September 25th 2006 The WFD and its economic elements Arnaud Courtecuisse – Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie.
Download ReportTranscript September 25th 2006 The WFD and its economic elements Arnaud Courtecuisse – Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie.
September 25th 2006 The WFD and its economic elements Arnaud Courtecuisse – Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie 1. WFD & Economic Analysis Activities Content Stakes Economic characterisation of water uses Set of economic indicators • link Economic data (GPD, Turnover, added with Pressure & Impact value, Employment) data Assessment of the current level of cost-recovery for water services For each water services, identification of financial flows and contribution of the 3 main economic sectors Provide elements for the baseline scenario development • which impact of Which trends for economic economic drivers on driving forces for 2015 pressures • current cost recovery • sustainability of the services • financial equity between the 3 sectors 1. WFD & Economic Analysis River Basin Management Plan • Derogation (disproportionate cost) • Heavily modified water bodies Programme of Measures • cost-effectiveness analysis in order to select the most cost-effective set of measures Economic analysis : To do what ? Tools to support decision making process 1. 2. 3. to identify and analyse the context to set « realistic » objective to set priorities (identify the most cost-effective measures) tools for action 4. to help to achieve the environmental objectives 2015 2004 Risk +++ +++ Risk Characteri sation +++ +++ derogation River Basin Management Plan Programme Objectives of measures ECONOMIC ANALYSIS What are the main water uses? Which economic figures ? 1. 2. identify the main activities using water Provide figures on abstraction, discharges, turnover, employement,…. The characterisation of the District (art. 5 DCE ; art. 3 décret 2005-475) 2. The context of the Artois-Picardie Basin Rivers quality assessment • 20 000 Km2 • 4,7 Millions inhabitants • GDP: 98 billions € • GPD/inhabitant: 21 107 € • GPD/inh France: 25 978 € • Unemployment rate: 12,7% • France: 9,9 % • 96% of drinkable water come from groundwater GPD/inhabitant IAA biens de cons. auto biens biens énergie mobile d’équ. interm. Nord - PC 2 068 1 517 867 1 877 6 950 1 415 Picardie 1 442 1 122 382 1 091 3 635 371 Bassin 2 602 1 932 1 008 2 281 8 295 1 552 13 433 39 065 72 739 26 046 11,4% 6,0% France 25 967 35 342 Bassin/France 10,0% 5,5% 7,5% 5,8% Basin Artois-Picardie – Added value Breakdown per main industrial activities Discharge (Organic Matter) per main industrial activities " ± " Les rejets industriels de MO par secteur d'activité DUNKERQUE CALAIS Secteur dominant en rejets de MO par masse d'eau agro-alimentaire " chimie BOULOGNE SUR MER métallurgie " LILLE papier, carton textile commerces et services " pas de rejets recensés LENS " DOUAI " VALENCIENNES " " " CAMBRAI ABBEVILLE " AMIENS " IGN BDCARTO®, AGENCE DE L'EAU ARTOIS-PICARDIE, ECODECISION, ARS MEDIA, 03/06/2003. MAUBEUGE SAINT QUENTIN 0 10 20 40 Km Baseline scenario 2015 Objectives : •Provide trends for the main water uses • Assess the pressures level for 2015 Risk assessment of water bodies which may not achieve good status in 2015 Approach adpoted for the development of the baseline scenario April 2003 December 2003 June 2003 System building Phase Phas 1: e 2: Syste Trend m s Charac analy terisati sis on Contacts experts • Documentation analysis • Existing surveys analysis • Definition of the basin’s system • Identification of key elements 2015 Forecast Phase 3: Phase 4: Scenarios building Impact assessment Local stakeholders meeting • Past analysis of the key elements evolution and 2015 forecats • Exepected evolution analysis • Planning documents analysis Contacts experts • Baseline scenario buiding • Two alternative scenario building (optmistic/pessimis tic) Local Stakeholders meeting • Pressures and impacts analysis • Revision of the results by experts Phas e 5: Identi ficati on of water bodie s with risk • Risk assessment for each water body • Final documents redaction Trends for Organic Matter 2015 2000 Take into account Upstream/downstream effect Masse d’eau Aval M2 Masse d’eau Amont M1 P1: Pressions générées Sur la masse d’eau pression transférée en aval : P’2 = (1-C1)x P1 C1: Auto-épuration C1x P1: pression auto-épurée P2: Pressions générées Sur la masse d’eau P’2: Pressions transférées de la masse d’eau M1 C2: Auto-épuration C2x (P2+ P’2) : pression auto-épurée