5% with control • RR=0.70 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.33), p=0.27 Metaregression • Influence of various covariates on myocardial infarction • • • • Percentage of patients with diabetes (p = 0.61) Publication year (p = 0.99) Thienopyridine before vs after PCI (p = 0.99) Higher dose of heparin in control arm (p = 0.78) Limitations • Could not stratify patients by other known risk factors – Platelet reactivity, statin use, lesion complexity • Included ticlopidine studies – However, efficacy is considered similar to clopidogrel Conclusions • Using GPI during modern elective PCI with thienopyridines and stenting has the following effects: – Postprocedural infarction is significantly reduced, ARR = 3.2%, risk ratio = 0.66 – Major bleeding is not significantly increased – Minor bleeding is significantly increased, ARR = 1.3%, risk ratio = 1.70 – No net effect on mortality Winchester DE, et al JACC 2011