Instructional Systems Technology Ph.D. Program IST@IUB School of Education Theodore W. Frick, IST chair Jiyoon Jung, 2nd year Ph.D.
Download ReportTranscript Instructional Systems Technology Ph.D. Program IST@IUB School of Education Theodore W. Frick, IST chair Jiyoon Jung, 2nd year Ph.D.
Instructional Systems Technology Ph.D. Program IST@IUB School of Education Theodore W. Frick, IST chair Jiyoon Jung, 2nd year Ph.D. student Colin M. Gray, 2nd year Ph.D. student Craig D. Howard, Ph.D. Candidate Andrew F. Barrett, Ph.D. Candidate Dossier Reviews Faculty evaluations of Ph.D. student progress in 3 interrelated areas Typical Ph.D. Research Sequence IST Research Courses Dossier Review Primary Evaluation Student Focus 1 R711, R690 Course performance Learn from classroom courses 2 R695 - 1 Research group(s) Write literature review 3 R695 - 2 Research group(s) Design 1st authored study 4 R695 - 3 Research group(s) Conduct 1st authored study 5 R695 - 4 2 Research group(s) Complete 1st authored study 6 R795 3 Research group(s) & proposal draft Identify dissertation committee 7 R799 Research group(s) & proposal defense Start dissertation research 8 R799 Research group(s) & final defense Finish dissertation research 1 Faculty-mentored Research Groups Throughout Ph.D. program Professor Research Groups Bonk • E-team—extreme learning • Emerging learning tech & Web 2.0 • e-learning & blended Brush, Leftwich, & • PBL Tech Glazewski • K-12 tech integration Cho • Action learning • Organizational learning • HRD Haynes • Workplace learning & performance Reigeluth • PIES: personalized integrated educational systems • Systemic change Boling & Frick Research Groups Design Research Boling Jiyoon Design Theory and Pedagogy Colin ID for Complex Learning Craig Frick Pattern Analysis Simulations and Games for Learning Andrew Jiyoon Jung • 2nd year doctoral student • M.A. in Educational Technology Background: • K-12 Teacher • Instructional Designer • Researcher Jiyoon's Initial Experiences • Focused on K-12 education, learning, teaching, supporting ... • Browsed three research groups initially and got involved 1. Design Research 2. Instructional Design for Complex Learning 3. PBL-Tech Jiyoon’s 1st Dossier Review • Time to narrow down: What should I do!!! • Exposed to a variety of research groups (3), subject areas (2), and multiple research methods • How could I contribute the most at this point in time? • my background • the survey instrument • teaching experience at IU Jiyoon's Current Research • Decided to build upon current work • Shifting roles in research groups Individual study under IRB review • Pre-service teacher technology integration • Decision making process • Model implementation & design case • Group Dynamics, Lead Faculty Mentorship Colin M. Gray • 2nd year doctoral student • M.A. in Graphic Design • M.Ed. in Educational Technology Background: • in visual and interactive design • art director at an instructional design consultancy Colin's Initial Experiences • Got involved in my primary research group before beginning the program • Joined an additional group on complex learning my first semester • Connections through my Ph.D. minor Colin’s Research Groups Role of Informal & Formal Mentoring • Connections and exposure to colleagues • Oversight by faculty members Exposed to a wide range of research approaches through different faculty and research groups Colin's Current Research • Submitted my first dossier review Fall 2011 • Collecting data for a first-authored research study • Have submitted a first authored design case for publication Craig D. Howard • Ph.D. Candidate • MA in Applied Linguistics & TESOL (Columbia U. in NYC ‘97) Background: • 10 years teaching EFL/ESL Craig’s Initial Experiences • Visited all of the research groups • Became 1st “lost puppy of IST” until I decided it was the methods, not the topics, that would drive my involvement Craig’s Research Groups • Developed an original research project with Andrew, creating 2 studies based on parallel data sets • Shared coding responsibilities 50/50 for both studies • Published: Howard, C.D., Barrett, A.F. & Frick, T.W. (2010). Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre-service teachers’ comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. The Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(1). 89-112. Craig’s Current Research • Dissertation uses a similar approach to our JECR article • Developing methods further From One Lost Puppy To Another Andrew F. Barrett • Ph.D. Candidate • M.Sc.Ed., Instructional Technology, Southern Illinois University • B.Sc., Computer Science, Queen's University in Canada Background: • 4 years as programmer and project manager in Internet consulting company Andrew’s Initial Experiences • Explored a few research groups, narrowed to one • Focusing a challenge • Drafted dissertation proposal Worked on Two Studies: • The relationship between product quality, anonymity, & peer assessment with Craig • Assessing TPACK done independently Andrew’s 2nd Dossier Review • • • • • Loud & Clear Feedback: Focus! Red flags about my dissertation plans Became 2nd lost puppy of IST Read recently completed dissertations Renewed my focus: CAT in instructional contexts • Changed dissertation, research group, and advisor to match my renewed focus Andrew’s Current Research • Starting data collection shortly on my dissertation with Dr. Frick • Working on publishing previous studies For further details: IST@IUB Ph.D. See the R695/R795 website: Google "r695 ist” See the Ph.D. program description: Google "ist iu" Creative Commons Image Credits http://www.flickr.com/photos/michi_photos/4 199631964/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/laserstars/308 6132328/