Largest community college system in Missouri serving an area of about 700 square miles; created by area voters in 1962 League for Innovation.
Download
Report
Transcript Largest community college system in Missouri serving an area of about 700 square miles; created by area voters in 1962 League for Innovation.
Largest community college system in Missouri
serving an area of about 700 square miles;
created by area voters in 1962
League for Innovation institution
Four campuses
Three education centers
Transfer, career and developmental programs
Non-credit continuing education courses
Various workforce development initiatives
25,000 credit students each semester
48,000 non-credit each year
28,000 workforce development students FY2007
90 credit programs
57 workforce development programs
2,000 faculty
4,000 employees
Public Website
Users Website
(faculty, student organizations, classes, and staff)
Intranet (three sites: key resources menu, static
content pages, and a SPS2001 document center)
“One College”
Issues and
problems with
current site
Developing a new
brand identity for
the institution
… but several identities
on the web site
Contains hundreds of mini-sites that don’t
connect to each other or the site as a whole
Site is difficult to navigate – and to find content
– 16,000 pages with no standard navigation!
Reflects the internal organization, not the users’
needs or expectations
Internal use content mixed in with other
content
Pages don’t follow best practices for web
design
Most pages don’t comply with our loosely
defined college standards
Common to have over 2,000 broken links
Out-of-date content
Non-compliance with ADA requirements
No unified appearance – brand identity is
fragmented
No workflow, review or style editing process
Taking content from the existing 16,000 pages
to distill the items of need to audiences
Taking multiple subsites (i.e., programs and
departments) and integrating them together
Vendor – marketing communications firm
Meetings at each campus to introduce project
and seek cooperation and support
2005 – Audience research conducted by
contracted firm
Current and prospective students – focus
groups and online surveys
Continuing Education and high school
guidance counselors – focus groups
Key administrators and faculty influencers –
phone interviews
Larger sample of faculty and staff – random,
online survey
Studied site’s navigation and search capabilities
Charted the entire site
92 charts provided a snapshot of the site’s
technological structure, showing the:
Types of pages (html, asp, etc.)
Graphics used (jpg, gif, swf, etc.)
Links (html, CSS, mailto, scripted)
Server side (SSI) and client scripting
Other document types (pdf, doc, xls, ppt, etc.)
One-on-one interviews with:
Senior administrators
Technology executives
Student services staff
Web coordinators
and others
These employees were directly related to the
web site’s operation, administration, updates
and/or maintenance
Rebrand the site to project STLCC as one
college
Build a site that allows visitors to select a path
based on personal needs
Create a new web content delivery system:
Easy to update
Reinforces web standards
Provides a consistent user experience
Flexible to respond to changing needs
Embeds review, tracking and accountability
Acquire and deploy technology that expedites
and streamlines the ongoing content
development and maintenance of the site
Continually evaluate the site’s effectiveness by
reviewing traffic metrics, click paths, on site
searches, and user studies
Use the fault-tolerant design of the existing site
Create an agile technical environment for
future web-based functionalities
Understand the current user experience
(qualitative research) and issues
Determine features and functionalities desired
by users
Reorganize and rewrite the content to fit the
needs of our target audiences
Integrate the site into the ongoing, daily
processes of the college
Develop an integrated, user-centric, web-based
platform for delivering student services and
informing the community at large
Branding
Targeting visitors and their needs
Audiences
Critical top-level site elements
Navigation required to expose key elements
Content
Technical
New firms selected through bid process for
advertising, branding, web site development,
including content
Selection of a web content management system
Creation of Web Advisory Committee –
cross-functional and campus representation
Branding – research-rich process to uncover
who we are internally and externally
Image – signal of our personal identity and
success
Loyalty – a preference of one brand over
another
Equity – assets linked to our brand name that
add to or subtract from our value
Revealed our blurred image – image
fragmentation
Revealed our publications, advertising and
Web site have inconsistent messages
Tie branding with enrollment management
communications strategies
Use the web site as the tool for prospective
student contact
Funnel inquiries to appropriate departments,
responding
Take action that can be tracked and follow-up
appropriately
Hired director of enrollment management
84.7% - Registration
82.4% - Student Resources
81.8% - Class Schedules
77.9% - Blackboard
60.3% - College Catalog
29.9% - can’t find what they are looking for
Ervin Marketing Report, May 2006
Registration
Hub for student news and communications
Access to all programs and classes
Class availability, times/room numbers,
changes, grades
Do everything online:
Pay for classes
Get parking passes
Get books
“Not have to go to the campus”
Ervin Marketing Report, May 2006
73% - accurate and timely information
70% - easy registration process
66% - ease of navigation
61% - descriptions of programs
55% - easy payment
Ervin Marketing Report, May 2006
Comprehensive and up-to-date?
Well organized?
Easy to navigate or find content?
Appropriate, consistent and functional
layout, branding, presentation and graphics?
Meets the needs of the intended audience(s)?
Does it “deliver the goods”?
Role of the Ad Hoc Web Advisory Committee –
taxonomy (navigation structure, organization)
Navigation and organization of content must
be intuitive
Must be timely, accurate and consistent
Content management system to assure fresh,
reviewed content
Frequently accessed content on home page
Student resources
Program information
Admissions and
Registration
Workforce Development
Continuing Education
Distance Learning
Foundation & Alumni
Library
Search
Authenticated portal link
Learning management
system link
About STLCC
Employee directory
Campuses and Centers
Maps
Calendars
Job opportunities
Newsroom
Contact information
Legal disclaimers and
statements
Access and disability
information
Diversity at STLCC
Provides structure to unstructured
content
Organizes together content from multiple
sources
Some users never search; and in many
cases search isn’t as effective as structure
Allows users to find the content they
need in a way that makes sense to them
Tried using an outside firm on contract
Most effective was the work of district
community relations personnel
Reviews and edits were done internally
– a very slow process
Final editing and checks for AP style by
community relations
Community Relations
Web Content Supervisor
Web Graphic Designer
Technology Support
Web Manager
Web Programmer
www.stlcc.edu
•Anonymous access
•Official College content
•Marketing focus
•Unified navigation and
appearance
•Workflow based
publishing and content
approval process using
Serena Collage WCMS
•Google mini search
users.stlcc.edu
•Anonymous access
•Faculty, staff, class,
group/organization, and
student content
•Navigation limited to list
of available “users” sites
•Unmanaged publishing
(although WCMS and
suggested templates, or
RSS feed from MOSS
mysite, will be available)
•Google mini search
my.stlcc.edu
•Authenticated access
•Self-service password
reset
•Entry point into Banner,
Blackboard, and other
systems and content
requiring authentication
•Navigation is
personalized to the user,
standardized appearance
•Publishing workflow
varies depending on
location within the site
•MOSS 2007 search
Automate consistency and standards through
templates and required elements
Allow authorized users to easily add or update
content “anytime anywhere” through a browser
Rich text editing eliminates the need for HTML or
web editor (i.e. Dreamweaver) experience
Manage workflows with the combination of task
management (assign, track and categorize), version
control, permissions and a review/approval system
Roll pages back to a previous version as needed
Schedule content replacement or removal
WCMS based
Workflow-driven updates
Special emergency/urgent content
Deploys from WCMS
Content not in WCMS
Needs to leverage template components and
standard font/color CSS (via SSI)
Web applications (mostly asp/aspx)
CORS
Deployed by replication using ViceVersa Pro
Cisco load-balanced switch
Two front-end web servers running multiple
websites in DMZ
WCMS server and database server
Server for content not managed by WCMS
Users site remains separate
Intranet will be replaced by MOSS 2007 site
– a new portal for all things authenticated
SungardHE Banner (ERP) Self-Service
BlackBoard LMS
Home-grown applications
Course Schedule
Schedule of Late-Starting Courses
Employee Directory
Continuing Education Registration
Student Application
Sexual Harassment, FERPA, and Diversity Tutorials
New system – Windows Live student e-mail
Web publishing process
Content review and approval process
Content deployment process
Requests for new/additional content/subsites
Change form
“Tight governance can
stifle a site, preventing
constituents from evolving
it to fit their needs”
“Loose governance can
result in a site flooded with
broken or inappropriate
content and functionality”
Zach Wall, ppc.com
Ownership and areas of responsibility
Modifications to the core navigation
Subsite additions / modifications
Site-wide standards
“Look and feel”
Style
Taxonomy
Metadata
Document types
Navigation
Coding
Security
Web Advisory
Committee
Intranet Website
Discussion with
college leaders
Discussions with
faculty and staff
Multiple usability
and beta tests
Rollout
announcements
Focus can get redirected based upon urgency
of communications
Underestimating timeline for content and
technical specifications development
Working with several different agencies
Agency reshuffle – new AE
Deploying new WCMS in conjunction with
new site
New positions, new employees – no blueprint
for their jobs
New employees in a large, complex
organization
Internal audiences – time it takes to
communicate
Managing expectations of new site –
1,600 vs. 16,000 pages
New brand identity – advertising, publications
New logo and graphic standards
New website went live March 9:
http://www.stlcc.edu
In order to have a go-live date, a “line” had to be
drawn somewhere on what content would be part
of the initial deployment
We used the Ad Hoc Web Committee to develop basic
guidelines for what was to be included for Phase 1
However, when you make such a decision, there are some
who may feel their content was left out, or who may
incorrectly feel that someone else had decided their
content wasn’t important enough
“Phase 2” begins
Corrections and updates
WCMS contributor training
Content that was not included in the initial deployment
New content based on feedback and metrics analysis
Some content needed to be delayed until we could develop
guidelines to present the information in a consistent manner
Further reinforce “One College”
Development of interactive, more dynamic content
Testimonial videos (Flash based)
“Phase 3” - Student credentials and my.stlcc.edu site
Richard Schumacher
Manager, Technology Initiatives
[email protected]
George Sackett
Web Content Supervisor
[email protected]
Presentation is available online at:
http://www.stlcc.edu/presentations/