September 25th 2006 The WFD and its economic elements Arnaud Courtecuisse – Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie.

Download Report

Transcript September 25th 2006 The WFD and its economic elements Arnaud Courtecuisse – Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie.

September 25th 2006
The WFD and its
economic elements
Arnaud Courtecuisse – Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie
1. WFD & Economic Analysis
Activities
Content
Stakes
Economic characterisation
of water uses
Set of economic indicators • link Economic data
(GPD, Turnover, added
with Pressure & Impact
value, Employment)
data
Assessment of the current
level of cost-recovery for
water services
For each water services,
identification of financial
flows and contribution of
the 3 main economic
sectors
Provide elements for the
baseline scenario
development
• which impact of
Which trends for economic
economic drivers on
driving forces for 2015
pressures
• current cost recovery
• sustainability of the
services
• financial equity
between the 3 sectors
1. WFD & Economic Analysis
River Basin Management Plan
• Derogation (disproportionate cost)
• Heavily modified water bodies
Programme of Measures
•
cost-effectiveness analysis in order to select the
most cost-effective set of measures
Economic analysis : To do what ?
Tools to support decision making process
1.
2.
3.
to identify and analyse the context
to set « realistic » objective
to set priorities (identify the most cost-effective
measures)
 tools for action
4.
to help to achieve the environmental objectives
2015
2004
Risk
+++
+++
Risk
Characteri
sation
+++
+++
derogation
River Basin Management
Plan
Programme Objectives
of measures
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
What are the main water
uses? Which economic
figures ?
1.
2.
identify the main activities using
water
Provide figures on abstraction,
discharges, turnover,
employement,….
The characterisation of the District
(art. 5 DCE ; art. 3 décret 2005-475)
2. The context of the Artois-Picardie Basin
Rivers quality
assessment
• 20 000 Km2
• 4,7 Millions inhabitants
• GDP: 98 billions €
• GPD/inhabitant: 21 107 €
• GPD/inh France: 25 978 €
• Unemployment rate: 12,7%
• France: 9,9 %
• 96% of drinkable water
come from groundwater
GPD/inhabitant
IAA
biens
de
cons.
auto
biens biens énergie
mobile d’équ. interm.
Nord - PC
2 068
1 517
867
1 877
6 950
1 415
Picardie
1 442
1 122
382
1 091
3 635
371
Bassin
2 602
1 932
1 008
2 281
8 295
1 552
13 433 39 065
72 739
26 046
11,4%
6,0%
France
25 967 35 342
Bassin/France
10,0%
5,5%
7,5%
5,8%
Basin Artois-Picardie – Added value
Breakdown per main industrial activities
Discharge (Organic Matter) per main industrial activities
"
±
"
Les rejets industriels de MO
par secteur d'activité
DUNKERQUE
CALAIS
Secteur dominant en rejets de MO
par masse d'eau
agro-alimentaire
"
chimie
BOULOGNE SUR MER
métallurgie
"
LILLE
papier, carton
textile
commerces et services
"
pas de rejets recensés
LENS
"
DOUAI
"
VALENCIENNES
"
"
"
CAMBRAI
ABBEVILLE
"
AMIENS
"
IGN BDCARTO®,
AGENCE DE L'EAU ARTOIS-PICARDIE,
ECODECISION, ARS MEDIA, 03/06/2003.
MAUBEUGE
SAINT QUENTIN
0
10
20
40 Km
Baseline scenario 2015
Objectives :
•Provide trends for the main
water uses
• Assess the pressures level for
2015
Risk assessment of water bodies
which may not achieve good status
in 2015
Approach adpoted for the development of the
baseline scenario
April 2003
December
2003
June 2003
System building
Phase
Phas
1:
e 2:
Syste
Trend
m
s
Charac
analy
terisati
sis
on
Contacts
experts
• Documentation
analysis
• Existing surveys
analysis
• Definition of the
basin’s system
• Identification of key
elements
2015 Forecast
Phase 3:
Phase 4:
Scenarios building Impact assessment
Local
stakeholders
meeting
• Past analysis of the
key elements evolution
and 2015 forecats
• Exepected evolution
analysis
• Planning documents
analysis
Contacts
experts
• Baseline scenario
buiding
• Two alternative
scenario building
(optmistic/pessimis
tic)
Local
Stakeholders
meeting
• Pressures and
impacts analysis
• Revision of the
results by experts
Phas
e 5:
Identi
ficati
on of
water
bodie
s with
risk
• Risk assessment
for each water
body
• Final documents
redaction
Trends for Organic
Matter
2015
2000
Take into account Upstream/downstream effect
Masse d’eau Aval M2
Masse d’eau Amont M1
P1:
Pressions générées
Sur la masse d’eau
pression transférée en aval :
P’2 = (1-C1)x P1
C1: Auto-épuration
C1x P1: pression auto-épurée
P2: Pressions générées
Sur la masse d’eau
P’2: Pressions transférées
de la masse d’eau M1
C2: Auto-épuration
C2x (P2+ P’2) : pression auto-épurée