Transcript Page 1 ● The Department of Statistics will carry out a nationwide from ● The exercise would canvass about Page 2

Page 1
● The Department of
Statistics will carry out a
nationwide
from
● The exercise would
canvass about
Page 2
To provide population
and housing data at
various geographical
level
To use as inputs for
population estimates and
projection, as well as for
policy formulation
Page 3
De facto – 1970, 1980 & 1991 Census
De jure – 2000 & 2010 Census
Page 4
Based on experience from 2000 Census-
• Face to face interview
• Self enumeration:
–e-Census
–Drop-off and pick-up
(DOPU)
Page 5
Page 6
to estimate the extent of coverage error
in the Census in terms of living quarters,
households and persons so as to
provide a basis for adjustment- living
quarters, household, person,
to evaluate content error by studying
differences in responses on selected
characteristics of persons enumerated in
the Census and PES – sex, ethnicity, age,
citizenship and marital status.
to serve as a guide in the planning and
implementation of future censuses and
surveys.
Page 7
Information
Census is
not revealed
involved in PES
Page 8
•2 - stage training:
Training
Pilot test
•
•
Managerial – permanent
staff of DOSM (3-4 days)
Enumerators and
supervisors (3-4 days)
• Clarity of questions
• The estimated time taken for
completing one household/living
quarters
• Testing of the computer system
Page 9
COVERAGE
• PES 1991 and
2000 covered
the whole of
Malaysia
(covered only
the population
residing in non
institutional
living quarters)
SAMPLE
FRAME
SAMPLING
DESIGN
• Sampling frame
was obtained
from National
Household
Sampling
Frame (NHSF)
established for
respective
census year
• Single stage
stratified sample
for both years
• Sample size • 1991 - 1,347EBs
/40,279
• 2000 - 1,800 EBs
/52,879.
Page 10
LEVEL OF
ANALYSIS
• To provide
estimates of
under
enumeration
rates at the
national,
regional, state
and stratum
levels.
APPROACH
• ‘de facto’ for
1991
• `de jure’ for
2000
DATE OF
CONDUCTED
PES
• 1991 PES - 15
August
• 2000 PES – 7
August
Page 11
Transcription
Four process
flows towards
matching
activities.
Listing and Enumeration
Office Reconciliation
Field Reconciliation
Page 12
Two major reasons
COVERAGE • Omissions
ERROR • Erroneous Inclusions
Two methods were used in
evaluating the content error
CONTENT
ERROR • Percentage of Degree of Agreement (D)
• Index of Inconsistency (I)
Page 13
Person
• 1991 – 4.6%
• 2000 – 4.4%
Living Quarters
• 1991 – 3.0%
• 2000 – 3.4%
Household
• 1991 – 5.6%
• 2000 – 6.8%
Content
• Malaysia - the Percentage of Degree of
Agreement for year 2000 for age group
was 87.8, lower than that of the sex (99.3)
and ethnic group (98.1). This is in line with
the Index of Inconsistency which posted
higher (13.3) compared to that of the sex
(1.3) and ethnic group (3.6). The similar
Page 14
pattern occurred for 1991.
• PES Report was produced for internal
circulation only.
• The duration of producing the report is
about 8 months after Census.
• The results of the PES were used for the
adjustment in the selected Census figures.
Page 15
There should be a closer
supervision in urban area
during the listing of LQ and
enumeration of persons
Probing questions are
necessary to remind
respondents of the
importance of giving
accurate response.
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
2000 PES
2010 PES
List. & Enumeration
period: 3 weeks
List. & Enumeration
period: 8 weeks
No. of enumerators:
780
No. of enumerators:
320
Sample size: 1800
EBs
Sample size: 1621
EBs
Page 19
Page 20
A single stage stratified sampling
Sample Size was based on under
enumeration rates found in 2000 PES.
(Person : 4.4%, LQ : 3.4%, household : 6.8%)
Estimation was done for every stratum (urban
and rural) for each state
Sample size for 2010 PES is 1,621 EBs out of
75,000 EBs.
Page 21
Page 22