Quaternary Environments Non-Marine Biological Evidence Proxy Records  Macrofossil Evidence  Packrats  Tree-line  Microfossil Evidence  Pollen  fluctuation Insects.

Download Report

Transcript Quaternary Environments Non-Marine Biological Evidence Proxy Records  Macrofossil Evidence  Packrats  Tree-line  Microfossil Evidence  Pollen  fluctuation Insects.

Quaternary Environments
Non-Marine Biological Evidence
Proxy Records

Macrofossil Evidence
 Packrats
 Tree-line

Microfossil Evidence
 Pollen

fluctuation
Insects
Macrofossil Evidence




Quantitative analysis of Quaternary plant
macrofossils began in 1957 (West 1957)
Seeds, fruits (orchids to coconuts), cones,
sporangia
Leaves, needles, buds
Wood
Macrofossil Seeds
Needle Cross Section
Macrofossil Diagram
Paleoscatology



Scat
 Procedure
 Blend
 Screen
Coprolites Analysis
Can identify food sources and disease
Cuticles

Waxy coating that has distinct morphology




Stomata: control gas exchange
Trichomes (leaf hairs)
Cork cells (provide leaf support)
Silica cells (support, discourage foliavores)
Phytoliths

Production



Disperal


Silica is deposited in the secondary plant wall of some
plants, particularly grasses and occasionally in wood.
Phytoliths most abundant in grasslands and steppes.
Large fragments move short distances (fragile) small
fragments (silt sized) may be distributed by wind.
Preservation

Resistant to oxidation, but the silica can be dissolved
by ground-water movement
Phytolith Morphology
Poaceae Zea luxuriens Phytolith
Poaceae Paspalum lividum Phytolith
Asteraceae Lipochaeta sp. Phytolith
Phytoliths

Identification




Many plants don't produce phytoliths: only a partial
indication of plants in area
Non-related species produce the same types :
dumbbells, saddles, bowls, boats, bottoms
Some Taxonomic categories can be recognized:
panicoid, festucoid, chloroid
A few forms are diagnostic to species level: e.g.,
maize
Phytolith Methods



Oxidize sample (boil in H2O2)
Wet sieve (phytoliths silt size)
Flotation (tetrabromoethane, ZnBr2) phytoliths
have specific gravity of 1.5-2.3, quartz 2.65
Wood Anatomy

Can identify wood to the species or genus
level
 Cell
structure
 Pits
 Tracheids
 Pores
 Resin
ducts
Wood Anatomy
Treeline

Upper Treeline
 Temperature
controlled
 Dating wood from tree above current treeline
 Arctic brown paleosols beneath recent
Spodosols

Lower Treeline
 Moisture
controlled
 Packrat Middens
Krummholz




Prostrate stunted vegetation
Protected by snow pack
Can grow above present treeline
Technically a different genetic species of a plant
that has stunted growth, but broadly used for
environmentally stunted trees
Flagged leaders standing
out from a Krummholz matt
©Tom Kloster 2001: http://www.splintercat.org/JeffParkRidge/ParkRidgeImages/
©Tom Kloster 2001: http://www.splintercat.org/JeffParkRidge/ParkRidgeImages/
http://patti.tensegrity.net/album/moraine/display/trees.html
Problems with Treeline Studies





Incomplete fossil record (highest elevation trees
may not have been found)
Elevation of mountain summits restrict how high
treeline could be recorded
Present treeline is hard to determine
Disturbances can affect tree line (fire, grazing,
avalanches, wind abrasion, insects)
Lag time in response to climate changes


Advance faster than retreat
Treeline may be affected by isostatic uplift
Treeline Fluctuations, Sweden
Dahl and Nesje 1996
Vegetation Zones with Elevation
Vegetation Zones with Elevation
Changes in Major Vegetation Zones for
22,000 years in Nevada
Packrats (Neotoma)




First used in Quaternary Paleoecology
introduced by Phillip Wells (Wells and
Jorgensen, 1964), a zoologist doing vegetation
reconnaissance on the Nevada Test Site.
Collect all vegetation around the midden
Preserved by amberat (urine)
Also bring in pollen
Packrat Midden
Locations
Davis: http://www.geo.arizona.edu/palynology/geos462/28packrats.html
Packrat Midden
Packrat Midden
Packrat Midden from University of Arizona (has Giant Sloth Bones)
Macrofossils and Pollen from Packrat
Middens
Davis: http://www.geo.arizona.edu/palynology/geos462/28packrats.html
Problems with Packrats

Collected material may not represent a random
representation of surrounding environment
Different species have different preferences
Discontinuous deposits

Bioturbation


Creosote Distribution From Packrat Middens
Davis: http://www.geo.arizona.edu/palynology/geos462/28packrats.html
Insect Studies

Organisms used

Coleoptera (Beetles) most common
Diptera (Flies)

Hymenoptera (Wasps and Ants)




Found in sedimentary deposits such as lake
beds or peat
Based on exoskeleton morphology
Little lag in assemblage changes
Insects

Study of late Quaternary beetle faunas began with




Production


Taphonomy poorly studied, but fossils are interpreted as local,
however, many beetles can fly and their remains are present in
streams.
Preservation


More species of beetles than of all other animals.
Dispersal


J.V. Matthews (1975) North American
G.R. Coope's (1977) study of British deposits
S.A. Elias (1985) western U.S.
Beetle carapaces are the most resistant of all insect fossils. Their
elytrae (chitinous wing covers) are particularly abundant, heads and
legs also common.
Identification

Beetles are probably the best studied insect group (taxonomically),
and their preserved remains useful in identification
Beetle Morphology
Reconstructed Paleotemperature
Based on Insect Remains, UK
Mutual Climate Range
Chironomid Percentage Diagram